Skip to content

3.1 schema tests: keyword coverage - #4839

Merged
ralfhandl merged 1 commit into
OAI:v3.1-devfrom
ralfhandl:3.1-schema-test-keyword-coverage
Aug 13, 2025
Merged

3.1 schema tests: keyword coverage#4839
ralfhandl merged 1 commit into
OAI:v3.1-devfrom
ralfhandl:3.1-schema-test-keyword-coverage

Conversation

@ralfhandl

@ralfhandlralfhandl commented Aug 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Raise keyword/line coverage of our OAS schemas to 100% by adding "pass" test cases:

  • Link Object with requestBody
  • Schema Object with (deprecated) example keyword
  • Specification Extension
  • technical test: Schema Object via schema.yaml instead of schema-base.yaml
  • schema changes are included in this pull request
  • schema changes are needed for this pull request but not done yet
  • no schema changes are needed for this pull request

@ralfhandl
ralfhandl requested review from a team as code ownersAugust 12, 2025 08:57
@ralfhandlralfhandl added this to the v3.1.2 milestone Aug 12, 2025
@ralfhandlralfhandl added the Schema changes related to the schema(s) label Aug 12, 2025
@ralfhandlralfhandl changed the title 3.1: schema test keyword coverage3.1 schema tests: keyword coverageAug 13, 2025
@ralfhandlralfhandl mentioned this pull request Aug 13, 2025
Merged
1 task
@ralfhandl
ralfhandl requested a review from a teamAugust 13, 2025 15:14
@ralfhandl

ralfhandl commented Aug 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Merged with one approval because it only adds test cases

@ralfhandl
ralfhandl merged commit b1bb5d4 into OAI:v3.1-devAug 13, 2025
2 checks passed
@ralfhandl
ralfhandl deleted the 3.1-schema-test-keyword-coverage branch August 13, 2025 15:21
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@handrewshandrewshandrews approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Schemachanges related to the schema(s)

Projects

None yet

Milestone

v3.1.2

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ralfhandl@handrews