docs: reconcile deep security scan roadmap - #23

Open
ZacharyRW wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/docs-deep-security-roadmap
Open

docs: reconcile deep security scan roadmap#23
ZacharyRW wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/docs-deep-security-roadmap

Conversation

@ZacharyRW

@ZacharyRWZacharyRW commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • record the sealed 2026-08-29 Deep Security Scan at revision 0dc93b7
  • reconcile 17 validated report instances into five non-duplicative security families
  • strengthen existing R0-4 and R0-5 safety work and add R0-6 artifact review binding plus R0-7 media path identity
  • retain the static-only partial-coverage limitations and update milestones, documentation dependencies, success metrics, and execution order

Safety impact

This is a documentation-only change. It does not modify rename behavior or authorize real media operations. The roadmap now makes the remaining manifest, artifact, and filesystem identity boundaries explicit before the first release.

Validation

  • .venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/ -v --cov=. --cov-report=term-missing --cov-fail-under=80 — 63 passed, 1 skipped, 90.00% coverage
  • git diff --check origin/main...HEAD

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Aug 30, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: ca47d6a8-1f90-41d5-807a-8870efd98959

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connectorBot commented Aug 30, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-08-30T03:28:25.884696Z198f870PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@greptile-apps

greptile-appsBot commented Aug 30, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary

This documentation-only PR reconciles the sealed Deep Security Scan into the project roadmap.

  • Consolidates 17 reported instances into five security families.
  • Expands artifact, manifest, provenance, and filesystem-identity milestones.
  • Updates dependencies, validation criteria, success metrics, and execution order.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge.

No blocking failure remains.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
ROADMAP.mdReconciles deep-scan findings into coherent roadmap milestones without changing runtime behavior.

Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "docs: preserve approved artifact imports" | Re-trigger Greptile

chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot reviewed Aug 30, 2026
View reviewed changes

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit:198f8701b4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment threadROADMAP.md Outdated
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ZacharyRW
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
docs: reconcile deep security scan roadmap - #23
Open
ZacharyRW wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/docs-deep-security-roadmap
Open
docs: reconcile deep security scan roadmap#23
ZacharyRW wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/docs-deep-security-roadmap
Conversation
@ZacharyRW
@ZacharyRWZacharyRW
commented
Aug 30, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Summary
  • record the sealed 2026-08-29 Deep Security Scan at revision 0dc93b7
  • reconcile 17 validated report instances into five non-duplicative security families
  • strengthen existing R0-4 and R0-5 safety work and add R0-6 artifact review binding plus R0-7 media path identity
  • retain the static-only partial-coverage limitations and update milestones, documentation dependencies, success metrics, and execution order
Safety impact
This is a documentation-only change. It does not modify rename behavior or authorize real media operations. The roadmap now makes the remaining manifest, artifact, and filesystem identity boundaries explicit before the first release.
Validation
  • .venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/ -v --cov=. --cov-report=term-missing --cov-fail-under=80 — 63 passed, 1 skipped, 90.00% coverage
  • git diff --check origin/main...HEAD
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Important
  •  🔍 Trigger review
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Team
Run ID: ca47d6a8-1f90-41d5-807a-8870efd98959
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-08-30T03:28:25.884696Z198f870PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@greptile-apps
greptile-appsBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary
This documentation-only PR reconciles the sealed Deep Security Scan into the project roadmap.
  • Consolidates 17 reported instances into five security families.
  • Expands artifact, manifest, provenance, and filesystem-identity milestones.
  • Updates dependencies, validation criteria, success metrics, and execution order.
Confidence Score: 5/5
The PR appears safe to merge.
No blocking failure remains.
Important Files Changed
FilenameOverview
ROADMAP.mdReconciles deep-scan findings into coherent roadmap milestones without changing runtime behavior.
Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "docs: preserve approved artifact imports" | Re-trigger Greptile
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
reviewed
Aug 30, 2026
View reviewed changes
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:198f8701b4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Comment threadROADMAP.md
Outdated

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ZacharyRW

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
docs: reconcile deep security scan roadmap - #23
Open
ZacharyRW wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/docs-deep-security-roadmap
Open
docs: reconcile deep security scan roadmap#23
ZacharyRW wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/docs-deep-security-roadmap
Conversation
@ZacharyRW
@ZacharyRWZacharyRW
commented
Aug 30, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Summary
  • record the sealed 2026-08-29 Deep Security Scan at revision 0dc93b7
  • reconcile 17 validated report instances into five non-duplicative security families
  • strengthen existing R0-4 and R0-5 safety work and add R0-6 artifact review binding plus R0-7 media path identity
  • retain the static-only partial-coverage limitations and update milestones, documentation dependencies, success metrics, and execution order
Safety impact
This is a documentation-only change. It does not modify rename behavior or authorize real media operations. The roadmap now makes the remaining manifest, artifact, and filesystem identity boundaries explicit before the first release.
Validation
  • .venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/ -v --cov=. --cov-report=term-missing --cov-fail-under=80 — 63 passed, 1 skipped, 90.00% coverage
  • git diff --check origin/main...HEAD
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Important
  •  🔍 Trigger review
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Team
Run ID: ca47d6a8-1f90-41d5-807a-8870efd98959
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-08-30T03:28:25.884696Z198f870PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@greptile-apps
greptile-appsBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary
This documentation-only PR reconciles the sealed Deep Security Scan into the project roadmap.
  • Consolidates 17 reported instances into five security families.
  • Expands artifact, manifest, provenance, and filesystem-identity milestones.
  • Updates dependencies, validation criteria, success metrics, and execution order.
Confidence Score: 5/5
The PR appears safe to merge.
No blocking failure remains.
Important Files Changed
FilenameOverview
ROADMAP.mdReconciles deep-scan findings into coherent roadmap milestones without changing runtime behavior.
Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "docs: preserve approved artifact imports" | Re-trigger Greptile
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
reviewed
Aug 30, 2026
View reviewed changes
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:198f8701b4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Comment threadROADMAP.md
Outdated

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ZacharyRW

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
docs: reconcile deep security scan roadmap - #23
Open
ZacharyRW wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/docs-deep-security-roadmap
Open
docs: reconcile deep security scan roadmap#23
ZacharyRW wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/docs-deep-security-roadmap
Conversation
@ZacharyRW
@ZacharyRWZacharyRW
commented
Aug 30, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Summary
  • record the sealed 2026-08-29 Deep Security Scan at revision 0dc93b7
  • reconcile 17 validated report instances into five non-duplicative security families
  • strengthen existing R0-4 and R0-5 safety work and add R0-6 artifact review binding plus R0-7 media path identity
  • retain the static-only partial-coverage limitations and update milestones, documentation dependencies, success metrics, and execution order
Safety impact
This is a documentation-only change. It does not modify rename behavior or authorize real media operations. The roadmap now makes the remaining manifest, artifact, and filesystem identity boundaries explicit before the first release.
Validation
  • .venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/ -v --cov=. --cov-report=term-missing --cov-fail-under=80 — 63 passed, 1 skipped, 90.00% coverage
  • git diff --check origin/main...HEAD
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Important
  •  🔍 Trigger review
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Team
Run ID: ca47d6a8-1f90-41d5-807a-8870efd98959
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-08-30T03:28:25.884696Z198f870PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@greptile-apps
greptile-appsBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary
This documentation-only PR reconciles the sealed Deep Security Scan into the project roadmap.
  • Consolidates 17 reported instances into five security families.
  • Expands artifact, manifest, provenance, and filesystem-identity milestones.
  • Updates dependencies, validation criteria, success metrics, and execution order.
Confidence Score: 5/5
The PR appears safe to merge.
No blocking failure remains.
Important Files Changed
FilenameOverview
ROADMAP.mdReconciles deep-scan findings into coherent roadmap milestones without changing runtime behavior.
Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "docs: preserve approved artifact imports" | Re-trigger Greptile
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
reviewed
Aug 30, 2026
View reviewed changes
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:198f8701b4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Comment threadROADMAP.md
Outdated

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ZacharyRW

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
docs: reconcile deep security scan roadmap - #23
Open
ZacharyRW wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/docs-deep-security-roadmap
Open
docs: reconcile deep security scan roadmap#23
ZacharyRW wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/docs-deep-security-roadmap
Conversation
@ZacharyRW
@ZacharyRWZacharyRW
commented
Aug 30, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Summary
  • record the sealed 2026-08-29 Deep Security Scan at revision 0dc93b7
  • reconcile 17 validated report instances into five non-duplicative security families
  • strengthen existing R0-4 and R0-5 safety work and add R0-6 artifact review binding plus R0-7 media path identity
  • retain the static-only partial-coverage limitations and update milestones, documentation dependencies, success metrics, and execution order
Safety impact
This is a documentation-only change. It does not modify rename behavior or authorize real media operations. The roadmap now makes the remaining manifest, artifact, and filesystem identity boundaries explicit before the first release.
Validation
  • .venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/ -v --cov=. --cov-report=term-missing --cov-fail-under=80 — 63 passed, 1 skipped, 90.00% coverage
  • git diff --check origin/main...HEAD
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Important
  •  🔍 Trigger review
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Team
Run ID: ca47d6a8-1f90-41d5-807a-8870efd98959
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-08-30T03:28:25.884696Z198f870PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@greptile-apps
greptile-appsBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary
This documentation-only PR reconciles the sealed Deep Security Scan into the project roadmap.
  • Consolidates 17 reported instances into five security families.
  • Expands artifact, manifest, provenance, and filesystem-identity milestones.
  • Updates dependencies, validation criteria, success metrics, and execution order.
Confidence Score: 5/5
The PR appears safe to merge.
No blocking failure remains.
Important Files Changed
FilenameOverview
ROADMAP.mdReconciles deep-scan findings into coherent roadmap milestones without changing runtime behavior.
Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "docs: preserve approved artifact imports" | Re-trigger Greptile
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
reviewed
Aug 30, 2026
View reviewed changes
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:198f8701b4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Comment threadROADMAP.md
Outdated

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ZacharyRW

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
docs: reconcile deep security scan roadmap - #23
Open
ZacharyRW wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/docs-deep-security-roadmap
Open
docs: reconcile deep security scan roadmap#23
ZacharyRW wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/docs-deep-security-roadmap
Conversation
@ZacharyRW
@ZacharyRWZacharyRW
commented
Aug 30, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Summary
  • record the sealed 2026-08-29 Deep Security Scan at revision 0dc93b7
  • reconcile 17 validated report instances into five non-duplicative security families
  • strengthen existing R0-4 and R0-5 safety work and add R0-6 artifact review binding plus R0-7 media path identity
  • retain the static-only partial-coverage limitations and update milestones, documentation dependencies, success metrics, and execution order
Safety impact
This is a documentation-only change. It does not modify rename behavior or authorize real media operations. The roadmap now makes the remaining manifest, artifact, and filesystem identity boundaries explicit before the first release.
Validation
  • .venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/ -v --cov=. --cov-report=term-missing --cov-fail-under=80 — 63 passed, 1 skipped, 90.00% coverage
  • git diff --check origin/main...HEAD
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Important
  •  🔍 Trigger review
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Team
Run ID: ca47d6a8-1f90-41d5-807a-8870efd98959
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-08-30T03:28:25.884696Z198f870PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@greptile-apps
greptile-appsBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary
This documentation-only PR reconciles the sealed Deep Security Scan into the project roadmap.
  • Consolidates 17 reported instances into five security families.
  • Expands artifact, manifest, provenance, and filesystem-identity milestones.
  • Updates dependencies, validation criteria, success metrics, and execution order.
Confidence Score: 5/5
The PR appears safe to merge.
No blocking failure remains.
Important Files Changed
FilenameOverview
ROADMAP.mdReconciles deep-scan findings into coherent roadmap milestones without changing runtime behavior.
Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "docs: preserve approved artifact imports" | Re-trigger Greptile
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
reviewed
Aug 30, 2026
View reviewed changes
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:198f8701b4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Comment threadROADMAP.md
Outdated

