Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Use CTK 12.9.1 for cuda-bindings 12.9.x - #955
Conversation
leofang
commented
Sep 9, 2025
ah.. this reminds me, we haven't backported #889 to 12.9.x, should we do it before this PR? |
kkraus14
commented
Sep 9, 2025
100%. I'll do that as part of this PR. |
leofang
commented
Sep 9, 2025
I wonder if the backport bot can handle it |
leofang
commented
Sep 10, 2025
Looks like not... #889 (comment) Let me know if I (or Copilot) should handle this for you. |
kkraus14
commented
Sep 10, 2025
I'll take care of it, thanks! |
…ith hard-coded values, optimized checkout, and prepared Windows self-hosted runner migration (NVIDIA#889) * Initial plan * Consolidate test matrices from workflows into ci/test-matrix.json Co-authored-by: leofang <5534781+leofang@users.noreply.github.com> * Hard-code all GPU and ARCH values in test-matrix.json with 6 fields per entry Co-authored-by: leofang <5534781+leofang@users.noreply.github.com> * Update Windows test matrix with a100 GPU and latest-1 driver, configure self-hosted runners Co-authored-by: leofang <5534781+leofang@users.noreply.github.com> * fix * Revert eed0b71 and change Windows DRIVER from latest-1 to latest Co-authored-by: leofang <5534781+leofang@users.noreply.github.com> * Add proxy cache setup to Windows workflow for self-hosted runners Co-authored-by: leofang <5534781+leofang@users.noreply.github.com> * Remove Git for Windows and gh CLI installation steps, add T4 GPU support to Windows matrix Co-authored-by: leofang <5534781+leofang@users.noreply.github.com> * Set fetch-depth: 1 for checkout steps and favor L4/T4 over A100 GPUs for Windows testing Co-authored-by: leofang <5534781+leofang@users.noreply.github.com> * Revert Windows workflow to GitHub-hosted runners with TODO comments for future self-hosted migration Co-authored-by: leofang <5534781+leofang@users.noreply.github.com> * [pre-commit.ci] auto code formatting * Revert Win runner name change for now --------- Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: leofang <5534781+leofang@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Leo Fang <leof@nvidia.com> Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually. Contributors can view more details about this message here. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
kkraus14
commented
Sep 10, 2025
/ok to test |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
kkraus14
commented
Sep 10, 2025
/ok to test |
Auto-sync is disabled for ready for review pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually. Contributors can view more details about this message here. |
cryos
commented
Sep 10, 2025
/ok to test |
cryos
commented
Sep 10, 2025
/ok to test |
| build-type: pull-request | ||
| host-platform: ${{ matrix.host-platform }} | ||
| build-ctk-ver: ${{ needs.ci-vars.outputs.CUDA_BUILD_VER }} | ||
| matrix_filter: "select(([.CUDA_VER // empty | split(\".\")[] | tonumber] as $v | ($v[0] < 13)))" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nitpick: can we programmatically derive 13 here and so we can have this unified across main and 12.9.x and allow it to nicely carry over to the future where we have main and 13.x.y?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You want to derive the CUDA major version from the branch name? I see the motivation, just thinking through what we want to key from programatically.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Or from the version json file since it would always be aligned to the major version we want to use? It's not a big deal though where if we want to punt to a future PR that's totally fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Third time was the charm 🎉 I can look at it for a follow up, it shouldn't be much, but it would be good to get this merged now. Lots of meetings today sadly...
cryos
commented
Sep 10, 2025
/ok to test |
cryos
commented
Sep 10, 2025
/ok to test |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
kkraus14
commented
Sep 10, 2025
@cryos I think we need to backport using the self hosted Windows runners as well. Want to do that here or a separate PR? |
cryos
commented
Sep 10, 2025
I was about to ask - I think we should, but I was going to do it in a follow up. Happy to do it here if preferred (it is a pretty small patch). |
kkraus14
commented
Sep 10, 2025
If you don't mind lets do it here. Thanks! |
Migrate the Windows testing to use the new NV GHA runners. Cherry-pick NVIDIA#958.
cryos
commented
Sep 10, 2025
/ok to test |
kkraus14
commented
Sep 10, 2025
cryos
commented
Sep 10, 2025
It looks like everything is passing in CI @kkraus14, it looks good to go from my perspective pending the open questions you mentioned. |
leofang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure what the matrix_filter is about (I assume it's to avoid editing the json file?), but LGTM
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
leofang
commented
Sep 11, 2025
Thanks, Keith, Marcus, Ralf! |
Description
closes#820
TODO:
Checklist