[PyTorch] Propagate skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear during FP8 CUDA graph capture - #3065

Merged
ksivaman merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
LeSingh1:fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

[PyTorch] Propagate skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear during FP8 CUDA graph capture#3065
ksivaman merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
LeSingh1:fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051

Conversation

@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

GroupedLinear.forward hardcoded None for skip_fp8_weight_update, so the FP8 graph-capture skip tensor was never forwarded during CUDA graph replay — the bug reported in #3051. Linear.forward handles this correctly: when FP8GlobalStateManager.fp8_graph_capturing() is true it reads quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor, forces is_first_microbatch = False, and threads the tensor into its forward args. GroupedLinear omitted that retrieval block and passed a literal None, even though the autograd _GroupedLinear.forward already unpacks and uses the flag (quantize_weight(..., skip_update_flag=skip_fp8_weight_update)).

Fix

Mirror the Linear reference path in GroupedLinear.forward: add the same fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block and thread skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args (positionally aligned with the existing autograd unpack). FP8GlobalStateManager is already imported in the module.

Verification status

Runtime-unverified — developed without a CUDA GPU, so the FP8 / CUDA-graph numerics and the Nemotron-MoE gradient-suppression reproducer were not run. The change is a near-mechanical parity fix against the established Linear path (same accessor, same is_first_microbatch forcing, same threading), and the positional unpack lines up with _GroupedLinear.forward. A GPU regression test (comparing GroupedLinear FP8 grads under graph-replay-active vs delayed) belongs alongside the existing CUDA-graph tests but can't run on this platform — I'd ask a maintainer with a GPU to confirm numerics before merge, and I'm happy to add the test.

Developed with AI assistance.

Addresses #3051

@LeSingh1
LeSingh1 requested a review from ksivaman as a code ownerMay 31, 2026 23:21
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the community-contribution PRs from external contributor outside the core maintainers, representing community-driven work. label May 31, 2026
@greptile-apps

greptile-appsBot commented May 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Greptile Summary

This PR fixes the missing propagation of skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear.forward during FP8 CUDA graph capture, mirroring the pattern already used in Linear.forward. A dedicated regression test is added to verify that graphed and non-graphed FP8 runs produce identical outputs with weight caching enabled.

  • Core fix (grouped_linear.py): Inserts an fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block before m_splits validation to set skip_fp8_weight_update and force is_first_microbatch = False during CUDA graph replay — the same pattern used by Linear.
  • New test (test_cuda_graphs.py): Adds _GroupedLinearWrapper to adapt the 3-D test harness, a new grouped_linear branch in _test_cuda_graphs, and a dedicated parametrized test that asserts graphed outputs match eager outputs under both DelayedScaling and Float8CurrentScaling recipes.

Confidence Score: 5/5

Safe to merge after resolving the duplicate fp8_graph_capturing() block; the fix itself is correct and the new test exercises the right code path.

The fix correctly mirrors Linear.forward and threads skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args, verified by the new regression test. The only issue is a redundant duplicate of the same retrieval block that was independently introduced into main before the PR was merged — both blocks compute identical values, so there is no incorrect behavior. The test logic is sound for the given model config.

transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.py — contains the duplicate retrieval block at lines 1687–1694 and 1708–1715 that should be reduced to one.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.pyAdds fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block before m_splits processing; identical block already existed after m_splits in the base branch, leaving both in the file as redundant duplicates
tests/pytorch/test_cuda_graphs.pyAdds _GroupedLinearWrapper, grouped_linear branch in _test_cuda_graphs, and a focused parametrized regression test; model config produces 64 total tokens (divisible by num_gemms=2) so the assertion holds

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
A[GroupedLinear.forward called] --> B{fp8_graph_capturing?}
B -- Yes --> C[skip_fp8_weight_update =
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor]
B -- No --> D[skip_fp8_weight_update = None]
C --> E{skip_fp8_weight_update
is not None?}
D --> E
E -- Yes --> F[is_first_microbatch = False]
E -- No --> G[is_first_microbatch unchanged]
F --> H[Validate m_splits]
G --> H
H --> I{fp8_graph_capturing?
⚠️ Duplicate block}
I -- Yes --> J[skip_fp8_weight_update =
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor]
I -- No --> K[skip_fp8_weight_update = None]
J --> L{skip_fp8_weight_update
is not None?}
K --> L
L -- Yes --> M[is_first_microbatch = False again]
L -- No --> N[is_first_microbatch unchanged]
M --> O[Build non_tensor_args with skip_fp8_weight_update]
N --> O
O --> P[_GroupedLinear.apply / forward]
style I fill:#ffcccc
style J fill:#ffcccc
style K fill:#ffcccc
style L fill:#ffcccc
style M fill:#ffcccc
Loading

Reviews (6): Last reviewed commit: "Merge branch 'main' into fix-grouped-lin..." | Re-trigger Greptile

@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch 2 times, most recently from 852029a to f8e5daaCompareJune 1, 2026 05:43
@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch from f8e5daa to 70d505eCompareJune 1, 2026 05:46
@jberchtold-nvidia
jberchtold-nvidia removed their request for review June 1, 2026 15:37
@ptrendx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@LeSingh1 Could you add the test that would exercise this functionality?

@ptrendxptrendx self-assigned this Jun 1, 2026
@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@ptrendx Added a test in tests/pytorch/test_cuda_graphs.py: test_make_graphed_callables_grouped_linear_with_fp8_weight_caching.

It wraps GroupedLinear (flattening the [seqlen, batch, hidden] harness input to 2D and splitting evenly across 2 GEMMs) so it slots into the existing _test_cuda_graphs harness, then runs the full / individual / none graph modes with fp8_weight_caching=True and asserts the graphed outputs equal the eager reference. That equality only holds when is_first_microbatch is threaded into the weight-update skip tensor on every microbatch — on the pre-fix None hardcode the cached FP8 weights diverge, so the test fails without the change. Parametrized over DelayedScaling + Float8CurrentScaling, both fp8_params settings, and the fp32/fp16 dtypes already used in this file.

One disclosure: I don't have FP8-capable GPU hardware locally, so I verified the test by construction (mirroring test_make_graphed_callables_with_fp8_weight_caching) rather than by running it — it'll need a CI/GPU run to confirm. Happy to adjust the recipe coverage or wrapper approach if you'd prefer it structured differently.

…8 CUDA graph capture
GroupedLinear.forward hardcoded None for skip_fp8_weight_update, so the
FP8 graph-capture skip tensor was never forwarded during CUDA graph
replay. Mirror Linear.forward: when fp8_graph_capturing() is true, read
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor, force is_first_microbatch
to False, and thread the tensor into the forward call (the slot
_GroupedLinear.forward already unpacks).
FixesNVIDIA#3051
Signed-off-by: LeSingh1 <sshaurya914@gmail.com>
Exercises skip_fp8_weight_update propagation in GroupedLinear during FP8
CUDA graph capture. With fp8_weight_caching enabled, graphed and eager
runs only match when is_first_microbatch is threaded into the weight-
update skip tensor for every microbatch, which the prior None hardcode
prevented.
Signed-off-by: LeSingh1 <sshaurya914@gmail.com>
@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch from 31c60f2 to 6c75a8eCompareJune 1, 2026 22:00
@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased onto main to resolve a conflict with #3038 (the GroupedLinear graph-safe refactor). Worth noting: #3038 plumbs skip_fp8_weight_update all the way through _GroupedLinear's autograd function, but the module-level GroupedLinear.forward still passes None, # skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args, so the value never reaches that plumbing during graph capture. This change wires it up the same way Linear.forward does (read the skip tensor from FP8GlobalStateManager.quantization_state when fp8_graph_capturing()). The test from the previous commit comes along with the rebase. Still GPU/CI-only on my end since I don't have FP8 hardware locally.

