Skip to content

[Backport branch/3.2.x] [libcu++] Correctly handle extended lambda in cuda::launch - #7069

Merged
pciolkosz merged 1 commit into
branch/3.2.xfrom
backport-6987-to-branch/3.2.x
Jan 3, 2026
Merged

pciolkosz merged 1 commit into
branch/3.2.xfrom
backport-6987-to-branch/3.2.x

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Jan 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Backport of #6987 to branch/3.2.x.

* Don't set current device in CUDA 13 and handle extended lambda

* Add extended lambda test

* Compiler workarounds

* Waive extended lambda test on NVRTC

* Apply suggestion from @davebayer

---------

Co-authored-by: David Bayer <48736217+davebayer@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8928e6f)
@copy-pr-bot

copy-pr-bot Bot commented Jan 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to Todo in CCCL Jan 3, 2026
@pciolkosz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/ok to test 06e7bf1

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jan 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🥳 CI Workflow Results

🟩 Finished in 1h 00m: Pass: 100%/90 | Total: 18h 43m | Max: 38m 29s | Hits: 98%/216030

See results here.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from Todo to In Review in CCCL Jan 3, 2026
@pciolkosz
pciolkosz merged commit ef58923 into branch/3.2.x Jan 3, 2026
103 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from In Review to Done in CCCL Jan 3, 2026
@miscco
miscco deleted the backport-6987-to-branch/3.2.x branch July 23, 2026 12:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant