Allow directly running nested tests instead of running from parent level - #11

Open
FooBarRaz wants to merge 1 commit into
NitorCreations:masterfrom
FooBarRaz:master
Open

Allow directly running nested tests instead of running from parent level#11
FooBarRaz wants to merge 1 commit into
NitorCreations:masterfrom
FooBarRaz:master

Conversation

@FooBarRaz

Copy link
Copy Markdown

We wanted to be able to directly run a nested test from the IDE instead of having to run the entire parent. In order to accomplish that, we modified the runner to build the enclosing context when a parent exists. This allows for running any @before and @after blocks from a parent, but only runs the tests at and below the nesting level of the specified test method or class.

@JordanMartinez

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Is this going to get merged and be released anytime soon? Or is such a capacity planned for (or already implemented in) JUnit 5, making this outdated?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@FooBarRaz@JordanMartinez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Allow directly running nested tests instead of running from parent level - #11

Open
FooBarRaz wants to merge 1 commit into
NitorCreations:masterfrom
FooBarRaz:master
Open

Allow directly running nested tests instead of running from parent level#11
FooBarRaz wants to merge 1 commit into
NitorCreations:masterfrom
FooBarRaz:master

Conversation

@FooBarRaz

Copy link
Copy Markdown

We wanted to be able to directly run a nested test from the IDE instead of having to run the entire parent. In order to accomplish that, we modified the runner to build the enclosing context when a parent exists. This allows for running any @before and @after blocks from a parent, but only runs the tests at and below the nesting level of the specified test method or class.

@JordanMartinez

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Is this going to get merged and be released anytime soon? Or is such a capacity planned for (or already implemented in) JUnit 5, making this outdated?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@FooBarRaz@JordanMartinez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Allow directly running nested tests instead of running from parent level - #11

Open
FooBarRaz wants to merge 1 commit into
NitorCreations:masterfrom
FooBarRaz:master
Open

Allow directly running nested tests instead of running from parent level#11
FooBarRaz wants to merge 1 commit into
NitorCreations:masterfrom
FooBarRaz:master

Conversation

@FooBarRaz

Copy link
Copy Markdown

We wanted to be able to directly run a nested test from the IDE instead of having to run the entire parent. In order to accomplish that, we modified the runner to build the enclosing context when a parent exists. This allows for running any @before and @after blocks from a parent, but only runs the tests at and below the nesting level of the specified test method or class.

@JordanMartinez

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Is this going to get merged and be released anytime soon? Or is such a capacity planned for (or already implemented in) JUnit 5, making this outdated?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@FooBarRaz@JordanMartinez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Allow directly running nested tests instead of running from parent level - #11

Open
FooBarRaz wants to merge 1 commit into
NitorCreations:masterfrom
FooBarRaz:master
Open

Allow directly running nested tests instead of running from parent level#11
FooBarRaz wants to merge 1 commit into
NitorCreations:masterfrom
FooBarRaz:master

Conversation

@FooBarRaz

Copy link
Copy Markdown

We wanted to be able to directly run a nested test from the IDE instead of having to run the entire parent. In order to accomplish that, we modified the runner to build the enclosing context when a parent exists. This allows for running any @before and @after blocks from a parent, but only runs the tests at and below the nesting level of the specified test method or class.

@JordanMartinez

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Is this going to get merged and be released anytime soon? Or is such a capacity planned for (or already implemented in) JUnit 5, making this outdated?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@FooBarRaz@JordanMartinez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Allow directly running nested tests instead of running from parent level - #11

Open
FooBarRaz wants to merge 1 commit into
NitorCreations:masterfrom
FooBarRaz:master
Open

Allow directly running nested tests instead of running from parent level#11
FooBarRaz wants to merge 1 commit into
NitorCreations:masterfrom
FooBarRaz:master

Conversation

@FooBarRaz

Copy link
Copy Markdown

We wanted to be able to directly run a nested test from the IDE instead of having to run the entire parent. In order to accomplish that, we modified the runner to build the enclosing context when a parent exists. This allows for running any @before and @after blocks from a parent, but only runs the tests at and below the nesting level of the specified test method or class.

@JordanMartinez

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Is this going to get merged and be released anytime soon? Or is such a capacity planned for (or already implemented in) JUnit 5, making this outdated?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@FooBarRaz@JordanMartinez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Allow directly running nested tests instead of running from parent level - #11

Open
FooBarRaz wants to merge 1 commit into
NitorCreations:masterfrom
FooBarRaz:master
Open

Allow directly running nested tests instead of running from parent level#11
FooBarRaz wants to merge 1 commit into
NitorCreations:masterfrom
FooBarRaz:master

Conversation

@FooBarRaz

Copy link
Copy Markdown

We wanted to be able to directly run a nested test from the IDE instead of having to run the entire parent. In order to accomplish that, we modified the runner to build the enclosing context when a parent exists. This allows for running any @before and @after blocks from a parent, but only runs the tests at and below the nesting level of the specified test method or class.

@JordanMartinez

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Is this going to get merged and be released anytime soon? Or is such a capacity planned for (or already implemented in) JUnit 5, making this outdated?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@FooBarRaz@JordanMartinez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Allow directly running nested tests instead of running from parent level - #11

Open
FooBarRaz wants to merge 1 commit into
NitorCreations:masterfrom
FooBarRaz:master
Open

Allow directly running nested tests instead of running from parent level#11
FooBarRaz wants to merge 1 commit into
NitorCreations:masterfrom
FooBarRaz:master

Conversation

@FooBarRaz

Copy link
Copy Markdown

We wanted to be able to directly run a nested test from the IDE instead of having to run the entire parent. In order to accomplish that, we modified the runner to build the enclosing context when a parent exists. This allows for running any @before and @after blocks from a parent, but only runs the tests at and below the nesting level of the specified test method or class.

@JordanMartinez

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Is this going to get merged and be released anytime soon? Or is such a capacity planned for (or already implemented in) JUnit 5, making this outdated?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@FooBarRaz@JordanMartinez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Allow directly running nested tests instead of running from parent level - #11

Open
FooBarRaz wants to merge 1 commit into
NitorCreations:masterfrom
FooBarRaz:master
Open

Allow directly running nested tests instead of running from parent level#11
FooBarRaz wants to merge 1 commit into
NitorCreations:masterfrom
FooBarRaz:master

Conversation

@FooBarRaz

Copy link
Copy Markdown

We wanted to be able to directly run a nested test from the IDE instead of having to run the entire parent. In order to accomplish that, we modified the runner to build the enclosing context when a parent exists. This allows for running any @before and @after blocks from a parent, but only runs the tests at and below the nesting level of the specified test method or class.

@JordanMartinez

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Is this going to get merged and be released anytime soon? Or is such a capacity planned for (or already implemented in) JUnit 5, making this outdated?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@FooBarRaz@JordanMartinez