@ptrendx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/te-ci pytorch

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/te-ci pytorch

@ksivaman
ksivaman merged commit 5fdfbec into NVIDIA:mainJun 10, 2026
11 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

community-contributionPRs from external contributor outside the core maintainers, representing community-driven work.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@LeSingh1@ptrendx@ksivaman
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[PyTorch] Propagate skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear during FP8 CUDA graph capture - #3065

Merged
ksivaman merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
LeSingh1:fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

[PyTorch] Propagate skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear during FP8 CUDA graph capture#3065
ksivaman merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
LeSingh1:fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051

Conversation

@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

GroupedLinear.forward hardcoded None for skip_fp8_weight_update, so the FP8 graph-capture skip tensor was never forwarded during CUDA graph replay — the bug reported in #3051. Linear.forward handles this correctly: when FP8GlobalStateManager.fp8_graph_capturing() is true it reads quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor, forces is_first_microbatch = False, and threads the tensor into its forward args. GroupedLinear omitted that retrieval block and passed a literal None, even though the autograd _GroupedLinear.forward already unpacks and uses the flag (quantize_weight(..., skip_update_flag=skip_fp8_weight_update)).

Fix

Mirror the Linear reference path in GroupedLinear.forward: add the same fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block and thread skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args (positionally aligned with the existing autograd unpack). FP8GlobalStateManager is already imported in the module.

Verification status

Runtime-unverified — developed without a CUDA GPU, so the FP8 / CUDA-graph numerics and the Nemotron-MoE gradient-suppression reproducer were not run. The change is a near-mechanical parity fix against the established Linear path (same accessor, same is_first_microbatch forcing, same threading), and the positional unpack lines up with _GroupedLinear.forward. A GPU regression test (comparing GroupedLinear FP8 grads under graph-replay-active vs delayed) belongs alongside the existing CUDA-graph tests but can't run on this platform — I'd ask a maintainer with a GPU to confirm numerics before merge, and I'm happy to add the test.

Developed with AI assistance.

Addresses #3051

@LeSingh1
LeSingh1 requested a review from ksivaman as a code ownerMay 31, 2026 23:21
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the community-contribution PRs from external contributor outside the core maintainers, representing community-driven work. label May 31, 2026
@greptile-apps

greptile-appsBot commented May 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Greptile Summary

This PR fixes the missing propagation of skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear.forward during FP8 CUDA graph capture, mirroring the pattern already used in Linear.forward. A dedicated regression test is added to verify that graphed and non-graphed FP8 runs produce identical outputs with weight caching enabled.

  • Core fix (grouped_linear.py): Inserts an fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block before m_splits validation to set skip_fp8_weight_update and force is_first_microbatch = False during CUDA graph replay — the same pattern used by Linear.
  • New test (test_cuda_graphs.py): Adds _GroupedLinearWrapper to adapt the 3-D test harness, a new grouped_linear branch in _test_cuda_graphs, and a dedicated parametrized test that asserts graphed outputs match eager outputs under both DelayedScaling and Float8CurrentScaling recipes.

Confidence Score: 5/5

Safe to merge after resolving the duplicate fp8_graph_capturing() block; the fix itself is correct and the new test exercises the right code path.

The fix correctly mirrors Linear.forward and threads skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args, verified by the new regression test. The only issue is a redundant duplicate of the same retrieval block that was independently introduced into main before the PR was merged — both blocks compute identical values, so there is no incorrect behavior. The test logic is sound for the given model config.

transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.py — contains the duplicate retrieval block at lines 1687–1694 and 1708–1715 that should be reduced to one.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.pyAdds fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block before m_splits processing; identical block already existed after m_splits in the base branch, leaving both in the file as redundant duplicates
tests/pytorch/test_cuda_graphs.pyAdds _GroupedLinearWrapper, grouped_linear branch in _test_cuda_graphs, and a focused parametrized regression test; model config produces 64 total tokens (divisible by num_gemms=2) so the assertion holds

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
A[GroupedLinear.forward called] --> B{fp8_graph_capturing?}
B -- Yes --> C[skip_fp8_weight_update =
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor]
B -- No --> D[skip_fp8_weight_update = None]
C --> E{skip_fp8_weight_update
is not None?}
D --> E
E -- Yes --> F[is_first_microbatch = False]
E -- No --> G[is_first_microbatch unchanged]
F --> H[Validate m_splits]
G --> H
H --> I{fp8_graph_capturing?
⚠️ Duplicate block}
I -- Yes --> J[skip_fp8_weight_update =
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor]
I -- No --> K[skip_fp8_weight_update = None]
J --> L{skip_fp8_weight_update
is not None?}
K --> L
L -- Yes --> M[is_first_microbatch = False again]
L -- No --> N[is_first_microbatch unchanged]
M --> O[Build non_tensor_args with skip_fp8_weight_update]
N --> O
O --> P[_GroupedLinear.apply / forward]
style I fill:#ffcccc
style J fill:#ffcccc
style K fill:#ffcccc
style L fill:#ffcccc
style M fill:#ffcccc
Loading

Reviews (6): Last reviewed commit: "Merge branch 'main' into fix-grouped-lin..." | Re-trigger Greptile

@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch 2 times, most recently from 852029a to f8e5daaCompareJune 1, 2026 05:43
@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch from f8e5daa to 70d505eCompareJune 1, 2026 05:46
@jberchtold-nvidia
jberchtold-nvidia removed their request for review June 1, 2026 15:37
@ptrendx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@LeSingh1 Could you add the test that would exercise this functionality?

@ptrendxptrendx self-assigned this Jun 1, 2026
@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@ptrendx Added a test in tests/pytorch/test_cuda_graphs.py: test_make_graphed_callables_grouped_linear_with_fp8_weight_caching.

It wraps GroupedLinear (flattening the [seqlen, batch, hidden] harness input to 2D and splitting evenly across 2 GEMMs) so it slots into the existing _test_cuda_graphs harness, then runs the full / individual / none graph modes with fp8_weight_caching=True and asserts the graphed outputs equal the eager reference. That equality only holds when is_first_microbatch is threaded into the weight-update skip tensor on every microbatch — on the pre-fix None hardcode the cached FP8 weights diverge, so the test fails without the change. Parametrized over DelayedScaling + Float8CurrentScaling, both fp8_params settings, and the fp32/fp16 dtypes already used in this file.

One disclosure: I don't have FP8-capable GPU hardware locally, so I verified the test by construction (mirroring test_make_graphed_callables_with_fp8_weight_caching) rather than by running it — it'll need a CI/GPU run to confirm. Happy to adjust the recipe coverage or wrapper approach if you'd prefer it structured differently.

…8 CUDA graph capture
GroupedLinear.forward hardcoded None for skip_fp8_weight_update, so the
FP8 graph-capture skip tensor was never forwarded during CUDA graph
replay. Mirror Linear.forward: when fp8_graph_capturing() is true, read
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor, force is_first_microbatch
to False, and thread the tensor into the forward call (the slot
_GroupedLinear.forward already unpacks).
FixesNVIDIA#3051
Signed-off-by: LeSingh1 <sshaurya914@gmail.com>
Exercises skip_fp8_weight_update propagation in GroupedLinear during FP8
CUDA graph capture. With fp8_weight_caching enabled, graphed and eager
runs only match when is_first_microbatch is threaded into the weight-
update skip tensor for every microbatch, which the prior None hardcode
prevented.
Signed-off-by: LeSingh1 <sshaurya914@gmail.com>
@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch from 31c60f2 to 6c75a8eCompareJune 1, 2026 22:00
@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased onto main to resolve a conflict with #3038 (the GroupedLinear graph-safe refactor). Worth noting: #3038 plumbs skip_fp8_weight_update all the way through _GroupedLinear's autograd function, but the module-level GroupedLinear.forward still passes None, # skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args, so the value never reaches that plumbing during graph capture. This change wires it up the same way Linear.forward does (read the skip tensor from FP8GlobalStateManager.quantization_state when fp8_graph_capturing()). The test from the previous commit comes along with the rebase. Still GPU/CI-only on my end since I don't have FP8 hardware locally.

