Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task. - #1923

Open
CarliPinell wants to merge 6 commits into
developfrom
bugfix/FOUR-27264
Open

Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.#1923
CarliPinell wants to merge 6 commits into
developfrom
bugfix/FOUR-27264

Conversation

@CarliPinell

@CarliPinellCarliPinell commented Jul 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Solution

  • When a record is selected from the Record List, the value persists when moving to the next task.

How to Test

  1. Create/import process attachaed in ticket
  2. Create a simple screen
  3. Add record list and add a collection to the configuration
  4. Create a case, select an option in the record list, complete task 1

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy

@cypress

cypressBot commented Jul 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

screen-builderRun #2344

Run Properties:status check passed Passed #2344 • git commit40c62b1f39: Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.
Projectscreen-builder
Branch Reviewbugfix/FOUR-27264
Run statusstatus check passed Passed #2344
Run duration09m 34s
Commitgit commit40c62b1f39: Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.
CommitterCarliPinell
View all properties for this run ↗︎
Test results
Tests that failedFailures0
Tests that were flakyFlaky0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skipPending19
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hookSkipped0
Tests that passedPassing392
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

@CarliPinellCarliPinell changed the title Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next taskJul 27, 2026
@CarliPinellCarliPinell changed the title Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next taskRecord list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.Jul 27, 2026
eiresendez
eiresendez requested changes Jul 28, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@CarliPinell the fix addresses the original issue, and I confirmed it no longer reproduces in manual testing.

However, this PR introduces a new pagination issue through the added selectedRow watcher: the existing @change path already provides a page-relative index, while the watcher passes a global index into the same handler, causing an incorrect selectedRowIndex and duplicate updates on page 2 and beyond. This behavior was not present before this change, could you please review it?

Comment threadsrc/components/renderer/form-record-list.vue Outdated
Comment threadtests/unit/FormRecordListCollectionSelection.spec.js
@processmaker-sonarqube

processmaker-sonarqubeBot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate passedQuality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
5 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
10.2% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

eiresendez
eiresendez approved these changes Jul 29, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new helper extraction is clean and keeps the component’s selection contract explicit. form-record-list.vue:626 now receives a page-relative index and delegates the single conversion to production-tested code 👍 👍

@decisions-sonarqube

decisions-sonarqubeBot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate failedQuality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 New issue
47.8% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDESonarQube for IDE

@nolanpro

nolanpro commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-0e0ae22cfc.engk8s.processmaker.net

@eiresendez
eiresendez requested review from eiresendez and removed request for mcraeteishaAugust 20, 2026 13:18
eiresendez
eiresendez approved these changes Aug 20, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The merge resolution correctly contracts: it keeps the non-mutating record mapping and legacy data.* compatibility. The previously approved page-relative index behavior remains unchanged. 👍 👍

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@eiresendezeiresendezeiresendez approved these changes

Assignees

@CarliPinellCarliPinell

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@CarliPinell@nolanpro@eiresendez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all \u003cpre\u003e\u003ccode\u003e blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "github.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task. - #1923

Open
CarliPinell wants to merge 6 commits into
developfrom
bugfix/FOUR-27264
Open

Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.#1923
CarliPinell wants to merge 6 commits into
developfrom
bugfix/FOUR-27264

Conversation

@CarliPinell

@CarliPinellCarliPinell commented Jul 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Solution

  • When a record is selected from the Record List, the value persists when moving to the next task.

How to Test

  1. Create/import process attachaed in ticket
  2. Create a simple screen
  3. Add record list and add a collection to the configuration
  4. Create a case, select an option in the record list, complete task 1

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy

@cypress

cypressBot commented Jul 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

screen-builderRun #2344

Run Properties:status check passed Passed #2344 • git commit40c62b1f39: Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.
Projectscreen-builder
Branch Reviewbugfix/FOUR-27264
Run statusstatus check passed Passed #2344
Run duration09m 34s
Commitgit commit40c62b1f39: Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.
CommitterCarliPinell
View all properties for this run ↗︎
Test results
Tests that failedFailures0
Tests that were flakyFlaky0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skipPending19
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hookSkipped0
Tests that passedPassing392
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

@CarliPinellCarliPinell changed the title Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next taskJul 27, 2026
@CarliPinellCarliPinell changed the title Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next taskRecord list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.Jul 27, 2026
eiresendez
eiresendez requested changes Jul 28, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@CarliPinell the fix addresses the original issue, and I confirmed it no longer reproduces in manual testing.

