Skip to content

ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs - #6038

Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/tend-review-fork-checkout
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs#6038
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/tend-review-fork-checkout

Conversation

@prql-bot

@prql-botprql-bot commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Problem

tend-review fails at the checkout step for fork PRs (e.g. #6037), turning the review check red before the review ever runs:

##[error]Refusing to check out fork pull request code from a 'pull_request_target' workflow. ... set 'allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true' on the actions/checkout step.

Root cause

actions/checkout@v7.0.0 (2026-06-18) added PR #2454, a guard that refuses to check out fork-PR code when the trigger is pull_request_target, unless allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true is set. tend-review.yaml is on: pull_request_target and feeds actions/checkout the fork ref directly, so every fork PR trips it. (Same-repo PRs are unaffected; tend-mention is unaffected because it checks out the base repo and then gh pr checkouts the branch — the action never sees a fork ref.)

The pin here is actions/checkout@v7 (Dependabot bumped it from the v6 that tend 0.1.6 generates), but the matching allow-unsafe-pr-checkout flag was not added, so the workflow is in the broken middle state.

Fix

Add allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true to the tend-review checkout step. This mirrors the upstream tend resolution: issue max-sixty/tend#723 → the maintainer chose this option → max-sixty/tend#725 merged it, shipped in tend 0.1.7 (this repo is pinned to 0.1.6).

This is a focused stopgap on the generated file so fork-PR reviews work again immediately; it will be superseded — with identical content for this line — by the next tend 0.1.7 workflow regen.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@prql-bot@claude
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs
970448e
actions/checkout@v7 refuses fork-PR checkout under pull_request_target
unless allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true is set. Mirrors the upstream tend
fix (max-sixty/tend#725, in 0.1.7).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@prql-botprql-bot mentioned this pull request Jun 24, 2026
Closed
@max-sixty
max-sixty merged commit fefeab2 into mainJun 24, 2026
41 checks passed
@max-sixty
max-sixty deleted the ci/tend-review-fork-checkout branch June 24, 2026 20:22
This was referenced Jun 25, 2026
Merged
Closed
Closed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs by prql-bot · Pull Request #6038 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs - #6038
Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
ci/tend-review-fork-checkout
Jun 24, 2026
Merged
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs#6038
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
ci/tend-review-fork-checkout
Conversation
@prql-bot
@prql-botprql-bot
commented
Jun 24, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Problem
tend-review fails at the checkout step for fork PRs (e.g. #6037), turning the review check red before the review ever runs:
##[error]Refusing to check out fork pull request code from a 'pull_request_target' workflow. ... set 'allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true' on the actions/checkout step.

Root cause
actions/checkout@v7.0.0 (2026-06-18) added PR #2454, a guard that refuses to check out fork-PR code when the trigger is pull_request_target, unless allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true is set. tend-review.yaml is on: pull_request_target and feeds actions/checkout the fork ref directly, so every fork PR trips it. (Same-repo PRs are unaffected; tend-mention is unaffected because it checks out the base repo and then gh pr checkouts the branch — the action never sees a fork ref.)
The pin here is actions/checkout@v7 (Dependabot bumped it from the v6 that tend 0.1.6 generates), but the matching allow-unsafe-pr-checkout flag was not added, so the workflow is in the broken middle state.
Fix
Add allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true to the tend-review checkout step. This mirrors the upstream tend resolution: issue max-sixty/tend#723 → the maintainer chose this option → max-sixty/tend#725 merged it, shipped in tend 0.1.7 (this repo is pinned to 0.1.6).
This is a focused stopgap on the generated file so fork-PR reviews work again immediately; it will be superseded — with identical content for this line — by the next tend 0.1.7 workflow regen.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@prql-bot@claude
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs
970448e
actions/checkout@v7 refuses fork-PR checkout under pull_request_target
unless allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true is set. Mirrors the upstream tend
fix (max-sixty/tend#725, in 0.1.7).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@prql-botprql-bot
mentioned this pull request
Jun 24, 2026
 Closed

@max-sixty
max-sixty
merged commit fefeab2
into
mainJun 24, 2026

41 checks passed

@max-sixty
max-sixty
deleted the

ci/tend-review-fork-checkout

branch
June 24, 2026 20:22

This was referenced Jun 25, 2026
 Merged

 Closed


Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs by prql-bot · Pull Request #6038 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs - #6038
Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
ci/tend-review-fork-checkout
Jun 24, 2026
Merged
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs#6038
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
ci/tend-review-fork-checkout
Conversation
@prql-bot
@prql-botprql-bot
commented
Jun 24, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Problem
tend-review fails at the checkout step for fork PRs (e.g. #6037), turning the review check red before the review ever runs:
##[error]Refusing to check out fork pull request code from a 'pull_request_target' workflow. ... set 'allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true' on the actions/checkout step.

