add sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returne… - #430

Open
sierra-moxon wants to merge 3 commits into
1.4from
add_sources_to_meta_edge
Open

add sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returne…#430
sierra-moxon wants to merge 3 commits into
1.4from
add_sources_to_meta_edge

Conversation

@sierra-moxon

@sierra-moxonsierra-moxon commented Apr 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR adds the sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returned in the meta knowledge graph.

Recently, the modeling and TAQA teams were presented with the use case:
"Find me all the unique triples provided to Translator by SEMMEDDB"

We know that SEMMEDDB is currently being served by both BTE and RTX-KG2. Some questions we wanted to ask with code:

  • Are there any other SEMMEDDB edges in Translator not from these two aggregators?
  • What are the unique SPOQs that we can expect BTE to provide from SEMMEDDB, how about RTX-KG2?
  • Do SPOQs from RTX-KG2 (and ultimately SEMMEDDB) match those provided from BTE (via SEMMEDDB)?

Note: we also have several instances of Chembl and clinicaltrials.gov being ingested by multiple teams. It would be handy for the modeling team to be able to compare translations of these important sources between groups (with the ultimate goal of having one transform schema per ingest that groups could follow to keep ingests consistent).

If testing software finds edges in the metakg that need to change with Biolink releases, it would be very handy for QC to be able to point to the primary_knowledge_source (or sources) for more information.

If not for 1.4, then perhaps this could be considered for the next release.

… least one RetrievalSource member of the sources list on both Edges and MetaEdges

@edeutschedeutsch left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is a reasonable addition, but I question if we can tolerate to make a mandatory (and thus breaking) addition at this late stage of 1.4. I would be happier with making it optional in 1.4 and mandatory in 1.5 is we so desire.

@edeutschedeutsch added this to the v1.4 milestone Apr 27, 2023
@edeutschedeutsch modified the milestones: v1.4, v1.5May 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sierra-moxon@RichardBruskiewich@edeutsch@vdancik@edgargaticaCU
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

add sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returne… - #430

Open
sierra-moxon wants to merge 3 commits into
1.4from
add_sources_to_meta_edge
Open

add sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returne…#430
sierra-moxon wants to merge 3 commits into
1.4from
add_sources_to_meta_edge

Conversation

@sierra-moxon

@sierra-moxonsierra-moxon commented Apr 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR adds the sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returned in the meta knowledge graph.

Recently, the modeling and TAQA teams were presented with the use case:
"Find me all the unique triples provided to Translator by SEMMEDDB"

We know that SEMMEDDB is currently being served by both BTE and RTX-KG2. Some questions we wanted to ask with code:

  • Are there any other SEMMEDDB edges in Translator not from these two aggregators?
  • What are the unique SPOQs that we can expect BTE to provide from SEMMEDDB, how about RTX-KG2?
  • Do SPOQs from RTX-KG2 (and ultimately SEMMEDDB) match those provided from BTE (via SEMMEDDB)?

Note: we also have several instances of Chembl and clinicaltrials.gov being ingested by multiple teams. It would be handy for the modeling team to be able to compare translations of these important sources between groups (with the ultimate goal of having one transform schema per ingest that groups could follow to keep ingests consistent).

If testing software finds edges in the metakg that need to change with Biolink releases, it would be very handy for QC to be able to point to the primary_knowledge_source (or sources) for more information.

If not for 1.4, then perhaps this could be considered for the next release.

… least one RetrievalSource member of the sources list on both Edges and MetaEdges

@edeutschedeutsch left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is a reasonable addition, but I question if we can tolerate to make a mandatory (and thus breaking) addition at this late stage of 1.4. I would be happier with making it optional in 1.4 and mandatory in 1.5 is we so desire.

