Skip to content

⚙️ [Maintenance]: Adopt Process-PSModule v6.1.4 and require Pester 6.x in tests - #29

Open
Marius Storhaug (MariusStorhaug) wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
maintenance/lock-pester-major-6
Open

⚙️ [Maintenance]: Adopt Process-PSModule v6.1.4 and require Pester 6.x in tests#29
Marius Storhaug (MariusStorhaug) wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
maintenance/lock-pester-major-6

Conversation

@MariusStorhaug

@MariusStorhaugMarius Storhaug (MariusStorhaug) commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This module now runs on the latest Process-PSModule automation (v6.1.4) and pins its test suite to Pester 6, so continuous integration uses the current build, test, and publish pipeline and the tests fail fast if Pester 6 is ever missing.

Changed: CI runs on Process-PSModule v6.1.4

The reusable workflow pin moves to v6.1.4 from the module's previously pinned v5 release, adopting the current pipeline, including the Pester 6 test runner and the consolidated TestData secret model. No caller changes are required — the existing secrets wiring keeps passing everything the pipeline needs.

Changed: Tests require Pester 6.x

Every test file now declares the Pester 6 requirement, so the suite always resolves Pester 6 and fails with a clear message if only an older Pester is available, instead of silently running on it.

Technical Details

  • .github/workflows/Process-PSModule.yml: pin bumped to workflow.yml@da180bac16b13bfbcdf08b2e4e221b5b49e5ff28 # v6.1.4.
  • tests/*.Tests.ps1: added #Requires -Modules @{ ModuleName = 'Pester'; ModuleVersion = '6.0.0'; MaximumVersion = '6.*' }.
  • Classic Should assertions are left unchanged. Pester 6 is backward-compatible, so converting to the new Should-* syntax is intentionally out of scope for this maintenance change.
  • Supersedes any stale Dependabot bump of the Process-PSModule pin.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings July 7, 2026 15:42
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No Significant Changes Detected

This PR does not contain changes to files that would trigger a new release:

PathDescription
src/**Module source code
README.mdDocumentation

Build, test, and publish stages will be skipped for this PR.

If you believe this is incorrect, please verify that your changes are in the correct locations.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds an explicit Pester dependency requirement to the module’s PowerShell test script so tests only run when the expected Pester major version is available (and the correct module identity is present).

Changes:

  • Add #Requires -Modules to tests/Markdown.Tests.ps1 to enforce Pester 6.x availability at discovery time.
  • Pin the required module identity via GUID.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment threadtests/Markdown.Tests.ps1 Outdated
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Super-linter summary

LanguageValidation result
CHECKOVPass ✅
GITHUB_ACTIONSPass ✅
GITLEAKSPass ✅
GIT_MERGE_CONFLICT_MARKERSPass ✅
MARKDOWNPass ✅
NATURAL_LANGUAGEPass ✅
POWERSHELLPass ✅
PRE_COMMITPass ✅
SPELL_CODESPELLPass ✅
TRIVYPass ✅
YAMLPass ✅

All files and directories linted successfully

For more information, see the GitHub Actions workflow run

Powered by Super-linter

The GUID pins module identity (precise pinning), a stricter control than the lock-to-major risk appetite. Keep only the version range.
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No Significant Changes Detected

This PR does not contain changes to files that would trigger a new release:

PathDescription
src/**Module source code
README.mdDocumentation

Build, test, and publish stages will be skipped for this PR.

If you believe this is incorrect, please verify that your changes are in the correct locations.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Super-linter summary

LanguageValidation result
CHECKOVPass ✅
GITHUB_ACTIONSPass ✅
GITLEAKSPass ✅
GIT_MERGE_CONFLICT_MARKERSPass ✅
MARKDOWNPass ✅
NATURAL_LANGUAGEPass ✅
POWERSHELLPass ✅
PRE_COMMITPass ✅
SPELL_CODESPELLPass ✅
TRIVYPass ✅
YAMLPass ✅

All files and directories linted successfully

For more information, see the GitHub Actions workflow run

Powered by Super-linter

@MariusStorhaug
Marius Storhaug (MariusStorhaug) marked this pull request as draft July 12, 2026 09:56
@MariusStorhaugMarius Storhaug (MariusStorhaug) changed the title ⚙️ [Maintenance]: Require Pester 6.x in test files⚙️ [Maintenance]: Adopt Process-PSModule v6.1.4 and require Pester 6.x in testsJul 12, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No Significant Changes Detected

This PR does not contain changes to files that would trigger a new release:

PatternDescription
^src/Matches files where path matches this pattern
^README\.md$Matches files where path matches this pattern

Build, test, and publish stages will be skipped for this PR.

If you believe this is incorrect, please verify that your changes are in the correct locations.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Super-linter summary

LanguageValidation result
CHECKOVPass ✅
GITHUB_ACTIONSPass ✅
GITLEAKSPass ✅
GIT_MERGE_CONFLICT_MARKERSPass ✅
MARKDOWNPass ✅
NATURAL_LANGUAGEPass ✅
POWERSHELLPass ✅
PRE_COMMITPass ✅
SPELL_CODESPELLPass ✅
TRIVYPass ✅
YAMLPass ✅

All files and directories linted successfully

For more information, see the GitHub Actions workflow run

Powered by Super-linter

@MariusStorhaug
Marius Storhaug (MariusStorhaug) marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2026 10:05
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MariusStorhaug