Root cause
actions/checkout@v7.0.0 (2026-06-18) added PR #2454, a guard that refuses to check out fork-PR code when the trigger is pull_request_target, unless allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true is set. tend-review.yaml is on: pull_request_target and feeds actions/checkout the fork ref directly, so every fork PR trips it. (Same-repo PRs are unaffected; tend-mention is unaffected because it checks out the base repo and then gh pr checkouts the branch — the action never sees a fork ref.)
The pin here is actions/checkout@v7 (Dependabot bumped it from the v6 that tend 0.1.6 generates), but the matching allow-unsafe-pr-checkout flag was not added, so the workflow is in the broken middle state.
Fix
Add allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true to the tend-review checkout step. This mirrors the upstream tend resolution: issue max-sixty/tend#723 → the maintainer chose this option → max-sixty/tend#725 merged it, shipped in tend 0.1.7 (this repo is pinned to 0.1.6).
This is a focused stopgap on the generated file so fork-PR reviews work again immediately; it will be superseded — with identical content for this line — by the next tend 0.1.7 workflow regen.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@prql-bot@claude
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs
970448e
actions/checkout@v7 refuses fork-PR checkout under pull_request_target
unless allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true is set. Mirrors the upstream tend
fix (max-sixty/tend#725, in 0.1.7).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@prql-botprql-bot
mentioned this pull request
Jun 24, 2026
 Closed

@max-sixty
max-sixty
merged commit fefeab2
into
mainJun 24, 2026

41 checks passed

@max-sixty
max-sixty
deleted the

ci/tend-review-fork-checkout

branch
June 24, 2026 20:22

This was referenced Jun 25, 2026
 Merged

 Closed


Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs by prql-bot · Pull Request #6038 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs - #6038
Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
ci/tend-review-fork-checkout
Jun 24, 2026
Merged
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs#6038
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
ci/tend-review-fork-checkout
Conversation
@prql-bot
@prql-botprql-bot
commented
Jun 24, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Problem
tend-review fails at the checkout step for fork PRs (e.g. #6037), turning the review check red before the review ever runs:
##[error]Refusing to check out fork pull request code from a 'pull_request_target' workflow. ... set 'allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true' on the actions/checkout step.

Root cause
actions/checkout@v7.0.0 (2026-06-18) added PR #2454, a guard that refuses to check out fork-PR code when the trigger is pull_request_target, unless allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true is set. tend-review.yaml is on: pull_request_target and feeds actions/checkout the fork ref directly, so every fork PR trips it. (Same-repo PRs are unaffected; tend-mention is unaffected because it checks out the base repo and then gh pr checkouts the branch — the action never sees a fork ref.)
The pin here is actions/checkout@v7 (Dependabot bumped it from the v6 that tend 0.1.6 generates), but the matching allow-unsafe-pr-checkout flag was not added, so the workflow is in the broken middle state.
Fix
Add allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true to the tend-review checkout step. This mirrors the upstream tend resolution: issue max-sixty/tend#723 → the maintainer chose this option → max-sixty/tend#725 merged it, shipped in tend 0.1.7 (this repo is pinned to 0.1.6).
This is a focused stopgap on the generated file so fork-PR reviews work again immediately; it will be superseded — with identical content for this line — by the next tend 0.1.7 workflow regen.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@prql-bot@claude
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs
970448e
actions/checkout@v7 refuses fork-PR checkout under pull_request_target
unless allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true is set. Mirrors the upstream tend
fix (max-sixty/tend#725, in 0.1.7).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@prql-botprql-bot
mentioned this pull request
Jun 24, 2026
 Closed

@max-sixty
max-sixty
merged commit fefeab2
into
mainJun 24, 2026

41 checks passed

@max-sixty
max-sixty
deleted the

ci/tend-review-fork-checkout

branch
June 24, 2026 20:22

This was referenced Jun 25, 2026
 Merged

 Closed


Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs by prql-bot · Pull Request #6038 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs - #6038
Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
ci/tend-review-fork-checkout
Jun 24, 2026
Merged
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs#6038
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
ci/tend-review-fork-checkout
Conversation
@prql-bot
@prql-botprql-bot
commented
Jun 24, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Problem
tend-review fails at the checkout step for fork PRs (e.g. #6037), turning the review check red before the review ever runs:
##[error]Refusing to check out fork pull request code from a 'pull_request_target' workflow. ... set 'allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true' on the actions/checkout step.

