Skip to content

RLCR loop: add diminishing-returns trip, severity ladder, and bookkeeping-postcondition guards #198

Description

@chenzongyao200127

Context

Observed in a 24-round RLCR loop terminated by the stagnation
circuit breaker. Findings are derived from a sanitised methodology
analysis; no project identifiers are included.

Methodology improvement suggestions

1. Add an "environment-blocked" terminal state

When the reviewer twice in a row names the same operationally-gated
dependency as the only open work, auto-transition the loop to an
operator-handoff state. The current circuit breaker fires only on
stagnation pattern; it should also fire on "remaining work is outside
the loop's reach", which is detectable from the reviewer naming the
same environment dependency across consecutive rounds.

2. Severity ladder for reviewer verdicts

Reviewers reliably promoted wording mismatches to "blocking" side
issues. Introduce three explicit severities: (a) behaviour-incorrect,
(b) interface-contract drift, (c) wording/cosmetic. Only (a) should
be allowed to block a round; (c) should be batched into periodic
cleanup passes.

3. Mirror-surface enumeration in the contract template

When the same defect class exists in N parallel files, the contract
should require enumerating all mirrors up front and fixing them in
one commit. A search-budget heuristic in the contract template can
enforce this: before editing any wording, run a project-wide search
for sibling phrasings and include all hits.

4. Postconditions must target shipping artefacts, not bookkeeping files

The meta-housekeeping cascade in the final two rounds was caused by
a brittle exact-grep postcondition on a summary file whose layout
the writer was free to wrap. Three rules:

  • Bookkeeping artefacts get no grep-style postconditions.
  • Prose postconditions must use whitespace-tolerant matching.
  • Two consecutive rounds whose mainline objective is repairing the
    loop's own bookkeeping should auto-trigger the stagnation breaker.

5. Audit-only rounds require explicit authorisation

Regression scrubs should be inlined into the validation step of the
next substantive round, not consume a full contract / implement /
review cycle on their own.

6. Track acceptance-criteria status as a time series

The headline AC metric was constant for 15 consecutive rounds.
Escalate when the metric is unchanged for K rounds (K=3), distinct
from "no defects found".

7. Contract complexity should scale to edit size

Late rounds had 10–11 success criteria for two-line edits, most
vacuously satisfied. A vacuous-criteria ratio above 50% in a freshly
generated contract is itself a busywork signal.

8. Split review verdicts on two axes

Distinguish "contract met this round" from "global progress
changed". Fourteen consecutive contract-met verdicts co-existed
with zero global movement — the vocabulary hid the divergence.

9. Cap summary length proportional to edit size

Late summaries reached 400–500 lines for two-line changes by
re-quoting prior context. Move recurring boilerplate to a
dereferenced evidence ledger.

10. Cross-cutting "diminishing returns" trip

A single piece of machinery monitoring (a) AC metric unchanged for K
rounds, (b) edit volume trending to zero, and (c) reviewer's only
remaining gap is the same environment-bound task. When all three are
true, auto-transition to operator handoff. In this session those
signals were all true 12 rounds before the stagnation breaker
finally fired.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
       blocks
      (function() {
      function addCopyButtons() {
      document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
      if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
      codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
      var btn = document.createElement('button');
      btn.textContent = 'Copy';
      btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
      btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
      btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
      btn.onclick = function() {
      navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
      btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
      setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
      });
      };
      codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
      codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
      });
      }
      addCopyButtons();
      // Re-run on dynamic content
      var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
      observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
      })();
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      RLCR loop: add diminishing-returns trip, severity ladder, and bookkeeping-postcondition guards · Issue #198 · PolyArch/humanize · GitHub
      Skip to content

      RLCR loop: add diminishing-returns trip, severity ladder, and bookkeeping-postcondition guards #198

      Description

      @chenzongyao200127

      Context

      Observed in a 24-round RLCR loop terminated by the stagnation
      circuit breaker. Findings are derived from a sanitised methodology
      analysis; no project identifiers are included.

