Add UseDigestTo* marker trait and blanket Sign/Verify impls - #9

Closed
tarcieri wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
use-digest-marker-traits
Closed

Add UseDigestTo* marker trait and blanket Sign/Verify impls#9
tarcieri wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
use-digest-marker-traits

Conversation

@tarcieri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This commit makes the digest for SignDigest and VerifyDigest an associated type rather than a generic, and also adds two marker traits:

  • UseDigestToSign: opt into blanket impl of Sign for SignDigest
  • UseDigestToVerify: opt into blanket impl of Verify for VerifyDigest

The reason for requiring a marker trait is there are cases where the same keys can be used with an IUF mode of an algorithm which is distinct from the non-IUF form, e.g. Ed25519 vs Ed25519ph. In this case, the underlying keys are the same, but the signature algorithm when using the
IUF mode is distinct.

This commit makes the digest for `SignDigest` and `VerifyDigest` an
associated type rather than a generic, and also adds two marker traits:
- `UseDigestToSign`: opt into blanket impl of `Sign` for `SignDigest`
- `UseDigestToVerify`: opt into blanket impl of `Verify` for `VerifyDigest`
The reason for requiring a marker trait is there are cases where the
same keys can be used with an IUF mode of an algorithm which is distinct
from the non-IUF form, e.g. Ed25519 vs Ed25519ph. In this case, the
underlying keys are the same, but the signature algorithm when using the
IUF mode is distinct.
@tarcieri
tarcieriforce-pushed the use-digest-marker-traits branch from 0b1b200 to 80f518aCompareMarch 26, 2019 17:49
@tarcieri

tarcieri commented Mar 26, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

One drawback of this approach is it means SignDigest and VerifyDigest are no longer object safe.

To preserve that, one option is to move the associated type to the marker trait (we need an associated type somewhere to constrain the blanket impl). It feels a bit redundant, but I'll go ahead and try that and push a second commit so we can compare. (Edit: did this in 2bff7eb)

This allows the `SignDigest` and `VerifyDigest` traits to remain object
safe with the same general shape as `Sign` and `Verify`.
@tarcieri
tarcieriforce-pushed the use-digest-marker-traits branch from 2bff7eb to 0232b07CompareMarch 26, 2019 18:06
@tarcieritarcieri mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2019
@tarcieri
tarcieri deleted the use-digest-marker-traits branch March 26, 2019 20:36
@tarcieri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@newpavlov I have a new idea about how to do this which I think is a little more in the middle between our approaches and better describes the underlying concepts.

Will open as a new PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@tarcieri
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add UseDigestTo* marker trait and blanket Sign/Verify impls - #9

Closed
tarcieri wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
use-digest-marker-traits
Closed

Add UseDigestTo* marker trait and blanket Sign/Verify impls#9
tarcieri wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
use-digest-marker-traits

Conversation

@tarcieri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This commit makes the digest for SignDigest and VerifyDigest an associated type rather than a generic, and also adds two marker traits:

  • UseDigestToSign: opt into blanket impl of Sign for SignDigest
  • UseDigestToVerify: opt into blanket impl of Verify for VerifyDigest

The reason for requiring a marker trait is there are cases where the same keys can be used with an IUF mode of an algorithm which is distinct from the non-IUF form, e.g. Ed25519 vs Ed25519ph. In this case, the underlying keys are the same, but the signature algorithm when using the
IUF mode is distinct.

This commit makes the digest for `SignDigest` and `VerifyDigest` an
associated type rather than a generic, and also adds two marker traits:
- `UseDigestToSign`: opt into blanket impl of `Sign` for `SignDigest`
- `UseDigestToVerify`: opt into blanket impl of `Verify` for `VerifyDigest`
The reason for requiring a marker trait is there are cases where the
same keys can be used with an IUF mode of an algorithm which is distinct
from the non-IUF form, e.g. Ed25519 vs Ed25519ph. In this case, the
underlying keys are the same, but the signature algorithm when using the
IUF mode is distinct.
@tarcieri
tarcieriforce-pushed the use-digest-marker-traits branch from 0b1b200 to 80f518aCompareMarch 26, 2019 17:49
@tarcieri

tarcieri commented Mar 26, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

One drawback of this approach is it means SignDigest and VerifyDigest are no longer object safe.

