Raise autocast usage error - #93

Merged
ksivaman merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
ksivaman:raise_autocast_usage_error
Mar 13, 2023
Merged

Raise autocast usage error#93
ksivaman merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
ksivaman:raise_autocast_usage_error

Conversation

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Without this change, the following use case errors out with a not very helpful message,

import torch
import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
model = te.Linear(512, 512)
inp = torch.rand((128, 512), device="cuda")
epochs = 5
def train():
# Incorrect usage: model is being run with fp8 multiple times
# under same autocast region with amax reduction turned on.
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True):
for _ in range(epochs):
activation = model(inp)
train()
train() # Error!

This PR fixes this case and catches the error the first time train() is called in the above script. The "correct" usage is below:

import torch
import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
model = te.Linear(512, 512)
inp = torch.rand((128, 512), device="cuda")
epochs = 5
def train():
for _ in range(epochs):
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True):
activation = model(inp)
train()
train()

Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
@ksivaman
ksivaman requested a review from ptrendxMarch 11, 2023 00:50
@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/te-ci

@ksivaman
ksivaman requested a review from timmoon10March 13, 2023 16:48

@timmoon10timmoon10 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

For my own understanding, we expect this assert error to trigger if we perform multiple forward or backward passes within an FP8, or if we perform a partial forward or backward pass within an FP8 context (e.g. if we've frozen most of the model to finetune a specific section) (edit: partial forward or backward passes should run fine). It should run fine if the number of forward and backward passes don't match.

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We don't want to run any portion of the model twice under the same autocast call when using amax reduction with FP8 training

@ksivaman
ksivaman merged commit 6605597 into NVIDIA:mainMar 13, 2023
nzmora-nvidia pushed a commit to nzmora-nvidia/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
cyanguwa pushed a commit to cyanguwa/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Yang <charleney@nvidia.com>
cyanguwa pushed a commit to cyanguwa/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Yang <charleney@nvidia.com>
@erlebach

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following code give the error:
AssertionError: Same module is being invoked more than once inside an `fp8_autocast` region when using FP8 with amax reduction. This behavior is currently unsupported. For more details and correct usage, please see https://github.com/NVIDIA/TransformerEngine/pull/93.

Here is the Python code:

import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
from transformer_engine.common.recipe import Format, DelayedScaling
fp8_format = Format.HYBRID # E4M3 during forward pass, E5M2 during backward pass
fp8_recipe = DelayedScaling(fp8_format=fp8_format, amax_history_len=16, amax_compute_algo="max")
import torch
device = torch.device('cuda' if torch.cuda.is_available() else 'cpu')
device = torch.device("cuda:0")
torch.manual_seed(12345)
my_linear = te.Linear(768, 768, bias=True).to(device)
inp = torch.rand((1024, 768)).to(device)
#inp = torch.rand((1024, 768)).cuda()
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True, fp8_recipe=fp8_recipe):
out_fp8 = my_linear(inp)
loss_fp8 = out_fp8.mean()
loss_fp8.backward() # This backward pass uses FP8, since out_fp8 was calculated inside fp8_autocast
out_fp32 = my_linear(inp)

The code runs fine without the last line. Since the last line runs outside the fp8_autocast why would this error occur?

Thanks for any insight. I am running with CUDA 11.8 for this library and CUDA 12.0 on the H100.

@ksivamanksivaman mentioned this pull request Apr 30, 2023
@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@erlebach This was a bug that was now been fixed in main (#187).

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ksivaman@erlebach@timmoon10
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Raise autocast usage error - #93

Merged
ksivaman merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
ksivaman:raise_autocast_usage_error
Mar 13, 2023
Merged

Raise autocast usage error#93
ksivaman merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
ksivaman:raise_autocast_usage_error

Conversation

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Without this change, the following use case errors out with a not very helpful message,

import torch
import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
model = te.Linear(512, 512)
inp = torch.rand((128, 512), device="cuda")
epochs = 5
def train():
# Incorrect usage: model is being run with fp8 multiple times
# under same autocast region with amax reduction turned on.
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True):
for _ in range(epochs):
activation = model(inp)
train()
train() # Error!