      Methodology improvement suggestions

      1. Add an "environment-blocked" terminal state

      When the reviewer twice in a row names the same operationally-gated
      dependency as the only open work, auto-transition the loop to an
      operator-handoff state. The current circuit breaker fires only on
      stagnation pattern; it should also fire on "remaining work is outside
      the loop's reach", which is detectable from the reviewer naming the
      same environment dependency across consecutive rounds.

      2. Severity ladder for reviewer verdicts

      Reviewers reliably promoted wording mismatches to "blocking" side
      issues. Introduce three explicit severities: (a) behaviour-incorrect,
      (b) interface-contract drift, (c) wording/cosmetic. Only (a) should
      be allowed to block a round; (c) should be batched into periodic
      cleanup passes.

      3. Mirror-surface enumeration in the contract template

      When the same defect class exists in N parallel files, the contract
      should require enumerating all mirrors up front and fixing them in
      one commit. A search-budget heuristic in the contract template can
      enforce this: before editing any wording, run a project-wide search
      for sibling phrasings and include all hits.

      4. Postconditions must target shipping artefacts, not bookkeeping files

      The meta-housekeeping cascade in the final two rounds was caused by
      a brittle exact-grep postcondition on a summary file whose layout
      the writer was free to wrap. Three rules:

      • Bookkeeping artefacts get no grep-style postconditions.
      • Prose postconditions must use whitespace-tolerant matching.
      • Two consecutive rounds whose mainline objective is repairing the
        loop's own bookkeeping should auto-trigger the stagnation breaker.

      5. Audit-only rounds require explicit authorisation

      Regression scrubs should be inlined into the validation step of the
      next substantive round, not consume a full contract / implement /
      review cycle on their own.

      6. Track acceptance-criteria status as a time series

      The headline AC metric was constant for 15 consecutive rounds.
      Escalate when the metric is unchanged for K rounds (K=3), distinct
      from "no defects found".

      7. Contract complexity should scale to edit size

      Late rounds had 10–11 success criteria for two-line edits, most
      vacuously satisfied. A vacuous-criteria ratio above 50% in a freshly
      generated contract is itself a busywork signal.

      8. Split review verdicts on two axes

      Distinguish "contract met this round" from "global progress
      changed". Fourteen consecutive contract-met verdicts co-existed
      with zero global movement — the vocabulary hid the divergence.

      9. Cap summary length proportional to edit size

      Late summaries reached 400–500 lines for two-line changes by
      re-quoting prior context. Move recurring boilerplate to a
      dereferenced evidence ledger.

      10. Cross-cutting "diminishing returns" trip

      A single piece of machinery monitoring (a) AC metric unchanged for K
      rounds, (b) edit volume trending to zero, and (c) reviewer's only
      remaining gap is the same environment-bound task. When all three are
      true, auto-transition to operator handoff. In this session those
      signals were all true 12 rounds before the stagnation breaker
      finally fired.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        No labels
        No labels

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' RLCR loop: add diminishing-returns trip, severity ladder, and bookkeeping-postcondition guards · Issue #198 · PolyArch/humanize · GitHub
          Skip to content

          RLCR loop: add diminishing-returns trip, severity ladder, and bookkeeping-postcondition guards #198

          Description

          @chenzongyao200127

          Context

          Observed in a 24-round RLCR loop terminated by the stagnation
          circuit breaker. Findings are derived from a sanitised methodology
          analysis; no project identifiers are included.

          Methodology improvement suggestions

          1. Add an "environment-blocked" terminal state

          When the reviewer twice in a row names the same operationally-gated
          dependency as the only open work, auto-transition the loop to an
          operator-handoff state. The current circuit breaker fires only on
          stagnation pattern; it should also fire on "remaining work is outside
          the loop's reach", which is detectable from the reviewer naming the
          same environment dependency across consecutive rounds.

          2. Severity ladder for reviewer verdicts

          Reviewers reliably promoted wording mismatches to "blocking" side
          issues. Introduce three explicit severities: (a) behaviour-incorrect,
          (b) interface-contract drift, (c) wording/cosmetic. Only (a) should
          be allowed to block a round; (c) should be batched into periodic
          cleanup passes.

