Skip to content

29 add fab build script - #36

Open
Joerg Henrichs (hiker) wants to merge 11 commits into
MetOffice:mainfrom
hiker:29_add_fab_build_script
Open

Joerg Henrichs (hiker) wants to merge 11 commits into
MetOffice:mainfrom
hiker:29_add_fab_build_script

Conversation

@hiker

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adds a Fab script to compile socrates.

Sci/Tech Reviewer:
Code Reviewer:

The fab script builds all binaries contained in standalone Socrates. It is not required to compile Socrates for e.g. um or LFRic,.
It needs a new Fab release at this stage.

Code Quality Checklist

(Some checks are automatically carried out via the CI pipeline)

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • My code follows the project's style guidelines
  • Comments have been included that aid understanding and enhance the readability of the code
  • My changes generate no new warnings

Testing

  • If shared files have been modified, I have run the UM and LFRic Apps rose stem suites
  • If any tests fail (rose-stem or CI) the reason is understood and acceptable (eg. kgo changes)
  • I have added tests to cover new functionality as appropriate (eg. system tests, unit tests, etc.)

I've only compiled the binaries, I don't know how to test any of these.

trac.log

Security Considerations

  • I have reviewed my changes for potential security issues
  • [N/A] Sensitive data is properly handled (if applicable)
  • [N/A] Authentication and authorisation are properly implemented (if applicable)

Performance Impact

  • Performance of the code has been considered and, if applicable, suitable performance measurements have been conducted

AI Assistance and Attribution

  • [N/A] Some of the content of this change has been produced with the assistance of Generative AI tool name (e.g., Met Office Github Copilot Enterprise, Github Copilot Personal, ChatGPT GPT-4, etc) and I have followed the Simulation Systems AI policy (including attribution labels)

Documentation

  • Where appropriate I have updated documentation related to this change and confirmed that it builds correctly

Sci/Tech Review

  • I understand this area of code and the changes being added
  • The proposed changes correspond to the pull request description
  • Documentation is sufficient (do documentation papers need updating)
  • Sufficient testing has been completed

Please alert the code reviewer via a tag when you have approved the SR

Code Review

  • All dependencies have been resolved
  • Related Issues have been properly linked and addressed
  • CLA compliance has been confirmed
  • Code quality standards have been met
  • Tests are adequate and have passed
  • Documentation is complete and accurate
  • Security considerations have been addressed
  • Performance impact is acceptable

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the cla-required The CLA has not yet been signed by the author of this PR - added by GA label Sep 10, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added cla-signed The CLA has been signed as part of this PR - added by GA and removed cla-required The CLA has not yet been signed by the author of this PR - added by GA labels Sep 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla-signed The CLA has been signed as part of this PR - added by GA

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants