Modify pipeline

[Radonirinaunimi]

This automatically runs the adiabatic minimization if existing_enhanced from the runcard is True.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #39 (80957bd) into master (29e0fb0) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #39 +/- ##
======================================
Coverage 0.00% 0.00% ======================================
Files 15 15 Lines 1335 1344 +9 ======================================
- Misses 1335 1344 +9 

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/pycompressor/__init__.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pycompressor/compressing.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 29e0fb0...80957bd. Read the comment docs.

[Radonirinaunimi]

@scarlehoff When you can, could you check whether this (5429600) is a reasonable change. It basically gets around manually running the adiabatic minimization. The solution I found is a bit archaic & brute but it works fine xD

[scarlehoff]

I'll have a look. Is there a way to hide codecov warnigns? I find it very "noisy"

[Radonirinaunimi]

I'll have a look. Is there a way to hide codecov warnigns? I find it very "noisy"

Good question! This is a part of the Github integration App for this repo which I am not able to remove.

[Radonirinaunimi]

@scarlehoff Thanks! I have this very bad habit of putting multiply definitions in one line (which I thought would prioritize visualization, but I have to get rid of that...).

[scarlehoff]

It depends on the situation, in practice what a, b = c,d does is to create the tuple (c, d) and then break it into (a, b). But in this case each of c and d are lists themselves so it becomes a bit confusing (and prone to errors, because you can do a,b=[c,d] and it works as well!)

[Radonirinaunimi]

It depends on the situation, in practice what a, b = c,d does is to create the tuple (c, d) and then break it into (a, b). But in this case each of c and d are lists themselves so it becomes a bit confusing (and prone to errors, because you can do a,b=[c,d] and it works as well!)

I definitely agree!

[Radonirinaunimi]

I suppose this can be merged now.

[scarlehoff]

I'm playing with it now. I have a few comments:

• Add some warning/info that adiabatic optimization is running.
• How do I avoid adiabatic optimization?