@ptrendx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/te-ci pytorch

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/te-ci pytorch

@ksivaman
ksivaman merged commit 5fdfbec into NVIDIA:mainJun 10, 2026
11 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

community-contributionPRs from external contributor outside the core maintainers, representing community-driven work.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@LeSingh1@ptrendx@ksivaman
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[PyTorch] Propagate skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear during FP8 CUDA graph capture - #3065

Merged
ksivaman merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
LeSingh1:fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

[PyTorch] Propagate skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear during FP8 CUDA graph capture#3065
ksivaman merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
LeSingh1:fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051

Conversation

@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

GroupedLinear.forward hardcoded None for skip_fp8_weight_update, so the FP8 graph-capture skip tensor was never forwarded during CUDA graph replay — the bug reported in #3051. Linear.forward handles this correctly: when FP8GlobalStateManager.fp8_graph_capturing() is true it reads quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor, forces is_first_microbatch = False, and threads the tensor into its forward args. GroupedLinear omitted that retrieval block and passed a literal None, even though the autograd _GroupedLinear.forward already unpacks and uses the flag (quantize_weight(..., skip_update_flag=skip_fp8_weight_update)).

Fix

Mirror the Linear reference path in GroupedLinear.forward: add the same fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block and thread skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args (positionally aligned with the existing autograd unpack). FP8GlobalStateManager is already imported in the module.

Verification status

Runtime-unverified — developed without a CUDA GPU, so the FP8 / CUDA-graph numerics and the Nemotron-MoE gradient-suppression reproducer were not run. The change is a near-mechanical parity fix against the established Linear path (same accessor, same is_first_microbatch forcing, same threading), and the positional unpack lines up with _GroupedLinear.forward. A GPU regression test (comparing GroupedLinear FP8 grads under graph-replay-active vs delayed) belongs alongside the existing CUDA-graph tests but can't run on this platform — I'd ask a maintainer with a GPU to confirm numerics before merge, and I'm happy to add the test.

Developed with AI assistance.

Addresses #3051

@LeSingh1
LeSingh1 requested a review from ksivaman as a code ownerMay 31, 2026 23:21
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the community-contribution PRs from external contributor outside the core maintainers, representing community-driven work. label May 31, 2026
@greptile-apps

greptile-appsBot commented May 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Greptile Summary

This PR fixes the missing propagation of skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear.forward during FP8 CUDA graph capture, mirroring the pattern already used in Linear.forward. A dedicated regression test is added to verify that graphed and non-graphed FP8 runs produce identical outputs with weight caching enabled.

  • Core fix (grouped_linear.py): Inserts an fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block before m_splits validation to set skip_fp8_weight_update and force is_first_microbatch = False during CUDA graph replay — the same pattern used by Linear.
  • New test (test_cuda_graphs.py): Adds _GroupedLinearWrapper to adapt the 3-D test harness, a new grouped_linear branch in _test_cuda_graphs, and a dedicated parametrized test that asserts graphed outputs match eager outputs under both DelayedScaling and Float8CurrentScaling recipes.

Confidence Score: 5/5

Safe to merge after resolving the duplicate fp8_graph_capturing() block; the fix itself is correct and the new test exercises the right code path.

The fix correctly mirrors Linear.forward and threads skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args, verified by the new regression test. The only issue is a redundant duplicate of the same retrieval block that was independently introduced into main before the PR was merged — both blocks compute identical values, so there is no incorrect behavior. The test logic is sound for the given model config.

transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.py — contains the duplicate retrieval block at lines 1687–1694 and 1708–1715 that should be reduced to one.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.pyAdds fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block before m_splits processing; identical block already existed after m_splits in the base branch, leaving both in the file as redundant duplicates
tests/pytorch/test_cuda_graphs.pyAdds _GroupedLinearWrapper, grouped_linear branch in _test_cuda_graphs, and a focused parametrized regression test; model config produces 64 total tokens (divisible by num_gemms=2) so the assertion holds

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
A[GroupedLinear.forward called] --> B{fp8_graph_capturing?}
B -- Yes --> C[skip_fp8_weight_update =
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor]
B -- No --> D[skip_fp8_weight_update = None]
C --> E{skip_fp8_weight_update
is not None?}
D --> E
E -- Yes --> F[is_first_microbatch = False]
E -- No --> G[is_first_microbatch unchanged]
F --> H[Validate m_splits]
G --> H
H --> I{fp8_graph_capturing?
⚠️ Duplicate block}
I -- Yes --> J[skip_fp8_weight_update =
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor]
I -- No --> K[skip_fp8_weight_update = None]
J --> L{skip_fp8_weight_update
is not None?}
K --> L
L -- Yes --> M[is_first_microbatch = False again]
L -- No --> N[is_first_microbatch unchanged]
M --> O[Build non_tensor_args with skip_fp8_weight_update]
N --> O
O --> P[_GroupedLinear.apply / forward]
style I fill:#ffcccc
style J fill:#ffcccc
style K fill:#ffcccc
style L fill:#ffcccc
style M fill:#ffcccc
Loading

Reviews (6): Last reviewed commit: "Merge branch 'main' into fix-grouped-lin..." | Re-trigger Greptile

@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch 2 times, most recently from 852029a to f8e5daaCompareJune 1, 2026 05:43
@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch from f8e5daa to 70d505eCompareJune 1, 2026 05:46
@jberchtold-nvidia
jberchtold-nvidia removed their request for review June 1, 2026 15:37
@ptrendx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@LeSingh1 Could you add the test that would exercise this functionality?

@ptrendxptrendx self-assigned this Jun 1, 2026
@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@ptrendx Added a test in tests/pytorch/test_cuda_graphs.py: test_make_graphed_callables_grouped_linear_with_fp8_weight_caching.

It wraps GroupedLinear (flattening the [seqlen, batch, hidden] harness input to 2D and splitting evenly across 2 GEMMs) so it slots into the existing _test_cuda_graphs harness, then runs the full / individual / none graph modes with fp8_weight_caching=True and asserts the graphed outputs equal the eager reference. That equality only holds when is_first_microbatch is threaded into the weight-update skip tensor on every microbatch — on the pre-fix None hardcode the cached FP8 weights diverge, so the test fails without the change. Parametrized over DelayedScaling + Float8CurrentScaling, both fp8_params settings, and the fp32/fp16 dtypes already used in this file.

One disclosure: I don't have FP8-capable GPU hardware locally, so I verified the test by construction (mirroring test_make_graphed_callables_with_fp8_weight_caching) rather than by running it — it'll need a CI/GPU run to confirm. Happy to adjust the recipe coverage or wrapper approach if you'd prefer it structured differently.

…8 CUDA graph capture
GroupedLinear.forward hardcoded None for skip_fp8_weight_update, so the
FP8 graph-capture skip tensor was never forwarded during CUDA graph
replay. Mirror Linear.forward: when fp8_graph_capturing() is true, read
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor, force is_first_microbatch
to False, and thread the tensor into the forward call (the slot
_GroupedLinear.forward already unpacks).
FixesNVIDIA#3051
Signed-off-by: LeSingh1 <sshaurya914@gmail.com>
Exercises skip_fp8_weight_update propagation in GroupedLinear during FP8
CUDA graph capture. With fp8_weight_caching enabled, graphed and eager
runs only match when is_first_microbatch is threaded into the weight-
update skip tensor for every microbatch, which the prior None hardcode
prevented.
Signed-off-by: LeSingh1 <sshaurya914@gmail.com>
@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch from 31c60f2 to 6c75a8eCompareJune 1, 2026 22:00
@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased onto main to resolve a conflict with #3038 (the GroupedLinear graph-safe refactor). Worth noting: #3038 plumbs skip_fp8_weight_update all the way through _GroupedLinear's autograd function, but the module-level GroupedLinear.forward still passes None, # skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args, so the value never reaches that plumbing during graph capture. This change wires it up the same way Linear.forward does (read the skip tensor from FP8GlobalStateManager.quantization_state when fp8_graph_capturing()). The test from the previous commit comes along with the rebase. Still GPU/CI-only on my end since I don't have FP8 hardware locally.