@edeutschedeutsch added this to the v1.4 milestone Apr 27, 2023
@edeutschedeutsch modified the milestones: v1.4, v1.5May 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sierra-moxon@RichardBruskiewich@edeutsch@vdancik@edgargaticaCU
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

add sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returne… - #430

Open
sierra-moxon wants to merge 3 commits into
1.4from
add_sources_to_meta_edge
Open

add sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returne…#430
sierra-moxon wants to merge 3 commits into
1.4from
add_sources_to_meta_edge

Conversation

@sierra-moxon

@sierra-moxonsierra-moxon commented Apr 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR adds the sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returned in the meta knowledge graph.

Recently, the modeling and TAQA teams were presented with the use case:
"Find me all the unique triples provided to Translator by SEMMEDDB"

We know that SEMMEDDB is currently being served by both BTE and RTX-KG2. Some questions we wanted to ask with code:

  • Are there any other SEMMEDDB edges in Translator not from these two aggregators?
  • What are the unique SPOQs that we can expect BTE to provide from SEMMEDDB, how about RTX-KG2?
  • Do SPOQs from RTX-KG2 (and ultimately SEMMEDDB) match those provided from BTE (via SEMMEDDB)?

Note: we also have several instances of Chembl and clinicaltrials.gov being ingested by multiple teams. It would be handy for the modeling team to be able to compare translations of these important sources between groups (with the ultimate goal of having one transform schema per ingest that groups could follow to keep ingests consistent).

If testing software finds edges in the metakg that need to change with Biolink releases, it would be very handy for QC to be able to point to the primary_knowledge_source (or sources) for more information.

If not for 1.4, then perhaps this could be considered for the next release.

… least one RetrievalSource member of the sources list on both Edges and MetaEdges

@edeutschedeutsch left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is a reasonable addition, but I question if we can tolerate to make a mandatory (and thus breaking) addition at this late stage of 1.4. I would be happier with making it optional in 1.4 and mandatory in 1.5 is we so desire.

@edeutschedeutsch added this to the v1.4 milestone Apr 27, 2023
@edeutschedeutsch modified the milestones: v1.4, v1.5May 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sierra-moxon@RichardBruskiewich@edeutsch@vdancik@edgargaticaCU
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

add sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returne… - #430

Open
sierra-moxon wants to merge 3 commits into
1.4from
add_sources_to_meta_edge
Open

add sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returne…#430
sierra-moxon wants to merge 3 commits into
1.4from
add_sources_to_meta_edge

Conversation

@sierra-moxon

@sierra-moxonsierra-moxon commented Apr 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR adds the sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returned in the meta knowledge graph.

Recently, the modeling and TAQA teams were presented with the use case:
"Find me all the unique triples provided to Translator by SEMMEDDB"

We know that SEMMEDDB is currently being served by both BTE and RTX-KG2. Some questions we wanted to ask with code:

  • Are there any other SEMMEDDB edges in Translator not from these two aggregators?
  • What are the unique SPOQs that we can expect BTE to provide from SEMMEDDB, how about RTX-KG2?
  • Do SPOQs from RTX-KG2 (and ultimately SEMMEDDB) match those provided from BTE (via SEMMEDDB)?

Note: we also have several instances of Chembl and clinicaltrials.gov being ingested by multiple teams. It would be handy for the modeling team to be able to compare translations of these important sources between groups (with the ultimate goal of having one transform schema per ingest that groups could follow to keep ingests consistent).

If testing software finds edges in the metakg that need to change with Biolink releases, it would be very handy for QC to be able to point to the primary_knowledge_source (or sources) for more information.

If not for 1.4, then perhaps this could be considered for the next release.

… least one RetrievalSource member of the sources list on both Edges and MetaEdges

@edeutschedeutsch left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is a reasonable addition, but I question if we can tolerate to make a mandatory (and thus breaking) addition at this late stage of 1.4. I would be happier with making it optional in 1.4 and mandatory in 1.5 is we so desire.

