[EPIC] Chapter 2 — AI Agent Explorer #403

Description

@AndresL230

Problem

Chapter 1 (the E2E Regression Suite epic) can only catch deviations from behavior someone thought to specify. An agent driving the real product surfaces the journeys nobody scripted. Its output is findings and traces, never a merge gate — a red Chapter 1 means someone broke something; a red Chapter 2 might mean the agent got confused, and only a human can tell.

What this chapter is

Asserts invariants under unscripted use; finds gaps in the spec itself; determinism impossible by design; runs nightly; never gates merge; flake expected; output is findings + browser traces. It depends on Chapter 1 being stable (#388), not merely existing.

Success criteria

  • One full nightly cycle completes with a readable session log
  • ≥3 findings promoted into scripted Chapter 1 regressions in the first month

Non-goals

  • Replacing the existing mocked suite (it is fast and it stays)
  • Adopting RLS policies
  • Visual regression / screenshot diffing
  • Automating real Google OAuth
  • LLM-as-judge scoring as a PR gate

Dependency graph

#388 (stability gate) ─┬─> #399 ─> #400 ─> #401
#391 (model seam) ─────┘ ▲
#397 (psycopg fixtures) ────────────┘

Open decision

  • Where does Chapter 2 live — this repo, or a sibling so its churn doesn't pollute this one? (Open decision 4 in the Chapter 1 epic.)

Children


Prior art: open bug #355 (duplicate subject_root node) is exactly the class of defect the #400 oracles are built to catch.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    
    Skip to content

    [EPIC] Chapter 2 — AI Agent Explorer #403

    Description

    @AndresL230

    Problem

    Chapter 1 (the E2E Regression Suite epic) can only catch deviations from behavior someone thought to specify. An agent driving the real product surfaces the journeys nobody scripted. Its output is findings and traces, never a merge gate — a red Chapter 1 means someone broke something; a red Chapter 2 might mean the agent got confused, and only a human can tell.

    What this chapter is

    Asserts invariants under unscripted use; finds gaps in the spec itself; determinism impossible by design; runs nightly; never gates merge; flake expected; output is findings + browser traces. It depends on Chapter 1 being stable (#388), not merely existing.

    Success criteria

    • One full nightly cycle completes with a readable session log
    • ≥3 findings promoted into scripted Chapter 1 regressions in the first month

    Non-goals

    • Replacing the existing mocked suite (it is fast and it stays)
    • Adopting RLS policies
    • Visual regression / screenshot diffing
    • Automating real Google OAuth
    • LLM-as-judge scoring as a PR gate

    Dependency graph

    #388 (stability gate) ─┬─> #399 ─> #400 ─> #401
    #391 (model seam) ─────┘ ▲
    #397 (psycopg fixtures) ────────────┘
    

    Open decision

    • Where does Chapter 2 live — this repo, or a sibling so its churn doesn't pollute this one? (Open decision 4 in the Chapter 1 epic.)

    Children


    Prior art: open bug #355 (duplicate subject_root node) is exactly the class of defect the #400 oracles are built to catch.

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
      Skip to content

      [EPIC] Chapter 2 — AI Agent Explorer #403

      Description

      @AndresL230

      Problem

      Chapter 1 (the E2E Regression Suite epic) can only catch deviations from behavior someone thought to specify. An agent driving the real product surfaces the journeys nobody scripted. Its output is findings and traces, never a merge gate — a red Chapter 1 means someone broke something; a red Chapter 2 might mean the agent got confused, and only a human can tell.

      What this chapter is

      Asserts invariants under unscripted use; finds gaps in the spec itself; determinism impossible by design; runs nightly; never gates merge; flake expected; output is findings + browser traces. It depends on Chapter 1 being stable (#388), not merely existing.

      Success criteria

      • One full nightly cycle completes with a readable session log
      • ≥3 findings promoted into scripted Chapter 1 regressions in the first month

      Non-goals

      • Replacing the existing mocked suite (it is fast and it stays)
      • Adopting RLS policies
      • Visual regression / screenshot diffing
      • Automating real Google OAuth
      • LLM-as-judge scoring as a PR gate

      Dependency graph

      #388 (stability gate) ─┬─> #399 ─> #400 ─> #401
      #391 (model seam) ─────┘ ▲
      #397 (psycopg fixtures) ────────────┘
      

      Open decision

      • Where does Chapter 2 live — this repo, or a sibling so its churn doesn't pollute this one? (Open decision 4 in the Chapter 1 epic.)

