[ADD] field name - #2572
Closed
gfcapalbo wants to merge 3 commits into
Closed
Conversation
thomaspaulb
requested changes
Jun 29, 2023
thomaspaulb
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please resolve conflicts :-)
gfcapalbo
force-pushed
the
14.0-jsonifier-with-name
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 30, 2023 13:16
8be248f to
c8257e1
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Closing , replaced by #2668 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a parameter to jsonifier with_fieldnames.
THis will allow jsonifier to return a different type of result: instead of :
{'product_qty' : 18}we will have:
{ product_qty : { 'value':18, 'fieldname': 'Product Quantity'} }Very useful to have , with one RPC call , the translated value of the field we are displaying, 100% the same as odoo backend.