@ptrendx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/te-ci pytorch

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/te-ci pytorch

@ksivaman
ksivaman merged commit 5fdfbec into NVIDIA:mainJun 10, 2026
11 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

community-contributionPRs from external contributor outside the core maintainers, representing community-driven work.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@LeSingh1@ptrendx@ksivaman
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[PyTorch] Propagate skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear during FP8 CUDA graph capture - #3065

Merged
ksivaman merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
LeSingh1:fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

[PyTorch] Propagate skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear during FP8 CUDA graph capture#3065
ksivaman merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
LeSingh1:fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051

Conversation

@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

GroupedLinear.forward hardcoded None for skip_fp8_weight_update, so the FP8 graph-capture skip tensor was never forwarded during CUDA graph replay — the bug reported in #3051. Linear.forward handles this correctly: when FP8GlobalStateManager.fp8_graph_capturing() is true it reads quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor, forces is_first_microbatch = False, and threads the tensor into its forward args. GroupedLinear omitted that retrieval block and passed a literal None, even though the autograd _GroupedLinear.forward already unpacks and uses the flag (quantize_weight(..., skip_update_flag=skip_fp8_weight_update)).

Fix

Mirror the Linear reference path in GroupedLinear.forward: add the same fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block and thread skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args (positionally aligned with the existing autograd unpack). FP8GlobalStateManager is already imported in the module.

Verification status

Runtime-unverified — developed without a CUDA GPU, so the FP8 / CUDA-graph numerics and the Nemotron-MoE gradient-suppression reproducer were not run. The change is a near-mechanical parity fix against the established Linear path (same accessor, same is_first_microbatch forcing, same threading), and the positional unpack lines up with _GroupedLinear.forward. A GPU regression test (comparing GroupedLinear FP8 grads under graph-replay-active vs delayed) belongs alongside the existing CUDA-graph tests but can't run on this platform — I'd ask a maintainer with a GPU to confirm numerics before merge, and I'm happy to add the test.

Developed with AI assistance.

Addresses #3051

@LeSingh1
LeSingh1 requested a review from ksivaman as a code ownerMay 31, 2026 23:21
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the community-contribution PRs from external contributor outside the core maintainers, representing community-driven work. label May 31, 2026
@greptile-apps

greptile-appsBot commented May 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Greptile Summary

This PR fixes the missing propagation of skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear.forward during FP8 CUDA graph capture, mirroring the pattern already used in Linear.forward. A dedicated regression test is added to verify that graphed and non-graphed FP8 runs produce identical outputs with weight caching enabled.

  • Core fix (grouped_linear.py): Inserts an fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block before m_splits validation to set skip_fp8_weight_update and force is_first_microbatch = False during CUDA graph replay — the same pattern used by Linear.
  • New test (test_cuda_graphs.py): Adds _GroupedLinearWrapper to adapt the 3-D test harness, a new grouped_linear branch in _test_cuda_graphs, and a dedicated parametrized test that asserts graphed outputs match eager outputs under both DelayedScaling and Float8CurrentScaling recipes.

Confidence Score: 5/5

Safe to merge after resolving the duplicate fp8_graph_capturing() block; the fix itself is correct and the new test exercises the right code path.

The fix correctly mirrors Linear.forward and threads skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args, verified by the new regression test. The only issue is a redundant duplicate of the same retrieval block that was independently introduced into main before the PR was merged — both blocks compute identical values, so there is no incorrect behavior. The test logic is sound for the given model config.

transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.py — contains the duplicate retrieval block at lines 1687–1694 and 1708–1715 that should be reduced to one.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.pyAdds fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block before m_splits processing; identical block already existed after m_splits in the base branch, leaving both in the file as redundant duplicates
tests/pytorch/test_cuda_graphs.pyAdds _GroupedLinearWrapper, grouped_linear branch in _test_cuda_graphs, and a focused parametrized regression test; model config produces 64 total tokens (divisible by num_gemms=2) so the assertion holds

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
A[GroupedLinear.forward called] --> B{fp8_graph_capturing?}
B -- Yes --> C[skip_fp8_weight_update =
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor]
B -- No --> D[skip_fp8_weight_update = None]
C --> E{skip_fp8_weight_update
is not None?}
D --> E
E -- Yes --> F[is_first_microbatch = False]
E -- No --> G[is_first_microbatch unchanged]
F --> H[Validate m_splits]
G --> H
H --> I{fp8_graph_capturing?
⚠️ Duplicate block}
I -- Yes --> J[skip_fp8_weight_update =
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor]
I -- No --> K[skip_fp8_weight_update = None]
J --> L{skip_fp8_weight_update
is not None?}
K --> L
L -- Yes --> M[is_first_microbatch = False again]
L -- No --> N[is_first_microbatch unchanged]
M --> O[Build non_tensor_args with skip_fp8_weight_update]
N --> O
O --> P[_GroupedLinear.apply / forward]
style I fill:#ffcccc
style J fill:#ffcccc
style K fill:#ffcccc
style L fill:#ffcccc
style M fill:#ffcccc
Loading

Reviews (6): Last reviewed commit: "Merge branch 'main' into fix-grouped-lin..." | Re-trigger Greptile

@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch 2 times, most recently from 852029a to f8e5daaCompareJune 1, 2026 05:43
@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch from f8e5daa to 70d505eCompareJune 1, 2026 05:46
@jberchtold-nvidia
jberchtold-nvidia removed their request for review June 1, 2026 15:37
@ptrendx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@LeSingh1 Could you add the test that would exercise this functionality?

@ptrendxptrendx self-assigned this Jun 1, 2026
@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@ptrendx Added a test in tests/pytorch/test_cuda_graphs.py: test_make_graphed_callables_grouped_linear_with_fp8_weight_caching.

It wraps GroupedLinear (flattening the [seqlen, batch, hidden] harness input to 2D and splitting evenly across 2 GEMMs) so it slots into the existing _test_cuda_graphs harness, then runs the full / individual / none graph modes with fp8_weight_caching=True and asserts the graphed outputs equal the eager reference. That equality only holds when is_first_microbatch is threaded into the weight-update skip tensor on every microbatch — on the pre-fix None hardcode the cached FP8 weights diverge, so the test fails without the change. Parametrized over DelayedScaling + Float8CurrentScaling, both fp8_params settings, and the fp32/fp16 dtypes already used in this file.

One disclosure: I don't have FP8-capable GPU hardware locally, so I verified the test by construction (mirroring test_make_graphed_callables_with_fp8_weight_caching) rather than by running it — it'll need a CI/GPU run to confirm. Happy to adjust the recipe coverage or wrapper approach if you'd prefer it structured differently.

…8 CUDA graph capture
GroupedLinear.forward hardcoded None for skip_fp8_weight_update, so the
FP8 graph-capture skip tensor was never forwarded during CUDA graph
replay. Mirror Linear.forward: when fp8_graph_capturing() is true, read
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor, force is_first_microbatch
to False, and thread the tensor into the forward call (the slot
_GroupedLinear.forward already unpacks).
FixesNVIDIA#3051
Signed-off-by: LeSingh1 <sshaurya914@gmail.com>
Exercises skip_fp8_weight_update propagation in GroupedLinear during FP8
CUDA graph capture. With fp8_weight_caching enabled, graphed and eager
runs only match when is_first_microbatch is threaded into the weight-
update skip tensor for every microbatch, which the prior None hardcode
prevented.
Signed-off-by: LeSingh1 <sshaurya914@gmail.com>
@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch from 31c60f2 to 6c75a8eCompareJune 1, 2026 22:00
@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased onto main to resolve a conflict with #3038 (the GroupedLinear graph-safe refactor). Worth noting: #3038 plumbs skip_fp8_weight_update all the way through _GroupedLinear's autograd function, but the module-level GroupedLinear.forward still passes None, # skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args, so the value never reaches that plumbing during graph capture. This change wires it up the same way Linear.forward does (read the skip tensor from FP8GlobalStateManager.quantization_state when fp8_graph_capturing()). The test from the previous commit comes along with the rebase. Still GPU/CI-only on my end since I don't have FP8 hardware locally.

