ci: give non-PR code quality runs distinct concurrency groups - #1894

Merged
kevalmorabia97 merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
arham766:ci-code-quality-concurrency
Jul 5, 2026
Merged

ci: give non-PR code quality runs distinct concurrency groups#1894
kevalmorabia97 merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
arham766:ci-code-quality-concurrency

Conversation

@arham766

@arham766arham766 commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Type of change: Bug fix

The concurrency group used github.event.pull_request.number with no fallback, so every nightly and manually dispatched run shared the literal group Code Quality- with cancel-in-progress: true — a manual dispatch cancels an in-flight nightly and vice versa. Adds the || github.sha fallback already used by unit_tests.yml.

Usage

N/A — CI workflow configuration change.

Testing

Matches the existing pattern in unit_tests.yml line-for-line. YAML validated.

Before your PR is "Ready for review"

  • Is this change backward compatible?: ✅
  • If you copied code from any other sources or added a new PIP dependency, did you follow guidance in CONTRIBUTING.md: N/A
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?: N/A (workflow config; validated as described above)
  • Did you update Changelog?: N/A (CI-only change)
  • Did you get Claude approval on this PR?: N/A (external contributor; cannot trigger /claude review)

Additional Information

Part of #1890 (item 4).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved workflow concurrency handling so automated runs are grouped and canceled more reliably across pull request, manual, and scheduled triggers.

Without the github.sha fallback (already used by unit_tests.yml), every
nightly and manually dispatched run shares the literal group
'Code Quality-' with cancel-in-progress enabled, so a manual dispatch
cancels an in-flight nightly run and vice versa.
Signed-off-by: arham766 <arhamislam766@yahoo.com>
@arham766
arham766 requested a review from a team as a code ownerJuly 2, 2026 21:28
@copy-pr-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 05e08661-1f5f-42a5-8170-78dac18970f2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b9225b and 49aed56.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/code_quality.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The concurrency group key in the code_quality GitHub Actions workflow was modified to combine the workflow name with either the pull request number or the commit SHA, replacing the previous PR-number-only grouping.

Changes

Workflow Concurrency Configuration

Layer / File(s)Summary
Update concurrency group key
.github/workflows/code_quality.yml
Changed the concurrency.group value to ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.sha }}, adding a fallback to the commit SHA when no PR number exists.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 6
✅ Passed checks (6 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title accurately summarizes the CI workflow change to separate non-PR code quality concurrency groups.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Security Anti-Patterns✅ PassedNo changed modelopt/examples code adds unsafe load/eval patterns; trust_remote_code stays caller-configurable, and new deps are permissive.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@kevalmorabia97

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/ok to test 49aed56

@kevalmorabia97
kevalmorabia97 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 5, 2026 11:06
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 70.21%. Comparing base (4b9225b) to head (49aed56).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1894 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 70.21% 70.21% =======================================
Files 515 515 Lines 57244 57244 =======================================
Hits 40196 40196 Misses 17048 17048 
FlagCoverage Δ
unit54.90% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@kevalmorabia97
kevalmorabia97 merged commit 0c40c37 into NVIDIA:mainJul 5, 2026
36 checks passed
talorabr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2026
### What does this PR do?
Type of change: Bug fix
The concurrency group used `github.event.pull_request.number` with no
fallback, so every nightly and manually dispatched run shared the
literal group `Code Quality-` with `cancel-in-progress: true` — a manual
dispatch cancels an in-flight nightly and vice versa. Adds the `||
github.sha` fallback already used by `unit_tests.yml`.
### Usage
N/A — CI workflow configuration change.
### Testing
Matches the existing pattern in `unit_tests.yml` line-for-line. YAML
validated.
### Before your PR is "*Ready for review*"
- Is this change backward compatible?: ✅
- If you copied code from any other sources or added a new PIP
dependency, did you follow guidance in `CONTRIBUTING.md`: N/A
- Did you write any new necessary tests?: N/A (workflow config;
validated as described above)
- Did you update
[Changelog](https://github.com/NVIDIA/Model-Optimizer/blob/main/CHANGELOG.rst)?:
N/A (CI-only change)
- Did you get Claude approval on this PR?: N/A (external contributor;
cannot trigger `/claude review`)
### Additional Information
Part of #1890 (item 4).
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Chores**
* Improved workflow concurrency handling so automated runs are grouped
and canceled more reliably across pull request, manual, and scheduled
triggers.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Signed-off-by: arham766 <arhamislam766@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: talora <talora@nvidia.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@arham766@kevalmorabia97
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

ci: give non-PR code quality runs distinct concurrency groups - #1894

Merged
kevalmorabia97 merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
arham766:ci-code-quality-concurrency
Jul 5, 2026
Merged

ci: give non-PR code quality runs distinct concurrency groups#1894
kevalmorabia97 merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
arham766:ci-code-quality-concurrency

Conversation

@arham766

@arham766arham766 commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Type of change: Bug fix

The concurrency group used github.event.pull_request.number with no fallback, so every nightly and manually dispatched run shared the literal group Code Quality- with cancel-in-progress: true — a manual dispatch cancels an in-flight nightly and vice versa. Adds the || github.sha fallback already used by unit_tests.yml.

