Conversation
This recently added feature is counter intuitive, error prone and is already causing bugs in sale_workflow.
Contributor
Author
Contributor
Author
gurneyalex
approved these changes
Aug 7, 2019
Contributor
|
This PR has the |
Member
|
/ocabot merge major |
Contributor
|
This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it! |
yvaucher
approved these changes
Aug 7, 2019
Member
|
damn the merge failed here a while ago. Will handle the rebase manually. |
Member
|
Seems it has already been merged there: 60d3d62 |
SiesslPhillip
pushed a commit
to grueneerde/OCA-server-tools
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2024
Syncing from upstream OCA/server-tools (16.0)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This recently added feature is counter intuitive, error prone and is
already causing bugs in sale_workflow.
Like this:
https://github.com/OCA/sale-workflow/blob/10.0/sale_exception/models/sale_order_line.py#L28
(sale_order_line)
@api.multi
def _detect_exceptions(self, rule):
records = super(SaleOrderLine, self)._detect_exceptions(rule)
return records.mapped('order_id')
I think it's the correct and obvious way to write this code. But the actual implementation, will fail if the sale order has no lines. It will test exceptions on all the sale order line (empty self = search([])) and return exceptions tied to other sale orders.
Please merge it with a major version number bump.
same as #1620