[16.0][ADD] web_form_view_resizable

[sbejaoui]

This module allows users to resize the form view, enhancing usability by providing additional space for better display. It's especially practical when more room is needed to view attachments in the chatter or to expand the form view for improved readability.

[legalsylvain]

Hi @sbejaoui. Thanks for sharing this module.

I tried it on runboat, and it doesn't work on my computer (with Firefox & Chromium). Is it working on runboat for you ?

thanks !

System : Ubuntu 20.04
Firefox : 131.0.2 (64 bits)
Chromium : Version 130.0.6723.58 (Build officiel) snap (64 bits)

[sbejaoui]

Hi @sbejaoui. Thanks for sharing this module.

I tried it on runboat, and it doesn't work on my computer (with Firefox & Chromium). Is it working on runboat for you ?

thanks !

System : Ubuntu 20.04 Firefox : 131.0.2 (64 bits) Chromium : Version 130.0.6723.58 (Build officiel) snap (64 bits)

Yes, it's working for me on runboat. Try the database with only the base module; I believe there may be a conflict with another module.

[tarteo]

@sbejaoui I've tested it on runbot on the baseonly version it works there. Only a minor problem is that when I grab the resize handle it shoots to the right a couple of pixels first(like 100px or so). Is it possible to make the minWidth and maxWidth dependable on screen size?

It conflicts with web_responsive, is it possible to make it work with existing modules?

[sbejaoui]

@sbejaoui I've tested it on runbot on the baseonly version it works there. Only a minor problem is that when I grab the resize handle it shoots to the right a couple of pixels first(like 100px or so). Is it possible to make the minWidth and maxWidth dependable on screen size?

It conflicts with web_responsive, is it possible to make it work with existing modules?

Thank you for the debug, I will make the changes

[pedrobaeza]

Thanks for this! I have tried and it seems that max/min size of the elements is limited:

[SAnnabelle]

Functionally it's good.

[javierizaca]

Functional review OK LGTM

[petrus-v]

@sbejaoui if I properly understand the history, when you have rebase in june you have drop the source code suggested by acsone#18 that were present when some people approved this PR

Could you go back to the 68ce1ff commit (and rebase if needs) or tell us why you remove it ?