Usage

N/A — CI workflow configuration change.

Testing

Matches the existing pattern in unit_tests.yml line-for-line. YAML validated.

Before your PR is "Ready for review"

  • Is this change backward compatible?: ✅
  • If you copied code from any other sources or added a new PIP dependency, did you follow guidance in CONTRIBUTING.md: N/A
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?: N/A (workflow config; validated as described above)
  • Did you update Changelog?: N/A (CI-only change)
  • Did you get Claude approval on this PR?: N/A (external contributor; cannot trigger /claude review)

Additional Information

Part of #1890 (item 4).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved workflow concurrency handling so automated runs are grouped and canceled more reliably across pull request, manual, and scheduled triggers.

Without the github.sha fallback (already used by unit_tests.yml), every
nightly and manually dispatched run shares the literal group
'Code Quality-' with cancel-in-progress enabled, so a manual dispatch
cancels an in-flight nightly run and vice versa.
Signed-off-by: arham766 <arhamislam766@yahoo.com>
@arham766
arham766 requested a review from a team as a code ownerJuly 2, 2026 21:28
@copy-pr-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 05e08661-1f5f-42a5-8170-78dac18970f2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b9225b and 49aed56.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/code_quality.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The concurrency group key in the code_quality GitHub Actions workflow was modified to combine the workflow name with either the pull request number or the commit SHA, replacing the previous PR-number-only grouping.

Changes

Workflow Concurrency Configuration

Layer / File(s)Summary
Update concurrency group key
.github/workflows/code_quality.yml
Changed the concurrency.group value to ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.sha }}, adding a fallback to the commit SHA when no PR number exists.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 6
✅ Passed checks (6 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title accurately summarizes the CI workflow change to separate non-PR code quality concurrency groups.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Security Anti-Patterns✅ PassedNo changed modelopt/examples code adds unsafe load/eval patterns; trust_remote_code stays caller-configurable, and new deps are permissive.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@kevalmorabia97

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/ok to test 49aed56

@kevalmorabia97
kevalmorabia97 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 5, 2026 11:06
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 70.21%. Comparing base (4b9225b) to head (49aed56).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1894 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 70.21% 70.21% =======================================
Files 515 515 Lines 57244 57244 =======================================
Hits 40196 40196 Misses 17048 17048 
FlagCoverage Δ
unit54.90% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@kevalmorabia97
kevalmorabia97 merged commit 0c40c37 into NVIDIA:mainJul 5, 2026
36 checks passed
talorabr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2026
### What does this PR do?
Type of change: Bug fix
The concurrency group used `github.event.pull_request.number` with no
fallback, so every nightly and manually dispatched run shared the
literal group `Code Quality-` with `cancel-in-progress: true` — a manual
dispatch cancels an in-flight nightly and vice versa. Adds the `||
github.sha` fallback already used by `unit_tests.yml`.
### Usage
N/A — CI workflow configuration change.
### Testing
Matches the existing pattern in `unit_tests.yml` line-for-line. YAML
validated.
### Before your PR is "*Ready for review*"
- Is this change backward compatible?: ✅
- If you copied code from any other sources or added a new PIP
dependency, did you follow guidance in `CONTRIBUTING.md`: N/A
- Did you write any new necessary tests?: N/A (workflow config;
validated as described above)
- Did you update
[Changelog](https://github.com/NVIDIA/Model-Optimizer/blob/main/CHANGELOG.rst)?:
N/A (CI-only change)
- Did you get Claude approval on this PR?: N/A (external contributor;
cannot trigger `/claude review`)
### Additional Information
Part of #1890 (item 4).
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Chores**
* Improved workflow concurrency handling so automated runs are grouped
and canceled more reliably across pull request, manual, and scheduled
triggers.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Signed-off-by: arham766 <arhamislam766@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: talora <talora@nvidia.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@arham766@kevalmorabia97
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ci: give non-PR code quality runs distinct concurrency groups - #1894

Merged
kevalmorabia97 merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
arham766:ci-code-quality-concurrency
Jul 5, 2026
Merged

ci: give non-PR code quality runs distinct concurrency groups#1894
kevalmorabia97 merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
arham766:ci-code-quality-concurrency

Conversation

@arham766

@arham766arham766 commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Type of change: Bug fix

The concurrency group used github.event.pull_request.number with no fallback, so every nightly and manually dispatched run shared the literal group Code Quality- with cancel-in-progress: true — a manual dispatch cancels an in-flight nightly and vice versa. Adds the || github.sha fallback already used by unit_tests.yml.