To preserve that, one option is to move the associated type to the marker trait (we need an associated type somewhere to constrain the blanket impl). It feels a bit redundant, but I'll go ahead and try that and push a second commit so we can compare. (Edit: did this in 2bff7eb)

This allows the `SignDigest` and `VerifyDigest` traits to remain object
safe with the same general shape as `Sign` and `Verify`.
@tarcieri
tarcieriforce-pushed the use-digest-marker-traits branch from 2bff7eb to 0232b07CompareMarch 26, 2019 18:06
@tarcieritarcieri mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2019
@tarcieri
tarcieri deleted the use-digest-marker-traits branch March 26, 2019 20:36
@tarcieri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@newpavlov I have a new idea about how to do this which I think is a little more in the middle between our approaches and better describes the underlying concepts.

Will open as a new PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@tarcieri
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add UseDigestTo* marker trait and blanket Sign/Verify impls - #9

Closed
tarcieri wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
use-digest-marker-traits
Closed

Add UseDigestTo* marker trait and blanket Sign/Verify impls#9
tarcieri wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
use-digest-marker-traits

Conversation

@tarcieri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This commit makes the digest for SignDigest and VerifyDigest an associated type rather than a generic, and also adds two marker traits:

  • UseDigestToSign: opt into blanket impl of Sign for SignDigest
  • UseDigestToVerify: opt into blanket impl of Verify for VerifyDigest

The reason for requiring a marker trait is there are cases where the same keys can be used with an IUF mode of an algorithm which is distinct from the non-IUF form, e.g. Ed25519 vs Ed25519ph. In this case, the underlying keys are the same, but the signature algorithm when using the
IUF mode is distinct.

This commit makes the digest for `SignDigest` and `VerifyDigest` an
associated type rather than a generic, and also adds two marker traits:
- `UseDigestToSign`: opt into blanket impl of `Sign` for `SignDigest`
- `UseDigestToVerify`: opt into blanket impl of `Verify` for `VerifyDigest`
The reason for requiring a marker trait is there are cases where the
same keys can be used with an IUF mode of an algorithm which is distinct
from the non-IUF form, e.g. Ed25519 vs Ed25519ph. In this case, the
underlying keys are the same, but the signature algorithm when using the
IUF mode is distinct.
@tarcieri
tarcieriforce-pushed the use-digest-marker-traits branch from 0b1b200 to 80f518aCompareMarch 26, 2019 17:49
@tarcieri

tarcieri commented Mar 26, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

One drawback of this approach is it means SignDigest and VerifyDigest are no longer object safe.

To preserve that, one option is to move the associated type to the marker trait (we need an associated type somewhere to constrain the blanket impl). It feels a bit redundant, but I'll go ahead and try that and push a second commit so we can compare. (Edit: did this in 2bff7eb)

This allows the `SignDigest` and `VerifyDigest` traits to remain object
safe with the same general shape as `Sign` and `Verify`.
@tarcieri
tarcieriforce-pushed the use-digest-marker-traits branch from 2bff7eb to 0232b07CompareMarch 26, 2019 18:06
@tarcieritarcieri mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2019
@tarcieri
tarcieri deleted the use-digest-marker-traits branch March 26, 2019 20:36
@tarcieri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@newpavlov I have a new idea about how to do this which I think is a little more in the middle between our approaches and better describes the underlying concepts.

Will open as a new PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@tarcieri
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add UseDigestTo* marker trait and blanket Sign/Verify impls - #9

Closed
tarcieri wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
use-digest-marker-traits
Closed

Add UseDigestTo* marker trait and blanket Sign/Verify impls#9
tarcieri wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
use-digest-marker-traits

Conversation

@tarcieri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This commit makes the digest for SignDigest and VerifyDigest an associated type rather than a generic, and also adds two marker traits:

  • UseDigestToSign: opt into blanket impl of Sign for SignDigest
  • UseDigestToVerify: opt into blanket impl of Verify for VerifyDigest

The reason for requiring a marker trait is there are cases where the same keys can be used with an IUF mode of an algorithm which is distinct from the non-IUF form, e.g. Ed25519 vs Ed25519ph. In this case, the underlying keys are the same, but the signature algorithm when using the
IUF mode is distinct.

