fix(security): scope search_course_materials by user_id (#125) - #225

Merged
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/125-search-materials-user-scope
Jun 14, 2026
Merged

fix(security): scope search_course_materials by user_id (#125)#225
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/125-search-materials-user-scope

Conversation

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#125. P1 / HIGH.

Vulnerability

search_course_materials (agents/tools/chat_context.py) filtered the documents table on course_idonly. Documents are user-scoped within a shared course, so the tool returned and decrypted every enrolled user's summary/concept_notes, feeding another student's private content into the requester's tutor/note-chat LLM context and answers. ctx.deps.user_id was available but unused.

Fix

Per-site user_id scoping (consistent with the sibling read_user_progress tool; NOT a change to decrypt_if_present, which stays a context-free field decryptor). user_id is threaded in as a keyword-only, required argument — no default that could silently re-disable the scope — and added to the documents filter. The tool wrapper passes ctx.deps.user_id (the LLM cannot supply it).

Negative test (cross-user, fails pre-fix)

TestSearchCourseMaterialsUserScope in tests/test_chat_context_tools.py: two docs in the same course owned by different users, with a faithful row-scoped DB mock. Asserts the caller receives only their own doc, the other user's doc is excluded, and the DB query carries user_id=eq.<caller>. On pre-fix code the test can't even express the scoped call (the vulnerable signature has no user_id param) → fails; post-fix it demonstrates the leak is closed. Existing call sites + the wrapper test updated for the new signature (the wrapper test now asserts user_id is pulled from deps).

Scope

File-disjoint from #123/#126/#124. Verified the chat-tutor and note-chat agents that register this tool still import cleanly.

⚠️ Auth-boundary change — do not merge, opened for your review.

search_course_materials filtered the documents table on course_id only, but
documents are user-scoped within a shared course. It decrypted every enrolled
user's summary/concept_notes and fed another student's private content into the
requester's tutor/note-chat LLM context. ctx.deps.user_id was available but
unused.
Thread user_id through as a keyword-only required arg (no silent default that
could re-disable scoping) and add user_id to the documents filter; the tool
wrapper passes ctx.deps.user_id alongside ctx.deps.course_id. Per-site scoping,
consistent with the sibling read_user_progress tool.
Test: two docs in one course owned by different users — the scoped query
returns only the caller's, and the query carries the caller's user_id filter.
Existing call sites updated for the new signature.
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 54 minutes and 8 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4de320d4-93e7-4da8-88d3-f7008da6d4cf

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a27b688 and 59b2bac.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • backend/agents/tools/chat_context.py
  • backend/tests/test_chat_context_tools.py
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch security/125-search-materials-user-scope

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

StatusNameLatest CommitPreview URLUpdated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
frontend59b2bacCommit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jun 13 2026, 05:02 AM

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged commit ad2e643 into mainJun 14, 2026
6 checks passed
@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez deleted the security/125-search-materials-user-scope branch June 14, 2026 02:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[P1] search_course_materials leaks other users' documents into the tutor/note-chat LLM

1 participant

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(security): scope search_course_materials by user_id (#125) - #225

Merged
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/125-search-materials-user-scope
Jun 14, 2026
Merged

fix(security): scope search_course_materials by user_id (#125)#225
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/125-search-materials-user-scope

Conversation

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#125. P1 / HIGH.

Vulnerability

search_course_materials (agents/tools/chat_context.py) filtered the documents table on course_idonly. Documents are user-scoped within a shared course, so the tool returned and decrypted every enrolled user's summary/concept_notes, feeding another student's private content into the requester's tutor/note-chat LLM context and answers. ctx.deps.user_id was available but unused.

Fix

Per-site user_id scoping (consistent with the sibling read_user_progress tool; NOT a change to decrypt_if_present, which stays a context-free field decryptor). user_id is threaded in as a keyword-only, required argument — no default that could silently re-disable the scope — and added to the documents filter. The tool wrapper passes ctx.deps.user_id (the LLM cannot supply it).

Negative test (cross-user, fails pre-fix)

TestSearchCourseMaterialsUserScope in tests/test_chat_context_tools.py: two docs in the same course owned by different users, with a faithful row-scoped DB mock. Asserts the caller receives only their own doc, the other user's doc is excluded, and the DB query carries user_id=eq.<caller>. On pre-fix code the test can't even express the scoped call (the vulnerable signature has no user_id param) → fails; post-fix it demonstrates the leak is closed. Existing call sites + the wrapper test updated for the new signature (the wrapper test now asserts user_id is pulled from deps).