@edeutschedeutsch added this to the v1.4 milestone Apr 27, 2023
@edeutschedeutsch modified the milestones: v1.4, v1.5May 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sierra-moxon@RichardBruskiewich@edeutsch@vdancik@edgargaticaCU
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

add sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returne… - #430

Open
sierra-moxon wants to merge 3 commits into
1.4from
add_sources_to_meta_edge
Open

add sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returne…#430
sierra-moxon wants to merge 3 commits into
1.4from
add_sources_to_meta_edge

Conversation

@sierra-moxon

@sierra-moxonsierra-moxon commented Apr 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR adds the sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returned in the meta knowledge graph.

Recently, the modeling and TAQA teams were presented with the use case:
"Find me all the unique triples provided to Translator by SEMMEDDB"

We know that SEMMEDDB is currently being served by both BTE and RTX-KG2. Some questions we wanted to ask with code:

  • Are there any other SEMMEDDB edges in Translator not from these two aggregators?
  • What are the unique SPOQs that we can expect BTE to provide from SEMMEDDB, how about RTX-KG2?
  • Do SPOQs from RTX-KG2 (and ultimately SEMMEDDB) match those provided from BTE (via SEMMEDDB)?

Note: we also have several instances of Chembl and clinicaltrials.gov being ingested by multiple teams. It would be handy for the modeling team to be able to compare translations of these important sources between groups (with the ultimate goal of having one transform schema per ingest that groups could follow to keep ingests consistent).

If testing software finds edges in the metakg that need to change with Biolink releases, it would be very handy for QC to be able to point to the primary_knowledge_source (or sources) for more information.

If not for 1.4, then perhaps this could be considered for the next release.

… least one RetrievalSource member of the sources list on both Edges and MetaEdges

@edeutschedeutsch left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is a reasonable addition, but I question if we can tolerate to make a mandatory (and thus breaking) addition at this late stage of 1.4. I would be happier with making it optional in 1.4 and mandatory in 1.5 is we so desire.

@edeutschedeutsch added this to the v1.4 milestone Apr 27, 2023
@edeutschedeutsch modified the milestones: v1.4, v1.5May 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sierra-moxon@RichardBruskiewich@edeutsch@vdancik@edgargaticaCU
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

add sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returne… - #430

Open
sierra-moxon wants to merge 3 commits into
1.4from
add_sources_to_meta_edge
Open

add sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returne…#430
sierra-moxon wants to merge 3 commits into
1.4from
add_sources_to_meta_edge

Conversation

@sierra-moxon

@sierra-moxonsierra-moxon commented Apr 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR adds the sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returned in the meta knowledge graph.

Recently, the modeling and TAQA teams were presented with the use case:
"Find me all the unique triples provided to Translator by SEMMEDDB"

We know that SEMMEDDB is currently being served by both BTE and RTX-KG2. Some questions we wanted to ask with code:

  • Are there any other SEMMEDDB edges in Translator not from these two aggregators?
  • What are the unique SPOQs that we can expect BTE to provide from SEMMEDDB, how about RTX-KG2?
  • Do SPOQs from RTX-KG2 (and ultimately SEMMEDDB) match those provided from BTE (via SEMMEDDB)?

Note: we also have several instances of Chembl and clinicaltrials.gov being ingested by multiple teams. It would be handy for the modeling team to be able to compare translations of these important sources between groups (with the ultimate goal of having one transform schema per ingest that groups could follow to keep ingests consistent).

If testing software finds edges in the metakg that need to change with Biolink releases, it would be very handy for QC to be able to point to the primary_knowledge_source (or sources) for more information.

If not for 1.4, then perhaps this could be considered for the next release.

… least one RetrievalSource member of the sources list on both Edges and MetaEdges

@edeutschedeutsch left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is a reasonable addition, but I question if we can tolerate to make a mandatory (and thus breaking) addition at this late stage of 1.4. I would be happier with making it optional in 1.4 and mandatory in 1.5 is we so desire.