However, this PR introduces a new pagination issue through the added selectedRow watcher: the existing @change path already provides a page-relative index, while the watcher passes a global index into the same handler, causing an incorrect selectedRowIndex and duplicate updates on page 2 and beyond. This behavior was not present before this change, could you please review it?

Comment threadsrc/components/renderer/form-record-list.vue Outdated
Comment threadtests/unit/FormRecordListCollectionSelection.spec.js
@processmaker-sonarqube

processmaker-sonarqubeBot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate passedQuality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
5 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
10.2% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

eiresendez
eiresendez approved these changes Jul 29, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new helper extraction is clean and keeps the component’s selection contract explicit. form-record-list.vue:626 now receives a page-relative index and delegates the single conversion to production-tested code 👍 👍

@decisions-sonarqube

decisions-sonarqubeBot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate failedQuality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 New issue
47.8% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDESonarQube for IDE

@nolanpro

nolanpro commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-0e0ae22cfc.engk8s.processmaker.net

@eiresendez
eiresendez requested review from eiresendez and removed request for mcraeteishaAugust 20, 2026 13:18
eiresendez
eiresendez approved these changes Aug 20, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The merge resolution correctly contracts: it keeps the non-mutating record mapping and legacy data.* compatibility. The previously approved page-relative index behavior remains unchanged. 👍 👍

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@eiresendezeiresendezeiresendez approved these changes

Assignees

@CarliPinellCarliPinell

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@CarliPinell@nolanpro@eiresendez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task. - #1923

Open
CarliPinell wants to merge 6 commits into
developfrom
bugfix/FOUR-27264
Open

Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.#1923
CarliPinell wants to merge 6 commits into
developfrom
bugfix/FOUR-27264

Conversation

@CarliPinell

@CarliPinellCarliPinell commented Jul 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Solution

  • When a record is selected from the Record List, the value persists when moving to the next task.

How to Test

  1. Create/import process attachaed in ticket
  2. Create a simple screen
  3. Add record list and add a collection to the configuration
  4. Create a case, select an option in the record list, complete task 1

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy

@cypress

cypressBot commented Jul 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

screen-builderRun #2344

Run Properties:status check passed Passed #2344 • git commit40c62b1f39: Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.
Projectscreen-builder
Branch Reviewbugfix/FOUR-27264
Run statusstatus check passed Passed #2344
Run duration09m 34s
Commitgit commit40c62b1f39: Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.
CommitterCarliPinell
View all properties for this run ↗︎
Test results
Tests that failedFailures0
Tests that were flakyFlaky0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skipPending19
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hookSkipped0
Tests that passedPassing392
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

@CarliPinellCarliPinell changed the title Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next taskJul 27, 2026
@CarliPinellCarliPinell changed the title Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next taskRecord list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.Jul 27, 2026
eiresendez
eiresendez requested changes Jul 28, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@CarliPinell the fix addresses the original issue, and I confirmed it no longer reproduces in manual testing.

However, this PR introduces a new pagination issue through the added selectedRow watcher: the existing @change path already provides a page-relative index, while the watcher passes a global index into the same handler, causing an incorrect selectedRowIndex and duplicate updates on page 2 and beyond. This behavior was not present before this change, could you please review it?