      Children


      Prior art: open bug #355 (duplicate subject_root node) is exactly the class of defect the #400 oracles are built to catch.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      Labels

      Type

      No type

      Projects

      No projects

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
        Skip to content

        [EPIC] Chapter 2 — AI Agent Explorer #403

        Description

        @AndresL230

        Problem

        Chapter 1 (the E2E Regression Suite epic) can only catch deviations from behavior someone thought to specify. An agent driving the real product surfaces the journeys nobody scripted. Its output is findings and traces, never a merge gate — a red Chapter 1 means someone broke something; a red Chapter 2 might mean the agent got confused, and only a human can tell.

        What this chapter is

        Asserts invariants under unscripted use; finds gaps in the spec itself; determinism impossible by design; runs nightly; never gates merge; flake expected; output is findings + browser traces. It depends on Chapter 1 being stable (#388), not merely existing.

        Success criteria

        • One full nightly cycle completes with a readable session log
        • ≥3 findings promoted into scripted Chapter 1 regressions in the first month

        Non-goals

        • Replacing the existing mocked suite (it is fast and it stays)
        • Adopting RLS policies
        • Visual regression / screenshot diffing
        • Automating real Google OAuth
        • LLM-as-judge scoring as a PR gate

        Dependency graph

        #388 (stability gate) ─┬─> #399 ─> #400 ─> #401
        #391 (model seam) ─────┘ ▲
        #397 (psycopg fixtures) ────────────┘
        

        Open decision

        • Where does Chapter 2 live — this repo, or a sibling so its churn doesn't pollute this one? (Open decision 4 in the Chapter 1 epic.)

        Children


        Prior art: open bug #355 (duplicate subject_root node) is exactly the class of defect the #400 oracles are built to catch.

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        Labels

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
          Skip to content

          [EPIC] Chapter 2 — AI Agent Explorer #403

          Description

          @AndresL230

          Problem

          Chapter 1 (the E2E Regression Suite epic) can only catch deviations from behavior someone thought to specify. An agent driving the real product surfaces the journeys nobody scripted. Its output is findings and traces, never a merge gate — a red Chapter 1 means someone broke something; a red Chapter 2 might mean the agent got confused, and only a human can tell.

          What this chapter is

          Asserts invariants under unscripted use; finds gaps in the spec itself; determinism impossible by design; runs nightly; never gates merge; flake expected; output is findings + browser traces. It depends on Chapter 1 being stable (#388), not merely existing.

          Success criteria

          • One full nightly cycle completes with a readable session log
          • ≥3 findings promoted into scripted Chapter 1 regressions in the first month

          Non-goals

          • Replacing the existing mocked suite (it is fast and it stays)
          • Adopting RLS policies
          • Visual regression / screenshot diffing
          • Automating real Google OAuth
          • LLM-as-judge scoring as a PR gate

          Dependency graph

          #388 (stability gate) ─┬─> #399 ─> #400 ─> #401
          #391 (model seam) ─────┘ ▲
          #397 (psycopg fixtures) ────────────┘
          

          Open decision

          • Where does Chapter 2 live — this repo, or a sibling so its churn doesn't pollute this one? (Open decision 4 in the Chapter 1 epic.)

          Children


          Prior art: open bug #355 (duplicate subject_root node) is exactly the class of defect the #400 oracles are built to catch.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          Labels

          Type

          No type

          Projects

          No projects

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
            Skip to content

            [EPIC] Chapter 2 — AI Agent Explorer #403

            Description

            @AndresL230

            Problem

            Chapter 1 (the E2E Regression Suite epic) can only catch deviations from behavior someone thought to specify. An agent driving the real product surfaces the journeys nobody scripted. Its output is findings and traces, never a merge gate — a red Chapter 1 means someone broke something; a red Chapter 2 might mean the agent got confused, and only a human can tell.