          3. Mirror-surface enumeration in the contract template

          When the same defect class exists in N parallel files, the contract
          should require enumerating all mirrors up front and fixing them in
          one commit. A search-budget heuristic in the contract template can
          enforce this: before editing any wording, run a project-wide search
          for sibling phrasings and include all hits.

          4. Postconditions must target shipping artefacts, not bookkeeping files

          The meta-housekeeping cascade in the final two rounds was caused by
          a brittle exact-grep postcondition on a summary file whose layout
          the writer was free to wrap. Three rules:

          • Bookkeeping artefacts get no grep-style postconditions.
          • Prose postconditions must use whitespace-tolerant matching.
          • Two consecutive rounds whose mainline objective is repairing the
            loop's own bookkeeping should auto-trigger the stagnation breaker.

          5. Audit-only rounds require explicit authorisation

          Regression scrubs should be inlined into the validation step of the
          next substantive round, not consume a full contract / implement /
          review cycle on their own.

          6. Track acceptance-criteria status as a time series

          The headline AC metric was constant for 15 consecutive rounds.
          Escalate when the metric is unchanged for K rounds (K=3), distinct
          from "no defects found".

          7. Contract complexity should scale to edit size

          Late rounds had 10–11 success criteria for two-line edits, most
          vacuously satisfied. A vacuous-criteria ratio above 50% in a freshly
          generated contract is itself a busywork signal.

          8. Split review verdicts on two axes

          Distinguish "contract met this round" from "global progress
          changed". Fourteen consecutive contract-met verdicts co-existed
          with zero global movement — the vocabulary hid the divergence.

          9. Cap summary length proportional to edit size

          Late summaries reached 400–500 lines for two-line changes by
          re-quoting prior context. Move recurring boilerplate to a
          dereferenced evidence ledger.

          10. Cross-cutting "diminishing returns" trip

          A single piece of machinery monitoring (a) AC metric unchanged for K
          rounds, (b) edit volume trending to zero, and (c) reviewer's only
          remaining gap is the same environment-bound task. When all three are
          true, auto-transition to operator handoff. In this session those
          signals were all true 12 rounds before the stagnation breaker
          finally fired.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            No labels
            No labels

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' RLCR loop: add diminishing-returns trip, severity ladder, and bookkeeping-postcondition guards · Issue #198 · PolyArch/humanize · GitHub
              Skip to content

              RLCR loop: add diminishing-returns trip, severity ladder, and bookkeeping-postcondition guards #198

              Description

              @chenzongyao200127

              Context

              Observed in a 24-round RLCR loop terminated by the stagnation
              circuit breaker. Findings are derived from a sanitised methodology
              analysis; no project identifiers are included.

              Methodology improvement suggestions

              1. Add an "environment-blocked" terminal state

              When the reviewer twice in a row names the same operationally-gated
              dependency as the only open work, auto-transition the loop to an
              operator-handoff state. The current circuit breaker fires only on
              stagnation pattern; it should also fire on "remaining work is outside
              the loop's reach", which is detectable from the reviewer naming the
              same environment dependency across consecutive rounds.

              2. Severity ladder for reviewer verdicts

              Reviewers reliably promoted wording mismatches to "blocking" side
              issues. Introduce three explicit severities: (a) behaviour-incorrect,
              (b) interface-contract drift, (c) wording/cosmetic. Only (a) should
              be allowed to block a round; (c) should be batched into periodic
              cleanup passes.

              3. Mirror-surface enumeration in the contract template

              When the same defect class exists in N parallel files, the contract
              should require enumerating all mirrors up front and fixing them in
              one commit. A search-budget heuristic in the contract template can
              enforce this: before editing any wording, run a project-wide search
              for sibling phrasings and include all hits.