Root cause
actions/checkout@v7.0.0 (2026-06-18) added PR #2454, a guard that refuses to check out fork-PR code when the trigger is pull_request_target, unless allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true is set. tend-review.yaml is on: pull_request_target and feeds actions/checkout the fork ref directly, so every fork PR trips it. (Same-repo PRs are unaffected; tend-mention is unaffected because it checks out the base repo and then gh pr checkouts the branch — the action never sees a fork ref.)
The pin here is actions/checkout@v7 (Dependabot bumped it from the v6 that tend 0.1.6 generates), but the matching allow-unsafe-pr-checkout flag was not added, so the workflow is in the broken middle state.
Fix
Add allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true to the tend-review checkout step. This mirrors the upstream tend resolution: issue max-sixty/tend#723 → the maintainer chose this option → max-sixty/tend#725 merged it, shipped in tend 0.1.7 (this repo is pinned to 0.1.6).
This is a focused stopgap on the generated file so fork-PR reviews work again immediately; it will be superseded — with identical content for this line — by the next tend 0.1.7 workflow regen.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@prql-bot@claude
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs
970448e
actions/checkout@v7 refuses fork-PR checkout under pull_request_target
unless allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true is set. Mirrors the upstream tend
fix (max-sixty/tend#725, in 0.1.7).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@prql-botprql-bot
mentioned this pull request
Jun 24, 2026
 Closed

@max-sixty
max-sixty
merged commit fefeab2
into
mainJun 24, 2026

41 checks passed

@max-sixty
max-sixty
deleted the

ci/tend-review-fork-checkout

branch
June 24, 2026 20:22

This was referenced Jun 25, 2026
 Merged

 Closed


Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs by prql-bot · Pull Request #6038 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs - #6038
Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
ci/tend-review-fork-checkout
Jun 24, 2026
Merged
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs#6038
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
ci/tend-review-fork-checkout
Conversation
@prql-bot
@prql-botprql-bot
commented
Jun 24, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Problem
tend-review fails at the checkout step for fork PRs (e.g. #6037), turning the review check red before the review ever runs:
##[error]Refusing to check out fork pull request code from a 'pull_request_target' workflow. ... set 'allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true' on the actions/checkout step.

Root cause
actions/checkout@v7.0.0 (2026-06-18) added PR #2454, a guard that refuses to check out fork-PR code when the trigger is pull_request_target, unless allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true is set. tend-review.yaml is on: pull_request_target and feeds actions/checkout the fork ref directly, so every fork PR trips it. (Same-repo PRs are unaffected; tend-mention is unaffected because it checks out the base repo and then gh pr checkouts the branch — the action never sees a fork ref.)
The pin here is actions/checkout@v7 (Dependabot bumped it from the v6 that tend 0.1.6 generates), but the matching allow-unsafe-pr-checkout flag was not added, so the workflow is in the broken middle state.
Fix
Add allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true to the tend-review checkout step. This mirrors the upstream tend resolution: issue max-sixty/tend#723 → the maintainer chose this option → max-sixty/tend#725 merged it, shipped in tend 0.1.7 (this repo is pinned to 0.1.6).
This is a focused stopgap on the generated file so fork-PR reviews work again immediately; it will be superseded — with identical content for this line — by the next tend 0.1.7 workflow regen.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@prql-bot@claude
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs
970448e
actions/checkout@v7 refuses fork-PR checkout under pull_request_target
unless allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true is set. Mirrors the upstream tend
fix (max-sixty/tend#725, in 0.1.7).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@prql-botprql-bot
mentioned this pull request
Jun 24, 2026
 Closed

@max-sixty
max-sixty
merged commit fefeab2
into
mainJun 24, 2026

41 checks passed

@max-sixty
max-sixty
deleted the

ci/tend-review-fork-checkout

branch
June 24, 2026 20:22

This was referenced Jun 25, 2026
 Merged

 Closed


Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs by prql-bot · Pull Request #6038 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs - #6038
Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
ci/tend-review-fork-checkout
Jun 24, 2026
Merged
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs#6038
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
ci/tend-review-fork-checkout
Conversation
@prql-bot
@prql-botprql-bot
commented
Jun 24, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Problem
tend-review fails at the checkout step for fork PRs (e.g. #6037), turning the review check red before the review ever runs:
##[error]Refusing to check out fork pull request code from a 'pull_request_target' workflow. ... set 'allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true' on the actions/checkout step.