Scope

File-disjoint from #123/#126/#124. Verified the chat-tutor and note-chat agents that register this tool still import cleanly.

⚠️ Auth-boundary change — do not merge, opened for your review.

search_course_materials filtered the documents table on course_id only, but
documents are user-scoped within a shared course. It decrypted every enrolled
user's summary/concept_notes and fed another student's private content into the
requester's tutor/note-chat LLM context. ctx.deps.user_id was available but
unused.
Thread user_id through as a keyword-only required arg (no silent default that
could re-disable scoping) and add user_id to the documents filter; the tool
wrapper passes ctx.deps.user_id alongside ctx.deps.course_id. Per-site scoping,
consistent with the sibling read_user_progress tool.
Test: two docs in one course owned by different users — the scoped query
returns only the caller's, and the query carries the caller's user_id filter.
Existing call sites updated for the new signature.
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 54 minutes and 8 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4de320d4-93e7-4da8-88d3-f7008da6d4cf

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a27b688 and 59b2bac.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • backend/agents/tools/chat_context.py
  • backend/tests/test_chat_context_tools.py
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch security/125-search-materials-user-scope

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

StatusNameLatest CommitPreview URLUpdated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
frontend59b2bacCommit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jun 13 2026, 05:02 AM

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged commit ad2e643 into mainJun 14, 2026
6 checks passed
@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez deleted the security/125-search-materials-user-scope branch June 14, 2026 02:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[P1] search_course_materials leaks other users' documents into the tutor/note-chat LLM

1 participant

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(security): scope search_course_materials by user_id (#125) - #225

Merged
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/125-search-materials-user-scope
Jun 14, 2026
Merged

fix(security): scope search_course_materials by user_id (#125)#225
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/125-search-materials-user-scope

Conversation

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#125. P1 / HIGH.

Vulnerability

search_course_materials (agents/tools/chat_context.py) filtered the documents table on course_idonly. Documents are user-scoped within a shared course, so the tool returned and decrypted every enrolled user's summary/concept_notes, feeding another student's private content into the requester's tutor/note-chat LLM context and answers. ctx.deps.user_id was available but unused.

Fix

Per-site user_id scoping (consistent with the sibling read_user_progress tool; NOT a change to decrypt_if_present, which stays a context-free field decryptor). user_id is threaded in as a keyword-only, required argument — no default that could silently re-disable the scope — and added to the documents filter. The tool wrapper passes ctx.deps.user_id (the LLM cannot supply it).

Negative test (cross-user, fails pre-fix)

TestSearchCourseMaterialsUserScope in tests/test_chat_context_tools.py: two docs in the same course owned by different users, with a faithful row-scoped DB mock. Asserts the caller receives only their own doc, the other user's doc is excluded, and the DB query carries user_id=eq.<caller>. On pre-fix code the test can't even express the scoped call (the vulnerable signature has no user_id param) → fails; post-fix it demonstrates the leak is closed. Existing call sites + the wrapper test updated for the new signature (the wrapper test now asserts user_id is pulled from deps).

Scope

File-disjoint from #123/#126/#124. Verified the chat-tutor and note-chat agents that register this tool still import cleanly.

⚠️ Auth-boundary change — do not merge, opened for your review.

search_course_materials filtered the documents table on course_id only, but
documents are user-scoped within a shared course. It decrypted every enrolled
user's summary/concept_notes and fed another student's private content into the
requester's tutor/note-chat LLM context. ctx.deps.user_id was available but
unused.
Thread user_id through as a keyword-only required arg (no silent default that
could re-disable scoping) and add user_id to the documents filter; the tool
wrapper passes ctx.deps.user_id alongside ctx.deps.course_id. Per-site scoping,
consistent with the sibling read_user_progress tool.
Test: two docs in one course owned by different users — the scoped query
returns only the caller's, and the query carries the caller's user_id filter.
Existing call sites updated for the new signature.
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 54 minutes and 8 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4de320d4-93e7-4da8-88d3-f7008da6d4cf

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a27b688 and 59b2bac.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • backend/agents/tools/chat_context.py
  • backend/tests/test_chat_context_tools.py
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch security/125-search-materials-user-scope

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

StatusNameLatest CommitPreview URLUpdated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
frontend59b2bacCommit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jun 13 2026, 05:02 AM

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged commit ad2e643 into mainJun 14, 2026
6 checks passed
@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez deleted the security/125-search-materials-user-scope branch June 14, 2026 02:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[P1] search_course_materials leaks other users' documents into the tutor/note-chat LLM

1 participant

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(security): scope search_course_materials by user_id (#125) - #225

Merged
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/125-search-materials-user-scope
Jun 14, 2026
Merged

fix(security): scope search_course_materials by user_id (#125)#225
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/125-search-materials-user-scope

Conversation

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#125. P1 / HIGH.