              4. Postconditions must target shipping artefacts, not bookkeeping files

              The meta-housekeeping cascade in the final two rounds was caused by
              a brittle exact-grep postcondition on a summary file whose layout
              the writer was free to wrap. Three rules:

              • Bookkeeping artefacts get no grep-style postconditions.
              • Prose postconditions must use whitespace-tolerant matching.
              • Two consecutive rounds whose mainline objective is repairing the
                loop's own bookkeeping should auto-trigger the stagnation breaker.

              5. Audit-only rounds require explicit authorisation

              Regression scrubs should be inlined into the validation step of the
              next substantive round, not consume a full contract / implement /
              review cycle on their own.

              6. Track acceptance-criteria status as a time series

              The headline AC metric was constant for 15 consecutive rounds.
              Escalate when the metric is unchanged for K rounds (K=3), distinct
              from "no defects found".

              7. Contract complexity should scale to edit size

              Late rounds had 10–11 success criteria for two-line edits, most
              vacuously satisfied. A vacuous-criteria ratio above 50% in a freshly
              generated contract is itself a busywork signal.

              8. Split review verdicts on two axes

              Distinguish "contract met this round" from "global progress
              changed". Fourteen consecutive contract-met verdicts co-existed
              with zero global movement — the vocabulary hid the divergence.

              9. Cap summary length proportional to edit size

              Late summaries reached 400–500 lines for two-line changes by
              re-quoting prior context. Move recurring boilerplate to a
              dereferenced evidence ledger.

              10. Cross-cutting "diminishing returns" trip

              A single piece of machinery monitoring (a) AC metric unchanged for K
              rounds, (b) edit volume trending to zero, and (c) reviewer's only
              remaining gap is the same environment-bound task. When all three are
              true, auto-transition to operator handoff. In this session those
              signals were all true 12 rounds before the stagnation breaker
              finally fired.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                No labels
                No labels

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' RLCR loop: add diminishing-returns trip, severity ladder, and bookkeeping-postcondition guards · Issue #198 · PolyArch/humanize · GitHub
                  Skip to content

                  RLCR loop: add diminishing-returns trip, severity ladder, and bookkeeping-postcondition guards #198

                  Description

                  @chenzongyao200127

                  Context

                  Observed in a 24-round RLCR loop terminated by the stagnation
                  circuit breaker. Findings are derived from a sanitised methodology
                  analysis; no project identifiers are included.

                  Methodology improvement suggestions

                  1. Add an "environment-blocked" terminal state

                  When the reviewer twice in a row names the same operationally-gated
                  dependency as the only open work, auto-transition the loop to an
                  operator-handoff state. The current circuit breaker fires only on
                  stagnation pattern; it should also fire on "remaining work is outside
                  the loop's reach", which is detectable from the reviewer naming the
                  same environment dependency across consecutive rounds.

                  2. Severity ladder for reviewer verdicts

                  Reviewers reliably promoted wording mismatches to "blocking" side
                  issues. Introduce three explicit severities: (a) behaviour-incorrect,
                  (b) interface-contract drift, (c) wording/cosmetic. Only (a) should
                  be allowed to block a round; (c) should be batched into periodic
                  cleanup passes.

                  3. Mirror-surface enumeration in the contract template

                  When the same defect class exists in N parallel files, the contract
                  should require enumerating all mirrors up front and fixing them in
                  one commit. A search-budget heuristic in the contract template can
                  enforce this: before editing any wording, run a project-wide search
                  for sibling phrasings and include all hits.

                  4. Postconditions must target shipping artefacts, not bookkeeping files

                  The meta-housekeeping cascade in the final two rounds was caused by
                  a brittle exact-grep postcondition on a summary file whose layout
                  the writer was free to wrap. Three rules:

                  • Bookkeeping artefacts get no grep-style postconditions.
                  • Prose postconditions must use whitespace-tolerant matching.
                  • Two consecutive rounds whose mainline objective is repairing the
                    loop's own bookkeeping should auto-trigger the stagnation breaker.

                  5. Audit-only rounds require explicit authorisation

                  Regression scrubs should be inlined into the validation step of the
                  next substantive round, not consume a full contract / implement /
                  review cycle on their own.