This PR fixes this case and catches the error the first time train() is called in the above script. The "correct" usage is below:

import torch
import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
model = te.Linear(512, 512)
inp = torch.rand((128, 512), device="cuda")
epochs = 5
def train():
for _ in range(epochs):
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True):
activation = model(inp)
train()
train()

Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
@ksivaman
ksivaman requested a review from ptrendxMarch 11, 2023 00:50
@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/te-ci

@ksivaman
ksivaman requested a review from timmoon10March 13, 2023 16:48

@timmoon10timmoon10 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

For my own understanding, we expect this assert error to trigger if we perform multiple forward or backward passes within an FP8, or if we perform a partial forward or backward pass within an FP8 context (e.g. if we've frozen most of the model to finetune a specific section) (edit: partial forward or backward passes should run fine). It should run fine if the number of forward and backward passes don't match.

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We don't want to run any portion of the model twice under the same autocast call when using amax reduction with FP8 training

@ksivaman
ksivaman merged commit 6605597 into NVIDIA:mainMar 13, 2023
nzmora-nvidia pushed a commit to nzmora-nvidia/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
cyanguwa pushed a commit to cyanguwa/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Yang <charleney@nvidia.com>
cyanguwa pushed a commit to cyanguwa/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Yang <charleney@nvidia.com>
@erlebach

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following code give the error:
AssertionError: Same module is being invoked more than once inside an `fp8_autocast` region when using FP8 with amax reduction. This behavior is currently unsupported. For more details and correct usage, please see https://github.com/NVIDIA/TransformerEngine/pull/93.

Here is the Python code:

import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
from transformer_engine.common.recipe import Format, DelayedScaling
fp8_format = Format.HYBRID # E4M3 during forward pass, E5M2 during backward pass
fp8_recipe = DelayedScaling(fp8_format=fp8_format, amax_history_len=16, amax_compute_algo="max")
import torch
device = torch.device('cuda' if torch.cuda.is_available() else 'cpu')
device = torch.device("cuda:0")
torch.manual_seed(12345)
my_linear = te.Linear(768, 768, bias=True).to(device)
inp = torch.rand((1024, 768)).to(device)
#inp = torch.rand((1024, 768)).cuda()
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True, fp8_recipe=fp8_recipe):
out_fp8 = my_linear(inp)
loss_fp8 = out_fp8.mean()
loss_fp8.backward() # This backward pass uses FP8, since out_fp8 was calculated inside fp8_autocast
out_fp32 = my_linear(inp)

The code runs fine without the last line. Since the last line runs outside the fp8_autocast why would this error occur?

Thanks for any insight. I am running with CUDA 11.8 for this library and CUDA 12.0 on the H100.

@ksivamanksivaman mentioned this pull request Apr 30, 2023
@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@erlebach This was a bug that was now been fixed in main (#187).

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ksivaman@erlebach@timmoon10
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Raise autocast usage error - #93

Merged
ksivaman merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
ksivaman:raise_autocast_usage_error
Mar 13, 2023
Merged

Raise autocast usage error#93
ksivaman merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
ksivaman:raise_autocast_usage_error

Conversation

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Without this change, the following use case errors out with a not very helpful message,

import torch
import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
model = te.Linear(512, 512)
inp = torch.rand((128, 512), device="cuda")
epochs = 5
def train():
# Incorrect usage: model is being run with fp8 multiple times
# under same autocast region with amax reduction turned on.
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True):
for _ in range(epochs):
activation = model(inp)
train()
train() # Error!

This PR fixes this case and catches the error the first time train() is called in the above script. The "correct" usage is below:

import torch
import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
model = te.Linear(512, 512)
inp = torch.rand((128, 512), device="cuda")
epochs = 5
def train():
for _ in range(epochs):
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True):
activation = model(inp)
train()
train()

Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
@ksivaman
ksivaman requested a review from ptrendxMarch 11, 2023 00:50
@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/te-ci

@ksivaman
ksivaman requested a review from timmoon10March 13, 2023 16:48

@timmoon10timmoon10 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

For my own understanding, we expect this assert error to trigger if we perform multiple forward or backward passes within an FP8, or if we perform a partial forward or backward pass within an FP8 context (e.g. if we've frozen most of the model to finetune a specific section) (edit: partial forward or backward passes should run fine). It should run fine if the number of forward and backward passes don't match.