Comment threadsrc/components/renderer/form-record-list.vue Outdated
Comment threadtests/unit/FormRecordListCollectionSelection.spec.js
@processmaker-sonarqube

processmaker-sonarqubeBot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate passedQuality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
5 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
10.2% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

eiresendez
eiresendez approved these changes Jul 29, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new helper extraction is clean and keeps the component’s selection contract explicit. form-record-list.vue:626 now receives a page-relative index and delegates the single conversion to production-tested code 👍 👍

@decisions-sonarqube

decisions-sonarqubeBot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate failedQuality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 New issue
47.8% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDESonarQube for IDE

@nolanpro

nolanpro commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-0e0ae22cfc.engk8s.processmaker.net

@eiresendez
eiresendez requested review from eiresendez and removed request for mcraeteishaAugust 20, 2026 13:18
eiresendez
eiresendez approved these changes Aug 20, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The merge resolution correctly contracts: it keeps the non-mutating record mapping and legacy data.* compatibility. The previously approved page-relative index behavior remains unchanged. 👍 👍

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@eiresendezeiresendezeiresendez approved these changes

Assignees

@CarliPinellCarliPinell

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@CarliPinell@nolanpro@eiresendez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length \u003e 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task. - #1923

Open
CarliPinell wants to merge 6 commits into
developfrom
bugfix/FOUR-27264
Open

Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.#1923
CarliPinell wants to merge 6 commits into
developfrom
bugfix/FOUR-27264

Conversation

@CarliPinell

@CarliPinellCarliPinell commented Jul 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Solution

  • When a record is selected from the Record List, the value persists when moving to the next task.

How to Test

  1. Create/import process attachaed in ticket
  2. Create a simple screen
  3. Add record list and add a collection to the configuration
  4. Create a case, select an option in the record list, complete task 1

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy

@cypress

cypressBot commented Jul 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

screen-builderRun #2344

Run Properties:status check passed Passed #2344 • git commit40c62b1f39: Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.
Projectscreen-builder
Branch Reviewbugfix/FOUR-27264
Run statusstatus check passed Passed #2344
Run duration09m 34s
Commitgit commit40c62b1f39: Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.
CommitterCarliPinell
View all properties for this run ↗︎
Test results
Tests that failedFailures0
Tests that were flakyFlaky0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skipPending19
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hookSkipped0
Tests that passedPassing392
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

@CarliPinellCarliPinell changed the title Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next taskJul 27, 2026
@CarliPinellCarliPinell changed the title Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next taskRecord list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.Jul 27, 2026
eiresendez
eiresendez requested changes Jul 28, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@CarliPinell the fix addresses the original issue, and I confirmed it no longer reproduces in manual testing.

However, this PR introduces a new pagination issue through the added selectedRow watcher: the existing @change path already provides a page-relative index, while the watcher passes a global index into the same handler, causing an incorrect selectedRowIndex and duplicate updates on page 2 and beyond. This behavior was not present before this change, could you please review it?

Comment threadsrc/components/renderer/form-record-list.vue Outdated
Comment threadtests/unit/FormRecordListCollectionSelection.spec.js
@processmaker-sonarqube

processmaker-sonarqubeBot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate passedQuality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
5 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
10.2% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

eiresendez
eiresendez approved these changes Jul 29, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new helper extraction is clean and keeps the component’s selection contract explicit. form-record-list.vue:626 now receives a page-relative index and delegates the single conversion to production-tested code 👍 👍

@decisions-sonarqube

decisions-sonarqubeBot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate failedQuality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 New issue
47.8% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDESonarQube for IDE

@nolanpro

nolanpro commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-0e0ae22cfc.engk8s.processmaker.net

@eiresendez
eiresendez requested review from eiresendez and removed request for mcraeteishaAugust 20, 2026 13:18
eiresendez
eiresendez approved these changes Aug 20, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The merge resolution correctly contracts: it keeps the non-mutating record mapping and legacy data.* compatibility. The previously approved page-relative index behavior remains unchanged. 👍 👍

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@eiresendezeiresendezeiresendez approved these changes

Assignees

@CarliPinellCarliPinell

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@CarliPinell@nolanpro@eiresendez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task. - #1923

Open
CarliPinell wants to merge 6 commits into
developfrom
bugfix/FOUR-27264
Open

Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.#1923
CarliPinell wants to merge 6 commits into
developfrom
bugfix/FOUR-27264

Conversation

@CarliPinell

@CarliPinellCarliPinell commented Jul 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Solution

  • When a record is selected from the Record List, the value persists when moving to the next task.

