[WIP] Bindings! - #84

Open
liscio wants to merge 35 commits into
RACCommunity:masterfrom
liscio:master
Open

[WIP] Bindings!#84
liscio wants to merge 35 commits into
RACCommunity:masterfrom
liscio:master

Conversation

@liscio

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Originally developed alongside a forthcoming update to FuzzMeasure (http://fuzzmeasure.com), this is my take on one way that Cocoa Bindings-like behavior may be approximated using RAC.

In addition to the Signals that contain controls' changing values, the ConsumerBinding provides the "other half" of the equation—updating their state to reflect incoming values. Like Cocoa Bindings, values are wrapped by placeholders that represent selection states such as MultipleValues and NoSelection.

A new PropertyBinding is a similar concept that exists for model objects to expose, where a validator function is provided to allow the "massaging" of incoming values. This approximates the role of Key-Value Validation as it existed within Cocoa Bindings.

This changeset does not include any examples, sadly. Hopefully I can put something together in the near future to share. Also, I need to adjust whitespace as this code was built alongside a project that uses 4 spaces in place of tabs. 😛

In addition to the above, this PR includes some additional extensions for AppKit controls.

In doing some of my own work, I found that I was duplicating a lot of what was already done in Rex, so I ported over much of what I've done on my own in order to better consolidate things.
There isn't a complete 1:1 test matching at the moment with the new AppKit methods, and I "broke" the API for NSTextField that was already in place to better match with conventions used elsewhere in RAC, and to distinguish between continuous and "normal" control events.
Originally developed alongside a forthcoming update to FuzzMeasure
(http://fuzzmeasure.com), this is my take on one way that Cocoa
Bindings-like behavior may be approximated using RAC.
In addition to the `Signal`s that contain controls' changing values, the
`ConsumerBinding` provides the "other half" of the equation—updating
their state to reflect incoming values. Like Cocoa Bindings, values are
wrapped by placeholders that represent selection states such as
`MultipleValues` and `NoSelection`.
A new `PropertyBinding` is a similar concept that exists for model
objects to expose, where a `validator` function is provided to allow the
"massaging" of incoming values. This approximates the role of Key-Value
Validation as it existed within Cocoa Bindings.
This changeset does not include any examples, sadly. Hopefully I can put
something together in the near future to share.
Trying to use Action-based triggers for values, in general, as
NSControls have always worked on a target/action-based system.
The joy of importing code from an app into a framework is all the
internal -> public promotion...
@liscioliscio changed the title Bindings![WIP] Bindings!Feb 2, 2016
@neilpa

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I did a quick pass on this but having never used Cocoa Bindings (or any meaningful Mac development for that matter) it'll take me a bit longer to digest this and offer feedback.

@liscio

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@neilpa It's a lot to digest. I sort of "rushed" to dump this code (after carefully building it, and using it successfully) into the repo because I wanted to make it available for my other projects sooner.

I'm hoping to come up with a small enough example to demonstrate this soon.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@liscio@neilpa@andersio
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[WIP] Bindings! - #84

Open
liscio wants to merge 35 commits into
RACCommunity:masterfrom
liscio:master
Open

[WIP] Bindings!#84
liscio wants to merge 35 commits into
RACCommunity:masterfrom
liscio:master

Conversation

@liscio

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Originally developed alongside a forthcoming update to FuzzMeasure (http://fuzzmeasure.com), this is my take on one way that Cocoa Bindings-like behavior may be approximated using RAC.

In addition to the Signals that contain controls' changing values, the ConsumerBinding provides the "other half" of the equation—updating their state to reflect incoming values. Like Cocoa Bindings, values are wrapped by placeholders that represent selection states such as MultipleValues and NoSelection.

A new PropertyBinding is a similar concept that exists for model objects to expose, where a validator function is provided to allow the "massaging" of incoming values. This approximates the role of Key-Value Validation as it existed within Cocoa Bindings.

