fix: precision for long dates - #279

Closed
johannes-vogel wants to merge 1 commit into
SAP:masterfrom
johannes-vogel:patch-2
Closed

fix: precision for long dates#279
johannes-vogel wants to merge 1 commit into
SAP:masterfrom
johannes-vogel:patch-2

Conversation

@johannes-vogel

@johannes-vogeljohannes-vogel commented Jul 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We are experimenting with the new data format versions (see #278) that the new version has included and stumbled over a bug that caused a precision loss. This PR includes the minimum fix for our tests to succeed.

The following value provided for a LONGDATE 2025-07-21T09:15:33.873Z results in a precision loss.

I also there's more improvement potential but that's for you to decide.

@IanMcCurdy FYI

minutes = ~~ts[5];
seconds = ~~ts[6];
nanoseconds = ~~((ts[6] * 1000000000) % 1000000000);
nanoseconds = ~~((ts[6] * 10000000) % 10000000);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alternatively, one could split ts[6] by the dot and convert the parts to a number or even adapt the timestamp regexp.

@IanMcCurdy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi Johannes, thanks for looking into this issue. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but the fix you've come up with looks valid to me - I'll put it through our internal review process and we'll get it submitted as soon as possible.

@johannes-vogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi Johannes, thanks for looking into this issue. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but the fix you've come up with looks valid to me - I'll put it through our internal review process and we'll get it submitted as soon as possible.

Please be aware, that this is sufficient for our usage since we have ms precision but values like '33.33333' are still prone to precision loss:

~~(('33.33333'*10000000)%10000000)3333299

@johannes-vogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I think that's fixed with 6506050

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@johannes-vogel@IanMcCurdy
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix: precision for long dates - #279

Closed
johannes-vogel wants to merge 1 commit into
SAP:masterfrom
johannes-vogel:patch-2
Closed

fix: precision for long dates#279
johannes-vogel wants to merge 1 commit into
SAP:masterfrom
johannes-vogel:patch-2

Conversation

@johannes-vogel

@johannes-vogeljohannes-vogel commented Jul 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We are experimenting with the new data format versions (see #278) that the new version has included and stumbled over a bug that caused a precision loss. This PR includes the minimum fix for our tests to succeed.

The following value provided for a LONGDATE 2025-07-21T09:15:33.873Z results in a precision loss.

I also there's more improvement potential but that's for you to decide.

@IanMcCurdy FYI

minutes = ~~ts[5];
seconds = ~~ts[6];
nanoseconds = ~~((ts[6] * 1000000000) % 1000000000);
nanoseconds = ~~((ts[6] * 10000000) % 10000000);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alternatively, one could split ts[6] by the dot and convert the parts to a number or even adapt the timestamp regexp.

@IanMcCurdy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi Johannes, thanks for looking into this issue. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but the fix you've come up with looks valid to me - I'll put it through our internal review process and we'll get it submitted as soon as possible.

@johannes-vogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi Johannes, thanks for looking into this issue. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but the fix you've come up with looks valid to me - I'll put it through our internal review process and we'll get it submitted as soon as possible.

Please be aware, that this is sufficient for our usage since we have ms precision but values like '33.33333' are still prone to precision loss:

~~(('33.33333'*10000000)%10000000)3333299

@johannes-vogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I think that's fixed with 6506050

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@johannes-vogel@IanMcCurdy
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix: precision for long dates - #279

Closed
johannes-vogel wants to merge 1 commit into
SAP:masterfrom
johannes-vogel:patch-2
Closed

fix: precision for long dates#279
johannes-vogel wants to merge 1 commit into
SAP:masterfrom
johannes-vogel:patch-2

Conversation

@johannes-vogel

@johannes-vogeljohannes-vogel commented Jul 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We are experimenting with the new data format versions (see #278) that the new version has included and stumbled over a bug that caused a precision loss. This PR includes the minimum fix for our tests to succeed.

The following value provided for a LONGDATE 2025-07-21T09:15:33.873Z results in a precision loss.

I also there's more improvement potential but that's for you to decide.

@IanMcCurdy FYI

minutes = ~~ts[5];
seconds = ~~ts[6];
nanoseconds = ~~((ts[6] * 1000000000) % 1000000000);
nanoseconds = ~~((ts[6] * 10000000) % 10000000);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alternatively, one could split ts[6] by the dot and convert the parts to a number or even adapt the timestamp regexp.

@IanMcCurdy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi Johannes, thanks for looking into this issue. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but the fix you've come up with looks valid to me - I'll put it through our internal review process and we'll get it submitted as soon as possible.

@johannes-vogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi Johannes, thanks for looking into this issue. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but the fix you've come up with looks valid to me - I'll put it through our internal review process and we'll get it submitted as soon as possible.

Please be aware, that this is sufficient for our usage since we have ms precision but values like '33.33333' are still prone to precision loss:

~~(('33.33333'*10000000)%10000000)3333299

@johannes-vogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I think that's fixed with 6506050

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@johannes-vogel@IanMcCurdy
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix: precision for long dates - #279

Closed
johannes-vogel wants to merge 1 commit into
SAP:masterfrom
johannes-vogel:patch-2
Closed

fix: precision for long dates#279
johannes-vogel wants to merge 1 commit into
SAP:masterfrom
johannes-vogel:patch-2

Conversation

@johannes-vogel

@johannes-vogeljohannes-vogel commented Jul 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We are experimenting with the new data format versions (see #278) that the new version has included and stumbled over a bug that caused a precision loss. This PR includes the minimum fix for our tests to succeed.

The following value provided for a LONGDATE 2025-07-21T09:15:33.873Z results in a precision loss.

I also there's more improvement potential but that's for you to decide.

@IanMcCurdy FYI

minutes = ~~ts[5];
seconds = ~~ts[6];
nanoseconds = ~~((ts[6] * 1000000000) % 1000000000);
nanoseconds = ~~((ts[6] * 10000000) % 10000000);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alternatively, one could split ts[6] by the dot and convert the parts to a number or even adapt the timestamp regexp.

@IanMcCurdy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi Johannes, thanks for looking into this issue. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but the fix you've come up with looks valid to me - I'll put it through our internal review process and we'll get it submitted as soon as possible.

@johannes-vogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi Johannes, thanks for looking into this issue. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but the fix you've come up with looks valid to me - I'll put it through our internal review process and we'll get it submitted as soon as possible.

Please be aware, that this is sufficient for our usage since we have ms precision but values like '33.33333' are still prone to precision loss:

~~(('33.33333'*10000000)%10000000)3333299

@johannes-vogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I think that's fixed with 6506050

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@johannes-vogel@IanMcCurdy
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix: precision for long dates - #279

Closed
johannes-vogel wants to merge 1 commit into
SAP:masterfrom
johannes-vogel:patch-2
Closed

fix: precision for long dates#279
johannes-vogel wants to merge 1 commit into
SAP:masterfrom
johannes-vogel:patch-2

Conversation

@johannes-vogel

@johannes-vogeljohannes-vogel commented Jul 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We are experimenting with the new data format versions (see #278) that the new version has included and stumbled over a bug that caused a precision loss. This PR includes the minimum fix for our tests to succeed.

The following value provided for a LONGDATE 2025-07-21T09:15:33.873Z results in a precision loss.

I also there's more improvement potential but that's for you to decide.

@IanMcCurdy FYI

minutes = ~~ts[5];
seconds = ~~ts[6];
nanoseconds = ~~((ts[6] * 1000000000) % 1000000000);
nanoseconds = ~~((ts[6] * 10000000) % 10000000);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alternatively, one could split ts[6] by the dot and convert the parts to a number or even adapt the timestamp regexp.

@IanMcCurdy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi Johannes, thanks for looking into this issue. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but the fix you've come up with looks valid to me - I'll put it through our internal review process and we'll get it submitted as soon as possible.

@johannes-vogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi Johannes, thanks for looking into this issue. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but the fix you've come up with looks valid to me - I'll put it through our internal review process and we'll get it submitted as soon as possible.

Please be aware, that this is sufficient for our usage since we have ms precision but values like '33.33333' are still prone to precision loss:

~~(('33.33333'*10000000)%10000000)3333299

@johannes-vogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I think that's fixed with 6506050

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@johannes-vogel@IanMcCurdy
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix: precision for long dates - #279

Closed
johannes-vogel wants to merge 1 commit into
SAP:masterfrom
johannes-vogel:patch-2
Closed

fix: precision for long dates#279
johannes-vogel wants to merge 1 commit into
SAP:masterfrom
johannes-vogel:patch-2

Conversation

@johannes-vogel

@johannes-vogeljohannes-vogel commented Jul 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We are experimenting with the new data format versions (see #278) that the new version has included and stumbled over a bug that caused a precision loss. This PR includes the minimum fix for our tests to succeed.

The following value provided for a LONGDATE 2025-07-21T09:15:33.873Z results in a precision loss.

I also there's more improvement potential but that's for you to decide.

@IanMcCurdy FYI

minutes = ~~ts[5];
seconds = ~~ts[6];
nanoseconds = ~~((ts[6] * 1000000000) % 1000000000);
nanoseconds = ~~((ts[6] * 10000000) % 10000000);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alternatively, one could split ts[6] by the dot and convert the parts to a number or even adapt the timestamp regexp.

@IanMcCurdy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi Johannes, thanks for looking into this issue. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but the fix you've come up with looks valid to me - I'll put it through our internal review process and we'll get it submitted as soon as possible.

@johannes-vogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi Johannes, thanks for looking into this issue. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but the fix you've come up with looks valid to me - I'll put it through our internal review process and we'll get it submitted as soon as possible.

Please be aware, that this is sufficient for our usage since we have ms precision but values like '33.33333' are still prone to precision loss:

~~(('33.33333'*10000000)%10000000)3333299

@johannes-vogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I think that's fixed with 6506050

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@johannes-vogel@IanMcCurdy
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix: precision for long dates - #279

Closed
johannes-vogel wants to merge 1 commit into
SAP:masterfrom
johannes-vogel:patch-2
Closed

fix: precision for long dates#279
johannes-vogel wants to merge 1 commit into
SAP:masterfrom
johannes-vogel:patch-2

Conversation

@johannes-vogel

@johannes-vogeljohannes-vogel commented Jul 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We are experimenting with the new data format versions (see #278) that the new version has included and stumbled over a bug that caused a precision loss. This PR includes the minimum fix for our tests to succeed.

The following value provided for a LONGDATE 2025-07-21T09:15:33.873Z results in a precision loss.

I also there's more improvement potential but that's for you to decide.

@IanMcCurdy FYI

minutes = ~~ts[5];
seconds = ~~ts[6];
nanoseconds = ~~((ts[6] * 1000000000) % 1000000000);
nanoseconds = ~~((ts[6] * 10000000) % 10000000);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alternatively, one could split ts[6] by the dot and convert the parts to a number or even adapt the timestamp regexp.

@IanMcCurdy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi Johannes, thanks for looking into this issue. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but the fix you've come up with looks valid to me - I'll put it through our internal review process and we'll get it submitted as soon as possible.

@johannes-vogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi Johannes, thanks for looking into this issue. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but the fix you've come up with looks valid to me - I'll put it through our internal review process and we'll get it submitted as soon as possible.

Please be aware, that this is sufficient for our usage since we have ms precision but values like '33.33333' are still prone to precision loss:

~~(('33.33333'*10000000)%10000000)3333299

@johannes-vogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I think that's fixed with 6506050

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@johannes-vogel@IanMcCurdy
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

fix: precision for long dates - #279

Closed
johannes-vogel wants to merge 1 commit into
SAP:masterfrom
johannes-vogel:patch-2
Closed

fix: precision for long dates#279
johannes-vogel wants to merge 1 commit into
SAP:masterfrom
johannes-vogel:patch-2

Conversation

@johannes-vogel

@johannes-vogeljohannes-vogel commented Jul 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We are experimenting with the new data format versions (see #278) that the new version has included and stumbled over a bug that caused a precision loss. This PR includes the minimum fix for our tests to succeed.

The following value provided for a LONGDATE 2025-07-21T09:15:33.873Z results in a precision loss.

I also there's more improvement potential but that's for you to decide.

@IanMcCurdy FYI

minutes = ~~ts[5];
seconds = ~~ts[6];
nanoseconds = ~~((ts[6] * 1000000000) % 1000000000);
nanoseconds = ~~((ts[6] * 10000000) % 10000000);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alternatively, one could split ts[6] by the dot and convert the parts to a number or even adapt the timestamp regexp.

@IanMcCurdy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi Johannes, thanks for looking into this issue. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but the fix you've come up with looks valid to me - I'll put it through our internal review process and we'll get it submitted as soon as possible.

@johannes-vogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi Johannes, thanks for looking into this issue. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but the fix you've come up with looks valid to me - I'll put it through our internal review process and we'll get it submitted as soon as possible.

Please be aware, that this is sufficient for our usage since we have ms precision but values like '33.33333' are still prone to precision loss:

~~(('33.33333'*10000000)%10000000)3333299

@johannes-vogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I think that's fixed with 6506050

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@johannes-vogel@IanMcCurdy