Vulnerability

search_course_materials (agents/tools/chat_context.py) filtered the documents table on course_idonly. Documents are user-scoped within a shared course, so the tool returned and decrypted every enrolled user's summary/concept_notes, feeding another student's private content into the requester's tutor/note-chat LLM context and answers. ctx.deps.user_id was available but unused.

Fix

Per-site user_id scoping (consistent with the sibling read_user_progress tool; NOT a change to decrypt_if_present, which stays a context-free field decryptor). user_id is threaded in as a keyword-only, required argument — no default that could silently re-disable the scope — and added to the documents filter. The tool wrapper passes ctx.deps.user_id (the LLM cannot supply it).

Negative test (cross-user, fails pre-fix)

TestSearchCourseMaterialsUserScope in tests/test_chat_context_tools.py: two docs in the same course owned by different users, with a faithful row-scoped DB mock. Asserts the caller receives only their own doc, the other user's doc is excluded, and the DB query carries user_id=eq.<caller>. On pre-fix code the test can't even express the scoped call (the vulnerable signature has no user_id param) → fails; post-fix it demonstrates the leak is closed. Existing call sites + the wrapper test updated for the new signature (the wrapper test now asserts user_id is pulled from deps).

Scope

File-disjoint from #123/#126/#124. Verified the chat-tutor and note-chat agents that register this tool still import cleanly.

⚠️ Auth-boundary change — do not merge, opened for your review.

search_course_materials filtered the documents table on course_id only, but
documents are user-scoped within a shared course. It decrypted every enrolled
user's summary/concept_notes and fed another student's private content into the
requester's tutor/note-chat LLM context. ctx.deps.user_id was available but
unused.
Thread user_id through as a keyword-only required arg (no silent default that
could re-disable scoping) and add user_id to the documents filter; the tool
wrapper passes ctx.deps.user_id alongside ctx.deps.course_id. Per-site scoping,
consistent with the sibling read_user_progress tool.
Test: two docs in one course owned by different users — the scoped query
returns only the caller's, and the query carries the caller's user_id filter.
Existing call sites updated for the new signature.
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 54 minutes and 8 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4de320d4-93e7-4da8-88d3-f7008da6d4cf

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a27b688 and 59b2bac.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • backend/agents/tools/chat_context.py
  • backend/tests/test_chat_context_tools.py
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch security/125-search-materials-user-scope

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

StatusNameLatest CommitPreview URLUpdated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
frontend59b2bacCommit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jun 13 2026, 05:02 AM

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged commit ad2e643 into mainJun 14, 2026
6 checks passed
@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez deleted the security/125-search-materials-user-scope branch June 14, 2026 02:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[P1] search_course_materials leaks other users' documents into the tutor/note-chat LLM

1 participant

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(security): scope search_course_materials by user_id (#125) - #225

Merged
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/125-search-materials-user-scope
Jun 14, 2026
Merged

fix(security): scope search_course_materials by user_id (#125)#225
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/125-search-materials-user-scope

Conversation

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#125. P1 / HIGH.

Vulnerability

search_course_materials (agents/tools/chat_context.py) filtered the documents table on course_idonly. Documents are user-scoped within a shared course, so the tool returned and decrypted every enrolled user's summary/concept_notes, feeding another student's private content into the requester's tutor/note-chat LLM context and answers. ctx.deps.user_id was available but unused.

Fix

Per-site user_id scoping (consistent with the sibling read_user_progress tool; NOT a change to decrypt_if_present, which stays a context-free field decryptor). user_id is threaded in as a keyword-only, required argument — no default that could silently re-disable the scope — and added to the documents filter. The tool wrapper passes ctx.deps.user_id (the LLM cannot supply it).

Negative test (cross-user, fails pre-fix)

TestSearchCourseMaterialsUserScope in tests/test_chat_context_tools.py: two docs in the same course owned by different users, with a faithful row-scoped DB mock. Asserts the caller receives only their own doc, the other user's doc is excluded, and the DB query carries user_id=eq.<caller>. On pre-fix code the test can't even express the scoped call (the vulnerable signature has no user_id param) → fails; post-fix it demonstrates the leak is closed. Existing call sites + the wrapper test updated for the new signature (the wrapper test now asserts user_id is pulled from deps).

Scope

File-disjoint from #123/#126/#124. Verified the chat-tutor and note-chat agents that register this tool still import cleanly.