@ptrendx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/te-ci pytorch

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/te-ci pytorch

@ksivaman
ksivaman merged commit 5fdfbec into NVIDIA:mainJun 10, 2026
11 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

community-contributionPRs from external contributor outside the core maintainers, representing community-driven work.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@LeSingh1@ptrendx@ksivaman
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[PyTorch] Propagate skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear during FP8 CUDA graph capture - #3065

Merged
ksivaman merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
LeSingh1:fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

[PyTorch] Propagate skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear during FP8 CUDA graph capture#3065
ksivaman merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
LeSingh1:fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051

Conversation

@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

GroupedLinear.forward hardcoded None for skip_fp8_weight_update, so the FP8 graph-capture skip tensor was never forwarded during CUDA graph replay — the bug reported in #3051. Linear.forward handles this correctly: when FP8GlobalStateManager.fp8_graph_capturing() is true it reads quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor, forces is_first_microbatch = False, and threads the tensor into its forward args. GroupedLinear omitted that retrieval block and passed a literal None, even though the autograd _GroupedLinear.forward already unpacks and uses the flag (quantize_weight(..., skip_update_flag=skip_fp8_weight_update)).

Fix

Mirror the Linear reference path in GroupedLinear.forward: add the same fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block and thread skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args (positionally aligned with the existing autograd unpack). FP8GlobalStateManager is already imported in the module.

Verification status

Runtime-unverified — developed without a CUDA GPU, so the FP8 / CUDA-graph numerics and the Nemotron-MoE gradient-suppression reproducer were not run. The change is a near-mechanical parity fix against the established Linear path (same accessor, same is_first_microbatch forcing, same threading), and the positional unpack lines up with _GroupedLinear.forward. A GPU regression test (comparing GroupedLinear FP8 grads under graph-replay-active vs delayed) belongs alongside the existing CUDA-graph tests but can't run on this platform — I'd ask a maintainer with a GPU to confirm numerics before merge, and I'm happy to add the test.

Developed with AI assistance.

Addresses #3051

@LeSingh1
LeSingh1 requested a review from ksivaman as a code ownerMay 31, 2026 23:21
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the community-contribution PRs from external contributor outside the core maintainers, representing community-driven work. label May 31, 2026
@greptile-apps

greptile-appsBot commented May 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Greptile Summary

This PR fixes the missing propagation of skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear.forward during FP8 CUDA graph capture, mirroring the pattern already used in Linear.forward. A dedicated regression test is added to verify that graphed and non-graphed FP8 runs produce identical outputs with weight caching enabled.

  • Core fix (grouped_linear.py): Inserts an fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block before m_splits validation to set skip_fp8_weight_update and force is_first_microbatch = False during CUDA graph replay — the same pattern used by Linear.
  • New test (test_cuda_graphs.py): Adds _GroupedLinearWrapper to adapt the 3-D test harness, a new grouped_linear branch in _test_cuda_graphs, and a dedicated parametrized test that asserts graphed outputs match eager outputs under both DelayedScaling and Float8CurrentScaling recipes.

Confidence Score: 5/5

Safe to merge after resolving the duplicate fp8_graph_capturing() block; the fix itself is correct and the new test exercises the right code path.

The fix correctly mirrors Linear.forward and threads skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args, verified by the new regression test. The only issue is a redundant duplicate of the same retrieval block that was independently introduced into main before the PR was merged — both blocks compute identical values, so there is no incorrect behavior. The test logic is sound for the given model config.

transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.py — contains the duplicate retrieval block at lines 1687–1694 and 1708–1715 that should be reduced to one.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.pyAdds fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block before m_splits processing; identical block already existed after m_splits in the base branch, leaving both in the file as redundant duplicates
tests/pytorch/test_cuda_graphs.pyAdds _GroupedLinearWrapper, grouped_linear branch in _test_cuda_graphs, and a focused parametrized regression test; model config produces 64 total tokens (divisible by num_gemms=2) so the assertion holds

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
A[GroupedLinear.forward called] --> B{fp8_graph_capturing?}
B -- Yes --> C[skip_fp8_weight_update =
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor]
B -- No --> D[skip_fp8_weight_update = None]
C --> E{skip_fp8_weight_update
is not None?}
D --> E
E -- Yes --> F[is_first_microbatch = False]
E -- No --> G[is_first_microbatch unchanged]
F --> H[Validate m_splits]
G --> H
H --> I{fp8_graph_capturing?
⚠️ Duplicate block}
I -- Yes --> J[skip_fp8_weight_update =
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor]
I -- No --> K[skip_fp8_weight_update = None]
J --> L{skip_fp8_weight_update
is not None?}
K --> L
L -- Yes --> M[is_first_microbatch = False again]
L -- No --> N[is_first_microbatch unchanged]
M --> O[Build non_tensor_args with skip_fp8_weight_update]
N --> O
O --> P[_GroupedLinear.apply / forward]
style I fill:#ffcccc
style J fill:#ffcccc
style K fill:#ffcccc
style L fill:#ffcccc
style M fill:#ffcccc
Loading

Reviews (6): Last reviewed commit: "Merge branch 'main' into fix-grouped-lin..." | Re-trigger Greptile

@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch 2 times, most recently from 852029a to f8e5daaCompareJune 1, 2026 05:43
@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch from f8e5daa to 70d505eCompareJune 1, 2026 05:46
@jberchtold-nvidia
jberchtold-nvidia removed their request for review June 1, 2026 15:37
@ptrendx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@LeSingh1 Could you add the test that would exercise this functionality?

@ptrendxptrendx self-assigned this Jun 1, 2026
@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@ptrendx Added a test in tests/pytorch/test_cuda_graphs.py: test_make_graphed_callables_grouped_linear_with_fp8_weight_caching.

It wraps GroupedLinear (flattening the [seqlen, batch, hidden] harness input to 2D and splitting evenly across 2 GEMMs) so it slots into the existing _test_cuda_graphs harness, then runs the full / individual / none graph modes with fp8_weight_caching=True and asserts the graphed outputs equal the eager reference. That equality only holds when is_first_microbatch is threaded into the weight-update skip tensor on every microbatch — on the pre-fix None hardcode the cached FP8 weights diverge, so the test fails without the change. Parametrized over DelayedScaling + Float8CurrentScaling, both fp8_params settings, and the fp32/fp16 dtypes already used in this file.

One disclosure: I don't have FP8-capable GPU hardware locally, so I verified the test by construction (mirroring test_make_graphed_callables_with_fp8_weight_caching) rather than by running it — it'll need a CI/GPU run to confirm. Happy to adjust the recipe coverage or wrapper approach if you'd prefer it structured differently.

…8 CUDA graph capture
GroupedLinear.forward hardcoded None for skip_fp8_weight_update, so the
FP8 graph-capture skip tensor was never forwarded during CUDA graph
replay. Mirror Linear.forward: when fp8_graph_capturing() is true, read
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor, force is_first_microbatch
to False, and thread the tensor into the forward call (the slot
_GroupedLinear.forward already unpacks).
FixesNVIDIA#3051
Signed-off-by: LeSingh1 <sshaurya914@gmail.com>
Exercises skip_fp8_weight_update propagation in GroupedLinear during FP8
CUDA graph capture. With fp8_weight_caching enabled, graphed and eager
runs only match when is_first_microbatch is threaded into the weight-
update skip tensor for every microbatch, which the prior None hardcode
prevented.
Signed-off-by: LeSingh1 <sshaurya914@gmail.com>
@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch from 31c60f2 to 6c75a8eCompareJune 1, 2026 22:00
@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased onto main to resolve a conflict with #3038 (the GroupedLinear graph-safe refactor). Worth noting: #3038 plumbs skip_fp8_weight_update all the way through _GroupedLinear's autograd function, but the module-level GroupedLinear.forward still passes None, # skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args, so the value never reaches that plumbing during graph capture. This change wires it up the same way Linear.forward does (read the skip tensor from FP8GlobalStateManager.quantization_state when fp8_graph_capturing()). The test from the previous commit comes along with the rebase. Still GPU/CI-only on my end since I don't have FP8 hardware locally.

