Integration test for different DBs in CI #2211

Closed
#2286
Closed
Integration test for different DBs in CI#2211
#2286
Labels
testing

Description

@Jelenkee
Jelenkee
opened on Mar 17, 2023

What's up?

Hi,
I noticed that there is an integration test with SQLite, DuckDB and Postgres that does not run in CI. Is there a special reason for that?

I think it would be cool to run tests for different vendors like MySQL (or MariaDB) in CI as well. Even IBM DB2 and MS SQL Server have public docker images that can be used.
The tests should cover the syntactic/semanctic differences between theses vendors (like SUBSTR vs SUBSTRING) so that issues like #1854 can be discovered earlier.

We can adapt the workflow from objection.js which looks pretty simple
workflow
docker-compose

It may not be necessary to fill the DBs with chinook before testing. Just a few records in a table may be enough.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    testing

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
       blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

      Skip to content
      Integration test for different DBs in CI #2211
      Closed
      #2286
      Closed
      Integration test for different DBs in CI#2211
      #2286
      Labels
      testing
      Description
      @Jelenkee
      Jelenkee
      opened on Mar 17, 2023
      What's up?
      Hi,
      
I noticed that there is an integration test with SQLite, DuckDB and Postgres that does not run in CI. Is there a special reason for that?
      I think it would be cool to run tests for different vendors like MySQL (or MariaDB) in CI as well. Even IBM DB2 and MS SQL Server have public docker images that can be used.
      
The tests should cover the syntactic/semanctic differences between theses vendors (like SUBSTR vs SUBSTRING) so that issues like #1854 can be discovered earlier.
      We can adapt the workflow from objection.js which looks pretty simple
      workflow
      docker-compose
      It may not be necessary to fill the DBs with chinook before testing. Just a few records in a table may be enough.
      Metadata
      Metadata
      Assignees
      No one assigned
        Labels
        testing
        Type
        No type
        Projects
        No projects
          Milestone
          No milestone
          Relationships
          None yet
          Development
          No branches or pull requests
          Issue actions
          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

          Skip to content
          Integration test for different DBs in CI #2211
          Closed
          #2286
          Closed
          Integration test for different DBs in CI#2211
          #2286
          Labels
          testing
          Description
          @Jelenkee
          Jelenkee
          opened on Mar 17, 2023
          What's up?
          Hi,
          
I noticed that there is an integration test with SQLite, DuckDB and Postgres that does not run in CI. Is there a special reason for that?
          I think it would be cool to run tests for different vendors like MySQL (or MariaDB) in CI as well. Even IBM DB2 and MS SQL Server have public docker images that can be used.
          
The tests should cover the syntactic/semanctic differences between theses vendors (like SUBSTR vs SUBSTRING) so that issues like #1854 can be discovered earlier.
          We can adapt the workflow from objection.js which looks pretty simple
          workflow
          docker-compose
          It may not be necessary to fill the DBs with chinook before testing. Just a few records in a table may be enough.
          Metadata
          Metadata
          Assignees
          No one assigned
            Labels
            testing
            Type
            No type
            Projects
            No projects
              Milestone
              No milestone
              Relationships
              None yet
              Development
              No branches or pull requests
              Issue actions
              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

              Skip to content
              Integration test for different DBs in CI #2211
              Closed
              #2286
              Closed
              Integration test for different DBs in CI#2211
              #2286
              Labels
              testing
              Description
              @Jelenkee
              Jelenkee
              opened on Mar 17, 2023
              What's up?
              Hi,
              
I noticed that there is an integration test with SQLite, DuckDB and Postgres that does not run in CI. Is there a special reason for that?
              I think it would be cool to run tests for different vendors like MySQL (or MariaDB) in CI as well. Even IBM DB2 and MS SQL Server have public docker images that can be used.
              
The tests should cover the syntactic/semanctic differences between theses vendors (like SUBSTR vs SUBSTRING) so that issues like #1854 can be discovered earlier.
              We can adapt the workflow from objection.js which looks pretty simple
              workflow
              docker-compose
              It may not be necessary to fill the DBs with chinook before testing. Just a few records in a table may be enough.
              Metadata
              Metadata
              Assignees
              No one assigned
                Labels
                testing
                Type
                No type
                Projects
                No projects
                  Milestone
                  No milestone
                  Relationships
                  None yet
                  Development
                  No branches or pull requests
                  Issue actions
                  
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

                  Skip to content
                  Integration test for different DBs in CI #2211
                  Closed
                  #2286
                  Closed
                  Integration test for different DBs in CI#2211
                  #2286
                  Labels
                  testing
                  Description
                  @Jelenkee
                  Jelenkee
                  opened on Mar 17, 2023
                  What's up?
                  Hi,
                  
I noticed that there is an integration test with SQLite, DuckDB and Postgres that does not run in CI. Is there a special reason for that?
                  I think it would be cool to run tests for different vendors like MySQL (or MariaDB) in CI as well. Even IBM DB2 and MS SQL Server have public docker images that can be used.
                  
