refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds. - #9288

Merged
gonfunko merged 4 commits into
developfrom
scroll-into-view
Aug 28, 2025
Merged

refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds.#9288
gonfunko merged 4 commits into
developfrom
scroll-into-view

Conversation

@gonfunko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The basics

The details

Resolves

Fixes#9212

Proposed Changes

This PR updates LineCursor to no longer attempt to scroll elements into view when they are focused. Instead, this responsibility is delegated to the elements themselves in the onNodeFocus() callback. This simplifies the implementation of LineCursor by not tying it to specific kinds of elements, and means that additional focusable elements (whether first or third party) can adopt this behavior.

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I think it makes a lot of sense to approach it this way. I worry a little about it being easy to forget to auto-scroll in onNodeFocus implementations, but I don't have a better suggestion on the approach.

Is it possible to add tests for the different components to verify that they auto-scroll correctly onto the screen? I realize that might be a lot to test, but if it's important to work then we probably should ensure that it stays working, if possible.

Comment threadcore/rendered_connection.ts Outdated
@gonfunko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added browser tests to ensure that focusing elements moves the workspace such that the element's bounds are visible.

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gonfunko! Approving to unblock, but had a few follow-ups: PTAL.

Comment threadtests/browser/test/basic_playground_test.mjs Outdated
Comment threadtests/browser/test/basic_playground_test.mjs Outdated
Comment threadcore/rendered_connection.ts Outdated

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Really nice tests, and I think the latest solution is much cleaner.

@gonfunko
gonfunko merged commit 47307a9 into developAug 28, 2025
13 checks passed
@gonfunko
gonfunko deleted the scroll-into-view branch August 28, 2025 18:28
gonfunko added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2025
…s into bounds. (#9288)
* refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds.
* chore: Add tests for scrolling focused elements into view.
* fix: Removed inadvertent `.only`.
* fix: Scroll parent block of connections into bounds on focus.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

PR: refactorRefactors code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

scroll components into view when they're focused

2 participants

@gonfunko@BenHenning
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds. - #9288

Merged
gonfunko merged 4 commits into
developfrom
scroll-into-view
Aug 28, 2025
Merged

refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds.#9288
gonfunko merged 4 commits into
developfrom
scroll-into-view

Conversation

@gonfunko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The basics

The details

Resolves

Fixes#9212

Proposed Changes

This PR updates LineCursor to no longer attempt to scroll elements into view when they are focused. Instead, this responsibility is delegated to the elements themselves in the onNodeFocus() callback. This simplifies the implementation of LineCursor by not tying it to specific kinds of elements, and means that additional focusable elements (whether first or third party) can adopt this behavior.

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I think it makes a lot of sense to approach it this way. I worry a little about it being easy to forget to auto-scroll in onNodeFocus implementations, but I don't have a better suggestion on the approach.

Is it possible to add tests for the different components to verify that they auto-scroll correctly onto the screen? I realize that might be a lot to test, but if it's important to work then we probably should ensure that it stays working, if possible.

Comment threadcore/rendered_connection.ts Outdated
@gonfunko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added browser tests to ensure that focusing elements moves the workspace such that the element's bounds are visible.

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gonfunko! Approving to unblock, but had a few follow-ups: PTAL.

Comment threadtests/browser/test/basic_playground_test.mjs Outdated
Comment threadtests/browser/test/basic_playground_test.mjs Outdated
Comment threadcore/rendered_connection.ts Outdated

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Really nice tests, and I think the latest solution is much cleaner.

