Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Closed
Conversation
MikeRalphson
commented
Jun 17, 2021
Member
As a result of #2604 the filename for this proposal should change to use a dated prefix. Please could you update this PR to match? You can use the original PR date. Apologies for the extra work. |
erunion
commented
Jun 21, 2021
Author
@MikeRalphson 👍 All good now |
darrelmiller
commented
Nov 18, 2021
Member
@erunion Thanks for submitting this. Apologies for the long delay in responding. Would you be available to present on this proposal in one of our Thursday TDC calls? |
darrelmiller
commented
Mar 10, 2022
Member
@erunion We are closing this for the moment as it has been inactive for a while. Please feel free to re-open if you want to follow up on this. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To allow for the viability of tooling to validate server variables before composing a URL I'm proposing that a
typeproperty be added onto the Server Variable Object schema much in the same way parameters and schemas require one.