This changeset does not include any examples, sadly. Hopefully I can put something together in the near future to share. Also, I need to adjust whitespace as this code was built alongside a project that uses 4 spaces in place of tabs. 😛

In addition to the above, this PR includes some additional extensions for AppKit controls.

In doing some of my own work, I found that I was duplicating a lot of what was already done in Rex, so I ported over much of what I've done on my own in order to better consolidate things.
There isn't a complete 1:1 test matching at the moment with the new AppKit methods, and I "broke" the API for NSTextField that was already in place to better match with conventions used elsewhere in RAC, and to distinguish between continuous and "normal" control events.
Originally developed alongside a forthcoming update to FuzzMeasure
(http://fuzzmeasure.com), this is my take on one way that Cocoa
Bindings-like behavior may be approximated using RAC.
In addition to the `Signal`s that contain controls' changing values, the
`ConsumerBinding` provides the "other half" of the equation—updating
their state to reflect incoming values. Like Cocoa Bindings, values are
wrapped by placeholders that represent selection states such as
`MultipleValues` and `NoSelection`.
A new `PropertyBinding` is a similar concept that exists for model
objects to expose, where a `validator` function is provided to allow the
"massaging" of incoming values. This approximates the role of Key-Value
Validation as it existed within Cocoa Bindings.
This changeset does not include any examples, sadly. Hopefully I can put
something together in the near future to share.
Trying to use Action-based triggers for values, in general, as
NSControls have always worked on a target/action-based system.
The joy of importing code from an app into a framework is all the
internal -> public promotion...
@liscioliscio changed the title Bindings![WIP] Bindings!Feb 2, 2016
@neilpa

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I did a quick pass on this but having never used Cocoa Bindings (or any meaningful Mac development for that matter) it'll take me a bit longer to digest this and offer feedback.

@liscio

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@neilpa It's a lot to digest. I sort of "rushed" to dump this code (after carefully building it, and using it successfully) into the repo because I wanted to make it available for my other projects sooner.

I'm hoping to come up with a small enough example to demonstrate this soon.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@liscio@neilpa@andersio
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[WIP] Bindings! - #84

Open
liscio wants to merge 35 commits into
RACCommunity:masterfrom
liscio:master
Open

[WIP] Bindings!#84
liscio wants to merge 35 commits into
RACCommunity:masterfrom
liscio:master

Conversation

@liscio

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Originally developed alongside a forthcoming update to FuzzMeasure (http://fuzzmeasure.com), this is my take on one way that Cocoa Bindings-like behavior may be approximated using RAC.

In addition to the Signals that contain controls' changing values, the ConsumerBinding provides the "other half" of the equation—updating their state to reflect incoming values. Like Cocoa Bindings, values are wrapped by placeholders that represent selection states such as MultipleValues and NoSelection.

A new PropertyBinding is a similar concept that exists for model objects to expose, where a validator function is provided to allow the "massaging" of incoming values. This approximates the role of Key-Value Validation as it existed within Cocoa Bindings.

This changeset does not include any examples, sadly. Hopefully I can put something together in the near future to share. Also, I need to adjust whitespace as this code was built alongside a project that uses 4 spaces in place of tabs. 😛

In addition to the above, this PR includes some additional extensions for AppKit controls.

In doing some of my own work, I found that I was duplicating a lot of what was already done in Rex, so I ported over much of what I've done on my own in order to better consolidate things.
There isn't a complete 1:1 test matching at the moment with the new AppKit methods, and I "broke" the API for NSTextField that was already in place to better match with conventions used elsewhere in RAC, and to distinguish between continuous and "normal" control events.
Originally developed alongside a forthcoming update to FuzzMeasure
(http://fuzzmeasure.com), this is my take on one way that Cocoa
Bindings-like behavior may be approximated using RAC.
In addition to the `Signal`s that contain controls' changing values, the
`ConsumerBinding` provides the "other half" of the equation—updating
their state to reflect incoming values. Like Cocoa Bindings, values are
wrapped by placeholders that represent selection states such as
`MultipleValues` and `NoSelection`.
A new `PropertyBinding` is a similar concept that exists for model
objects to expose, where a `validator` function is provided to allow the
"massaging" of incoming values. This approximates the role of Key-Value
Validation as it existed within Cocoa Bindings.
This changeset does not include any examples, sadly. Hopefully I can put
something together in the near future to share.
Trying to use Action-based triggers for values, in general, as
NSControls have always worked on a target/action-based system.
The joy of importing code from an app into a framework is all the
internal -> public promotion...
@liscioliscio changed the title Bindings![WIP] Bindings!Feb 2, 2016
@neilpa