This commit makes the digest for `SignDigest` and `VerifyDigest` an
associated type rather than a generic, and also adds two marker traits:
- `UseDigestToSign`: opt into blanket impl of `Sign` for `SignDigest`
- `UseDigestToVerify`: opt into blanket impl of `Verify` for `VerifyDigest`
The reason for requiring a marker trait is there are cases where the
same keys can be used with an IUF mode of an algorithm which is distinct
from the non-IUF form, e.g. Ed25519 vs Ed25519ph. In this case, the
underlying keys are the same, but the signature algorithm when using the
IUF mode is distinct.
@tarcieri
tarcieriforce-pushed the use-digest-marker-traits branch from 0b1b200 to 80f518aCompareMarch 26, 2019 17:49
@tarcieri

tarcieri commented Mar 26, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

One drawback of this approach is it means SignDigest and VerifyDigest are no longer object safe.

To preserve that, one option is to move the associated type to the marker trait (we need an associated type somewhere to constrain the blanket impl). It feels a bit redundant, but I'll go ahead and try that and push a second commit so we can compare. (Edit: did this in 2bff7eb)

This allows the `SignDigest` and `VerifyDigest` traits to remain object
safe with the same general shape as `Sign` and `Verify`.
@tarcieri
tarcieriforce-pushed the use-digest-marker-traits branch from 2bff7eb to 0232b07CompareMarch 26, 2019 18:06
@tarcieritarcieri mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2019
@tarcieri
tarcieri deleted the use-digest-marker-traits branch March 26, 2019 20:36
@tarcieri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@newpavlov I have a new idea about how to do this which I think is a little more in the middle between our approaches and better describes the underlying concepts.

Will open as a new PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@tarcieri
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add UseDigestTo* marker trait and blanket Sign/Verify impls - #9

Closed
tarcieri wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
use-digest-marker-traits
Closed

Add UseDigestTo* marker trait and blanket Sign/Verify impls#9
tarcieri wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
use-digest-marker-traits

Conversation

@tarcieri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This commit makes the digest for SignDigest and VerifyDigest an associated type rather than a generic, and also adds two marker traits:

  • UseDigestToSign: opt into blanket impl of Sign for SignDigest
  • UseDigestToVerify: opt into blanket impl of Verify for VerifyDigest

The reason for requiring a marker trait is there are cases where the same keys can be used with an IUF mode of an algorithm which is distinct from the non-IUF form, e.g. Ed25519 vs Ed25519ph. In this case, the underlying keys are the same, but the signature algorithm when using the
IUF mode is distinct.

This commit makes the digest for `SignDigest` and `VerifyDigest` an
associated type rather than a generic, and also adds two marker traits:
- `UseDigestToSign`: opt into blanket impl of `Sign` for `SignDigest`
- `UseDigestToVerify`: opt into blanket impl of `Verify` for `VerifyDigest`
The reason for requiring a marker trait is there are cases where the
same keys can be used with an IUF mode of an algorithm which is distinct
from the non-IUF form, e.g. Ed25519 vs Ed25519ph. In this case, the
underlying keys are the same, but the signature algorithm when using the
IUF mode is distinct.
@tarcieri
tarcieriforce-pushed the use-digest-marker-traits branch from 0b1b200 to 80f518aCompareMarch 26, 2019 17:49
@tarcieri

tarcieri commented Mar 26, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

One drawback of this approach is it means SignDigest and VerifyDigest are no longer object safe.

To preserve that, one option is to move the associated type to the marker trait (we need an associated type somewhere to constrain the blanket impl). It feels a bit redundant, but I'll go ahead and try that and push a second commit so we can compare. (Edit: did this in 2bff7eb)

This allows the `SignDigest` and `VerifyDigest` traits to remain object
safe with the same general shape as `Sign` and `Verify`.
@tarcieri
tarcieriforce-pushed the use-digest-marker-traits branch from 2bff7eb to 0232b07CompareMarch 26, 2019 18:06
@tarcieritarcieri mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2019
@tarcieri
tarcieri deleted the use-digest-marker-traits branch March 26, 2019 20:36
@tarcieri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@newpavlov I have a new idea about how to do this which I think is a little more in the middle between our approaches and better describes the underlying concepts.

Will open as a new PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@tarcieri
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add UseDigestTo* marker trait and blanket Sign/Verify impls - #9

Closed
tarcieri wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
use-digest-marker-traits
Closed

Add UseDigestTo* marker trait and blanket Sign/Verify impls#9
tarcieri wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
use-digest-marker-traits

Conversation

@tarcieri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This commit makes the digest for SignDigest and VerifyDigest an associated type rather than a generic, and also adds two marker traits:

  • UseDigestToSign: opt into blanket impl of Sign for SignDigest
  • UseDigestToVerify: opt into blanket impl of Verify for VerifyDigest

The reason for requiring a marker trait is there are cases where the same keys can be used with an IUF mode of an algorithm which is distinct from the non-IUF form, e.g. Ed25519 vs Ed25519ph. In this case, the underlying keys are the same, but the signature algorithm when using the
IUF mode is distinct.

This commit makes the digest for `SignDigest` and `VerifyDigest` an
associated type rather than a generic, and also adds two marker traits:
- `UseDigestToSign`: opt into blanket impl of `Sign` for `SignDigest`
- `UseDigestToVerify`: opt into blanket impl of `Verify` for `VerifyDigest`
The reason for requiring a marker trait is there are cases where the
same keys can be used with an IUF mode of an algorithm which is distinct
from the non-IUF form, e.g. Ed25519 vs Ed25519ph. In this case, the
underlying keys are the same, but the signature algorithm when using the
IUF mode is distinct.
@tarcieri
tarcieriforce-pushed the use-digest-marker-traits branch from 0b1b200 to 80f518aCompareMarch 26, 2019 17:49
@tarcieri

tarcieri commented Mar 26, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

One drawback of this approach is it means SignDigest and VerifyDigest are no longer object safe.

To preserve that, one option is to move the associated type to the marker trait (we need an associated type somewhere to constrain the blanket impl). It feels a bit redundant, but I'll go ahead and try that and push a second commit so we can compare. (Edit: did this in 2bff7eb)

This allows the `SignDigest` and `VerifyDigest` traits to remain object
safe with the same general shape as `Sign` and `Verify`.
@tarcieri
tarcieriforce-pushed the use-digest-marker-traits branch from 2bff7eb to 0232b07CompareMarch 26, 2019 18:06
@tarcieritarcieri mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2019
@tarcieri
tarcieri deleted the use-digest-marker-traits branch March 26, 2019 20:36
@tarcieri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@newpavlov I have a new idea about how to do this which I think is a little more in the middle between our approaches and better describes the underlying concepts.

Will open as a new PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@tarcieri
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add UseDigestTo* marker trait and blanket Sign/Verify impls - #9

Closed
tarcieri wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
use-digest-marker-traits
Closed

Add UseDigestTo* marker trait and blanket Sign/Verify impls#9
tarcieri wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
use-digest-marker-traits

Conversation

@tarcieri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This commit makes the digest for SignDigest and VerifyDigest an associated type rather than a generic, and also adds two marker traits:

  • UseDigestToSign: opt into blanket impl of Sign for SignDigest
  • UseDigestToVerify: opt into blanket impl of Verify for VerifyDigest

The reason for requiring a marker trait is there are cases where the same keys can be used with an IUF mode of an algorithm which is distinct from the non-IUF form, e.g. Ed25519 vs Ed25519ph. In this case, the underlying keys are the same, but the signature algorithm when using the
IUF mode is distinct.