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We don't want to run any portion of the model twice under the same autocast call when using amax reduction with FP8 training

@ksivaman
ksivaman merged commit 6605597 into NVIDIA:mainMar 13, 2023
nzmora-nvidia pushed a commit to nzmora-nvidia/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
cyanguwa pushed a commit to cyanguwa/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Yang <charleney@nvidia.com>
cyanguwa pushed a commit to cyanguwa/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Yang <charleney@nvidia.com>
@erlebach

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following code give the error:
AssertionError: Same module is being invoked more than once inside an `fp8_autocast` region when using FP8 with amax reduction. This behavior is currently unsupported. For more details and correct usage, please see https://github.com/NVIDIA/TransformerEngine/pull/93.

Here is the Python code:

import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
from transformer_engine.common.recipe import Format, DelayedScaling
fp8_format = Format.HYBRID # E4M3 during forward pass, E5M2 during backward pass
fp8_recipe = DelayedScaling(fp8_format=fp8_format, amax_history_len=16, amax_compute_algo="max")
import torch
device = torch.device('cuda' if torch.cuda.is_available() else 'cpu')
device = torch.device("cuda:0")
torch.manual_seed(12345)
my_linear = te.Linear(768, 768, bias=True).to(device)
inp = torch.rand((1024, 768)).to(device)
#inp = torch.rand((1024, 768)).cuda()
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True, fp8_recipe=fp8_recipe):
out_fp8 = my_linear(inp)
loss_fp8 = out_fp8.mean()
loss_fp8.backward() # This backward pass uses FP8, since out_fp8 was calculated inside fp8_autocast
out_fp32 = my_linear(inp)

The code runs fine without the last line. Since the last line runs outside the fp8_autocast why would this error occur?

Thanks for any insight. I am running with CUDA 11.8 for this library and CUDA 12.0 on the H100.

@ksivamanksivaman mentioned this pull request Apr 30, 2023
@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@erlebach This was a bug that was now been fixed in main (#187).

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ksivaman@erlebach@timmoon10
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Raise autocast usage error - #93

Merged
ksivaman merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
ksivaman:raise_autocast_usage_error
Mar 13, 2023
Merged

Raise autocast usage error#93
ksivaman merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
ksivaman:raise_autocast_usage_error

Conversation

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Without this change, the following use case errors out with a not very helpful message,

import torch
import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
model = te.Linear(512, 512)
inp = torch.rand((128, 512), device="cuda")
epochs = 5
def train():
# Incorrect usage: model is being run with fp8 multiple times
# under same autocast region with amax reduction turned on.
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True):
for _ in range(epochs):
activation = model(inp)
train()
train() # Error!

This PR fixes this case and catches the error the first time train() is called in the above script. The "correct" usage is below:

import torch
import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
model = te.Linear(512, 512)
inp = torch.rand((128, 512), device="cuda")
epochs = 5
def train():
for _ in range(epochs):
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True):
activation = model(inp)
train()
train()

Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
@ksivaman
ksivaman requested a review from ptrendxMarch 11, 2023 00:50
@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/te-ci

@ksivaman
ksivaman requested a review from timmoon10March 13, 2023 16:48

@timmoon10timmoon10 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

For my own understanding, we expect this assert error to trigger if we perform multiple forward or backward passes within an FP8, or if we perform a partial forward or backward pass within an FP8 context (e.g. if we've frozen most of the model to finetune a specific section) (edit: partial forward or backward passes should run fine). It should run fine if the number of forward and backward passes don't match.