The tests should cover the syntactic/semanctic differences between theses vendors (like SUBSTR vs SUBSTRING) so that issues like #1854 can be discovered earlier.
                  We can adapt the workflow from objection.js which looks pretty simple
                  workflow
                  docker-compose
                  It may not be necessary to fill the DBs with chinook before testing. Just a few records in a table may be enough.
                  Metadata
                  Metadata
                  Assignees
                  No one assigned
                    Labels
                    testing
                    Type
                    No type
                    Projects
                    No projects
                      Milestone
                      No milestone
                      Relationships
                      None yet
                      Development
                      No branches or pull requests
                      Issue actions
                      
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

                      Skip to content
                      Integration test for different DBs in CI #2211
                      Closed
                      #2286
                      Closed
                      Integration test for different DBs in CI#2211
                      #2286
                      Labels
                      testing
                      Description
                      @Jelenkee
                      Jelenkee
                      opened on Mar 17, 2023
                      What's up?
                      Hi,
                      
I noticed that there is an integration test with SQLite, DuckDB and Postgres that does not run in CI. Is there a special reason for that?
                      I think it would be cool to run tests for different vendors like MySQL (or MariaDB) in CI as well. Even IBM DB2 and MS SQL Server have public docker images that can be used.
                      
The tests should cover the syntactic/semanctic differences between theses vendors (like SUBSTR vs SUBSTRING) so that issues like #1854 can be discovered earlier.
                      We can adapt the workflow from objection.js which looks pretty simple
                      workflow
                      docker-compose
                      It may not be necessary to fill the DBs with chinook before testing. Just a few records in a table may be enough.
                      Metadata
                      Metadata
                      Assignees
                      No one assigned
                        Labels
                        testing
                        Type
                        No type
                        Projects
                        No projects
                          Milestone
                          No milestone
                          Relationships
                          None yet
                          Development
                          No branches or pull requests
                          Issue actions
                          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

                          Skip to content
                          Integration test for different DBs in CI #2211
                          Closed
                          #2286
                          Closed
                          Integration test for different DBs in CI#2211
                          #2286
                          Labels
                          testing
                          Description
                          @Jelenkee
                          Jelenkee
                          opened on Mar 17, 2023
                          What's up?
                          Hi,
                          
I noticed that there is an integration test with SQLite, DuckDB and Postgres that does not run in CI. Is there a special reason for that?
                          I think it would be cool to run tests for different vendors like MySQL (or MariaDB) in CI as well. Even IBM DB2 and MS SQL Server have public docker images that can be used.
                          
The tests should cover the syntactic/semanctic differences between theses vendors (like SUBSTR vs SUBSTRING) so that issues like #1854 can be discovered earlier.
                          We can adapt the workflow from objection.js which looks pretty simple
                          workflow
                          docker-compose
                          It may not be necessary to fill the DBs with chinook before testing. Just a few records in a table may be enough.
                          Metadata
                          Metadata
                          Assignees
                          No one assigned
                            Labels
                            testing
                            Type
                            No type
                            Projects
                            No projects
                              Milestone
                              No milestone
                              Relationships
                              None yet
                              Development
                              No branches or pull requests
                              Issue actions
                              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

                              Skip to content
                              Integration test for different DBs in CI #2211
                              Closed
                              #2286
                              Closed
                              Integration test for different DBs in CI#2211
                              #2286
                              Labels
                              testing
                              Description
                              @Jelenkee
                              Jelenkee
                              opened on Mar 17, 2023
                              What's up?
                              Hi,
                              
I noticed that there is an integration test with SQLite, DuckDB and Postgres that does not run in CI. Is there a special reason for that?
                              I think it would be cool to run tests for different vendors like MySQL (or MariaDB) in CI as well. Even IBM DB2 and MS SQL Server have public docker images that can be used.
                              
The tests should cover the syntactic/semanctic differences between theses vendors (like SUBSTR vs SUBSTRING) so that issues like #1854 can be discovered earlier.
                              We can adapt the workflow from objection.js which looks pretty simple
                              workflow
                              docker-compose
                              It may not be necessary to fill the DBs with chinook before testing. Just a few records in a table may be enough.
                              Metadata
                              Metadata
                              Assignees
                              No one assigned
                                Labels
                                testing
                                Type
                                No type
                                Projects
                                No projects
                                  Milestone
                                  No milestone
                                  Relationships
                                  None yet
                                  Development
                                  No branches or pull requests
                                  Issue actions