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I did a quick pass on this but having never used Cocoa Bindings (or any meaningful Mac development for that matter) it'll take me a bit longer to digest this and offer feedback.

@liscio

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@neilpa It's a lot to digest. I sort of "rushed" to dump this code (after carefully building it, and using it successfully) into the repo because I wanted to make it available for my other projects sooner.

I'm hoping to come up with a small enough example to demonstrate this soon.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@liscio@neilpa@andersio
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[WIP] Bindings! - #84

Open
liscio wants to merge 35 commits into
RACCommunity:masterfrom
liscio:master
Open

[WIP] Bindings!#84
liscio wants to merge 35 commits into
RACCommunity:masterfrom
liscio:master

Conversation

@liscio

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Originally developed alongside a forthcoming update to FuzzMeasure (http://fuzzmeasure.com), this is my take on one way that Cocoa Bindings-like behavior may be approximated using RAC.

In addition to the Signals that contain controls' changing values, the ConsumerBinding provides the "other half" of the equation—updating their state to reflect incoming values. Like Cocoa Bindings, values are wrapped by placeholders that represent selection states such as MultipleValues and NoSelection.

A new PropertyBinding is a similar concept that exists for model objects to expose, where a validator function is provided to allow the "massaging" of incoming values. This approximates the role of Key-Value Validation as it existed within Cocoa Bindings.

This changeset does not include any examples, sadly. Hopefully I can put something together in the near future to share. Also, I need to adjust whitespace as this code was built alongside a project that uses 4 spaces in place of tabs. 😛

In addition to the above, this PR includes some additional extensions for AppKit controls.

In doing some of my own work, I found that I was duplicating a lot of what was already done in Rex, so I ported over much of what I've done on my own in order to better consolidate things.
There isn't a complete 1:1 test matching at the moment with the new AppKit methods, and I "broke" the API for NSTextField that was already in place to better match with conventions used elsewhere in RAC, and to distinguish between continuous and "normal" control events.
Originally developed alongside a forthcoming update to FuzzMeasure
(http://fuzzmeasure.com), this is my take on one way that Cocoa
Bindings-like behavior may be approximated using RAC.
In addition to the `Signal`s that contain controls' changing values, the
`ConsumerBinding` provides the "other half" of the equation—updating
their state to reflect incoming values. Like Cocoa Bindings, values are
wrapped by placeholders that represent selection states such as
`MultipleValues` and `NoSelection`.
A new `PropertyBinding` is a similar concept that exists for model
objects to expose, where a `validator` function is provided to allow the
"massaging" of incoming values. This approximates the role of Key-Value
Validation as it existed within Cocoa Bindings.
This changeset does not include any examples, sadly. Hopefully I can put
something together in the near future to share.
Trying to use Action-based triggers for values, in general, as
NSControls have always worked on a target/action-based system.
The joy of importing code from an app into a framework is all the
internal -> public promotion...
@liscioliscio changed the title Bindings![WIP] Bindings!Feb 2, 2016
@neilpa

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I did a quick pass on this but having never used Cocoa Bindings (or any meaningful Mac development for that matter) it'll take me a bit longer to digest this and offer feedback.

@liscio

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@neilpa It's a lot to digest. I sort of "rushed" to dump this code (after carefully building it, and using it successfully) into the repo because I wanted to make it available for my other projects sooner.