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We don't want to run any portion of the model twice under the same autocast call when using amax reduction with FP8 training

@ksivaman
ksivaman merged commit 6605597 into NVIDIA:mainMar 13, 2023
nzmora-nvidia pushed a commit to nzmora-nvidia/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
cyanguwa pushed a commit to cyanguwa/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Yang <charleney@nvidia.com>
cyanguwa pushed a commit to cyanguwa/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Yang <charleney@nvidia.com>
@erlebach

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following code give the error:
AssertionError: Same module is being invoked more than once inside an `fp8_autocast` region when using FP8 with amax reduction. This behavior is currently unsupported. For more details and correct usage, please see https://github.com/NVIDIA/TransformerEngine/pull/93.

Here is the Python code:

import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
from transformer_engine.common.recipe import Format, DelayedScaling
fp8_format = Format.HYBRID # E4M3 during forward pass, E5M2 during backward pass
fp8_recipe = DelayedScaling(fp8_format=fp8_format, amax_history_len=16, amax_compute_algo="max")
import torch
device = torch.device('cuda' if torch.cuda.is_available() else 'cpu')
device = torch.device("cuda:0")
torch.manual_seed(12345)
my_linear = te.Linear(768, 768, bias=True).to(device)
inp = torch.rand((1024, 768)).to(device)
#inp = torch.rand((1024, 768)).cuda()
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True, fp8_recipe=fp8_recipe):
out_fp8 = my_linear(inp)
loss_fp8 = out_fp8.mean()
loss_fp8.backward() # This backward pass uses FP8, since out_fp8 was calculated inside fp8_autocast
out_fp32 = my_linear(inp)

The code runs fine without the last line. Since the last line runs outside the fp8_autocast why would this error occur?

Thanks for any insight. I am running with CUDA 11.8 for this library and CUDA 12.0 on the H100.

@ksivamanksivaman mentioned this pull request Apr 30, 2023
@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@erlebach This was a bug that was now been fixed in main (#187).

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ksivaman@erlebach@timmoon10
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Raise autocast usage error - #93

Merged
ksivaman merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
ksivaman:raise_autocast_usage_error
Mar 13, 2023
Merged

Raise autocast usage error#93
ksivaman merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
ksivaman:raise_autocast_usage_error

Conversation

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Without this change, the following use case errors out with a not very helpful message,

import torch
import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
model = te.Linear(512, 512)
inp = torch.rand((128, 512), device="cuda")
epochs = 5
def train():
# Incorrect usage: model is being run with fp8 multiple times
# under same autocast region with amax reduction turned on.
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True):
for _ in range(epochs):
activation = model(inp)
train()
train() # Error!

This PR fixes this case and catches the error the first time train() is called in the above script. The "correct" usage is below:

import torch
import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
model = te.Linear(512, 512)
inp = torch.rand((128, 512), device="cuda")
epochs = 5
def train():
for _ in range(epochs):
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True):
activation = model(inp)
train()
train()

Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
@ksivaman
ksivaman requested a review from ptrendxMarch 11, 2023 00:50
@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/te-ci

@ksivaman
ksivaman requested a review from timmoon10March 13, 2023 16:48

@timmoon10timmoon10 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

For my own understanding, we expect this assert error to trigger if we perform multiple forward or backward passes within an FP8, or if we perform a partial forward or backward pass within an FP8 context (e.g. if we've frozen most of the model to finetune a specific section) (edit: partial forward or backward passes should run fine). It should run fine if the number of forward and backward passes don't match.

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We don't want to run any portion of the model twice under the same autocast call when using amax reduction with FP8 training

@ksivaman
ksivaman merged commit 6605597 into NVIDIA:mainMar 13, 2023
nzmora-nvidia pushed a commit to nzmora-nvidia/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
cyanguwa pushed a commit to cyanguwa/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Yang <charleney@nvidia.com>
cyanguwa pushed a commit to cyanguwa/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Yang <charleney@nvidia.com>
@erlebach

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following code give the error:
AssertionError: Same module is being invoked more than once inside an `fp8_autocast` region when using FP8 with amax reduction. This behavior is currently unsupported. For more details and correct usage, please see https://github.com/NVIDIA/TransformerEngine/pull/93.