                  6. Track acceptance-criteria status as a time series

                  The headline AC metric was constant for 15 consecutive rounds.
                  Escalate when the metric is unchanged for K rounds (K=3), distinct
                  from "no defects found".

                  7. Contract complexity should scale to edit size

                  Late rounds had 10–11 success criteria for two-line edits, most
                  vacuously satisfied. A vacuous-criteria ratio above 50% in a freshly
                  generated contract is itself a busywork signal.

                  8. Split review verdicts on two axes

                  Distinguish "contract met this round" from "global progress
                  changed". Fourteen consecutive contract-met verdicts co-existed
                  with zero global movement — the vocabulary hid the divergence.

                  9. Cap summary length proportional to edit size

                  Late summaries reached 400–500 lines for two-line changes by
                  re-quoting prior context. Move recurring boilerplate to a
                  dereferenced evidence ledger.

                  10. Cross-cutting "diminishing returns" trip

                  A single piece of machinery monitoring (a) AC metric unchanged for K
                  rounds, (b) edit volume trending to zero, and (c) reviewer's only
                  remaining gap is the same environment-bound task. When all three are
                  true, auto-transition to operator handoff. In this session those
                  signals were all true 12 rounds before the stagnation breaker
                  finally fired.

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    No labels
                    No labels

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' RLCR loop: add diminishing-returns trip, severity ladder, and bookkeeping-postcondition guards · Issue #198 · PolyArch/humanize · GitHub
                      Skip to content

                      RLCR loop: add diminishing-returns trip, severity ladder, and bookkeeping-postcondition guards #198

                      Description

                      @chenzongyao200127

                      Context

                      Observed in a 24-round RLCR loop terminated by the stagnation
                      circuit breaker. Findings are derived from a sanitised methodology
                      analysis; no project identifiers are included.

                      Methodology improvement suggestions

                      1. Add an "environment-blocked" terminal state

                      When the reviewer twice in a row names the same operationally-gated
                      dependency as the only open work, auto-transition the loop to an
                      operator-handoff state. The current circuit breaker fires only on
                      stagnation pattern; it should also fire on "remaining work is outside
                      the loop's reach", which is detectable from the reviewer naming the
                      same environment dependency across consecutive rounds.

                      2. Severity ladder for reviewer verdicts

                      Reviewers reliably promoted wording mismatches to "blocking" side
                      issues. Introduce three explicit severities: (a) behaviour-incorrect,
                      (b) interface-contract drift, (c) wording/cosmetic. Only (a) should
                      be allowed to block a round; (c) should be batched into periodic
                      cleanup passes.

                      3. Mirror-surface enumeration in the contract template

                      When the same defect class exists in N parallel files, the contract
                      should require enumerating all mirrors up front and fixing them in
                      one commit. A search-budget heuristic in the contract template can
                      enforce this: before editing any wording, run a project-wide search
                      for sibling phrasings and include all hits.

                      4. Postconditions must target shipping artefacts, not bookkeeping files

                      The meta-housekeeping cascade in the final two rounds was caused by
                      a brittle exact-grep postcondition on a summary file whose layout
                      the writer was free to wrap. Three rules:

                      • Bookkeeping artefacts get no grep-style postconditions.
                      • Prose postconditions must use whitespace-tolerant matching.
                      • Two consecutive rounds whose mainline objective is repairing the
                        loop's own bookkeeping should auto-trigger the stagnation breaker.

                      5. Audit-only rounds require explicit authorisation

                      Regression scrubs should be inlined into the validation step of the
                      next substantive round, not consume a full contract / implement /
                      review cycle on their own.

                      6. Track acceptance-criteria status as a time series

                      The headline AC metric was constant for 15 consecutive rounds.
                      Escalate when the metric is unchanged for K rounds (K=3), distinct
                      from "no defects found".

                      7. Contract complexity should scale to edit size

                      Late rounds had 10–11 success criteria for two-line edits, most
                      vacuously satisfied. A vacuous-criteria ratio above 50% in a freshly
                      generated contract is itself a busywork signal.

