Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Implement verify-only PSS PaddingScheme - #173
Conversation
tarcieri
commented
Jul 31, 2022
Instead of introducing a Its only use is to pass it to Really it'd be nice to implement the traits from the |
lumag
commented
Jul 31, 2022
@tarcieri done |
lumag
commented
Aug 17, 2022
gracious ping |
The passed rng is not necessary for PSS signature verification. Instead of passing artificial unused RNG through the PaddingScheme, add new sign_with_rng() API and pass rng directly. In the sign_blinded() use the passed rng both for salt generation and for the blinding process. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
lumag
commented
Aug 23, 2022
Refreshed to remove conflict. |
Kriskras99
commented
Sep 14, 2022
@tarcieri could this be included in the upcoming 0.7.0 release? It would save me a dependency and make it clearer what is going on in my code. |
tarcieri
commented
Sep 14, 2022
Yep, that's the plan |
Kriskras99
commented
Sep 14, 2022
Great! I look forward to testing 0.7.0-pre2😁 |
…ustCrypto#173) The passed rng is not necessary for PSS signature verification. Instead of passing artificial unused RNG through the PaddingScheme, add new sign_with_rng() API and pass rng directly. In the sign_blinded() use the passed rng both for salt generation and for the blinding process. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
A fix for #172 , implementation of verify-only PSS padding schema