            What this chapter is

            Asserts invariants under unscripted use; finds gaps in the spec itself; determinism impossible by design; runs nightly; never gates merge; flake expected; output is findings + browser traces. It depends on Chapter 1 being stable (#388), not merely existing.

            Success criteria

            • One full nightly cycle completes with a readable session log
            • ≥3 findings promoted into scripted Chapter 1 regressions in the first month

            Non-goals

            • Replacing the existing mocked suite (it is fast and it stays)
            • Adopting RLS policies
            • Visual regression / screenshot diffing
            • Automating real Google OAuth
            • LLM-as-judge scoring as a PR gate

            Dependency graph

            #388 (stability gate) ─┬─> #399 ─> #400 ─> #401
            #391 (model seam) ─────┘ ▲
            #397 (psycopg fixtures) ────────────┘
            

            Open decision

            • Where does Chapter 2 live — this repo, or a sibling so its churn doesn't pollute this one? (Open decision 4 in the Chapter 1 epic.)

            Children


            Prior art: open bug #355 (duplicate subject_root node) is exactly the class of defect the #400 oracles are built to catch.

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            Labels

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              [EPIC] Chapter 2 — AI Agent Explorer #403

              Description

              @AndresL230

              Problem

              Chapter 1 (the E2E Regression Suite epic) can only catch deviations from behavior someone thought to specify. An agent driving the real product surfaces the journeys nobody scripted. Its output is findings and traces, never a merge gate — a red Chapter 1 means someone broke something; a red Chapter 2 might mean the agent got confused, and only a human can tell.

              What this chapter is

              Asserts invariants under unscripted use; finds gaps in the spec itself; determinism impossible by design; runs nightly; never gates merge; flake expected; output is findings + browser traces. It depends on Chapter 1 being stable (#388), not merely existing.

              Success criteria

              • One full nightly cycle completes with a readable session log
              • ≥3 findings promoted into scripted Chapter 1 regressions in the first month

              Non-goals

              • Replacing the existing mocked suite (it is fast and it stays)
              • Adopting RLS policies
              • Visual regression / screenshot diffing
              • Automating real Google OAuth
              • LLM-as-judge scoring as a PR gate

              Dependency graph

              #388 (stability gate) ─┬─> #399 ─> #400 ─> #401
              #391 (model seam) ─────┘ ▲
              #397 (psycopg fixtures) ────────────┘
              

              Open decision

              • Where does Chapter 2 live — this repo, or a sibling so its churn doesn't pollute this one? (Open decision 4 in the Chapter 1 epic.)

              Children


              Prior art: open bug #355 (duplicate subject_root node) is exactly the class of defect the #400 oracles are built to catch.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              Labels

              Type

              No type

              Projects

              No projects

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                Skip to content

                [EPIC] Chapter 2 — AI Agent Explorer #403

                Description

                @AndresL230

                Problem

                Chapter 1 (the E2E Regression Suite epic) can only catch deviations from behavior someone thought to specify. An agent driving the real product surfaces the journeys nobody scripted. Its output is findings and traces, never a merge gate — a red Chapter 1 means someone broke something; a red Chapter 2 might mean the agent got confused, and only a human can tell.

                What this chapter is

                Asserts invariants under unscripted use; finds gaps in the spec itself; determinism impossible by design; runs nightly; never gates merge; flake expected; output is findings + browser traces. It depends on Chapter 1 being stable (#388), not merely existing.

                Success criteria

                • One full nightly cycle completes with a readable session log
                • ≥3 findings promoted into scripted Chapter 1 regressions in the first month

                Non-goals

                • Replacing the existing mocked suite (it is fast and it stays)
                • Adopting RLS policies
                • Visual regression / screenshot diffing
                • Automating real Google OAuth
                • LLM-as-judge scoring as a PR gate

                Dependency graph

                #388 (stability gate) ─┬─> #399 ─> #400 ─> #401
                #391 (model seam) ─────┘ ▲
                #397 (psycopg fixtures) ────────────┘
                

                Open decision

                • Where does Chapter 2 live — this repo, or a sibling so its churn doesn't pollute this one? (Open decision 4 in the Chapter 1 epic.)

                Children


                Prior art: open bug #355 (duplicate subject_root node) is exactly the class of defect the #400 oracles are built to catch.

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Assignees

                Labels

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions