Reduce clique size boosts - #175

Draft
gaurav wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reduce-clique-size-boosts
Draft

Reduce clique size boosts#175
gaurav wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reduce-clique-size-boosts

Conversation

@gaurav

@gauravgaurav commented Jan 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR experiments with removing the clique size boosts we currently have. It looks like we don't get a significant reduction in performance if we turn this off, but more experimentation will be necessary.

This is also a good opportunity to adjust the other boosts to see if we can fix#161

@gaurav

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Good news: a lot of search results don't change, so that's good.
Bad news: we get a LOT more UMLS/NCIT single-clique results coming back -- so clearly some level of boosting is necessary. So I'll keep tweaking this until I figure out a level that works better than what we have now.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Backlog

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PDE5 should give PDE5A first?

1 participant

@gaurav
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Reduce clique size boosts - #175

Draft
gaurav wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reduce-clique-size-boosts
Draft

Reduce clique size boosts#175
gaurav wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reduce-clique-size-boosts

Conversation

@gaurav

@gauravgaurav commented Jan 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR experiments with removing the clique size boosts we currently have. It looks like we don't get a significant reduction in performance if we turn this off, but more experimentation will be necessary.

This is also a good opportunity to adjust the other boosts to see if we can fix#161

@gaurav

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Good news: a lot of search results don't change, so that's good.
Bad news: we get a LOT more UMLS/NCIT single-clique results coming back -- so clearly some level of boosting is necessary. So I'll keep tweaking this until I figure out a level that works better than what we have now.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Backlog

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PDE5 should give PDE5A first?

1 participant

@gaurav
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Reduce clique size boosts - #175

Draft
gaurav wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reduce-clique-size-boosts
Draft

Reduce clique size boosts#175
gaurav wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reduce-clique-size-boosts

Conversation

@gaurav

@gauravgaurav commented Jan 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR experiments with removing the clique size boosts we currently have. It looks like we don't get a significant reduction in performance if we turn this off, but more experimentation will be necessary.

This is also a good opportunity to adjust the other boosts to see if we can fix#161

@gaurav

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Good news: a lot of search results don't change, so that's good.
Bad news: we get a LOT more UMLS/NCIT single-clique results coming back -- so clearly some level of boosting is necessary. So I'll keep tweaking this until I figure out a level that works better than what we have now.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Backlog

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PDE5 should give PDE5A first?

1 participant

@gaurav
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Reduce clique size boosts - #175

Draft
gaurav wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reduce-clique-size-boosts
Draft

Reduce clique size boosts#175
gaurav wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reduce-clique-size-boosts

Conversation

@gaurav

@gauravgaurav commented Jan 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR experiments with removing the clique size boosts we currently have. It looks like we don't get a significant reduction in performance if we turn this off, but more experimentation will be necessary.

This is also a good opportunity to adjust the other boosts to see if we can fix#161

@gaurav

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Good news: a lot of search results don't change, so that's good.
Bad news: we get a LOT more UMLS/NCIT single-clique results coming back -- so clearly some level of boosting is necessary. So I'll keep tweaking this until I figure out a level that works better than what we have now.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Backlog

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PDE5 should give PDE5A first?

1 participant

@gaurav
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Reduce clique size boosts - #175

Draft
gaurav wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reduce-clique-size-boosts
Draft

Reduce clique size boosts#175
gaurav wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reduce-clique-size-boosts

Conversation

@gaurav

@gauravgaurav commented Jan 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR experiments with removing the clique size boosts we currently have. It looks like we don't get a significant reduction in performance if we turn this off, but more experimentation will be necessary.

This is also a good opportunity to adjust the other boosts to see if we can fix#161

@gaurav

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Good news: a lot of search results don't change, so that's good.
Bad news: we get a LOT more UMLS/NCIT single-clique results coming back -- so clearly some level of boosting is necessary. So I'll keep tweaking this until I figure out a level that works better than what we have now.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Backlog

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PDE5 should give PDE5A first?

1 participant

@gaurav
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Reduce clique size boosts - #175

Draft
gaurav wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reduce-clique-size-boosts
Draft

Reduce clique size boosts#175
gaurav wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reduce-clique-size-boosts

Conversation

@gaurav

@gauravgaurav commented Jan 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR experiments with removing the clique size boosts we currently have. It looks like we don't get a significant reduction in performance if we turn this off, but more experimentation will be necessary.

This is also a good opportunity to adjust the other boosts to see if we can fix#161

@gaurav

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Good news: a lot of search results don't change, so that's good.
Bad news: we get a LOT more UMLS/NCIT single-clique results coming back -- so clearly some level of boosting is necessary. So I'll keep tweaking this until I figure out a level that works better than what we have now.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Backlog

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PDE5 should give PDE5A first?

1 participant

@gaurav
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Reduce clique size boosts - #175

Draft
gaurav wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reduce-clique-size-boosts
Draft

Reduce clique size boosts#175
gaurav wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reduce-clique-size-boosts

Conversation

@gaurav

@gauravgaurav commented Jan 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR experiments with removing the clique size boosts we currently have. It looks like we don't get a significant reduction in performance if we turn this off, but more experimentation will be necessary.

This is also a good opportunity to adjust the other boosts to see if we can fix#161

@gaurav

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Good news: a lot of search results don't change, so that's good.
Bad news: we get a LOT more UMLS/NCIT single-clique results coming back -- so clearly some level of boosting is necessary. So I'll keep tweaking this until I figure out a level that works better than what we have now.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Backlog

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PDE5 should give PDE5A first?

1 participant

@gaurav
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Reduce clique size boosts - #175

Draft
gaurav wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reduce-clique-size-boosts
Draft

Reduce clique size boosts#175
gaurav wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reduce-clique-size-boosts

Conversation

@gaurav

@gauravgaurav commented Jan 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR experiments with removing the clique size boosts we currently have. It looks like we don't get a significant reduction in performance if we turn this off, but more experimentation will be necessary.

This is also a good opportunity to adjust the other boosts to see if we can fix#161

@gaurav

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Good news: a lot of search results don't change, so that's good.
Bad news: we get a LOT more UMLS/NCIT single-clique results coming back -- so clearly some level of boosting is necessary. So I'll keep tweaking this until I figure out a level that works better than what we have now.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Backlog

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PDE5 should give PDE5A first?

1 participant

@gaurav