How to Test

  1. Create/import process attachaed in ticket
  2. Create a simple screen
  3. Add record list and add a collection to the configuration
  4. Create a case, select an option in the record list, complete task 1

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy

@cypress

cypressBot commented Jul 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

screen-builderRun #2344

Run Properties:status check passed Passed #2344 • git commit40c62b1f39: Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.
Projectscreen-builder
Branch Reviewbugfix/FOUR-27264
Run statusstatus check passed Passed #2344
Run duration09m 34s
Commitgit commit40c62b1f39: Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.
CommitterCarliPinell
View all properties for this run ↗︎
Test results
Tests that failedFailures0
Tests that were flakyFlaky0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skipPending19
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hookSkipped0
Tests that passedPassing392
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

@CarliPinellCarliPinell changed the title Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next taskJul 27, 2026
@CarliPinellCarliPinell changed the title Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next taskRecord list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.Jul 27, 2026
eiresendez
eiresendez requested changes Jul 28, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@CarliPinell the fix addresses the original issue, and I confirmed it no longer reproduces in manual testing.

However, this PR introduces a new pagination issue through the added selectedRow watcher: the existing @change path already provides a page-relative index, while the watcher passes a global index into the same handler, causing an incorrect selectedRowIndex and duplicate updates on page 2 and beyond. This behavior was not present before this change, could you please review it?

Comment threadsrc/components/renderer/form-record-list.vue Outdated
Comment threadtests/unit/FormRecordListCollectionSelection.spec.js
@processmaker-sonarqube

processmaker-sonarqubeBot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate passedQuality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
5 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
10.2% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

eiresendez
eiresendez approved these changes Jul 29, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new helper extraction is clean and keeps the component’s selection contract explicit. form-record-list.vue:626 now receives a page-relative index and delegates the single conversion to production-tested code 👍 👍

@decisions-sonarqube

decisions-sonarqubeBot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate failedQuality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 New issue
47.8% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDESonarQube for IDE

@nolanpro

nolanpro commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-0e0ae22cfc.engk8s.processmaker.net

@eiresendez
eiresendez requested review from eiresendez and removed request for mcraeteishaAugust 20, 2026 13:18
eiresendez
eiresendez approved these changes Aug 20, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The merge resolution correctly contracts: it keeps the non-mutating record mapping and legacy data.* compatibility. The previously approved page-relative index behavior remains unchanged. 👍 👍

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@eiresendezeiresendezeiresendez approved these changes

Assignees

@CarliPinellCarliPinell

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@CarliPinell@nolanpro@eiresendez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task. - #1923

Open
CarliPinell wants to merge 6 commits into
developfrom
bugfix/FOUR-27264
Open

Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.#1923
CarliPinell wants to merge 6 commits into
developfrom
bugfix/FOUR-27264

Conversation

@CarliPinell

@CarliPinellCarliPinell commented Jul 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Solution

  • When a record is selected from the Record List, the value persists when moving to the next task.

How to Test

  1. Create/import process attachaed in ticket
  2. Create a simple screen
  3. Add record list and add a collection to the configuration
  4. Create a case, select an option in the record list, complete task 1

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy

@cypress

cypressBot commented Jul 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

screen-builderRun #2344

Run Properties:status check passed Passed #2344 • git commit40c62b1f39: Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.
Projectscreen-builder
Branch Reviewbugfix/FOUR-27264
Run statusstatus check passed Passed #2344
Run duration09m 34s
Commitgit commit40c62b1f39: Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.
CommitterCarliPinell
View all properties for this run ↗︎
Test results
Tests that failedFailures0
Tests that were flakyFlaky0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skipPending19
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hookSkipped0
Tests that passedPassing392
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

@CarliPinellCarliPinell changed the title Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next taskJul 27, 2026
@CarliPinellCarliPinell changed the title Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next taskRecord list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.Jul 27, 2026
eiresendez
eiresendez requested changes Jul 28, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@CarliPinell the fix addresses the original issue, and I confirmed it no longer reproduces in manual testing.