@ptrendx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/te-ci pytorch

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/te-ci pytorch

@ksivaman
ksivaman merged commit 5fdfbec into NVIDIA:mainJun 10, 2026
11 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

community-contributionPRs from external contributor outside the core maintainers, representing community-driven work.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@LeSingh1@ptrendx@ksivaman
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[PyTorch] Propagate skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear during FP8 CUDA graph capture - #3065

Merged
ksivaman merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
LeSingh1:fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

[PyTorch] Propagate skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear during FP8 CUDA graph capture#3065
ksivaman merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
LeSingh1:fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051

Conversation

@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

GroupedLinear.forward hardcoded None for skip_fp8_weight_update, so the FP8 graph-capture skip tensor was never forwarded during CUDA graph replay — the bug reported in #3051. Linear.forward handles this correctly: when FP8GlobalStateManager.fp8_graph_capturing() is true it reads quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor, forces is_first_microbatch = False, and threads the tensor into its forward args. GroupedLinear omitted that retrieval block and passed a literal None, even though the autograd _GroupedLinear.forward already unpacks and uses the flag (quantize_weight(..., skip_update_flag=skip_fp8_weight_update)).

Fix

Mirror the Linear reference path in GroupedLinear.forward: add the same fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block and thread skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args (positionally aligned with the existing autograd unpack). FP8GlobalStateManager is already imported in the module.

Verification status

Runtime-unverified — developed without a CUDA GPU, so the FP8 / CUDA-graph numerics and the Nemotron-MoE gradient-suppression reproducer were not run. The change is a near-mechanical parity fix against the established Linear path (same accessor, same is_first_microbatch forcing, same threading), and the positional unpack lines up with _GroupedLinear.forward. A GPU regression test (comparing GroupedLinear FP8 grads under graph-replay-active vs delayed) belongs alongside the existing CUDA-graph tests but can't run on this platform — I'd ask a maintainer with a GPU to confirm numerics before merge, and I'm happy to add the test.

Developed with AI assistance.

Addresses #3051

@LeSingh1
LeSingh1 requested a review from ksivaman as a code ownerMay 31, 2026 23:21
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the community-contribution PRs from external contributor outside the core maintainers, representing community-driven work. label May 31, 2026
@greptile-apps

greptile-appsBot commented May 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Greptile Summary

This PR fixes the missing propagation of skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear.forward during FP8 CUDA graph capture, mirroring the pattern already used in Linear.forward. A dedicated regression test is added to verify that graphed and non-graphed FP8 runs produce identical outputs with weight caching enabled.

  • Core fix (grouped_linear.py): Inserts an fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block before m_splits validation to set skip_fp8_weight_update and force is_first_microbatch = False during CUDA graph replay — the same pattern used by Linear.
  • New test (test_cuda_graphs.py): Adds _GroupedLinearWrapper to adapt the 3-D test harness, a new grouped_linear branch in _test_cuda_graphs, and a dedicated parametrized test that asserts graphed outputs match eager outputs under both DelayedScaling and Float8CurrentScaling recipes.

Confidence Score: 5/5

Safe to merge after resolving the duplicate fp8_graph_capturing() block; the fix itself is correct and the new test exercises the right code path.

The fix correctly mirrors Linear.forward and threads skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args, verified by the new regression test. The only issue is a redundant duplicate of the same retrieval block that was independently introduced into main before the PR was merged — both blocks compute identical values, so there is no incorrect behavior. The test logic is sound for the given model config.

transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.py — contains the duplicate retrieval block at lines 1687–1694 and 1708–1715 that should be reduced to one.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.pyAdds fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block before m_splits processing; identical block already existed after m_splits in the base branch, leaving both in the file as redundant duplicates
tests/pytorch/test_cuda_graphs.pyAdds _GroupedLinearWrapper, grouped_linear branch in _test_cuda_graphs, and a focused parametrized regression test; model config produces 64 total tokens (divisible by num_gemms=2) so the assertion holds

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
A[GroupedLinear.forward called] --> B{fp8_graph_capturing?}
B -- Yes --> C[skip_fp8_weight_update =
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor]
B -- No --> D[skip_fp8_weight_update = None]
C --> E{skip_fp8_weight_update
is not None?}
D --> E
E -- Yes --> F[is_first_microbatch = False]
E -- No --> G[is_first_microbatch unchanged]
F --> H[Validate m_splits]
G --> H
H --> I{fp8_graph_capturing?
⚠️ Duplicate block}
I -- Yes --> J[skip_fp8_weight_update =
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor]
I -- No --> K[skip_fp8_weight_update = None]
J --> L{skip_fp8_weight_update
is not None?}
K --> L
L -- Yes --> M[is_first_microbatch = False again]
L -- No --> N[is_first_microbatch unchanged]
M --> O[Build non_tensor_args with skip_fp8_weight_update]
N --> O
O --> P[_GroupedLinear.apply / forward]
style I fill:#ffcccc
style J fill:#ffcccc
style K fill:#ffcccc
style L fill:#ffcccc
style M fill:#ffcccc
Loading

Reviews (6): Last reviewed commit: "Merge branch 'main' into fix-grouped-lin..." | Re-trigger Greptile

@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch 2 times, most recently from 852029a to f8e5daaCompareJune 1, 2026 05:43
@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch from f8e5daa to 70d505eCompareJune 1, 2026 05:46
@jberchtold-nvidia
jberchtold-nvidia removed their request for review June 1, 2026 15:37
@ptrendx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@LeSingh1 Could you add the test that would exercise this functionality?

@ptrendxptrendx self-assigned this Jun 1, 2026
@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@ptrendx Added a test in tests/pytorch/test_cuda_graphs.py: test_make_graphed_callables_grouped_linear_with_fp8_weight_caching.

It wraps GroupedLinear (flattening the [seqlen, batch, hidden] harness input to 2D and splitting evenly across 2 GEMMs) so it slots into the existing _test_cuda_graphs harness, then runs the full / individual / none graph modes with fp8_weight_caching=True and asserts the graphed outputs equal the eager reference. That equality only holds when is_first_microbatch is threaded into the weight-update skip tensor on every microbatch — on the pre-fix None hardcode the cached FP8 weights diverge, so the test fails without the change. Parametrized over DelayedScaling + Float8CurrentScaling, both fp8_params settings, and the fp32/fp16 dtypes already used in this file.

One disclosure: I don't have FP8-capable GPU hardware locally, so I verified the test by construction (mirroring test_make_graphed_callables_with_fp8_weight_caching) rather than by running it — it'll need a CI/GPU run to confirm. Happy to adjust the recipe coverage or wrapper approach if you'd prefer it structured differently.

…8 CUDA graph capture
GroupedLinear.forward hardcoded None for skip_fp8_weight_update, so the
FP8 graph-capture skip tensor was never forwarded during CUDA graph
replay. Mirror Linear.forward: when fp8_graph_capturing() is true, read
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor, force is_first_microbatch
to False, and thread the tensor into the forward call (the slot
_GroupedLinear.forward already unpacks).
FixesNVIDIA#3051
Signed-off-by: LeSingh1 <sshaurya914@gmail.com>
Exercises skip_fp8_weight_update propagation in GroupedLinear during FP8
CUDA graph capture. With fp8_weight_caching enabled, graphed and eager
runs only match when is_first_microbatch is threaded into the weight-
update skip tensor for every microbatch, which the prior None hardcode
prevented.
Signed-off-by: LeSingh1 <sshaurya914@gmail.com>
@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch from 31c60f2 to 6c75a8eCompareJune 1, 2026 22:00
@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased onto main to resolve a conflict with #3038 (the GroupedLinear graph-safe refactor). Worth noting: #3038 plumbs skip_fp8_weight_update all the way through _GroupedLinear's autograd function, but the module-level GroupedLinear.forward still passes None, # skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args, so the value never reaches that plumbing during graph capture. This change wires it up the same way Linear.forward does (read the skip tensor from FP8GlobalStateManager.quantization_state when fp8_graph_capturing()). The test from the previous commit comes along with the rebase. Still GPU/CI-only on my end since I don't have FP8 hardware locally.