Here is the Python code:

import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
from transformer_engine.common.recipe import Format, DelayedScaling
fp8_format = Format.HYBRID # E4M3 during forward pass, E5M2 during backward pass
fp8_recipe = DelayedScaling(fp8_format=fp8_format, amax_history_len=16, amax_compute_algo="max")
import torch
device = torch.device('cuda' if torch.cuda.is_available() else 'cpu')
device = torch.device("cuda:0")
torch.manual_seed(12345)
my_linear = te.Linear(768, 768, bias=True).to(device)
inp = torch.rand((1024, 768)).to(device)
#inp = torch.rand((1024, 768)).cuda()
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True, fp8_recipe=fp8_recipe):
out_fp8 = my_linear(inp)
loss_fp8 = out_fp8.mean()
loss_fp8.backward() # This backward pass uses FP8, since out_fp8 was calculated inside fp8_autocast
out_fp32 = my_linear(inp)

The code runs fine without the last line. Since the last line runs outside the fp8_autocast why would this error occur?

Thanks for any insight. I am running with CUDA 11.8 for this library and CUDA 12.0 on the H100.

@ksivamanksivaman mentioned this pull request Apr 30, 2023
@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@erlebach This was a bug that was now been fixed in main (#187).

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ksivaman@erlebach@timmoon10
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Raise autocast usage error - #93

Merged
ksivaman merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
ksivaman:raise_autocast_usage_error
Mar 13, 2023
Merged

Raise autocast usage error#93
ksivaman merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
ksivaman:raise_autocast_usage_error

Conversation

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Without this change, the following use case errors out with a not very helpful message,

import torch
import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
model = te.Linear(512, 512)
inp = torch.rand((128, 512), device="cuda")
epochs = 5
def train():
# Incorrect usage: model is being run with fp8 multiple times
# under same autocast region with amax reduction turned on.
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True):
for _ in range(epochs):
activation = model(inp)
train()
train() # Error!

This PR fixes this case and catches the error the first time train() is called in the above script. The "correct" usage is below:

import torch
import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
model = te.Linear(512, 512)
inp = torch.rand((128, 512), device="cuda")
epochs = 5
def train():
for _ in range(epochs):
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True):
activation = model(inp)
train()
train()

Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
@ksivaman
ksivaman requested a review from ptrendxMarch 11, 2023 00:50
@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/te-ci

@ksivaman
ksivaman requested a review from timmoon10March 13, 2023 16:48

@timmoon10timmoon10 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

For my own understanding, we expect this assert error to trigger if we perform multiple forward or backward passes within an FP8, or if we perform a partial forward or backward pass within an FP8 context (e.g. if we've frozen most of the model to finetune a specific section) (edit: partial forward or backward passes should run fine). It should run fine if the number of forward and backward passes don't match.

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We don't want to run any portion of the model twice under the same autocast call when using amax reduction with FP8 training

@ksivaman
ksivaman merged commit 6605597 into NVIDIA:mainMar 13, 2023
nzmora-nvidia pushed a commit to nzmora-nvidia/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
cyanguwa pushed a commit to cyanguwa/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Yang <charleney@nvidia.com>
cyanguwa pushed a commit to cyanguwa/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Yang <charleney@nvidia.com>
@erlebach

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following code give the error:
AssertionError: Same module is being invoked more than once inside an `fp8_autocast` region when using FP8 with amax reduction. This behavior is currently unsupported. For more details and correct usage, please see https://github.com/NVIDIA/TransformerEngine/pull/93.