⚠️ Auth-boundary change — do not merge, opened for your review.

search_course_materials filtered the documents table on course_id only, but
documents are user-scoped within a shared course. It decrypted every enrolled
user's summary/concept_notes and fed another student's private content into the
requester's tutor/note-chat LLM context. ctx.deps.user_id was available but
unused.
Thread user_id through as a keyword-only required arg (no silent default that
could re-disable scoping) and add user_id to the documents filter; the tool
wrapper passes ctx.deps.user_id alongside ctx.deps.course_id. Per-site scoping,
consistent with the sibling read_user_progress tool.
Test: two docs in one course owned by different users — the scoped query
returns only the caller's, and the query carries the caller's user_id filter.
Existing call sites updated for the new signature.
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 54 minutes and 8 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4de320d4-93e7-4da8-88d3-f7008da6d4cf

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a27b688 and 59b2bac.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • backend/agents/tools/chat_context.py
  • backend/tests/test_chat_context_tools.py
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch security/125-search-materials-user-scope

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

StatusNameLatest CommitPreview URLUpdated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
frontend59b2bacCommit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jun 13 2026, 05:02 AM

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged commit ad2e643 into mainJun 14, 2026
6 checks passed
@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez deleted the security/125-search-materials-user-scope branch June 14, 2026 02:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[P1] search_course_materials leaks other users' documents into the tutor/note-chat LLM

1 participant

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(security): scope search_course_materials by user_id (#125) - #225

Merged
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/125-search-materials-user-scope
Jun 14, 2026
Merged

fix(security): scope search_course_materials by user_id (#125)#225
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/125-search-materials-user-scope

Conversation

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#125. P1 / HIGH.

Vulnerability

search_course_materials (agents/tools/chat_context.py) filtered the documents table on course_idonly. Documents are user-scoped within a shared course, so the tool returned and decrypted every enrolled user's summary/concept_notes, feeding another student's private content into the requester's tutor/note-chat LLM context and answers. ctx.deps.user_id was available but unused.

Fix

Per-site user_id scoping (consistent with the sibling read_user_progress tool; NOT a change to decrypt_if_present, which stays a context-free field decryptor). user_id is threaded in as a keyword-only, required argument — no default that could silently re-disable the scope — and added to the documents filter. The tool wrapper passes ctx.deps.user_id (the LLM cannot supply it).

Negative test (cross-user, fails pre-fix)

TestSearchCourseMaterialsUserScope in tests/test_chat_context_tools.py: two docs in the same course owned by different users, with a faithful row-scoped DB mock. Asserts the caller receives only their own doc, the other user's doc is excluded, and the DB query carries user_id=eq.<caller>. On pre-fix code the test can't even express the scoped call (the vulnerable signature has no user_id param) → fails; post-fix it demonstrates the leak is closed. Existing call sites + the wrapper test updated for the new signature (the wrapper test now asserts user_id is pulled from deps).

Scope

File-disjoint from #123/#126/#124. Verified the chat-tutor and note-chat agents that register this tool still import cleanly.

⚠️ Auth-boundary change — do not merge, opened for your review.

search_course_materials filtered the documents table on course_id only, but
documents are user-scoped within a shared course. It decrypted every enrolled
user's summary/concept_notes and fed another student's private content into the
requester's tutor/note-chat LLM context. ctx.deps.user_id was available but
unused.
Thread user_id through as a keyword-only required arg (no silent default that
could re-disable scoping) and add user_id to the documents filter; the tool
wrapper passes ctx.deps.user_id alongside ctx.deps.course_id. Per-site scoping,
consistent with the sibling read_user_progress tool.
Test: two docs in one course owned by different users — the scoped query
returns only the caller's, and the query carries the caller's user_id filter.
Existing call sites updated for the new signature.
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 54 minutes and 8 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4de320d4-93e7-4da8-88d3-f7008da6d4cf

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a27b688 and 59b2bac.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • backend/agents/tools/chat_context.py
  • backend/tests/test_chat_context_tools.py
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch security/125-search-materials-user-scope

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

StatusNameLatest CommitPreview URLUpdated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
frontend59b2bacCommit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jun 13 2026, 05:02 AM

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged commit ad2e643 into mainJun 14, 2026
6 checks passed
@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez deleted the security/125-search-materials-user-scope branch June 14, 2026 02:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[P1] search_course_materials leaks other users' documents into the tutor/note-chat LLM

1 participant

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(security): scope search_course_materials by user_id (#125) - #225

Merged
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/125-search-materials-user-scope
Jun 14, 2026
Merged

fix(security): scope search_course_materials by user_id (#125)#225
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/125-search-materials-user-scope

Conversation

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#125. P1 / HIGH.

