Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Call find_typedefs.pl in the Postgres repo - #29
Draft
tristan957 wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
The previous subroutine code has moved to the Postgres repo to have one source of truth for finding typedefs instead of the previous shell script and this buildfarm code, which didn't have the same features.
tristan957force-pushed
the
find_typedefs
branch
from
December 13, 2023 20:55
793ab79 to
c3e6bf0ComparePea1594
approved these changes
May 18, 2024
tristan957
commented
May 20, 2024
Author
This PR needs the patch that copies the build farm find_typedefs.pl into the Postgres tree. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The previous subroutine code has moved to the Postgres repo to have one source of truth for finding typedefs instead of the previous shell script and this buildfarm code, which didn't have the same features.