I'm hoping to come up with a small enough example to demonstrate this soon.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@liscio@neilpa@andersio
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[WIP] Bindings! - #84

Open
liscio wants to merge 35 commits into
RACCommunity:masterfrom
liscio:master
Open

[WIP] Bindings!#84
liscio wants to merge 35 commits into
RACCommunity:masterfrom
liscio:master

Conversation

@liscio

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Originally developed alongside a forthcoming update to FuzzMeasure (http://fuzzmeasure.com), this is my take on one way that Cocoa Bindings-like behavior may be approximated using RAC.

In addition to the Signals that contain controls' changing values, the ConsumerBinding provides the "other half" of the equation—updating their state to reflect incoming values. Like Cocoa Bindings, values are wrapped by placeholders that represent selection states such as MultipleValues and NoSelection.

A new PropertyBinding is a similar concept that exists for model objects to expose, where a validator function is provided to allow the "massaging" of incoming values. This approximates the role of Key-Value Validation as it existed within Cocoa Bindings.

This changeset does not include any examples, sadly. Hopefully I can put something together in the near future to share. Also, I need to adjust whitespace as this code was built alongside a project that uses 4 spaces in place of tabs. 😛

In addition to the above, this PR includes some additional extensions for AppKit controls.

In doing some of my own work, I found that I was duplicating a lot of what was already done in Rex, so I ported over much of what I've done on my own in order to better consolidate things.
There isn't a complete 1:1 test matching at the moment with the new AppKit methods, and I "broke" the API for NSTextField that was already in place to better match with conventions used elsewhere in RAC, and to distinguish between continuous and "normal" control events.
Originally developed alongside a forthcoming update to FuzzMeasure
(http://fuzzmeasure.com), this is my take on one way that Cocoa
Bindings-like behavior may be approximated using RAC.
In addition to the `Signal`s that contain controls' changing values, the
`ConsumerBinding` provides the "other half" of the equation—updating
their state to reflect incoming values. Like Cocoa Bindings, values are
wrapped by placeholders that represent selection states such as
`MultipleValues` and `NoSelection`.
A new `PropertyBinding` is a similar concept that exists for model
objects to expose, where a `validator` function is provided to allow the
"massaging" of incoming values. This approximates the role of Key-Value
Validation as it existed within Cocoa Bindings.
This changeset does not include any examples, sadly. Hopefully I can put
something together in the near future to share.
Trying to use Action-based triggers for values, in general, as
NSControls have always worked on a target/action-based system.
The joy of importing code from an app into a framework is all the
internal -> public promotion...
@liscioliscio changed the title Bindings![WIP] Bindings!Feb 2, 2016
@neilpa

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I did a quick pass on this but having never used Cocoa Bindings (or any meaningful Mac development for that matter) it'll take me a bit longer to digest this and offer feedback.

@liscio

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@neilpa It's a lot to digest. I sort of "rushed" to dump this code (after carefully building it, and using it successfully) into the repo because I wanted to make it available for my other projects sooner.

I'm hoping to come up with a small enough example to demonstrate this soon.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@liscio@neilpa@andersio
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[WIP] Bindings! - #84

Open
liscio wants to merge 35 commits into
RACCommunity:masterfrom
liscio:master
Open

[WIP] Bindings!#84
liscio wants to merge 35 commits into
RACCommunity:masterfrom
liscio:master

Conversation

@liscio

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Originally developed alongside a forthcoming update to FuzzMeasure (http://fuzzmeasure.com), this is my take on one way that Cocoa Bindings-like behavior may be approximated using RAC.

In addition to the Signals that contain controls' changing values, the ConsumerBinding provides the "other half" of the equation—updating their state to reflect incoming values. Like Cocoa Bindings, values are wrapped by placeholders that represent selection states such as MultipleValues and NoSelection.

A new PropertyBinding is a similar concept that exists for model objects to expose, where a validator function is provided to allow the "massaging" of incoming values. This approximates the role of Key-Value Validation as it existed within Cocoa Bindings.