                      8. Split review verdicts on two axes

                      Distinguish "contract met this round" from "global progress
                      changed". Fourteen consecutive contract-met verdicts co-existed
                      with zero global movement — the vocabulary hid the divergence.

                      9. Cap summary length proportional to edit size

                      Late summaries reached 400–500 lines for two-line changes by
                      re-quoting prior context. Move recurring boilerplate to a
                      dereferenced evidence ledger.

                      10. Cross-cutting "diminishing returns" trip

                      A single piece of machinery monitoring (a) AC metric unchanged for K
                      rounds, (b) edit volume trending to zero, and (c) reviewer's only
                      remaining gap is the same environment-bound task. When all three are
                      true, auto-transition to operator handoff. In this session those
                      signals were all true 12 rounds before the stagnation breaker
                      finally fired.

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        No labels
                        No labels

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' RLCR loop: add diminishing-returns trip, severity ladder, and bookkeeping-postcondition guards · Issue #198 · PolyArch/humanize · GitHub
                          Skip to content

                          RLCR loop: add diminishing-returns trip, severity ladder, and bookkeeping-postcondition guards #198

                          Description

                          @chenzongyao200127

                          Context

                          Observed in a 24-round RLCR loop terminated by the stagnation
                          circuit breaker. Findings are derived from a sanitised methodology
                          analysis; no project identifiers are included.

                          Methodology improvement suggestions

                          1. Add an "environment-blocked" terminal state

                          When the reviewer twice in a row names the same operationally-gated
                          dependency as the only open work, auto-transition the loop to an
                          operator-handoff state. The current circuit breaker fires only on
                          stagnation pattern; it should also fire on "remaining work is outside
                          the loop's reach", which is detectable from the reviewer naming the
                          same environment dependency across consecutive rounds.

                          2. Severity ladder for reviewer verdicts

                          Reviewers reliably promoted wording mismatches to "blocking" side
                          issues. Introduce three explicit severities: (a) behaviour-incorrect,
                          (b) interface-contract drift, (c) wording/cosmetic. Only (a) should
                          be allowed to block a round; (c) should be batched into periodic
                          cleanup passes.

                          3. Mirror-surface enumeration in the contract template

                          When the same defect class exists in N parallel files, the contract
                          should require enumerating all mirrors up front and fixing them in
                          one commit. A search-budget heuristic in the contract template can
                          enforce this: before editing any wording, run a project-wide search
                          for sibling phrasings and include all hits.

                          4. Postconditions must target shipping artefacts, not bookkeeping files

                          The meta-housekeeping cascade in the final two rounds was caused by
                          a brittle exact-grep postcondition on a summary file whose layout
                          the writer was free to wrap. Three rules:

                          • Bookkeeping artefacts get no grep-style postconditions.
                          • Prose postconditions must use whitespace-tolerant matching.
                          • Two consecutive rounds whose mainline objective is repairing the
                            loop's own bookkeeping should auto-trigger the stagnation breaker.

                          5. Audit-only rounds require explicit authorisation

                          Regression scrubs should be inlined into the validation step of the
                          next substantive round, not consume a full contract / implement /
                          review cycle on their own.

                          6. Track acceptance-criteria status as a time series

                          The headline AC metric was constant for 15 consecutive rounds.
                          Escalate when the metric is unchanged for K rounds (K=3), distinct
                          from "no defects found".

                          7. Contract complexity should scale to edit size

                          Late rounds had 10–11 success criteria for two-line edits, most
                          vacuously satisfied. A vacuous-criteria ratio above 50% in a freshly
                          generated contract is itself a busywork signal.

                          8. Split review verdicts on two axes

                          Distinguish "contract met this round" from "global progress
                          changed". Fourteen consecutive contract-met verdicts co-existed
                          with zero global movement — the vocabulary hid the divergence.

                          9. Cap summary length proportional to edit size

                          Late summaries reached 400–500 lines for two-line changes by
                          re-quoting prior context. Move recurring boilerplate to a
                          dereferenced evidence ledger.