@gonfunko
gonfunko merged commit 47307a9 into developAug 28, 2025
13 checks passed
@gonfunko
gonfunko deleted the scroll-into-view branch August 28, 2025 18:28
gonfunko added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2025
…s into bounds. (#9288)
* refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds.
* chore: Add tests for scrolling focused elements into view.
* fix: Removed inadvertent `.only`.
* fix: Scroll parent block of connections into bounds on focus.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

PR: refactorRefactors code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

scroll components into view when they're focused

2 participants

@gonfunko@BenHenning
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds. - #9288

Merged
gonfunko merged 4 commits into
developfrom
scroll-into-view
Aug 28, 2025
Merged

refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds.#9288
gonfunko merged 4 commits into
developfrom
scroll-into-view

Conversation

@gonfunko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The basics

The details

Resolves

Fixes#9212

Proposed Changes

This PR updates LineCursor to no longer attempt to scroll elements into view when they are focused. Instead, this responsibility is delegated to the elements themselves in the onNodeFocus() callback. This simplifies the implementation of LineCursor by not tying it to specific kinds of elements, and means that additional focusable elements (whether first or third party) can adopt this behavior.

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I think it makes a lot of sense to approach it this way. I worry a little about it being easy to forget to auto-scroll in onNodeFocus implementations, but I don't have a better suggestion on the approach.

Is it possible to add tests for the different components to verify that they auto-scroll correctly onto the screen? I realize that might be a lot to test, but if it's important to work then we probably should ensure that it stays working, if possible.

Comment threadcore/rendered_connection.ts Outdated
@gonfunko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added browser tests to ensure that focusing elements moves the workspace such that the element's bounds are visible.

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gonfunko! Approving to unblock, but had a few follow-ups: PTAL.

Comment threadtests/browser/test/basic_playground_test.mjs Outdated
Comment threadtests/browser/test/basic_playground_test.mjs Outdated
Comment threadcore/rendered_connection.ts Outdated

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Really nice tests, and I think the latest solution is much cleaner.

@gonfunko
gonfunko merged commit 47307a9 into developAug 28, 2025
13 checks passed
@gonfunko
gonfunko deleted the scroll-into-view branch August 28, 2025 18:28
gonfunko added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2025
…s into bounds. (#9288)
* refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds.
* chore: Add tests for scrolling focused elements into view.
* fix: Removed inadvertent `.only`.
* fix: Scroll parent block of connections into bounds on focus.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

PR: refactorRefactors code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

scroll components into view when they're focused

2 participants

@gonfunko@BenHenning
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds. - #9288

Merged
gonfunko merged 4 commits into
developfrom
scroll-into-view
Aug 28, 2025
Merged

refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds.#9288
gonfunko merged 4 commits into
developfrom
scroll-into-view

Conversation

@gonfunko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The basics

The details

Resolves

Fixes#9212

Proposed Changes

This PR updates LineCursor to no longer attempt to scroll elements into view when they are focused. Instead, this responsibility is delegated to the elements themselves in the onNodeFocus() callback. This simplifies the implementation of LineCursor by not tying it to specific kinds of elements, and means that additional focusable elements (whether first or third party) can adopt this behavior.

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I think it makes a lot of sense to approach it this way. I worry a little about it being easy to forget to auto-scroll in onNodeFocus implementations, but I don't have a better suggestion on the approach.

Is it possible to add tests for the different components to verify that they auto-scroll correctly onto the screen? I realize that might be a lot to test, but if it's important to work then we probably should ensure that it stays working, if possible.

Comment threadcore/rendered_connection.ts Outdated
@gonfunko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added browser tests to ensure that focusing elements moves the workspace such that the element's bounds are visible.

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gonfunko! Approving to unblock, but had a few follow-ups: PTAL.

Comment threadtests/browser/test/basic_playground_test.mjs Outdated
Comment threadtests/browser/test/basic_playground_test.mjs Outdated
Comment threadcore/rendered_connection.ts Outdated

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Really nice tests, and I think the latest solution is much cleaner.

