Skip to content

Add errors used in binder. - #130

Merged
alex merged 1 commit into
Rust-for-Linux:rustfrom
wedsonaf:errors
Mar 20, 2021
Merged

Add errors used in binder.#130
alex merged 1 commit into
Rust-for-Linux:rustfrom
wedsonaf:errors

Conversation

@wedsonaf

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@alex
alex merged commit e9b9c0e into Rust-for-Linux:rustMar 20, 2021
@wedsonaf
wedsonaf deleted the errors branch March 20, 2021 22:47
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2024
Like commit 1cf3bfc ("bpf: Support 64-bit pointers to kfuncs")
for s390x, add support for 64-bit pointers to kfuncs for LoongArch.
Since the infrastructure is already implemented in BPF core, the only
thing need to be done is to override bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call().
Before this change, several test_verifier tests failed:
# ./test_verifier | grep # | grep FAIL
#119/p calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with non-scalar FAIL
#120/p calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with nesting depth > 4 FAIL
#121/p calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with FAM FAIL
#122/p calls: invalid kfunc call: reg->type != PTR_TO_CTX FAIL
#123/p calls: invalid kfunc call: void * not allowed in func proto without mem size arg FAIL
#124/p calls: trigger reg2btf_ids[reg->type] for reg->type > __BPF_REG_TYPE_MAX FAIL
#125/p calls: invalid kfunc call: reg->off must be zero when passed to release kfunc FAIL
#126/p calls: invalid kfunc call: don't match first member type when passed to release kfunc FAIL
#127/p calls: invalid kfunc call: PTR_TO_BTF_ID with negative offset FAIL
#128/p calls: invalid kfunc call: PTR_TO_BTF_ID with variable offset FAIL
#129/p calls: invalid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID FAIL
#130/p calls: valid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID FAIL
#486/p map_kptr: ref: reference state created and released on xchg FAIL
This is because the kfuncs in the loaded module are far away from
__bpf_call_base:
ffff800002009440 t bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail1 [bpf_testmod]
9000000002e128d8 T __bpf_call_base
The offset relative to __bpf_call_base does NOT fit in s32, which breaks
the assumption in BPF core. Enable bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call() lifts
this limit.
Note that to reproduce the above result, tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
should be applied, and run the test with JIT enabled, unpriv BPF enabled.
With this change, the test_verifier tests now all passed:
# ./test_verifier
...
Summary: 777 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@wedsonaf@alex