Root cause
actions/checkout@v7.0.0 (2026-06-18) added PR #2454, a guard that refuses to check out fork-PR code when the trigger is pull_request_target, unless allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true is set. tend-review.yaml is on: pull_request_target and feeds actions/checkout the fork ref directly, so every fork PR trips it. (Same-repo PRs are unaffected; tend-mention is unaffected because it checks out the base repo and then gh pr checkouts the branch — the action never sees a fork ref.)
The pin here is actions/checkout@v7 (Dependabot bumped it from the v6 that tend 0.1.6 generates), but the matching allow-unsafe-pr-checkout flag was not added, so the workflow is in the broken middle state.
Fix
Add allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true to the tend-review checkout step. This mirrors the upstream tend resolution: issue max-sixty/tend#723 → the maintainer chose this option → max-sixty/tend#725 merged it, shipped in tend 0.1.7 (this repo is pinned to 0.1.6).
This is a focused stopgap on the generated file so fork-PR reviews work again immediately; it will be superseded — with identical content for this line — by the next tend 0.1.7 workflow regen.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@prql-bot@claude
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs
970448e
actions/checkout@v7 refuses fork-PR checkout under pull_request_target
unless allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true is set. Mirrors the upstream tend
fix (max-sixty/tend#725, in 0.1.7).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@prql-botprql-bot
mentioned this pull request
Jun 24, 2026
 Closed

@max-sixty
max-sixty
merged commit fefeab2
into
mainJun 24, 2026

41 checks passed

@max-sixty
max-sixty
deleted the

ci/tend-review-fork-checkout

branch
June 24, 2026 20:22

This was referenced Jun 25, 2026
 Merged

 Closed


Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs by prql-bot · Pull Request #6038 · PRQL/prql · GitHub
Skip to content
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs - #6038
Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
ci/tend-review-fork-checkout
Jun 24, 2026
Merged
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs#6038
max-sixty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
ci/tend-review-fork-checkout
Conversation
@prql-bot
@prql-botprql-bot
commented
Jun 24, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
Problem
tend-review fails at the checkout step for fork PRs (e.g. #6037), turning the review check red before the review ever runs:
##[error]Refusing to check out fork pull request code from a 'pull_request_target' workflow. ... set 'allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true' on the actions/checkout step.

Root cause
actions/checkout@v7.0.0 (2026-06-18) added PR #2454, a guard that refuses to check out fork-PR code when the trigger is pull_request_target, unless allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true is set. tend-review.yaml is on: pull_request_target and feeds actions/checkout the fork ref directly, so every fork PR trips it. (Same-repo PRs are unaffected; tend-mention is unaffected because it checks out the base repo and then gh pr checkouts the branch — the action never sees a fork ref.)
The pin here is actions/checkout@v7 (Dependabot bumped it from the v6 that tend 0.1.6 generates), but the matching allow-unsafe-pr-checkout flag was not added, so the workflow is in the broken middle state.
Fix
Add allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true to the tend-review checkout step. This mirrors the upstream tend resolution: issue max-sixty/tend#723 → the maintainer chose this option → max-sixty/tend#725 merged it, shipped in tend 0.1.7 (this repo is pinned to 0.1.6).
This is a focused stopgap on the generated file so fork-PR reviews work again immediately; it will be superseded — with identical content for this line — by the next tend 0.1.7 workflow regen.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@prql-bot@claude
ci: opt into v7 fork-PR checkout so tend-review runs on fork PRs
970448e
actions/checkout@v7 refuses fork-PR checkout under pull_request_target
unless allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true is set. Mirrors the upstream tend
fix (max-sixty/tend#725, in 0.1.7).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@prql-botprql-bot
mentioned this pull request
Jun 24, 2026
 Closed

@max-sixty
max-sixty
merged commit fefeab2
into
mainJun 24, 2026

41 checks passed

@max-sixty
max-sixty
deleted the

ci/tend-review-fork-checkout

branch
June 24, 2026 20:22

This was referenced Jun 25, 2026
 Merged

 Closed


Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@prql-bot@max-sixty