Usage

N/A — CI workflow configuration change.

Testing

Matches the existing pattern in unit_tests.yml line-for-line. YAML validated.

Before your PR is "Ready for review"

  • Is this change backward compatible?: ✅
  • If you copied code from any other sources or added a new PIP dependency, did you follow guidance in CONTRIBUTING.md: N/A
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?: N/A (workflow config; validated as described above)
  • Did you update Changelog?: N/A (CI-only change)
  • Did you get Claude approval on this PR?: N/A (external contributor; cannot trigger /claude review)

Additional Information

Part of #1890 (item 4).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved workflow concurrency handling so automated runs are grouped and canceled more reliably across pull request, manual, and scheduled triggers.

Without the github.sha fallback (already used by unit_tests.yml), every
nightly and manually dispatched run shares the literal group
'Code Quality-' with cancel-in-progress enabled, so a manual dispatch
cancels an in-flight nightly run and vice versa.
Signed-off-by: arham766 <arhamislam766@yahoo.com>
@arham766
arham766 requested a review from a team as a code ownerJuly 2, 2026 21:28
@copy-pr-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 05e08661-1f5f-42a5-8170-78dac18970f2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b9225b and 49aed56.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/code_quality.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The concurrency group key in the code_quality GitHub Actions workflow was modified to combine the workflow name with either the pull request number or the commit SHA, replacing the previous PR-number-only grouping.

Changes

Workflow Concurrency Configuration

Layer / File(s)Summary
Update concurrency group key
.github/workflows/code_quality.yml
Changed the concurrency.group value to ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.sha }}, adding a fallback to the commit SHA when no PR number exists.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 6
✅ Passed checks (6 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title accurately summarizes the CI workflow change to separate non-PR code quality concurrency groups.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Security Anti-Patterns✅ PassedNo changed modelopt/examples code adds unsafe load/eval patterns; trust_remote_code stays caller-configurable, and new deps are permissive.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@kevalmorabia97

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/ok to test 49aed56

@kevalmorabia97
kevalmorabia97 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 5, 2026 11:06
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 70.21%. Comparing base (4b9225b) to head (49aed56).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1894 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 70.21% 70.21% =======================================
Files 515 515 Lines 57244 57244 =======================================
Hits 40196 40196 Misses 17048 17048 
FlagCoverage Δ
unit54.90% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@kevalmorabia97
kevalmorabia97 merged commit 0c40c37 into NVIDIA:mainJul 5, 2026
36 checks passed
talorabr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2026
### What does this PR do?
Type of change: Bug fix
The concurrency group used `github.event.pull_request.number` with no
fallback, so every nightly and manually dispatched run shared the
literal group `Code Quality-` with `cancel-in-progress: true` — a manual
dispatch cancels an in-flight nightly and vice versa. Adds the `||
github.sha` fallback already used by `unit_tests.yml`.
### Usage
N/A — CI workflow configuration change.
### Testing
Matches the existing pattern in `unit_tests.yml` line-for-line. YAML
validated.
### Before your PR is "*Ready for review*"
- Is this change backward compatible?: ✅
- If you copied code from any other sources or added a new PIP
dependency, did you follow guidance in `CONTRIBUTING.md`: N/A
- Did you write any new necessary tests?: N/A (workflow config;
validated as described above)
- Did you update
[Changelog](https://github.com/NVIDIA/Model-Optimizer/blob/main/CHANGELOG.rst)?:
N/A (CI-only change)
- Did you get Claude approval on this PR?: N/A (external contributor;
cannot trigger `/claude review`)
### Additional Information
Part of #1890 (item 4).
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Chores**
* Improved workflow concurrency handling so automated runs are grouped
and canceled more reliably across pull request, manual, and scheduled
triggers.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Signed-off-by: arham766 <arhamislam766@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: talora <talora@nvidia.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@arham766@kevalmorabia97
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ci: give non-PR code quality runs distinct concurrency groups - #1894

Merged
kevalmorabia97 merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
arham766:ci-code-quality-concurrency
Jul 5, 2026
Merged

ci: give non-PR code quality runs distinct concurrency groups#1894
kevalmorabia97 merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
arham766:ci-code-quality-concurrency

Conversation

@arham766

@arham766arham766 commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Type of change: Bug fix

The concurrency group used github.event.pull_request.number with no fallback, so every nightly and manually dispatched run shared the literal group Code Quality- with cancel-in-progress: true — a manual dispatch cancels an in-flight nightly and vice versa. Adds the || github.sha fallback already used by unit_tests.yml.

Usage

N/A — CI workflow configuration change.

Testing

Matches the existing pattern in unit_tests.yml line-for-line. YAML validated.

Before your PR is "Ready for review"

  • Is this change backward compatible?: ✅
  • If you copied code from any other sources or added a new PIP dependency, did you follow guidance in CONTRIBUTING.md: N/A
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?: N/A (workflow config; validated as described above)
  • Did you update Changelog?: N/A (CI-only change)
  • Did you get Claude approval on this PR?: N/A (external contributor; cannot trigger /claude review)

Additional Information

Part of #1890 (item 4).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved workflow concurrency handling so automated runs are grouped and canceled more reliably across pull request, manual, and scheduled triggers.

Without the github.sha fallback (already used by unit_tests.yml), every
nightly and manually dispatched run shares the literal group
'Code Quality-' with cancel-in-progress enabled, so a manual dispatch
cancels an in-flight nightly run and vice versa.
Signed-off-by: arham766 <arhamislam766@yahoo.com>
@arham766
arham766 requested a review from a team as a code ownerJuly 2, 2026 21:28
@copy-pr-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 05e08661-1f5f-42a5-8170-78dac18970f2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b9225b and 49aed56.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/code_quality.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The concurrency group key in the code_quality GitHub Actions workflow was modified to combine the workflow name with either the pull request number or the commit SHA, replacing the previous PR-number-only grouping.

Changes

Workflow Concurrency Configuration

Layer / File(s)Summary
Update concurrency group key
.github/workflows/code_quality.yml
Changed the concurrency.group value to ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.sha }}, adding a fallback to the commit SHA when no PR number exists.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 6
✅ Passed checks (6 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title accurately summarizes the CI workflow change to separate non-PR code quality concurrency groups.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Security Anti-Patterns✅ PassedNo changed modelopt/examples code adds unsafe load/eval patterns; trust_remote_code stays caller-configurable, and new deps are permissive.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@kevalmorabia97

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/ok to test 49aed56

@kevalmorabia97
kevalmorabia97 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 5, 2026 11:06
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 70.21%. Comparing base (4b9225b) to head (49aed56).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1894 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 70.21% 70.21% =======================================
Files 515 515 Lines 57244 57244 =======================================
Hits 40196 40196 Misses 17048 17048 
FlagCoverage Δ
unit54.90% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@kevalmorabia97
kevalmorabia97 merged commit 0c40c37 into NVIDIA:mainJul 5, 2026
36 checks passed
talorabr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2026
### What does this PR do?
Type of change: Bug fix
The concurrency group used `github.event.pull_request.number` with no
fallback, so every nightly and manually dispatched run shared the
literal group `Code Quality-` with `cancel-in-progress: true` — a manual
dispatch cancels an in-flight nightly and vice versa. Adds the `||
github.sha` fallback already used by `unit_tests.yml`.
### Usage
N/A — CI workflow configuration change.
### Testing
Matches the existing pattern in `unit_tests.yml` line-for-line. YAML
validated.
### Before your PR is "*Ready for review*"
- Is this change backward compatible?: ✅
- If you copied code from any other sources or added a new PIP
dependency, did you follow guidance in `CONTRIBUTING.md`: N/A
- Did you write any new necessary tests?: N/A (workflow config;
validated as described above)
- Did you update
[Changelog](https://github.com/NVIDIA/Model-Optimizer/blob/main/CHANGELOG.rst)?:
N/A (CI-only change)
- Did you get Claude approval on this PR?: N/A (external contributor;
cannot trigger `/claude review`)
### Additional Information
Part of #1890 (item 4).
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Chores**
* Improved workflow concurrency handling so automated runs are grouped
and canceled more reliably across pull request, manual, and scheduled
triggers.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Signed-off-by: arham766 <arhamislam766@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: talora <talora@nvidia.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@arham766@kevalmorabia97
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

ci: give non-PR code quality runs distinct concurrency groups - #1894

Merged
kevalmorabia97 merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
arham766:ci-code-quality-concurrency
Jul 5, 2026
Merged

ci: give non-PR code quality runs distinct concurrency groups#1894
kevalmorabia97 merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
arham766:ci-code-quality-concurrency

Conversation

@arham766

@arham766arham766 commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Type of change: Bug fix

The concurrency group used github.event.pull_request.number with no fallback, so every nightly and manually dispatched run shared the literal group Code Quality- with cancel-in-progress: true — a manual dispatch cancels an in-flight nightly and vice versa. Adds the || github.sha fallback already used by unit_tests.yml.

Usage

N/A — CI workflow configuration change.

Testing

Matches the existing pattern in unit_tests.yml line-for-line. YAML validated.

Before your PR is "Ready for review"

  • Is this change backward compatible?: ✅
  • If you copied code from any other sources or added a new PIP dependency, did you follow guidance in CONTRIBUTING.md: N/A
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?: N/A (workflow config; validated as described above)
  • Did you update Changelog?: N/A (CI-only change)
  • Did you get Claude approval on this PR?: N/A (external contributor; cannot trigger /claude review)

Additional Information

Part of #1890 (item 4).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved workflow concurrency handling so automated runs are grouped and canceled more reliably across pull request, manual, and scheduled triggers.

Without the github.sha fallback (already used by unit_tests.yml), every
nightly and manually dispatched run shares the literal group
'Code Quality-' with cancel-in-progress enabled, so a manual dispatch
cancels an in-flight nightly run and vice versa.
Signed-off-by: arham766 <arhamislam766@yahoo.com>
@arham766
arham766 requested a review from a team as a code ownerJuly 2, 2026 21:28
@copy-pr-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 05e08661-1f5f-42a5-8170-78dac18970f2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b9225b and 49aed56.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/code_quality.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The concurrency group key in the code_quality GitHub Actions workflow was modified to combine the workflow name with either the pull request number or the commit SHA, replacing the previous PR-number-only grouping.

Changes

Workflow Concurrency Configuration

Layer / File(s)Summary
Update concurrency group key
.github/workflows/code_quality.yml
Changed the concurrency.group value to ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.sha }}, adding a fallback to the commit SHA when no PR number exists.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 6
✅ Passed checks (6 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title accurately summarizes the CI workflow change to separate non-PR code quality concurrency groups.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Security Anti-Patterns✅ PassedNo changed modelopt/examples code adds unsafe load/eval patterns; trust_remote_code stays caller-configurable, and new deps are permissive.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@kevalmorabia97

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/ok to test 49aed56

@kevalmorabia97
kevalmorabia97 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 5, 2026 11:06
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 70.21%. Comparing base (4b9225b) to head (49aed56).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1894 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 70.21% 70.21% =======================================
Files 515 515 Lines 57244 57244 =======================================
Hits 40196 40196 Misses 17048 17048 
FlagCoverage Δ
unit54.90% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@kevalmorabia97
kevalmorabia97 merged commit 0c40c37 into NVIDIA:mainJul 5, 2026
36 checks passed
talorabr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2026
### What does this PR do?
Type of change: Bug fix
The concurrency group used `github.event.pull_request.number` with no
fallback, so every nightly and manually dispatched run shared the
literal group `Code Quality-` with `cancel-in-progress: true` — a manual
dispatch cancels an in-flight nightly and vice versa. Adds the `||
github.sha` fallback already used by `unit_tests.yml`.
### Usage
N/A — CI workflow configuration change.
### Testing
Matches the existing pattern in `unit_tests.yml` line-for-line. YAML
validated.
### Before your PR is "*Ready for review*"
- Is this change backward compatible?: ✅
- If you copied code from any other sources or added a new PIP
dependency, did you follow guidance in `CONTRIBUTING.md`: N/A
- Did you write any new necessary tests?: N/A (workflow config;
validated as described above)
- Did you update
[Changelog](https://github.com/NVIDIA/Model-Optimizer/blob/main/CHANGELOG.rst)?:
N/A (CI-only change)
- Did you get Claude approval on this PR?: N/A (external contributor;
cannot trigger `/claude review`)
### Additional Information
Part of #1890 (item 4).
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Chores**
* Improved workflow concurrency handling so automated runs are grouped
and canceled more reliably across pull request, manual, and scheduled
triggers.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Signed-off-by: arham766 <arhamislam766@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: talora <talora@nvidia.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@arham766@kevalmorabia97
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ci: give non-PR code quality runs distinct concurrency groups - #1894

Merged
kevalmorabia97 merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
arham766:ci-code-quality-concurrency
Jul 5, 2026
Merged

ci: give non-PR code quality runs distinct concurrency groups#1894
kevalmorabia97 merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
arham766:ci-code-quality-concurrency

Conversation

@arham766

@arham766arham766 commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Type of change: Bug fix

The concurrency group used github.event.pull_request.number with no fallback, so every nightly and manually dispatched run shared the literal group Code Quality- with cancel-in-progress: true — a manual dispatch cancels an in-flight nightly and vice versa. Adds the || github.sha fallback already used by unit_tests.yml.

Usage

N/A — CI workflow configuration change.

Testing

Matches the existing pattern in unit_tests.yml line-for-line. YAML validated.

Before your PR is "Ready for review"

  • Is this change backward compatible?: ✅
  • If you copied code from any other sources or added a new PIP dependency, did you follow guidance in CONTRIBUTING.md: N/A
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?: N/A (workflow config; validated as described above)
  • Did you update Changelog?: N/A (CI-only change)
  • Did you get Claude approval on this PR?: N/A (external contributor; cannot trigger /claude review)

Additional Information

Part of #1890 (item 4).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved workflow concurrency handling so automated runs are grouped and canceled more reliably across pull request, manual, and scheduled triggers.

Without the github.sha fallback (already used by unit_tests.yml), every
nightly and manually dispatched run shares the literal group
'Code Quality-' with cancel-in-progress enabled, so a manual dispatch
cancels an in-flight nightly run and vice versa.
Signed-off-by: arham766 <arhamislam766@yahoo.com>
@arham766
arham766 requested a review from a team as a code ownerJuly 2, 2026 21:28
@copy-pr-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 05e08661-1f5f-42a5-8170-78dac18970f2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b9225b and 49aed56.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/code_quality.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The concurrency group key in the code_quality GitHub Actions workflow was modified to combine the workflow name with either the pull request number or the commit SHA, replacing the previous PR-number-only grouping.

Changes

Workflow Concurrency Configuration

Layer / File(s)Summary
Update concurrency group key
.github/workflows/code_quality.yml
Changed the concurrency.group value to ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.sha }}, adding a fallback to the commit SHA when no PR number exists.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 6
✅ Passed checks (6 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title accurately summarizes the CI workflow change to separate non-PR code quality concurrency groups.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Security Anti-Patterns✅ PassedNo changed modelopt/examples code adds unsafe load/eval patterns; trust_remote_code stays caller-configurable, and new deps are permissive.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@kevalmorabia97

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/ok to test 49aed56

@kevalmorabia97
kevalmorabia97 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 5, 2026 11:06
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 70.21%. Comparing base (4b9225b) to head (49aed56).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1894 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 70.21% 70.21% =======================================
Files 515 515 Lines 57244 57244 =======================================
Hits 40196 40196 Misses 17048 17048 
FlagCoverage Δ
unit54.90% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@kevalmorabia97
kevalmorabia97 merged commit 0c40c37 into NVIDIA:mainJul 5, 2026
36 checks passed
talorabr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2026
### What does this PR do?
Type of change: Bug fix
The concurrency group used `github.event.pull_request.number` with no
fallback, so every nightly and manually dispatched run shared the
literal group `Code Quality-` with `cancel-in-progress: true` — a manual
dispatch cancels an in-flight nightly and vice versa. Adds the `||
github.sha` fallback already used by `unit_tests.yml`.
### Usage
N/A — CI workflow configuration change.
### Testing
Matches the existing pattern in `unit_tests.yml` line-for-line. YAML
validated.
### Before your PR is "*Ready for review*"
- Is this change backward compatible?: ✅
- If you copied code from any other sources or added a new PIP
dependency, did you follow guidance in `CONTRIBUTING.md`: N/A
- Did you write any new necessary tests?: N/A (workflow config;
validated as described above)
- Did you update
[Changelog](https://github.com/NVIDIA/Model-Optimizer/blob/main/CHANGELOG.rst)?:
N/A (CI-only change)
- Did you get Claude approval on this PR?: N/A (external contributor;
cannot trigger `/claude review`)
### Additional Information
Part of #1890 (item 4).
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Chores**
* Improved workflow concurrency handling so automated runs are grouped
and canceled more reliably across pull request, manual, and scheduled
triggers.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Signed-off-by: arham766 <arhamislam766@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: talora <talora@nvidia.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@arham766@kevalmorabia97
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ci: give non-PR code quality runs distinct concurrency groups - #1894

Merged
kevalmorabia97 merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
arham766:ci-code-quality-concurrency
Jul 5, 2026
Merged

ci: give non-PR code quality runs distinct concurrency groups#1894
kevalmorabia97 merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
arham766:ci-code-quality-concurrency

Conversation

@arham766

@arham766arham766 commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Type of change: Bug fix

The concurrency group used github.event.pull_request.number with no fallback, so every nightly and manually dispatched run shared the literal group Code Quality- with cancel-in-progress: true — a manual dispatch cancels an in-flight nightly and vice versa. Adds the || github.sha fallback already used by unit_tests.yml.

