Adding the round_and_hash_float_array also to v3 - #2156

Merged
erikvansebille merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3
Aug 22, 2025
Merged

Adding the round_and_hash_float_array also to v3#2156
erikvansebille merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3

Conversation

@erikvansebille

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR adds the tests/utils.round_and_hash_float_array() function also to v3, so we can easily compare unit test results between v3 and v4.

  • Chose the correct base branch (main for v3 changes, v4-dev for v4 changes)

So we can easily compare unit test results between v3 and v4

@VeckoTheGeckoVeckoTheGecko left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Though if we want to

unit test results between v3 and v4.

we of course also need to identify tests that we want to use for this comparison. The test suites have diverged quite a bit - but I imagine you already have some tests in mind @erikvansebille ? Also, we have the saved outputs introduced in ffb2fca and used in tests/v4/test_interpolation.py - but I assume you want to expand the comparison to other parts in the codebase?

@erikvansebille

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Exactly! I needed this function when working on #2152, and can imagine it's good to have when we port over other functionality and unit tests

@erikvansebille
erikvansebille merged commit 4073545 into mainAug 22, 2025
16 checks passed
@erikvansebille
erikvansebille deleted the hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3 branch August 22, 2025 08:31
@github-project-automationgithub-project-automationBot moved this from Backlog to Done in Parcels developmentAug 22, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@erikvansebille@VeckoTheGecko
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Adding the round_and_hash_float_array also to v3 - #2156

Merged
erikvansebille merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3
Aug 22, 2025
Merged

Adding the round_and_hash_float_array also to v3#2156
erikvansebille merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3

Conversation

@erikvansebille

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR adds the tests/utils.round_and_hash_float_array() function also to v3, so we can easily compare unit test results between v3 and v4.

  • Chose the correct base branch (main for v3 changes, v4-dev for v4 changes)

So we can easily compare unit test results between v3 and v4

@VeckoTheGeckoVeckoTheGecko left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Though if we want to

unit test results between v3 and v4.

we of course also need to identify tests that we want to use for this comparison. The test suites have diverged quite a bit - but I imagine you already have some tests in mind @erikvansebille ? Also, we have the saved outputs introduced in ffb2fca and used in tests/v4/test_interpolation.py - but I assume you want to expand the comparison to other parts in the codebase?

@erikvansebille

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Exactly! I needed this function when working on #2152, and can imagine it's good to have when we port over other functionality and unit tests

@erikvansebille
erikvansebille merged commit 4073545 into mainAug 22, 2025
16 checks passed
@erikvansebille
erikvansebille deleted the hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3 branch August 22, 2025 08:31
@github-project-automationgithub-project-automationBot moved this from Backlog to Done in Parcels developmentAug 22, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@erikvansebille@VeckoTheGecko
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Adding the round_and_hash_float_array also to v3 - #2156

Merged
erikvansebille merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3
Aug 22, 2025
Merged

Adding the round_and_hash_float_array also to v3#2156
erikvansebille merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3

Conversation

@erikvansebille

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR adds the tests/utils.round_and_hash_float_array() function also to v3, so we can easily compare unit test results between v3 and v4.

  • Chose the correct base branch (main for v3 changes, v4-dev for v4 changes)

So we can easily compare unit test results between v3 and v4

@VeckoTheGeckoVeckoTheGecko left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Though if we want to

unit test results between v3 and v4.

we of course also need to identify tests that we want to use for this comparison. The test suites have diverged quite a bit - but I imagine you already have some tests in mind @erikvansebille ? Also, we have the saved outputs introduced in ffb2fca and used in tests/v4/test_interpolation.py - but I assume you want to expand the comparison to other parts in the codebase?

@erikvansebille

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Exactly! I needed this function when working on #2152, and can imagine it's good to have when we port over other functionality and unit tests

@erikvansebille
erikvansebille merged commit 4073545 into mainAug 22, 2025
16 checks passed
@erikvansebille
erikvansebille deleted the hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3 branch August 22, 2025 08:31
@github-project-automationgithub-project-automationBot moved this from Backlog to Done in Parcels developmentAug 22, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@erikvansebille@VeckoTheGecko
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Adding the round_and_hash_float_array also to v3 - #2156

Merged
erikvansebille merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3
Aug 22, 2025
Merged

Adding the round_and_hash_float_array also to v3#2156
erikvansebille merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3

Conversation

@erikvansebille

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR adds the tests/utils.round_and_hash_float_array() function also to v3, so we can easily compare unit test results between v3 and v4.

  • Chose the correct base branch (main for v3 changes, v4-dev for v4 changes)

So we can easily compare unit test results between v3 and v4

@VeckoTheGeckoVeckoTheGecko left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Though if we want to

unit test results between v3 and v4.

we of course also need to identify tests that we want to use for this comparison. The test suites have diverged quite a bit - but I imagine you already have some tests in mind @erikvansebille ? Also, we have the saved outputs introduced in ffb2fca and used in tests/v4/test_interpolation.py - but I assume you want to expand the comparison to other parts in the codebase?

@erikvansebille

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Exactly! I needed this function when working on #2152, and can imagine it's good to have when we port over other functionality and unit tests

@erikvansebille
erikvansebille merged commit 4073545 into mainAug 22, 2025
16 checks passed
@erikvansebille
erikvansebille deleted the hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3 branch August 22, 2025 08:31
@github-project-automationgithub-project-automationBot moved this from Backlog to Done in Parcels developmentAug 22, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@erikvansebille@VeckoTheGecko
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Adding the round_and_hash_float_array also to v3 - #2156

Merged
erikvansebille merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3
Aug 22, 2025
Merged

Adding the round_and_hash_float_array also to v3#2156
erikvansebille merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3

Conversation

@erikvansebille

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR adds the tests/utils.round_and_hash_float_array() function also to v3, so we can easily compare unit test results between v3 and v4.