@ptrendx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/te-ci pytorch

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/te-ci pytorch

@ksivaman
ksivaman merged commit 5fdfbec into NVIDIA:mainJun 10, 2026
11 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

community-contributionPRs from external contributor outside the core maintainers, representing community-driven work.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@LeSingh1@ptrendx@ksivaman
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[PyTorch] Propagate skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear during FP8 CUDA graph capture - #3065

Merged
ksivaman merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
LeSingh1:fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

[PyTorch] Propagate skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear during FP8 CUDA graph capture#3065
ksivaman merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
LeSingh1:fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051

Conversation

@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

GroupedLinear.forward hardcoded None for skip_fp8_weight_update, so the FP8 graph-capture skip tensor was never forwarded during CUDA graph replay — the bug reported in #3051. Linear.forward handles this correctly: when FP8GlobalStateManager.fp8_graph_capturing() is true it reads quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor, forces is_first_microbatch = False, and threads the tensor into its forward args. GroupedLinear omitted that retrieval block and passed a literal None, even though the autograd _GroupedLinear.forward already unpacks and uses the flag (quantize_weight(..., skip_update_flag=skip_fp8_weight_update)).

Fix

Mirror the Linear reference path in GroupedLinear.forward: add the same fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block and thread skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args (positionally aligned with the existing autograd unpack). FP8GlobalStateManager is already imported in the module.

Verification status

Runtime-unverified — developed without a CUDA GPU, so the FP8 / CUDA-graph numerics and the Nemotron-MoE gradient-suppression reproducer were not run. The change is a near-mechanical parity fix against the established Linear path (same accessor, same is_first_microbatch forcing, same threading), and the positional unpack lines up with _GroupedLinear.forward. A GPU regression test (comparing GroupedLinear FP8 grads under graph-replay-active vs delayed) belongs alongside the existing CUDA-graph tests but can't run on this platform — I'd ask a maintainer with a GPU to confirm numerics before merge, and I'm happy to add the test.

Developed with AI assistance.

Addresses #3051

@LeSingh1
LeSingh1 requested a review from ksivaman as a code ownerMay 31, 2026 23:21
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the community-contribution PRs from external contributor outside the core maintainers, representing community-driven work. label May 31, 2026
@greptile-apps

greptile-appsBot commented May 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Greptile Summary

This PR fixes the missing propagation of skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear.forward during FP8 CUDA graph capture, mirroring the pattern already used in Linear.forward. A dedicated regression test is added to verify that graphed and non-graphed FP8 runs produce identical outputs with weight caching enabled.

  • Core fix (grouped_linear.py): Inserts an fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block before m_splits validation to set skip_fp8_weight_update and force is_first_microbatch = False during CUDA graph replay — the same pattern used by Linear.
  • New test (test_cuda_graphs.py): Adds _GroupedLinearWrapper to adapt the 3-D test harness, a new grouped_linear branch in _test_cuda_graphs, and a dedicated parametrized test that asserts graphed outputs match eager outputs under both DelayedScaling and Float8CurrentScaling recipes.

Confidence Score: 5/5

Safe to merge after resolving the duplicate fp8_graph_capturing() block; the fix itself is correct and the new test exercises the right code path.

The fix correctly mirrors Linear.forward and threads skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args, verified by the new regression test. The only issue is a redundant duplicate of the same retrieval block that was independently introduced into main before the PR was merged — both blocks compute identical values, so there is no incorrect behavior. The test logic is sound for the given model config.

transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.py — contains the duplicate retrieval block at lines 1687–1694 and 1708–1715 that should be reduced to one.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.pyAdds fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block before m_splits processing; identical block already existed after m_splits in the base branch, leaving both in the file as redundant duplicates
tests/pytorch/test_cuda_graphs.pyAdds _GroupedLinearWrapper, grouped_linear branch in _test_cuda_graphs, and a focused parametrized regression test; model config produces 64 total tokens (divisible by num_gemms=2) so the assertion holds

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
A[GroupedLinear.forward called] --> B{fp8_graph_capturing?}
B -- Yes --> C[skip_fp8_weight_update =
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor]
B -- No --> D[skip_fp8_weight_update = None]
C --> E{skip_fp8_weight_update
is not None?}
D --> E
E -- Yes --> F[is_first_microbatch = False]
E -- No --> G[is_first_microbatch unchanged]
F --> H[Validate m_splits]
G --> H
H --> I{fp8_graph_capturing?
⚠️ Duplicate block}
I -- Yes --> J[skip_fp8_weight_update =
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor]
I -- No --> K[skip_fp8_weight_update = None]
J --> L{skip_fp8_weight_update
is not None?}
K --> L
L -- Yes --> M[is_first_microbatch = False again]
L -- No --> N[is_first_microbatch unchanged]
M --> O[Build non_tensor_args with skip_fp8_weight_update]
N --> O
O --> P[_GroupedLinear.apply / forward]
style I fill:#ffcccc
style J fill:#ffcccc
style K fill:#ffcccc
style L fill:#ffcccc
style M fill:#ffcccc
Loading

Reviews (6): Last reviewed commit: "Merge branch 'main' into fix-grouped-lin..." | Re-trigger Greptile

@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch 2 times, most recently from 852029a to f8e5daaCompareJune 1, 2026 05:43
@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch from f8e5daa to 70d505eCompareJune 1, 2026 05:46
@jberchtold-nvidia
jberchtold-nvidia removed their request for review June 1, 2026 15:37
@ptrendx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@LeSingh1 Could you add the test that would exercise this functionality?

@ptrendxptrendx self-assigned this Jun 1, 2026
@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@ptrendx Added a test in tests/pytorch/test_cuda_graphs.py: test_make_graphed_callables_grouped_linear_with_fp8_weight_caching.

It wraps GroupedLinear (flattening the [seqlen, batch, hidden] harness input to 2D and splitting evenly across 2 GEMMs) so it slots into the existing _test_cuda_graphs harness, then runs the full / individual / none graph modes with fp8_weight_caching=True and asserts the graphed outputs equal the eager reference. That equality only holds when is_first_microbatch is threaded into the weight-update skip tensor on every microbatch — on the pre-fix None hardcode the cached FP8 weights diverge, so the test fails without the change. Parametrized over DelayedScaling + Float8CurrentScaling, both fp8_params settings, and the fp32/fp16 dtypes already used in this file.

One disclosure: I don't have FP8-capable GPU hardware locally, so I verified the test by construction (mirroring test_make_graphed_callables_with_fp8_weight_caching) rather than by running it — it'll need a CI/GPU run to confirm. Happy to adjust the recipe coverage or wrapper approach if you'd prefer it structured differently.

…8 CUDA graph capture
GroupedLinear.forward hardcoded None for skip_fp8_weight_update, so the
FP8 graph-capture skip tensor was never forwarded during CUDA graph
replay. Mirror Linear.forward: when fp8_graph_capturing() is true, read
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor, force is_first_microbatch
to False, and thread the tensor into the forward call (the slot
_GroupedLinear.forward already unpacks).
FixesNVIDIA#3051
Signed-off-by: LeSingh1 <sshaurya914@gmail.com>
Exercises skip_fp8_weight_update propagation in GroupedLinear during FP8
CUDA graph capture. With fp8_weight_caching enabled, graphed and eager
runs only match when is_first_microbatch is threaded into the weight-
update skip tensor for every microbatch, which the prior None hardcode
prevented.
Signed-off-by: LeSingh1 <sshaurya914@gmail.com>
@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch from 31c60f2 to 6c75a8eCompareJune 1, 2026 22:00
@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased onto main to resolve a conflict with #3038 (the GroupedLinear graph-safe refactor). Worth noting: #3038 plumbs skip_fp8_weight_update all the way through _GroupedLinear's autograd function, but the module-level GroupedLinear.forward still passes None, # skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args, so the value never reaches that plumbing during graph capture. This change wires it up the same way Linear.forward does (read the skip tensor from FP8GlobalStateManager.quantization_state when fp8_graph_capturing()). The test from the previous commit comes along with the rebase. Still GPU/CI-only on my end since I don't have FP8 hardware locally.

