Skip to content

Unable to reach the accuracy reported in the paper #14

Description

@AnkhXXX

I trained with a 4090 but was not able to reach the metrics reported in the paper. My results are (2014: 62.4, 2016: 60.7, 2019: 63.6). I would like to ask whether the authors used any other hyperparameters. The configuration I used is as follows:

seed_everything: 7
trainer:
checkpoint_callback: true
callbacks:
- class_path: pytorch_lightning.callbacks.LearningRateMonitor
init_args:
logging_interval: epoch
- class_path: pytorch_lightning.callbacks.ModelCheckpoint
init_args:
save_top_k: 1
monitor: val_ExpRate
mode: max
filename: '{epoch}-{step}-{val_ExpRate:.4f}'
default_root_dir: 'lightning_logs/version_0'
gpus: 1
check_val_every_n_epoch: 2
max_epochs: 300
deterministic: true
num_sanity_val_steps: 1
model:
d_model: 256

encoder

growth_rate: 24
num_layers: 16

decoder

nhead: 8
num_decoder_layers: 3
dim_feedforward: 1024
dropout: 0.3
dc: 32
cross_coverage: true
self_coverage: true

beam search

beam_size: 10
max_len: 200
alpha: 1.0
early_stopping: false
temperature: 1.0

training

learning_rate: 0.08
patience: 20
data:
zipfile_path: data_crohme.zip
test_year: '2014'
train_batch_size: 8
eval_batch_size: 4
num_workers: 4
scale_aug: True

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions