Article about Feliz and Fable React

[isaacabraham]

@MangelMaxime can you have a quick look through this article just to make sure it's broadly correct?

Thanks

[MangelMaxime]

The content is globally correct I would just avoid using invalid code snippets because this can be confusing to the users.

Regarding Feliz syntax, I believe most people/documentation use the prefixed DSL Html.div instead of div. So I am not sure we should use the non-prefixed version.

Or if we should use the prefixed version and then add a note about the non-prefixed version and how to activate it.

I also believe that the non prefixed version is not allows possible to user with binding library like Feliz.Bulma because it use a mix of static member and modules.

Lastly, it could perhaps be interesting to linked My journey with Feliz | A comparison between Fable.React and Feliz which goes much more in details and contains feedbacks/remarks from the community.

[MangelMaxime]

Same here.

h1 [
className "primary"
children [
p [ text "Hello"]
p [ text "Another paragraph"]
h2 [ className "primary"]]]

Code is valid if users use

open typeFeliz.Htmlopen typeFeliz.prop

[isaacabraham]

@MangelMaxime could you re-review this to see if it's now ready to go in?

[MangelMaxime]

@isaacabraham I added a few more comments.

The first one is the problematic one the others two are more related to details that you can decide to follow or not.

[mattgallagher92]

On the whole pretty good. I agree with the comments Maxime made.

[mattgallagher92]

@isaacabraham ping

[isaacabraham]

I'll fix this tomorrow

[Larocceau]

@mattgallagher92 I addressed the last few open issues. Ok to merge?

[mattgallagher92]

@Larocceau yep, though I'd just make one slight wording change 🙂

[mattgallagher92]

Suggested change

	* Fable.React and Feliz can be mixed into your application if required (for progressive migration for example)
	* Fable.React and Feliz can be mixed together in your application if required (for progressive migration for example)

"Mixed into" doesn't necessarily imply mixed together, so I'd make this clearer.