Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Relying on DOM order to make the flex item scroll is fragile. A more robust approach is to ensure the flex parent allows its child to shrink and scroll by setting
min-height: 0on the flex container and ensuring the scrollable area hasoverflow-y: auto. This reduces coupling to DOM order and prevents regressions if fixed-height assumptions change.Suggestion
Consider codifying the scroll behavior via styles so it doesn’t depend on DOM order:
minHeight: 0to the flex container.overflowY: 'auto'(and keepflex: 1).Example:
Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you'd like me to add a commit with this suggestion