@edeutschedeutsch added this to the v1.4 milestone Apr 27, 2023
@edeutschedeutsch modified the milestones: v1.4, v1.5May 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sierra-moxon@RichardBruskiewich@edeutsch@vdancik@edgargaticaCU
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

add sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returne… - #430

Open
sierra-moxon wants to merge 3 commits into
1.4from
add_sources_to_meta_edge
Open

add sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returne…#430
sierra-moxon wants to merge 3 commits into
1.4from
add_sources_to_meta_edge

Conversation

@sierra-moxon

@sierra-moxonsierra-moxon commented Apr 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR adds the sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returned in the meta knowledge graph.

Recently, the modeling and TAQA teams were presented with the use case:
"Find me all the unique triples provided to Translator by SEMMEDDB"

We know that SEMMEDDB is currently being served by both BTE and RTX-KG2. Some questions we wanted to ask with code:

  • Are there any other SEMMEDDB edges in Translator not from these two aggregators?
  • What are the unique SPOQs that we can expect BTE to provide from SEMMEDDB, how about RTX-KG2?
  • Do SPOQs from RTX-KG2 (and ultimately SEMMEDDB) match those provided from BTE (via SEMMEDDB)?

Note: we also have several instances of Chembl and clinicaltrials.gov being ingested by multiple teams. It would be handy for the modeling team to be able to compare translations of these important sources between groups (with the ultimate goal of having one transform schema per ingest that groups could follow to keep ingests consistent).

If testing software finds edges in the metakg that need to change with Biolink releases, it would be very handy for QC to be able to point to the primary_knowledge_source (or sources) for more information.

If not for 1.4, then perhaps this could be considered for the next release.

… least one RetrievalSource member of the sources list on both Edges and MetaEdges

@edeutschedeutsch left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is a reasonable addition, but I question if we can tolerate to make a mandatory (and thus breaking) addition at this late stage of 1.4. I would be happier with making it optional in 1.4 and mandatory in 1.5 is we so desire.

@edeutschedeutsch added this to the v1.4 milestone Apr 27, 2023
@edeutschedeutsch modified the milestones: v1.4, v1.5May 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sierra-moxon@RichardBruskiewich@edeutsch@vdancik@edgargaticaCU
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

add sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returne… - #430

Open
sierra-moxon wants to merge 3 commits into
1.4from
add_sources_to_meta_edge
Open

add sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returne…#430
sierra-moxon wants to merge 3 commits into
1.4from
add_sources_to_meta_edge

Conversation

@sierra-moxon

@sierra-moxonsierra-moxon commented Apr 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR adds the sources field to MetaEdge so that infores identifiers are returned in the meta knowledge graph.

Recently, the modeling and TAQA teams were presented with the use case:
"Find me all the unique triples provided to Translator by SEMMEDDB"

We know that SEMMEDDB is currently being served by both BTE and RTX-KG2. Some questions we wanted to ask with code:

  • Are there any other SEMMEDDB edges in Translator not from these two aggregators?
  • What are the unique SPOQs that we can expect BTE to provide from SEMMEDDB, how about RTX-KG2?
  • Do SPOQs from RTX-KG2 (and ultimately SEMMEDDB) match those provided from BTE (via SEMMEDDB)?

Note: we also have several instances of Chembl and clinicaltrials.gov being ingested by multiple teams. It would be handy for the modeling team to be able to compare translations of these important sources between groups (with the ultimate goal of having one transform schema per ingest that groups could follow to keep ingests consistent).

If testing software finds edges in the metakg that need to change with Biolink releases, it would be very handy for QC to be able to point to the primary_knowledge_source (or sources) for more information.

If not for 1.4, then perhaps this could be considered for the next release.

… least one RetrievalSource member of the sources list on both Edges and MetaEdges

@edeutschedeutsch left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is a reasonable addition, but I question if we can tolerate to make a mandatory (and thus breaking) addition at this late stage of 1.4. I would be happier with making it optional in 1.4 and mandatory in 1.5 is we so desire.

@edeutschedeutsch added this to the v1.4 milestone Apr 27, 2023
@edeutschedeutsch modified the milestones: v1.4, v1.5May 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sierra-moxon@RichardBruskiewich@edeutsch@vdancik@edgargaticaCU