This changeset does not include any examples, sadly. Hopefully I can put something together in the near future to share. Also, I need to adjust whitespace as this code was built alongside a project that uses 4 spaces in place of tabs. 😛

In addition to the above, this PR includes some additional extensions for AppKit controls.

In doing some of my own work, I found that I was duplicating a lot of what was already done in Rex, so I ported over much of what I've done on my own in order to better consolidate things.
There isn't a complete 1:1 test matching at the moment with the new AppKit methods, and I "broke" the API for NSTextField that was already in place to better match with conventions used elsewhere in RAC, and to distinguish between continuous and "normal" control events.
Originally developed alongside a forthcoming update to FuzzMeasure
(http://fuzzmeasure.com), this is my take on one way that Cocoa
Bindings-like behavior may be approximated using RAC.
In addition to the `Signal`s that contain controls' changing values, the
`ConsumerBinding` provides the "other half" of the equation—updating
their state to reflect incoming values. Like Cocoa Bindings, values are
wrapped by placeholders that represent selection states such as
`MultipleValues` and `NoSelection`.
A new `PropertyBinding` is a similar concept that exists for model
objects to expose, where a `validator` function is provided to allow the
"massaging" of incoming values. This approximates the role of Key-Value
Validation as it existed within Cocoa Bindings.
This changeset does not include any examples, sadly. Hopefully I can put
something together in the near future to share.
Trying to use Action-based triggers for values, in general, as
NSControls have always worked on a target/action-based system.
The joy of importing code from an app into a framework is all the
internal -> public promotion...
@liscioliscio changed the title Bindings![WIP] Bindings!Feb 2, 2016
@neilpa

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I did a quick pass on this but having never used Cocoa Bindings (or any meaningful Mac development for that matter) it'll take me a bit longer to digest this and offer feedback.

@liscio

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@neilpa It's a lot to digest. I sort of "rushed" to dump this code (after carefully building it, and using it successfully) into the repo because I wanted to make it available for my other projects sooner.

I'm hoping to come up with a small enough example to demonstrate this soon.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@liscio@neilpa@andersio
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[WIP] Bindings! - #84

Open
liscio wants to merge 35 commits into
RACCommunity:masterfrom
liscio:master
Open

[WIP] Bindings!#84
liscio wants to merge 35 commits into
RACCommunity:masterfrom
liscio:master

Conversation

@liscio

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Originally developed alongside a forthcoming update to FuzzMeasure (http://fuzzmeasure.com), this is my take on one way that Cocoa Bindings-like behavior may be approximated using RAC.

In addition to the Signals that contain controls' changing values, the ConsumerBinding provides the "other half" of the equation—updating their state to reflect incoming values. Like Cocoa Bindings, values are wrapped by placeholders that represent selection states such as MultipleValues and NoSelection.

A new PropertyBinding is a similar concept that exists for model objects to expose, where a validator function is provided to allow the "massaging" of incoming values. This approximates the role of Key-Value Validation as it existed within Cocoa Bindings.

This changeset does not include any examples, sadly. Hopefully I can put something together in the near future to share. Also, I need to adjust whitespace as this code was built alongside a project that uses 4 spaces in place of tabs. 😛

In addition to the above, this PR includes some additional extensions for AppKit controls.

In doing some of my own work, I found that I was duplicating a lot of what was already done in Rex, so I ported over much of what I've done on my own in order to better consolidate things.
There isn't a complete 1:1 test matching at the moment with the new AppKit methods, and I "broke" the API for NSTextField that was already in place to better match with conventions used elsewhere in RAC, and to distinguish between continuous and "normal" control events.
Originally developed alongside a forthcoming update to FuzzMeasure
(http://fuzzmeasure.com), this is my take on one way that Cocoa
Bindings-like behavior may be approximated using RAC.
In addition to the `Signal`s that contain controls' changing values, the
`ConsumerBinding` provides the "other half" of the equation—updating
their state to reflect incoming values. Like Cocoa Bindings, values are
wrapped by placeholders that represent selection states such as
`MultipleValues` and `NoSelection`.
A new `PropertyBinding` is a similar concept that exists for model
objects to expose, where a `validator` function is provided to allow the
"massaging" of incoming values. This approximates the role of Key-Value
Validation as it existed within Cocoa Bindings.
This changeset does not include any examples, sadly. Hopefully I can put
something together in the near future to share.
Trying to use Action-based triggers for values, in general, as
NSControls have always worked on a target/action-based system.
The joy of importing code from an app into a framework is all the
internal -> public promotion...
@liscioliscio changed the title Bindings![WIP] Bindings!Feb 2, 2016
@neilpa