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ZacharyRW

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
docs: reconcile deep security scan roadmap - #23
Open
ZacharyRW wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/docs-deep-security-roadmap
Open
docs: reconcile deep security scan roadmap#23
ZacharyRW wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/docs-deep-security-roadmap
Conversation
@ZacharyRW
@ZacharyRWZacharyRW
commented
Aug 30, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Summary
  • record the sealed 2026-08-29 Deep Security Scan at revision 0dc93b7
  • reconcile 17 validated report instances into five non-duplicative security families
  • strengthen existing R0-4 and R0-5 safety work and add R0-6 artifact review binding plus R0-7 media path identity
  • retain the static-only partial-coverage limitations and update milestones, documentation dependencies, success metrics, and execution order
Safety impact
This is a documentation-only change. It does not modify rename behavior or authorize real media operations. The roadmap now makes the remaining manifest, artifact, and filesystem identity boundaries explicit before the first release.
Validation
  • .venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/ -v --cov=. --cov-report=term-missing --cov-fail-under=80 — 63 passed, 1 skipped, 90.00% coverage
  • git diff --check origin/main...HEAD
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Important
  •  🔍 Trigger review
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Team
Run ID: ca47d6a8-1f90-41d5-807a-8870efd98959
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-08-30T03:28:25.884696Z198f870PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@greptile-apps
greptile-appsBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary
This documentation-only PR reconciles the sealed Deep Security Scan into the project roadmap.
  • Consolidates 17 reported instances into five security families.
  • Expands artifact, manifest, provenance, and filesystem-identity milestones.
  • Updates dependencies, validation criteria, success metrics, and execution order.
Confidence Score: 5/5
The PR appears safe to merge.
No blocking failure remains.
Important Files Changed
FilenameOverview
ROADMAP.mdReconciles deep-scan findings into coherent roadmap milestones without changing runtime behavior.
Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "docs: preserve approved artifact imports" | Re-trigger Greptile
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
reviewed
Aug 30, 2026
View reviewed changes
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:198f8701b4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Comment threadROADMAP.md
Outdated

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ZacharyRW

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
docs: reconcile deep security scan roadmap - #23
Open
ZacharyRW wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/docs-deep-security-roadmap
Open
docs: reconcile deep security scan roadmap#23
ZacharyRW wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom 
codex/docs-deep-security-roadmap
Conversation
@ZacharyRW
@ZacharyRWZacharyRW
commented
Aug 30, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Summary
  • record the sealed 2026-08-29 Deep Security Scan at revision 0dc93b7
  • reconcile 17 validated report instances into five non-duplicative security families
  • strengthen existing R0-4 and R0-5 safety work and add R0-6 artifact review binding plus R0-7 media path identity
  • retain the static-only partial-coverage limitations and update milestones, documentation dependencies, success metrics, and execution order
Safety impact
This is a documentation-only change. It does not modify rename behavior or authorize real media operations. The roadmap now makes the remaining manifest, artifact, and filesystem identity boundaries explicit before the first release.
Validation
  • .venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/ -v --cov=. --cov-report=term-missing --cov-fail-under=80 — 63 passed, 1 skipped, 90.00% coverage
  • git diff --check origin/main...HEAD
@coderabbitai
coderabbitaiBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Important
  •  🔍 Trigger review
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Team
Run ID: ca47d6a8-1f90-41d5-807a-8870efd98959
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-08-30T03:28:25.884696Z198f870PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
@greptile-apps
greptile-appsBot
commented
Aug 30, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary
This documentation-only PR reconciles the sealed Deep Security Scan into the project roadmap.
  • Consolidates 17 reported instances into five security families.
  • Expands artifact, manifest, provenance, and filesystem-identity milestones.
  • Updates dependencies, validation criteria, success metrics, and execution order.
Confidence Score: 5/5
The PR appears safe to merge.
No blocking failure remains.
Important Files Changed
FilenameOverview
ROADMAP.mdReconciles deep-scan findings into coherent roadmap milestones without changing runtime behavior.
Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "docs: preserve approved artifact imports" | Re-trigger Greptile
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
reviewed
Aug 30, 2026
View reviewed changes
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:198f8701b4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Comment threadROADMAP.md
Outdated

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ZacharyRW