Here is the Python code:

import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
from transformer_engine.common.recipe import Format, DelayedScaling
fp8_format = Format.HYBRID # E4M3 during forward pass, E5M2 during backward pass
fp8_recipe = DelayedScaling(fp8_format=fp8_format, amax_history_len=16, amax_compute_algo="max")
import torch
device = torch.device('cuda' if torch.cuda.is_available() else 'cpu')
device = torch.device("cuda:0")
torch.manual_seed(12345)
my_linear = te.Linear(768, 768, bias=True).to(device)
inp = torch.rand((1024, 768)).to(device)
#inp = torch.rand((1024, 768)).cuda()
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True, fp8_recipe=fp8_recipe):
out_fp8 = my_linear(inp)
loss_fp8 = out_fp8.mean()
loss_fp8.backward() # This backward pass uses FP8, since out_fp8 was calculated inside fp8_autocast
out_fp32 = my_linear(inp)

The code runs fine without the last line. Since the last line runs outside the fp8_autocast why would this error occur?

Thanks for any insight. I am running with CUDA 11.8 for this library and CUDA 12.0 on the H100.

@ksivamanksivaman mentioned this pull request Apr 30, 2023
@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@erlebach This was a bug that was now been fixed in main (#187).

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ksivaman@erlebach@timmoon10
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Raise autocast usage error - #93

Merged
ksivaman merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
ksivaman:raise_autocast_usage_error
Mar 13, 2023
Merged

Raise autocast usage error#93
ksivaman merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
ksivaman:raise_autocast_usage_error

Conversation

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Without this change, the following use case errors out with a not very helpful message,

import torch
import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
model = te.Linear(512, 512)
inp = torch.rand((128, 512), device="cuda")
epochs = 5
def train():
# Incorrect usage: model is being run with fp8 multiple times
# under same autocast region with amax reduction turned on.
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True):
for _ in range(epochs):
activation = model(inp)
train()
train() # Error!

This PR fixes this case and catches the error the first time train() is called in the above script. The "correct" usage is below:

import torch
import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
model = te.Linear(512, 512)
inp = torch.rand((128, 512), device="cuda")
epochs = 5
def train():
for _ in range(epochs):
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True):
activation = model(inp)
train()
train()

Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
@ksivaman
ksivaman requested a review from ptrendxMarch 11, 2023 00:50
@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/te-ci

@ksivaman
ksivaman requested a review from timmoon10March 13, 2023 16:48

@timmoon10timmoon10 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

For my own understanding, we expect this assert error to trigger if we perform multiple forward or backward passes within an FP8, or if we perform a partial forward or backward pass within an FP8 context (e.g. if we've frozen most of the model to finetune a specific section) (edit: partial forward or backward passes should run fine). It should run fine if the number of forward and backward passes don't match.

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We don't want to run any portion of the model twice under the same autocast call when using amax reduction with FP8 training

@ksivaman
ksivaman merged commit 6605597 into NVIDIA:mainMar 13, 2023
nzmora-nvidia pushed a commit to nzmora-nvidia/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
cyanguwa pushed a commit to cyanguwa/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Yang <charleney@nvidia.com>
cyanguwa pushed a commit to cyanguwa/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Yang <charleney@nvidia.com>
@erlebach

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following code give the error:
AssertionError: Same module is being invoked more than once inside an `fp8_autocast` region when using FP8 with amax reduction. This behavior is currently unsupported. For more details and correct usage, please see https://github.com/NVIDIA/TransformerEngine/pull/93.

Here is the Python code:

import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
from transformer_engine.common.recipe import Format, DelayedScaling
fp8_format = Format.HYBRID # E4M3 during forward pass, E5M2 during backward pass
fp8_recipe = DelayedScaling(fp8_format=fp8_format, amax_history_len=16, amax_compute_algo="max")
import torch
device = torch.device('cuda' if torch.cuda.is_available() else 'cpu')
device = torch.device("cuda:0")
torch.manual_seed(12345)
my_linear = te.Linear(768, 768, bias=True).to(device)
inp = torch.rand((1024, 768)).to(device)
#inp = torch.rand((1024, 768)).cuda()
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True, fp8_recipe=fp8_recipe):
out_fp8 = my_linear(inp)
loss_fp8 = out_fp8.mean()
loss_fp8.backward() # This backward pass uses FP8, since out_fp8 was calculated inside fp8_autocast
out_fp32 = my_linear(inp)

The code runs fine without the last line. Since the last line runs outside the fp8_autocast why would this error occur?

Thanks for any insight. I am running with CUDA 11.8 for this library and CUDA 12.0 on the H100.

@ksivamanksivaman mentioned this pull request Apr 30, 2023
@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@erlebach This was a bug that was now been fixed in main (#187).

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ksivaman@erlebach@timmoon10
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Raise autocast usage error - #93

Merged
ksivaman merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
ksivaman:raise_autocast_usage_error
Mar 13, 2023
Merged

Raise autocast usage error#93
ksivaman merged 4 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
ksivaman:raise_autocast_usage_error

Conversation

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Without this change, the following use case errors out with a not very helpful message,

import torch
import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
model = te.Linear(512, 512)
inp = torch.rand((128, 512), device="cuda")
epochs = 5
def train():
# Incorrect usage: model is being run with fp8 multiple times
# under same autocast region with amax reduction turned on.
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True):
for _ in range(epochs):
activation = model(inp)
train()
train() # Error!

This PR fixes this case and catches the error the first time train() is called in the above script. The "correct" usage is below:

import torch
import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
model = te.Linear(512, 512)
inp = torch.rand((128, 512), device="cuda")
epochs = 5
def train():
for _ in range(epochs):
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True):
activation = model(inp)
train()
train()

Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
@ksivaman
ksivaman requested a review from ptrendxMarch 11, 2023 00:50
@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/te-ci

@ksivaman
ksivaman requested a review from timmoon10March 13, 2023 16:48

@timmoon10timmoon10 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

For my own understanding, we expect this assert error to trigger if we perform multiple forward or backward passes within an FP8, or if we perform a partial forward or backward pass within an FP8 context (e.g. if we've frozen most of the model to finetune a specific section) (edit: partial forward or backward passes should run fine). It should run fine if the number of forward and backward passes don't match.

@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We don't want to run any portion of the model twice under the same autocast call when using amax reduction with FP8 training

@ksivaman
ksivaman merged commit 6605597 into NVIDIA:mainMar 13, 2023
nzmora-nvidia pushed a commit to nzmora-nvidia/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
cyanguwa pushed a commit to cyanguwa/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Yang <charleney@nvidia.com>
cyanguwa pushed a commit to cyanguwa/TransformerEngine that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2023
* catch incorrect usage of fp8_autocast
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
* catch error on first time double execution
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kirthi Shankar Sivamani <ksivamani@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Yang <charleney@nvidia.com>
@erlebach

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following code give the error:
AssertionError: Same module is being invoked more than once inside an `fp8_autocast` region when using FP8 with amax reduction. This behavior is currently unsupported. For more details and correct usage, please see https://github.com/NVIDIA/TransformerEngine/pull/93.

Here is the Python code:

import transformer_engine.pytorch as te
from transformer_engine.common.recipe import Format, DelayedScaling
fp8_format = Format.HYBRID # E4M3 during forward pass, E5M2 during backward pass
fp8_recipe = DelayedScaling(fp8_format=fp8_format, amax_history_len=16, amax_compute_algo="max")
import torch
device = torch.device('cuda' if torch.cuda.is_available() else 'cpu')
device = torch.device("cuda:0")
torch.manual_seed(12345)
my_linear = te.Linear(768, 768, bias=True).to(device)
inp = torch.rand((1024, 768)).to(device)
#inp = torch.rand((1024, 768)).cuda()
with te.fp8_autocast(enabled=True, fp8_recipe=fp8_recipe):
out_fp8 = my_linear(inp)
loss_fp8 = out_fp8.mean()
loss_fp8.backward() # This backward pass uses FP8, since out_fp8 was calculated inside fp8_autocast
out_fp32 = my_linear(inp)

The code runs fine without the last line. Since the last line runs outside the fp8_autocast why would this error occur?

Thanks for any insight. I am running with CUDA 11.8 for this library and CUDA 12.0 on the H100.

@ksivamanksivaman mentioned this pull request Apr 30, 2023
@ksivaman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@erlebach This was a bug that was now been fixed in main (#187).

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ksivaman@erlebach@timmoon10