Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
(A001) Simplify workflow for unittests - #411
Conversation
adeas31
commented
Feb 19, 2026
I agree these are more OpenModelica tests. I suggest we remove this test and its workflow completely. OMPython has no benefit having it.
Why is this workflow needed? Perhaps
Better to add it when its required. Here its inclusion is not clear. |
OK; remove it completly (also the definiton using a cron job) or just deactivate the automated run such that it can be executed if needed?
OK; will remove it here. The idea was to be able to run both options v4xx and v400 separatly ... |
adeas31
commented
Feb 23, 2026
Remove it completely. We already test this as part of our library testing. |
* these are test for OpenModelica / no specific check for OMPython * they are run via a cron job * it increases the runtime of the unittest job
d35a8ba to
bb5df2bComparesyntron
commented
Feb 23, 2026
@adeas31 Updated PR; only change is the removal of the test |
adeas31
commented
Feb 24, 2026
Remove the FMI Test link from the README. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
simplify main test workflow - do not run test_FMIRegression
furthermore add a test workflow which runs only the latest version (unittests in ./tests) - needed later if data for v400 is defined
see PR #404