Adding support for Postmark Tags

[jxmallett]

Postmark has support for tagging emails to aid with statistics. I think we can use the Swift ID property to do the same thing.

Swift automatically generates a 'unique' ID like [hash]@[domain] but you can set your own with $message->setId('blah'); and this bit of code will tag the Postmark message with that ID.

I think this would technically be a BC break because it changes the default behaviour - Emails used to be sent with no tag, but they'll now default to sending with Swift's auto-generated tag.

[hkdobrev]

@jxmallett Sorry for the late response! Do you think you could look into the tests and rebase on top of latest master? If not, that's fine - just let me know and I'll try to update it.

[jxmallett]

Postmark has support for tagging emails to aid with statistics. I think we can use the Swift ID property to do the same thing.

Swift automatically generates a 'unique' ID like [hash]@[domain] but you can set your own with $message->setId('blah'); and this bit of code will tag the Postmark message with that ID.

I think this would technically be a BC break because it changes the default behaviour - Emails used to be sent with no tag, but they'll now default to sending with Swift's auto-generated tag.

[hkdobrev]

@jxmallett Sorry for the late response! Do you think you could look into the tests and rebase on top of latest master? If not, that's fine - just let me know and I'll try to update it.

[jxmallett]

Postmark has support for tagging emails to aid with statistics. I think we can use the Swift ID property to do the same thing.

Swift automatically generates a 'unique' ID like [hash]@[domain] but you can set your own with $message->setId('blah'); and this bit of code will tag the Postmark message with that ID.

I think this would technically be a BC break because it changes the default behaviour - Emails used to be sent with no tag, but they'll now default to sending with Swift's auto-generated tag.

[hkdobrev]

@jxmallett Sorry for the late response! Do you think you could look into the tests and rebase on top of latest master? If not, that's fine - just let me know and I'll try to update it.

[jxmallett]

Postmark has support for tagging emails to aid with statistics. I think we can use the Swift ID property to do the same thing.

Swift automatically generates a 'unique' ID like [hash]@[domain] but you can set your own with $message->setId('blah'); and this bit of code will tag the Postmark message with that ID.

I think this would technically be a BC break because it changes the default behaviour - Emails used to be sent with no tag, but they'll now default to sending with Swift's auto-generated tag.

[hkdobrev]

@jxmallett Sorry for the late response! Do you think you could look into the tests and rebase on top of latest master? If not, that's fine - just let me know and I'll try to update it.

[jxmallett]

Postmark has support for tagging emails to aid with statistics. I think we can use the Swift ID property to do the same thing.

Swift automatically generates a 'unique' ID like [hash]@[domain] but you can set your own with $message->setId('blah'); and this bit of code will tag the Postmark message with that ID.

I think this would technically be a BC break because it changes the default behaviour - Emails used to be sent with no tag, but they'll now default to sending with Swift's auto-generated tag.

[hkdobrev]

@jxmallett Sorry for the late response! Do you think you could look into the tests and rebase on top of latest master? If not, that's fine - just let me know and I'll try to update it.

[jxmallett]

Postmark has support for tagging emails to aid with statistics. I think we can use the Swift ID property to do the same thing.

Swift automatically generates a 'unique' ID like [hash]@[domain] but you can set your own with $message->setId('blah'); and this bit of code will tag the Postmark message with that ID.

I think this would technically be a BC break because it changes the default behaviour - Emails used to be sent with no tag, but they'll now default to sending with Swift's auto-generated tag.

[hkdobrev]

@jxmallett Sorry for the late response! Do you think you could look into the tests and rebase on top of latest master? If not, that's fine - just let me know and I'll try to update it.

[jxmallett]

Postmark has support for tagging emails to aid with statistics. I think we can use the Swift ID property to do the same thing.

Swift automatically generates a 'unique' ID like [hash]@[domain] but you can set your own with $message->setId('blah'); and this bit of code will tag the Postmark message with that ID.

I think this would technically be a BC break because it changes the default behaviour - Emails used to be sent with no tag, but they'll now default to sending with Swift's auto-generated tag.

[hkdobrev]

@jxmallett Sorry for the late response! Do you think you could look into the tests and rebase on top of latest master? If not, that's fine - just let me know and I'll try to update it.

[jxmallett]

Postmark has support for tagging emails to aid with statistics. I think we can use the Swift ID property to do the same thing.

Swift automatically generates a 'unique' ID like [hash]@[domain] but you can set your own with $message->setId('blah'); and this bit of code will tag the Postmark message with that ID.

I think this would technically be a BC break because it changes the default behaviour - Emails used to be sent with no tag, but they'll now default to sending with Swift's auto-generated tag.

[hkdobrev]

@jxmallett Sorry for the late response! Do you think you could look into the tests and rebase on top of latest master? If not, that's fine - just let me know and I'll try to update it.