However, this PR introduces a new pagination issue through the added selectedRow watcher: the existing @change path already provides a page-relative index, while the watcher passes a global index into the same handler, causing an incorrect selectedRowIndex and duplicate updates on page 2 and beyond. This behavior was not present before this change, could you please review it?

Comment threadsrc/components/renderer/form-record-list.vue Outdated
Comment threadtests/unit/FormRecordListCollectionSelection.spec.js
@processmaker-sonarqube

processmaker-sonarqubeBot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate passedQuality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
5 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
10.2% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

eiresendez
eiresendez approved these changes Jul 29, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new helper extraction is clean and keeps the component’s selection contract explicit. form-record-list.vue:626 now receives a page-relative index and delegates the single conversion to production-tested code 👍 👍

@decisions-sonarqube

decisions-sonarqubeBot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate failedQuality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 New issue
47.8% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDESonarQube for IDE

@nolanpro

nolanpro commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-0e0ae22cfc.engk8s.processmaker.net

@eiresendez
eiresendez requested review from eiresendez and removed request for mcraeteishaAugust 20, 2026 13:18
eiresendez
eiresendez approved these changes Aug 20, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The merge resolution correctly contracts: it keeps the non-mutating record mapping and legacy data.* compatibility. The previously approved page-relative index behavior remains unchanged. 👍 👍

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@eiresendezeiresendezeiresendez approved these changes

Assignees

@CarliPinellCarliPinell

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@CarliPinell@nolanpro@eiresendez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task. - #1923

Open
CarliPinell wants to merge 6 commits into
developfrom
bugfix/FOUR-27264
Open

Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.#1923
CarliPinell wants to merge 6 commits into
developfrom
bugfix/FOUR-27264

Conversation

@CarliPinell

@CarliPinellCarliPinell commented Jul 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Solution

  • When a record is selected from the Record List, the value persists when moving to the next task.

How to Test

  1. Create/import process attachaed in ticket
  2. Create a simple screen
  3. Add record list and add a collection to the configuration
  4. Create a case, select an option in the record list, complete task 1

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy

@cypress

cypressBot commented Jul 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

screen-builderRun #2344

Run Properties:status check passed Passed #2344 • git commit40c62b1f39: Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.
Projectscreen-builder
Branch Reviewbugfix/FOUR-27264
Run statusstatus check passed Passed #2344
Run duration09m 34s
Commitgit commit40c62b1f39: Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.
CommitterCarliPinell
View all properties for this run ↗︎
Test results
Tests that failedFailures0
Tests that were flakyFlaky0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skipPending19
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hookSkipped0
Tests that passedPassing392
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

@CarliPinellCarliPinell changed the title Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next taskJul 27, 2026
@CarliPinellCarliPinell changed the title Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next taskRecord list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.Jul 27, 2026
eiresendez
eiresendez requested changes Jul 28, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@CarliPinell the fix addresses the original issue, and I confirmed it no longer reproduces in manual testing.

However, this PR introduces a new pagination issue through the added selectedRow watcher: the existing @change path already provides a page-relative index, while the watcher passes a global index into the same handler, causing an incorrect selectedRowIndex and duplicate updates on page 2 and beyond. This behavior was not present before this change, could you please review it?

