Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
3.1.1: improved RFC section links - #3973
Conversation
lornajane
commented
Jul 30, 2024
I think this looks good, but I'm not sure how someone reading the markdown source can use these links. Are they just expected to know where to look for the replacements in our build scripts, or is there a better way to tackle it? |
ralfhandl
commented
Jul 30, 2024
If you mean ReSpec references like is unrelated to [[JSON-Schema-2020-12|JSON Schema]].then the answer unfortunately is
In this example the answer is https://www.specref.org/?q=JSON-Schema-2020-12. Current assumption is
We can keep the markdown "reader-friendly" and educate editors to (1) stick to reference patterns recognized by the build script, and (2) adjust the build script for any new external reference that is not an RFC. Which way do we want to go? |
lornajane
commented
Aug 1, 2024
Discussion in TDC this week, we are overall not concerned about the destination of the hyperlinks being behind another level of abstraction |
…ed-RFC-section-links
…ed-RFC-section-links
ralfhandl
commented
Aug 5, 2024
Closed in favor of #3996 |
#section-xinstead of#autoid-yor#page-z