@gonfunko
gonfunko merged commit 47307a9 into developAug 28, 2025
13 checks passed
@gonfunko
gonfunko deleted the scroll-into-view branch August 28, 2025 18:28
gonfunko added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2025
…s into bounds. (#9288)
* refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds.
* chore: Add tests for scrolling focused elements into view.
* fix: Removed inadvertent `.only`.
* fix: Scroll parent block of connections into bounds on focus.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

PR: refactorRefactors code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

scroll components into view when they're focused

2 participants

@gonfunko@BenHenning
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds. - #9288

Merged
gonfunko merged 4 commits into
developfrom
scroll-into-view
Aug 28, 2025
Merged

refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds.#9288
gonfunko merged 4 commits into
developfrom
scroll-into-view

Conversation

@gonfunko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The basics

The details

Resolves

Fixes#9212

Proposed Changes

This PR updates LineCursor to no longer attempt to scroll elements into view when they are focused. Instead, this responsibility is delegated to the elements themselves in the onNodeFocus() callback. This simplifies the implementation of LineCursor by not tying it to specific kinds of elements, and means that additional focusable elements (whether first or third party) can adopt this behavior.

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I think it makes a lot of sense to approach it this way. I worry a little about it being easy to forget to auto-scroll in onNodeFocus implementations, but I don't have a better suggestion on the approach.

Is it possible to add tests for the different components to verify that they auto-scroll correctly onto the screen? I realize that might be a lot to test, but if it's important to work then we probably should ensure that it stays working, if possible.

Comment threadcore/rendered_connection.ts Outdated
@gonfunko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added browser tests to ensure that focusing elements moves the workspace such that the element's bounds are visible.

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gonfunko! Approving to unblock, but had a few follow-ups: PTAL.

Comment threadtests/browser/test/basic_playground_test.mjs Outdated
Comment threadtests/browser/test/basic_playground_test.mjs Outdated
Comment threadcore/rendered_connection.ts Outdated

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Really nice tests, and I think the latest solution is much cleaner.

@gonfunko
gonfunko merged commit 47307a9 into developAug 28, 2025
13 checks passed
@gonfunko
gonfunko deleted the scroll-into-view branch August 28, 2025 18:28
gonfunko added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2025
…s into bounds. (#9288)
* refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds.
* chore: Add tests for scrolling focused elements into view.
* fix: Removed inadvertent `.only`.
* fix: Scroll parent block of connections into bounds on focus.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

PR: refactorRefactors code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

scroll components into view when they're focused

2 participants

@gonfunko@BenHenning
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds. - #9288

Merged
gonfunko merged 4 commits into
developfrom
scroll-into-view
Aug 28, 2025
Merged

refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds.#9288
gonfunko merged 4 commits into
developfrom
scroll-into-view

Conversation

@gonfunko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The basics

The details

Resolves

Fixes#9212

Proposed Changes

This PR updates LineCursor to no longer attempt to scroll elements into view when they are focused. Instead, this responsibility is delegated to the elements themselves in the onNodeFocus() callback. This simplifies the implementation of LineCursor by not tying it to specific kinds of elements, and means that additional focusable elements (whether first or third party) can adopt this behavior.

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I think it makes a lot of sense to approach it this way. I worry a little about it being easy to forget to auto-scroll in onNodeFocus implementations, but I don't have a better suggestion on the approach.

Is it possible to add tests for the different components to verify that they auto-scroll correctly onto the screen? I realize that might be a lot to test, but if it's important to work then we probably should ensure that it stays working, if possible.

Comment threadcore/rendered_connection.ts Outdated
@gonfunko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added browser tests to ensure that focusing elements moves the workspace such that the element's bounds are visible.

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gonfunko! Approving to unblock, but had a few follow-ups: PTAL.

Comment threadtests/browser/test/basic_playground_test.mjs Outdated
Comment threadtests/browser/test/basic_playground_test.mjs Outdated
Comment threadcore/rendered_connection.ts Outdated

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Really nice tests, and I think the latest solution is much cleaner.

@gonfunko
gonfunko merged commit 47307a9 into developAug 28, 2025
13 checks passed
@gonfunko
gonfunko deleted the scroll-into-view branch August 28, 2025 18:28
gonfunko added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2025
…s into bounds. (#9288)
* refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds.
* chore: Add tests for scrolling focused elements into view.
* fix: Removed inadvertent `.only`.
* fix: Scroll parent block of connections into bounds on focus.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

PR: refactorRefactors code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

scroll components into view when they're focused

2 participants

@gonfunko@BenHenning
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds. - #9288

Merged
gonfunko merged 4 commits into
developfrom
scroll-into-view
Aug 28, 2025
Merged

refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds.#9288
gonfunko merged 4 commits into
developfrom
scroll-into-view

Conversation

@gonfunko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The basics

The details

Resolves

Fixes#9212

Proposed Changes

This PR updates LineCursor to no longer attempt to scroll elements into view when they are focused. Instead, this responsibility is delegated to the elements themselves in the onNodeFocus() callback. This simplifies the implementation of LineCursor by not tying it to specific kinds of elements, and means that additional focusable elements (whether first or third party) can adopt this behavior.