@ptrendx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/te-ci pytorch

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/te-ci pytorch

@ksivaman
ksivaman merged commit 5fdfbec into NVIDIA:mainJun 10, 2026
11 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

community-contributionPRs from external contributor outside the core maintainers, representing community-driven work.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@LeSingh1@ptrendx@ksivaman
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[PyTorch] Propagate skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear during FP8 CUDA graph capture - #3065

Merged
ksivaman merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
LeSingh1:fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

[PyTorch] Propagate skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear during FP8 CUDA graph capture#3065
ksivaman merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
LeSingh1:fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051

Conversation

@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

GroupedLinear.forward hardcoded None for skip_fp8_weight_update, so the FP8 graph-capture skip tensor was never forwarded during CUDA graph replay — the bug reported in #3051. Linear.forward handles this correctly: when FP8GlobalStateManager.fp8_graph_capturing() is true it reads quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor, forces is_first_microbatch = False, and threads the tensor into its forward args. GroupedLinear omitted that retrieval block and passed a literal None, even though the autograd _GroupedLinear.forward already unpacks and uses the flag (quantize_weight(..., skip_update_flag=skip_fp8_weight_update)).

Fix

Mirror the Linear reference path in GroupedLinear.forward: add the same fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block and thread skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args (positionally aligned with the existing autograd unpack). FP8GlobalStateManager is already imported in the module.

Verification status

Runtime-unverified — developed without a CUDA GPU, so the FP8 / CUDA-graph numerics and the Nemotron-MoE gradient-suppression reproducer were not run. The change is a near-mechanical parity fix against the established Linear path (same accessor, same is_first_microbatch forcing, same threading), and the positional unpack lines up with _GroupedLinear.forward. A GPU regression test (comparing GroupedLinear FP8 grads under graph-replay-active vs delayed) belongs alongside the existing CUDA-graph tests but can't run on this platform — I'd ask a maintainer with a GPU to confirm numerics before merge, and I'm happy to add the test.

Developed with AI assistance.

Addresses #3051

@LeSingh1
LeSingh1 requested a review from ksivaman as a code ownerMay 31, 2026 23:21
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the community-contribution PRs from external contributor outside the core maintainers, representing community-driven work. label May 31, 2026
@greptile-apps

greptile-appsBot commented May 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Greptile Summary

This PR fixes the missing propagation of skip_fp8_weight_update in GroupedLinear.forward during FP8 CUDA graph capture, mirroring the pattern already used in Linear.forward. A dedicated regression test is added to verify that graphed and non-graphed FP8 runs produce identical outputs with weight caching enabled.

  • Core fix (grouped_linear.py): Inserts an fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block before m_splits validation to set skip_fp8_weight_update and force is_first_microbatch = False during CUDA graph replay — the same pattern used by Linear.
  • New test (test_cuda_graphs.py): Adds _GroupedLinearWrapper to adapt the 3-D test harness, a new grouped_linear branch in _test_cuda_graphs, and a dedicated parametrized test that asserts graphed outputs match eager outputs under both DelayedScaling and Float8CurrentScaling recipes.

Confidence Score: 5/5

Safe to merge after resolving the duplicate fp8_graph_capturing() block; the fix itself is correct and the new test exercises the right code path.

The fix correctly mirrors Linear.forward and threads skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args, verified by the new regression test. The only issue is a redundant duplicate of the same retrieval block that was independently introduced into main before the PR was merged — both blocks compute identical values, so there is no incorrect behavior. The test logic is sound for the given model config.

transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.py — contains the duplicate retrieval block at lines 1687–1694 and 1708–1715 that should be reduced to one.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.pyAdds fp8_graph_capturing() retrieval block before m_splits processing; identical block already existed after m_splits in the base branch, leaving both in the file as redundant duplicates
tests/pytorch/test_cuda_graphs.pyAdds _GroupedLinearWrapper, grouped_linear branch in _test_cuda_graphs, and a focused parametrized regression test; model config produces 64 total tokens (divisible by num_gemms=2) so the assertion holds

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
A[GroupedLinear.forward called] --> B{fp8_graph_capturing?}
B -- Yes --> C[skip_fp8_weight_update =
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor]
B -- No --> D[skip_fp8_weight_update = None]
C --> E{skip_fp8_weight_update
is not None?}
D --> E
E -- Yes --> F[is_first_microbatch = False]
E -- No --> G[is_first_microbatch unchanged]
F --> H[Validate m_splits]
G --> H
H --> I{fp8_graph_capturing?
⚠️ Duplicate block}
I -- Yes --> J[skip_fp8_weight_update =
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor]
I -- No --> K[skip_fp8_weight_update = None]
J --> L{skip_fp8_weight_update
is not None?}
K --> L
L -- Yes --> M[is_first_microbatch = False again]
L -- No --> N[is_first_microbatch unchanged]
M --> O[Build non_tensor_args with skip_fp8_weight_update]
N --> O
O --> P[_GroupedLinear.apply / forward]
style I fill:#ffcccc
style J fill:#ffcccc
style K fill:#ffcccc
style L fill:#ffcccc
style M fill:#ffcccc
Loading

Reviews (6): Last reviewed commit: "Merge branch 'main' into fix-grouped-lin..." | Re-trigger Greptile

@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch 2 times, most recently from 852029a to f8e5daaCompareJune 1, 2026 05:43
@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch from f8e5daa to 70d505eCompareJune 1, 2026 05:46
@jberchtold-nvidia
jberchtold-nvidia removed their request for review June 1, 2026 15:37
@ptrendx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@LeSingh1 Could you add the test that would exercise this functionality?

@ptrendxptrendx self-assigned this Jun 1, 2026
@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@ptrendx Added a test in tests/pytorch/test_cuda_graphs.py: test_make_graphed_callables_grouped_linear_with_fp8_weight_caching.

It wraps GroupedLinear (flattening the [seqlen, batch, hidden] harness input to 2D and splitting evenly across 2 GEMMs) so it slots into the existing _test_cuda_graphs harness, then runs the full / individual / none graph modes with fp8_weight_caching=True and asserts the graphed outputs equal the eager reference. That equality only holds when is_first_microbatch is threaded into the weight-update skip tensor on every microbatch — on the pre-fix None hardcode the cached FP8 weights diverge, so the test fails without the change. Parametrized over DelayedScaling + Float8CurrentScaling, both fp8_params settings, and the fp32/fp16 dtypes already used in this file.

One disclosure: I don't have FP8-capable GPU hardware locally, so I verified the test by construction (mirroring test_make_graphed_callables_with_fp8_weight_caching) rather than by running it — it'll need a CI/GPU run to confirm. Happy to adjust the recipe coverage or wrapper approach if you'd prefer it structured differently.

…8 CUDA graph capture
GroupedLinear.forward hardcoded None for skip_fp8_weight_update, so the
FP8 graph-capture skip tensor was never forwarded during CUDA graph
replay. Mirror Linear.forward: when fp8_graph_capturing() is true, read
quantization_state.skip_fp8_weight_update_tensor, force is_first_microbatch
to False, and thread the tensor into the forward call (the slot
_GroupedLinear.forward already unpacks).
FixesNVIDIA#3051
Signed-off-by: LeSingh1 <sshaurya914@gmail.com>
Exercises skip_fp8_weight_update propagation in GroupedLinear during FP8
CUDA graph capture. With fp8_weight_caching enabled, graphed and eager
runs only match when is_first_microbatch is threaded into the weight-
update skip tensor for every microbatch, which the prior None hardcode
prevented.
Signed-off-by: LeSingh1 <sshaurya914@gmail.com>
@LeSingh1
LeSingh1force-pushed the fix-grouped-linear-skip-fp8-weight-update-3051 branch from 31c60f2 to 6c75a8eCompareJune 1, 2026 22:00
@LeSingh1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased onto main to resolve a conflict with #3038 (the GroupedLinear graph-safe refactor). Worth noting: #3038 plumbs skip_fp8_weight_update all the way through _GroupedLinear's autograd function, but the module-level GroupedLinear.forward still passes None, # skip_fp8_weight_update into non_tensor_args, so the value never reaches that plumbing during graph capture. This change wires it up the same way Linear.forward does (read the skip tensor from FP8GlobalStateManager.quantization_state when fp8_graph_capturing()). The test from the previous commit comes along with the rebase. Still GPU/CI-only on my end since I don't have FP8 hardware locally.

@ptrendx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/te-ci pytorch

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/te-ci pytorch

@ksivaman
ksivaman merged commit 5fdfbec into NVIDIA:mainJun 10, 2026
11 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

community-contributionPRs from external contributor outside the core maintainers, representing community-driven work.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@LeSingh1@ptrendx@ksivaman