  • Chose the correct base branch (main for v3 changes, v4-dev for v4 changes)

So we can easily compare unit test results between v3 and v4

@VeckoTheGeckoVeckoTheGecko left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Though if we want to

unit test results between v3 and v4.

we of course also need to identify tests that we want to use for this comparison. The test suites have diverged quite a bit - but I imagine you already have some tests in mind @erikvansebille ? Also, we have the saved outputs introduced in ffb2fca and used in tests/v4/test_interpolation.py - but I assume you want to expand the comparison to other parts in the codebase?

@erikvansebille

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Exactly! I needed this function when working on #2152, and can imagine it's good to have when we port over other functionality and unit tests

@erikvansebille
erikvansebille merged commit 4073545 into mainAug 22, 2025
16 checks passed
@erikvansebille
erikvansebille deleted the hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3 branch August 22, 2025 08:31
@github-project-automationgithub-project-automationBot moved this from Backlog to Done in Parcels developmentAug 22, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@erikvansebille@VeckoTheGecko
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Adding the round_and_hash_float_array also to v3 - #2156

Merged
erikvansebille merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3
Aug 22, 2025
Merged

Adding the round_and_hash_float_array also to v3#2156
erikvansebille merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3

Conversation

@erikvansebille

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR adds the tests/utils.round_and_hash_float_array() function also to v3, so we can easily compare unit test results between v3 and v4.

  • Chose the correct base branch (main for v3 changes, v4-dev for v4 changes)

So we can easily compare unit test results between v3 and v4

@VeckoTheGeckoVeckoTheGecko left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Though if we want to

unit test results between v3 and v4.

we of course also need to identify tests that we want to use for this comparison. The test suites have diverged quite a bit - but I imagine you already have some tests in mind @erikvansebille ? Also, we have the saved outputs introduced in ffb2fca and used in tests/v4/test_interpolation.py - but I assume you want to expand the comparison to other parts in the codebase?

@erikvansebille

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Exactly! I needed this function when working on #2152, and can imagine it's good to have when we port over other functionality and unit tests

@erikvansebille
erikvansebille merged commit 4073545 into mainAug 22, 2025
16 checks passed
@erikvansebille
erikvansebille deleted the hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3 branch August 22, 2025 08:31
@github-project-automationgithub-project-automationBot moved this from Backlog to Done in Parcels developmentAug 22, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@erikvansebille@VeckoTheGecko
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Adding the round_and_hash_float_array also to v3 - #2156

Merged
erikvansebille merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3
Aug 22, 2025
Merged

Adding the round_and_hash_float_array also to v3#2156
erikvansebille merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3

Conversation

@erikvansebille

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR adds the tests/utils.round_and_hash_float_array() function also to v3, so we can easily compare unit test results between v3 and v4.

  • Chose the correct base branch (main for v3 changes, v4-dev for v4 changes)

So we can easily compare unit test results between v3 and v4

@VeckoTheGeckoVeckoTheGecko left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Though if we want to

unit test results between v3 and v4.

we of course also need to identify tests that we want to use for this comparison. The test suites have diverged quite a bit - but I imagine you already have some tests in mind @erikvansebille ? Also, we have the saved outputs introduced in ffb2fca and used in tests/v4/test_interpolation.py - but I assume you want to expand the comparison to other parts in the codebase?

@erikvansebille

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Exactly! I needed this function when working on #2152, and can imagine it's good to have when we port over other functionality and unit tests

@erikvansebille
erikvansebille merged commit 4073545 into mainAug 22, 2025
16 checks passed
@erikvansebille
erikvansebille deleted the hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3 branch August 22, 2025 08:31
@github-project-automationgithub-project-automationBot moved this from Backlog to Done in Parcels developmentAug 22, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@erikvansebille@VeckoTheGecko
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Adding the round_and_hash_float_array also to v3 - #2156

Merged
erikvansebille merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3
Aug 22, 2025
Merged

Adding the round_and_hash_float_array also to v3#2156
erikvansebille merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3

Conversation

@erikvansebille

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR adds the tests/utils.round_and_hash_float_array() function also to v3, so we can easily compare unit test results between v3 and v4.

  • Chose the correct base branch (main for v3 changes, v4-dev for v4 changes)

So we can easily compare unit test results between v3 and v4

@VeckoTheGeckoVeckoTheGecko left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Though if we want to

unit test results between v3 and v4.

we of course also need to identify tests that we want to use for this comparison. The test suites have diverged quite a bit - but I imagine you already have some tests in mind @erikvansebille ? Also, we have the saved outputs introduced in ffb2fca and used in tests/v4/test_interpolation.py - but I assume you want to expand the comparison to other parts in the codebase?

@erikvansebille

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Exactly! I needed this function when working on #2152, and can imagine it's good to have when we port over other functionality and unit tests

@erikvansebille
erikvansebille merged commit 4073545 into mainAug 22, 2025
16 checks passed
@erikvansebille
erikvansebille deleted the hashfunction_for_testing_in_v3 branch August 22, 2025 08:31
@github-project-automationgithub-project-automationBot moved this from Backlog to Done in Parcels developmentAug 22, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@erikvansebille@VeckoTheGecko