Comment threadsrc/components/renderer/form-record-list.vue Outdated
Comment threadtests/unit/FormRecordListCollectionSelection.spec.js
@processmaker-sonarqube

processmaker-sonarqubeBot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate passedQuality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
5 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
10.2% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

eiresendez
eiresendez approved these changes Jul 29, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new helper extraction is clean and keeps the component’s selection contract explicit. form-record-list.vue:626 now receives a page-relative index and delegates the single conversion to production-tested code 👍 👍

@decisions-sonarqube

decisions-sonarqubeBot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate failedQuality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 New issue
47.8% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDESonarQube for IDE

@nolanpro

nolanpro commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-0e0ae22cfc.engk8s.processmaker.net

@eiresendez
eiresendez requested review from eiresendez and removed request for mcraeteishaAugust 20, 2026 13:18
eiresendez
eiresendez approved these changes Aug 20, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The merge resolution correctly contracts: it keeps the non-mutating record mapping and legacy data.* compatibility. The previously approved page-relative index behavior remains unchanged. 👍 👍

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@eiresendezeiresendezeiresendez approved these changes

Assignees

@CarliPinellCarliPinell

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@CarliPinell@nolanpro@eiresendez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task. - #1923

Open
CarliPinell wants to merge 6 commits into
developfrom
bugfix/FOUR-27264
Open

Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.#1923
CarliPinell wants to merge 6 commits into
developfrom
bugfix/FOUR-27264

Conversation

@CarliPinell

@CarliPinellCarliPinell commented Jul 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Solution

  • When a record is selected from the Record List, the value persists when moving to the next task.

How to Test

  1. Create/import process attachaed in ticket
  2. Create a simple screen
  3. Add record list and add a collection to the configuration
  4. Create a case, select an option in the record list, complete task 1

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy

@cypress

cypressBot commented Jul 27, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

screen-builderRun #2344

Run Properties:status check passed Passed #2344 • git commit40c62b1f39: Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.
Projectscreen-builder
Branch Reviewbugfix/FOUR-27264
Run statusstatus check passed Passed #2344
Run duration09m 34s
Commitgit commit40c62b1f39: Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.
CommitterCarliPinell
View all properties for this run ↗︎
Test results
Tests that failedFailures0
Tests that were flakyFlaky0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skipPending19
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hookSkipped0
Tests that passedPassing392
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

@CarliPinellCarliPinell changed the title Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next taskJul 27, 2026
@CarliPinellCarliPinell changed the title Record list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next taskRecord list does not retrieve the selected value/data in the next task.Jul 27, 2026
eiresendez
eiresendez requested changes Jul 28, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@CarliPinell the fix addresses the original issue, and I confirmed it no longer reproduces in manual testing.

However, this PR introduces a new pagination issue through the added selectedRow watcher: the existing @change path already provides a page-relative index, while the watcher passes a global index into the same handler, causing an incorrect selectedRowIndex and duplicate updates on page 2 and beyond. This behavior was not present before this change, could you please review it?

Comment threadsrc/components/renderer/form-record-list.vue Outdated
Comment threadtests/unit/FormRecordListCollectionSelection.spec.js
@processmaker-sonarqube

processmaker-sonarqubeBot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate passedQuality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
5 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
10.2% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

eiresendez
eiresendez approved these changes Jul 29, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new helper extraction is clean and keeps the component’s selection contract explicit. form-record-list.vue:626 now receives a page-relative index and delegates the single conversion to production-tested code 👍 👍

@decisions-sonarqube

decisions-sonarqubeBot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate failedQuality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 New issue
47.8% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDESonarQube for IDE

@nolanpro

nolanpro commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-0e0ae22cfc.engk8s.processmaker.net

@eiresendez
eiresendez requested review from eiresendez and removed request for mcraeteishaAugust 20, 2026 13:18
eiresendez
eiresendez approved these changes Aug 20, 2026
View reviewed changes

@eiresendezeiresendez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The merge resolution correctly contracts: it keeps the non-mutating record mapping and legacy data.* compatibility. The previously approved page-relative index behavior remains unchanged. 👍 👍

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@eiresendezeiresendezeiresendez approved these changes

Assignees

@CarliPinellCarliPinell

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@CarliPinell@nolanpro@eiresendez