Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
docs: document issue lifecycle labels and roadmap sequencing - #2524
Conversation
🌿 Preview your docs:https://nvidia-preview-pr-2524.docs.buildwithfern.com/openshell |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
pimlock
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks good IMO, I haven't reviewed all the small changes, my assumption is the overall approach was to define the new process (the issue-lifecycle doc), give that to the agent to update all existing skills/documentation around this?
Once this lands, we'll need to migrate some of the existing labels, right? E.g. the state:... -> agent:....
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
682bd79 to
3cdfeecCompareUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
matthewgrossman
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
overall lgtm, also feels reasonable to try out and adjust the process as we find parts we like/don't like (like we're doing now!)
Add a published Issue Triage and Lifecycle page and align AGENTS.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, README.md, the PR template, and the issue-handling skills on the state:*/agent:* label model. Signed-off-by: Kris Hicks <khicks@nvidia.com>
3cdfeec to
03bf078Compare
Summary
Add a published Issue Triage and Lifecycle page and align AGENTS.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, README.md, the PR template, and the issue-handling skills on the state:/agent: label model.
This is meant to make it easier for us to manage the open issues and PRs in the project. Presently it's not easy to know which issues are validated and/or accepted, for example. This also clarifies the state machine for issues that are going to be owned by an agent.
Related Issue
Changes
Testing
mise run pre-commitpassesChecklist