                          10. Cross-cutting "diminishing returns" trip

                          A single piece of machinery monitoring (a) AC metric unchanged for K
                          rounds, (b) edit volume trending to zero, and (c) reviewer's only
                          remaining gap is the same environment-bound task. When all three are
                          true, auto-transition to operator handoff. In this session those
                          signals were all true 12 rounds before the stagnation breaker
                          finally fired.

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            No labels
                            No labels

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); RLCR loop: add diminishing-returns trip, severity ladder, and bookkeeping-postcondition guards · Issue #198 · PolyArch/humanize · GitHub
                              Skip to content

                              RLCR loop: add diminishing-returns trip, severity ladder, and bookkeeping-postcondition guards #198

                              Description

                              @chenzongyao200127

                              Context

                              Observed in a 24-round RLCR loop terminated by the stagnation
                              circuit breaker. Findings are derived from a sanitised methodology
                              analysis; no project identifiers are included.

                              Methodology improvement suggestions

                              1. Add an "environment-blocked" terminal state

                              When the reviewer twice in a row names the same operationally-gated
                              dependency as the only open work, auto-transition the loop to an
                              operator-handoff state. The current circuit breaker fires only on
                              stagnation pattern; it should also fire on "remaining work is outside
                              the loop's reach", which is detectable from the reviewer naming the
                              same environment dependency across consecutive rounds.

                              2. Severity ladder for reviewer verdicts

                              Reviewers reliably promoted wording mismatches to "blocking" side
                              issues. Introduce three explicit severities: (a) behaviour-incorrect,
                              (b) interface-contract drift, (c) wording/cosmetic. Only (a) should
                              be allowed to block a round; (c) should be batched into periodic
                              cleanup passes.

                              3. Mirror-surface enumeration in the contract template

                              When the same defect class exists in N parallel files, the contract
                              should require enumerating all mirrors up front and fixing them in
                              one commit. A search-budget heuristic in the contract template can
                              enforce this: before editing any wording, run a project-wide search
                              for sibling phrasings and include all hits.

                              4. Postconditions must target shipping artefacts, not bookkeeping files

                              The meta-housekeeping cascade in the final two rounds was caused by
                              a brittle exact-grep postcondition on a summary file whose layout
                              the writer was free to wrap. Three rules:

                              • Bookkeeping artefacts get no grep-style postconditions.
                              • Prose postconditions must use whitespace-tolerant matching.
                              • Two consecutive rounds whose mainline objective is repairing the
                                loop's own bookkeeping should auto-trigger the stagnation breaker.

                              5. Audit-only rounds require explicit authorisation

                              Regression scrubs should be inlined into the validation step of the
                              next substantive round, not consume a full contract / implement /
                              review cycle on their own.

                              6. Track acceptance-criteria status as a time series

                              The headline AC metric was constant for 15 consecutive rounds.
                              Escalate when the metric is unchanged for K rounds (K=3), distinct
                              from "no defects found".

                              7. Contract complexity should scale to edit size

                              Late rounds had 10–11 success criteria for two-line edits, most
                              vacuously satisfied. A vacuous-criteria ratio above 50% in a freshly
                              generated contract is itself a busywork signal.

                              8. Split review verdicts on two axes

                              Distinguish "contract met this round" from "global progress
                              changed". Fourteen consecutive contract-met verdicts co-existed
                              with zero global movement — the vocabulary hid the divergence.

                              9. Cap summary length proportional to edit size

                              Late summaries reached 400–500 lines for two-line changes by
                              re-quoting prior context. Move recurring boilerplate to a
                              dereferenced evidence ledger.

                              10. Cross-cutting "diminishing returns" trip

                              A single piece of machinery monitoring (a) AC metric unchanged for K
                              rounds, (b) edit volume trending to zero, and (c) reviewer's only
                              remaining gap is the same environment-bound task. When all three are
                              true, auto-transition to operator handoff. In this session those
                              signals were all true 12 rounds before the stagnation breaker
                              finally fired.

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                No labels
                                No labels

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions