Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: MetaState-Prototype-Project/prototype
Length of output: 199
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: MetaState-Prototype-Project/prototype
Length of output: 51395
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: MetaState-Prototype-Project/prototype
Length of output: 50445
Remove or clarify the schema ID change—verify the new ID is documented and intentional.
The old schema ID (
7e94fada-581d-49b0-b6f5-1fe0766da360) has no references in the codebase, so there are no direct breaking changes to existing code. However, theschemaIdfield is actively used throughout the system (ontology service indexing, w3ds-gateway resolution, web3 adapter mapping, and eVault operations), making this a structural change that requires:c20e9437-02a4-4917-8cee-de35dabbdb6a) aligns with external eVault integration or system architecture🤖 Prompt for AI Agents