Usage

N/A — CI workflow configuration change.

Testing

Matches the existing pattern in unit_tests.yml line-for-line. YAML validated.

Before your PR is "Ready for review"

  • Is this change backward compatible?: ✅
  • If you copied code from any other sources or added a new PIP dependency, did you follow guidance in CONTRIBUTING.md: N/A
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?: N/A (workflow config; validated as described above)
  • Did you update Changelog?: N/A (CI-only change)
  • Did you get Claude approval on this PR?: N/A (external contributor; cannot trigger /claude review)

Additional Information

Part of #1890 (item 4).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved workflow concurrency handling so automated runs are grouped and canceled more reliably across pull request, manual, and scheduled triggers.

Without the github.sha fallback (already used by unit_tests.yml), every
nightly and manually dispatched run shares the literal group
'Code Quality-' with cancel-in-progress enabled, so a manual dispatch
cancels an in-flight nightly run and vice versa.
Signed-off-by: arham766 <arhamislam766@yahoo.com>
@arham766
arham766 requested a review from a team as a code ownerJuly 2, 2026 21:28
@copy-pr-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 05e08661-1f5f-42a5-8170-78dac18970f2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b9225b and 49aed56.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/code_quality.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The concurrency group key in the code_quality GitHub Actions workflow was modified to combine the workflow name with either the pull request number or the commit SHA, replacing the previous PR-number-only grouping.

Changes

Workflow Concurrency Configuration

Layer / File(s)Summary
Update concurrency group key
.github/workflows/code_quality.yml
Changed the concurrency.group value to ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.sha }}, adding a fallback to the commit SHA when no PR number exists.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 6
✅ Passed checks (6 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title accurately summarizes the CI workflow change to separate non-PR code quality concurrency groups.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Security Anti-Patterns✅ PassedNo changed modelopt/examples code adds unsafe load/eval patterns; trust_remote_code stays caller-configurable, and new deps are permissive.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@kevalmorabia97

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/ok to test 49aed56

@kevalmorabia97
kevalmorabia97 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 5, 2026 11:06
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 70.21%. Comparing base (4b9225b) to head (49aed56).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1894 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 70.21% 70.21% =======================================
Files 515 515 Lines 57244 57244 =======================================
Hits 40196 40196 Misses 17048 17048 
FlagCoverage Δ
unit54.90% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@kevalmorabia97
kevalmorabia97 merged commit 0c40c37 into NVIDIA:mainJul 5, 2026
36 checks passed
talorabr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2026
### What does this PR do?
Type of change: Bug fix
The concurrency group used `github.event.pull_request.number` with no
fallback, so every nightly and manually dispatched run shared the
literal group `Code Quality-` with `cancel-in-progress: true` — a manual
dispatch cancels an in-flight nightly and vice versa. Adds the `||
github.sha` fallback already used by `unit_tests.yml`.
### Usage
N/A — CI workflow configuration change.
### Testing
Matches the existing pattern in `unit_tests.yml` line-for-line. YAML
validated.
### Before your PR is "*Ready for review*"
- Is this change backward compatible?: ✅
- If you copied code from any other sources or added a new PIP
dependency, did you follow guidance in `CONTRIBUTING.md`: N/A
- Did you write any new necessary tests?: N/A (workflow config;
validated as described above)
- Did you update
[Changelog](https://github.com/NVIDIA/Model-Optimizer/blob/main/CHANGELOG.rst)?:
N/A (CI-only change)
- Did you get Claude approval on this PR?: N/A (external contributor;
cannot trigger `/claude review`)
### Additional Information
Part of #1890 (item 4).
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Chores**
* Improved workflow concurrency handling so automated runs are grouped
and canceled more reliably across pull request, manual, and scheduled
triggers.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Signed-off-by: arham766 <arhamislam766@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: talora <talora@nvidia.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@arham766@kevalmorabia97
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

ci: give non-PR code quality runs distinct concurrency groups - #1894

Merged
kevalmorabia97 merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
arham766:ci-code-quality-concurrency
Jul 5, 2026
Merged

ci: give non-PR code quality runs distinct concurrency groups#1894
kevalmorabia97 merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
arham766:ci-code-quality-concurrency

Conversation

@arham766

@arham766arham766 commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Type of change: Bug fix

The concurrency group used github.event.pull_request.number with no fallback, so every nightly and manually dispatched run shared the literal group Code Quality- with cancel-in-progress: true — a manual dispatch cancels an in-flight nightly and vice versa. Adds the || github.sha fallback already used by unit_tests.yml.