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I did a quick pass on this but having never used Cocoa Bindings (or any meaningful Mac development for that matter) it'll take me a bit longer to digest this and offer feedback.

@liscio

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@neilpa It's a lot to digest. I sort of "rushed" to dump this code (after carefully building it, and using it successfully) into the repo because I wanted to make it available for my other projects sooner.

I'm hoping to come up with a small enough example to demonstrate this soon.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@liscio@neilpa@andersio
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[WIP] Bindings! - #84

Open
liscio wants to merge 35 commits into
RACCommunity:masterfrom
liscio:master
Open

[WIP] Bindings!#84
liscio wants to merge 35 commits into
RACCommunity:masterfrom
liscio:master

Conversation

@liscio

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Originally developed alongside a forthcoming update to FuzzMeasure (http://fuzzmeasure.com), this is my take on one way that Cocoa Bindings-like behavior may be approximated using RAC.

In addition to the Signals that contain controls' changing values, the ConsumerBinding provides the "other half" of the equation—updating their state to reflect incoming values. Like Cocoa Bindings, values are wrapped by placeholders that represent selection states such as MultipleValues and NoSelection.

A new PropertyBinding is a similar concept that exists for model objects to expose, where a validator function is provided to allow the "massaging" of incoming values. This approximates the role of Key-Value Validation as it existed within Cocoa Bindings.

This changeset does not include any examples, sadly. Hopefully I can put something together in the near future to share. Also, I need to adjust whitespace as this code was built alongside a project that uses 4 spaces in place of tabs. 😛

In addition to the above, this PR includes some additional extensions for AppKit controls.

In doing some of my own work, I found that I was duplicating a lot of what was already done in Rex, so I ported over much of what I've done on my own in order to better consolidate things.
There isn't a complete 1:1 test matching at the moment with the new AppKit methods, and I "broke" the API for NSTextField that was already in place to better match with conventions used elsewhere in RAC, and to distinguish between continuous and "normal" control events.
Originally developed alongside a forthcoming update to FuzzMeasure
(http://fuzzmeasure.com), this is my take on one way that Cocoa
Bindings-like behavior may be approximated using RAC.
In addition to the `Signal`s that contain controls' changing values, the
`ConsumerBinding` provides the "other half" of the equation—updating
their state to reflect incoming values. Like Cocoa Bindings, values are
wrapped by placeholders that represent selection states such as
`MultipleValues` and `NoSelection`.
A new `PropertyBinding` is a similar concept that exists for model
objects to expose, where a `validator` function is provided to allow the
"massaging" of incoming values. This approximates the role of Key-Value
Validation as it existed within Cocoa Bindings.
This changeset does not include any examples, sadly. Hopefully I can put
something together in the near future to share.
Trying to use Action-based triggers for values, in general, as
NSControls have always worked on a target/action-based system.
The joy of importing code from an app into a framework is all the
internal -> public promotion...
@liscioliscio changed the title Bindings![WIP] Bindings!Feb 2, 2016
@neilpa

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I did a quick pass on this but having never used Cocoa Bindings (or any meaningful Mac development for that matter) it'll take me a bit longer to digest this and offer feedback.

@liscio

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@neilpa It's a lot to digest. I sort of "rushed" to dump this code (after carefully building it, and using it successfully) into the repo because I wanted to make it available for my other projects sooner.

I'm hoping to come up with a small enough example to demonstrate this soon.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@liscio@neilpa@andersio