Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add clang-format configuration - #326
Conversation
mrbean-bremen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, this looks good! I would like a couple of minor changes, and would like @usiems to have another look, before merging this.
| SplitEmptyNamespace: true | ||
| PPIndentWidth: 2 | ||
| FixNamespaceComments: false | ||
| # ?????? |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
| ReflowComments: false | ||
| ConstructorInitializerIndentWidth: 2 | ||
| ContinuationIndentWidth: 2 | ||
| AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine: None |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would propose to useAllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine: Inline
here.
This way short inline functions in the header are put into one line.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
| AfterFunction: true | ||
| AfterNamespace: false | ||
| AfterEnum: false | ||
| AfterCaseLabel: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
'AfterCaseLabel: true' better matches the current style.
I rather dislike that the break behind a closing brace is put onto the same line, but found no option to influence this. The developers of clang-format seem to believe that this is as it should be.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is the option BreakBeforeBraces: Allman which would put all braces on a separate line, including the break. I would be fine with this, but it would be a larger change for the existing code base.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nah, I don't like that, in my opinion this takes up too much space.
| AfterNamespace: false | ||
| AfterEnum: false | ||
| AfterCaseLabel: false | ||
| AfterControlStatement: Never |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would like this to beAfterControlStatement: MultiLine
that is, put the brace on the next line if the if condition has more than one line.
| PadOperators: false | ||
| AlignEscapedNewlines: DontAlign | ||
| AlignOperands: Align | ||
| AlignTrailingComments: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
SettingAlignTrailingComments: true
neatly arranges the comments in the initialization lists of Python objects.
Speaking of initializer lists of Python objects: I noticed that clang-format collapses lines without trailing comments in these lists, which makes these less tidy. We should add trailing comments for these lines to keep the Python style (search for _HEAD_INIT in the code).
| AllowShortBlocksOnASingleLine: Empty | ||
| AllowShortCaseLabelsOnASingleLine: false | ||
| AllowShortEnumsOnASingleLine: true | ||
| # AllowShortIfStatementsOnASingleLine: Nevers |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The value for this option is Never!
…when formatting with clang-format
mrbean-bremen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good from my perspective, thanks!
I leave it to @usiems to decide about the BreakBeforeBraces: Allman option.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You may want to consider adding the clang-format hook to a pre-commit-config yaml as 3D Slicer and other related projects have adopted (see https://github.com/Slicer/Slicer/blob/1b1bbb22b4f858ff3d47d196de4ac491a0b9ea5c/.pre-commit-config.yaml#L27-L39). Pre-commit-config yml usage has been adopted by many projects and something that is generally called in a GitHub actions workflow file (e.g. lint.yml) using the pre-commit github action (https://github.com/pre-commit/action).
^This way new styling is applied consistently and enforced for every PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, good point! I'm using pre-commit in all Python projects, just didn't think about it here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jamesobutler - pre-commit is added now, thanks for the suggestion!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great! Now just need a lint github workflow to run pre-commit where the workflow will fail if pre-commit detects issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I had also enabled pre-commit.ci (as I do usually with pre-commit), so indeed the workflow will fail in this case.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Full description: #265