Usage

N/A — CI workflow configuration change.

Testing

Matches the existing pattern in unit_tests.yml line-for-line. YAML validated.

Before your PR is "Ready for review"

  • Is this change backward compatible?: ✅
  • If you copied code from any other sources or added a new PIP dependency, did you follow guidance in CONTRIBUTING.md: N/A
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?: N/A (workflow config; validated as described above)
  • Did you update Changelog?: N/A (CI-only change)
  • Did you get Claude approval on this PR?: N/A (external contributor; cannot trigger /claude review)

Additional Information

Part of #1890 (item 4).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved workflow concurrency handling so automated runs are grouped and canceled more reliably across pull request, manual, and scheduled triggers.

Without the github.sha fallback (already used by unit_tests.yml), every
nightly and manually dispatched run shares the literal group
'Code Quality-' with cancel-in-progress enabled, so a manual dispatch
cancels an in-flight nightly run and vice versa.
Signed-off-by: arham766 <arhamislam766@yahoo.com>
@arham766
arham766 requested a review from a team as a code ownerJuly 2, 2026 21:28
@copy-pr-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 05e08661-1f5f-42a5-8170-78dac18970f2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b9225b and 49aed56.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/code_quality.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The concurrency group key in the code_quality GitHub Actions workflow was modified to combine the workflow name with either the pull request number or the commit SHA, replacing the previous PR-number-only grouping.

Changes

Workflow Concurrency Configuration

Layer / File(s)Summary
Update concurrency group key
.github/workflows/code_quality.yml
Changed the concurrency.group value to ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.sha }}, adding a fallback to the commit SHA when no PR number exists.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 6
✅ Passed checks (6 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description Check✅ PassedCheck skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check✅ PassedThe title accurately summarizes the CI workflow change to separate non-PR code quality concurrency groups.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Security Anti-Patterns✅ PassedNo changed modelopt/examples code adds unsafe load/eval patterns; trust_remote_code stays caller-configurable, and new deps are permissive.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@kevalmorabia97

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/ok to test 49aed56

@kevalmorabia97
kevalmorabia97 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 5, 2026 11:06
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 70.21%. Comparing base (4b9225b) to head (49aed56).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1894 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 70.21% 70.21% =======================================
Files 515 515 Lines 57244 57244 =======================================
Hits 40196 40196 Misses 17048 17048 
FlagCoverage Δ
unit54.90% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@kevalmorabia97
kevalmorabia97 merged commit 0c40c37 into NVIDIA:mainJul 5, 2026
36 checks passed
talorabr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2026
### What does this PR do?
Type of change: Bug fix
The concurrency group used `github.event.pull_request.number` with no
fallback, so every nightly and manually dispatched run shared the
literal group `Code Quality-` with `cancel-in-progress: true` — a manual
dispatch cancels an in-flight nightly and vice versa. Adds the `||
github.sha` fallback already used by `unit_tests.yml`.
### Usage
N/A — CI workflow configuration change.
### Testing
Matches the existing pattern in `unit_tests.yml` line-for-line. YAML
validated.
### Before your PR is "*Ready for review*"
- Is this change backward compatible?: ✅
- If you copied code from any other sources or added a new PIP
dependency, did you follow guidance in `CONTRIBUTING.md`: N/A
- Did you write any new necessary tests?: N/A (workflow config;
validated as described above)
- Did you update
[Changelog](https://github.com/NVIDIA/Model-Optimizer/blob/main/CHANGELOG.rst)?:
N/A (CI-only change)
- Did you get Claude approval on this PR?: N/A (external contributor;
cannot trigger `/claude review`)
### Additional Information
Part of #1890 (item 4).
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Chores**
* Improved workflow concurrency handling so automated runs are grouped
and canceled more reliably across pull request, manual, and scheduled
triggers.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Signed-off-by: arham766 <arhamislam766@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: talora <talora@nvidia.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@arham766@kevalmorabia97