This commit makes the digest for `SignDigest` and `VerifyDigest` an
associated type rather than a generic, and also adds two marker traits:
- `UseDigestToSign`: opt into blanket impl of `Sign` for `SignDigest`
- `UseDigestToVerify`: opt into blanket impl of `Verify` for `VerifyDigest`
The reason for requiring a marker trait is there are cases where the
same keys can be used with an IUF mode of an algorithm which is distinct
from the non-IUF form, e.g. Ed25519 vs Ed25519ph. In this case, the
underlying keys are the same, but the signature algorithm when using the
IUF mode is distinct.
@tarcieri
tarcieriforce-pushed the use-digest-marker-traits branch from 0b1b200 to 80f518aCompareMarch 26, 2019 17:49
@tarcieri

tarcieri commented Mar 26, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

One drawback of this approach is it means SignDigest and VerifyDigest are no longer object safe.

To preserve that, one option is to move the associated type to the marker trait (we need an associated type somewhere to constrain the blanket impl). It feels a bit redundant, but I'll go ahead and try that and push a second commit so we can compare. (Edit: did this in 2bff7eb)

This allows the `SignDigest` and `VerifyDigest` traits to remain object
safe with the same general shape as `Sign` and `Verify`.
@tarcieri
tarcieriforce-pushed the use-digest-marker-traits branch from 2bff7eb to 0232b07CompareMarch 26, 2019 18:06
@tarcieritarcieri mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2019
@tarcieri
tarcieri deleted the use-digest-marker-traits branch March 26, 2019 20:36
@tarcieri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@newpavlov I have a new idea about how to do this which I think is a little more in the middle between our approaches and better describes the underlying concepts.

Will open as a new PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@tarcieri
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Add UseDigestTo* marker trait and blanket Sign/Verify impls - #9

Closed
tarcieri wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
use-digest-marker-traits
Closed

Add UseDigestTo* marker trait and blanket Sign/Verify impls#9
tarcieri wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
use-digest-marker-traits

Conversation

@tarcieri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This commit makes the digest for SignDigest and VerifyDigest an associated type rather than a generic, and also adds two marker traits:

  • UseDigestToSign: opt into blanket impl of Sign for SignDigest
  • UseDigestToVerify: opt into blanket impl of Verify for VerifyDigest

The reason for requiring a marker trait is there are cases where the same keys can be used with an IUF mode of an algorithm which is distinct from the non-IUF form, e.g. Ed25519 vs Ed25519ph. In this case, the underlying keys are the same, but the signature algorithm when using the
IUF mode is distinct.

This commit makes the digest for `SignDigest` and `VerifyDigest` an
associated type rather than a generic, and also adds two marker traits:
- `UseDigestToSign`: opt into blanket impl of `Sign` for `SignDigest`
- `UseDigestToVerify`: opt into blanket impl of `Verify` for `VerifyDigest`
The reason for requiring a marker trait is there are cases where the
same keys can be used with an IUF mode of an algorithm which is distinct
from the non-IUF form, e.g. Ed25519 vs Ed25519ph. In this case, the
underlying keys are the same, but the signature algorithm when using the
IUF mode is distinct.
@tarcieri
tarcieriforce-pushed the use-digest-marker-traits branch from 0b1b200 to 80f518aCompareMarch 26, 2019 17:49
@tarcieri

tarcieri commented Mar 26, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

One drawback of this approach is it means SignDigest and VerifyDigest are no longer object safe.

To preserve that, one option is to move the associated type to the marker trait (we need an associated type somewhere to constrain the blanket impl). It feels a bit redundant, but I'll go ahead and try that and push a second commit so we can compare. (Edit: did this in 2bff7eb)

This allows the `SignDigest` and `VerifyDigest` traits to remain object
safe with the same general shape as `Sign` and `Verify`.
@tarcieri
tarcieriforce-pushed the use-digest-marker-traits branch from 2bff7eb to 0232b07CompareMarch 26, 2019 18:06
@tarcieritarcieri mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2019
@tarcieri
tarcieri deleted the use-digest-marker-traits branch March 26, 2019 20:36
@tarcieri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@newpavlov I have a new idea about how to do this which I think is a little more in the middle between our approaches and better describes the underlying concepts.

Will open as a new PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@tarcieri