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I think it makes a lot of sense to approach it this way. I worry a little about it being easy to forget to auto-scroll in onNodeFocus implementations, but I don't have a better suggestion on the approach.

Is it possible to add tests for the different components to verify that they auto-scroll correctly onto the screen? I realize that might be a lot to test, but if it's important to work then we probably should ensure that it stays working, if possible.

Comment threadcore/rendered_connection.ts Outdated
@gonfunko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added browser tests to ensure that focusing elements moves the workspace such that the element's bounds are visible.

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gonfunko! Approving to unblock, but had a few follow-ups: PTAL.

Comment threadtests/browser/test/basic_playground_test.mjs Outdated
Comment threadtests/browser/test/basic_playground_test.mjs Outdated
Comment threadcore/rendered_connection.ts Outdated

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Really nice tests, and I think the latest solution is much cleaner.

@gonfunko
gonfunko merged commit 47307a9 into developAug 28, 2025
13 checks passed
@gonfunko
gonfunko deleted the scroll-into-view branch August 28, 2025 18:28
gonfunko added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2025
…s into bounds. (#9288)
* refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds.
* chore: Add tests for scrolling focused elements into view.
* fix: Removed inadvertent `.only`.
* fix: Scroll parent block of connections into bounds on focus.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

PR: refactorRefactors code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

scroll components into view when they're focused

2 participants

@gonfunko@BenHenning
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds. - #9288

Merged
gonfunko merged 4 commits into
developfrom
scroll-into-view
Aug 28, 2025
Merged

refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds.#9288
gonfunko merged 4 commits into
developfrom
scroll-into-view

Conversation

@gonfunko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The basics

The details

Resolves

Fixes#9212

Proposed Changes

This PR updates LineCursor to no longer attempt to scroll elements into view when they are focused. Instead, this responsibility is delegated to the elements themselves in the onNodeFocus() callback. This simplifies the implementation of LineCursor by not tying it to specific kinds of elements, and means that additional focusable elements (whether first or third party) can adopt this behavior.

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I think it makes a lot of sense to approach it this way. I worry a little about it being easy to forget to auto-scroll in onNodeFocus implementations, but I don't have a better suggestion on the approach.

Is it possible to add tests for the different components to verify that they auto-scroll correctly onto the screen? I realize that might be a lot to test, but if it's important to work then we probably should ensure that it stays working, if possible.

Comment threadcore/rendered_connection.ts Outdated
@gonfunko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added browser tests to ensure that focusing elements moves the workspace such that the element's bounds are visible.

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gonfunko! Approving to unblock, but had a few follow-ups: PTAL.

Comment threadtests/browser/test/basic_playground_test.mjs Outdated
Comment threadtests/browser/test/basic_playground_test.mjs Outdated
Comment threadcore/rendered_connection.ts Outdated

@BenHenningBenHenning left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Really nice tests, and I think the latest solution is much cleaner.

@gonfunko
gonfunko merged commit 47307a9 into developAug 28, 2025
13 checks passed
@gonfunko
gonfunko deleted the scroll-into-view branch August 28, 2025 18:28
gonfunko added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2025
…s into bounds. (#9288)
* refactor: Make focusable elements responsible for scrolling themselves into bounds.
* chore: Add tests for scrolling focused elements into view.
* fix: Removed inadvertent `.only`.
* fix: Scroll parent block of connections into bounds on focus.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

PR: refactorRefactors code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

scroll components into view when they're focused

2 participants

@gonfunko@BenHenning