Vulnerability

search_course_materials (agents/tools/chat_context.py) filtered the documents table on course_idonly. Documents are user-scoped within a shared course, so the tool returned and decrypted every enrolled user's summary/concept_notes, feeding another student's private content into the requester's tutor/note-chat LLM context and answers. ctx.deps.user_id was available but unused.

Fix

Per-site user_id scoping (consistent with the sibling read_user_progress tool; NOT a change to decrypt_if_present, which stays a context-free field decryptor). user_id is threaded in as a keyword-only, required argument — no default that could silently re-disable the scope — and added to the documents filter. The tool wrapper passes ctx.deps.user_id (the LLM cannot supply it).

Negative test (cross-user, fails pre-fix)

TestSearchCourseMaterialsUserScope in tests/test_chat_context_tools.py: two docs in the same course owned by different users, with a faithful row-scoped DB mock. Asserts the caller receives only their own doc, the other user's doc is excluded, and the DB query carries user_id=eq.<caller>. On pre-fix code the test can't even express the scoped call (the vulnerable signature has no user_id param) → fails; post-fix it demonstrates the leak is closed. Existing call sites + the wrapper test updated for the new signature (the wrapper test now asserts user_id is pulled from deps).

Scope

File-disjoint from #123/#126/#124. Verified the chat-tutor and note-chat agents that register this tool still import cleanly.

⚠️ Auth-boundary change — do not merge, opened for your review.

search_course_materials filtered the documents table on course_id only, but
documents are user-scoped within a shared course. It decrypted every enrolled
user's summary/concept_notes and fed another student's private content into the
requester's tutor/note-chat LLM context. ctx.deps.user_id was available but
unused.
Thread user_id through as a keyword-only required arg (no silent default that
could re-disable scoping) and add user_id to the documents filter; the tool
wrapper passes ctx.deps.user_id alongside ctx.deps.course_id. Per-site scoping,
consistent with the sibling read_user_progress tool.
Test: two docs in one course owned by different users — the scoped query
returns only the caller's, and the query carries the caller's user_id filter.
Existing call sites updated for the new signature.
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 54 minutes and 8 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4de320d4-93e7-4da8-88d3-f7008da6d4cf

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a27b688 and 59b2bac.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • backend/agents/tools/chat_context.py
  • backend/tests/test_chat_context_tools.py
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch security/125-search-materials-user-scope

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

StatusNameLatest CommitPreview URLUpdated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
frontend59b2bacCommit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jun 13 2026, 05:02 AM

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged commit ad2e643 into mainJun 14, 2026
6 checks passed
@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez deleted the security/125-search-materials-user-scope branch June 14, 2026 02:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[P1] search_course_materials leaks other users' documents into the tutor/note-chat LLM

1 participant

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

fix(security): scope search_course_materials by user_id (#125) - #225

Merged
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/125-search-materials-user-scope
Jun 14, 2026
Merged

fix(security): scope search_course_materials by user_id (#125)#225
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/125-search-materials-user-scope

Conversation

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#125. P1 / HIGH.

Vulnerability

search_course_materials (agents/tools/chat_context.py) filtered the documents table on course_idonly. Documents are user-scoped within a shared course, so the tool returned and decrypted every enrolled user's summary/concept_notes, feeding another student's private content into the requester's tutor/note-chat LLM context and answers. ctx.deps.user_id was available but unused.

Fix

Per-site user_id scoping (consistent with the sibling read_user_progress tool; NOT a change to decrypt_if_present, which stays a context-free field decryptor). user_id is threaded in as a keyword-only, required argument — no default that could silently re-disable the scope — and added to the documents filter. The tool wrapper passes ctx.deps.user_id (the LLM cannot supply it).

Negative test (cross-user, fails pre-fix)

TestSearchCourseMaterialsUserScope in tests/test_chat_context_tools.py: two docs in the same course owned by different users, with a faithful row-scoped DB mock. Asserts the caller receives only their own doc, the other user's doc is excluded, and the DB query carries user_id=eq.<caller>. On pre-fix code the test can't even express the scoped call (the vulnerable signature has no user_id param) → fails; post-fix it demonstrates the leak is closed. Existing call sites + the wrapper test updated for the new signature (the wrapper test now asserts user_id is pulled from deps).

Scope

File-disjoint from #123/#126/#124. Verified the chat-tutor and note-chat agents that register this tool still import cleanly.

⚠️ Auth-boundary change — do not merge, opened for your review.

search_course_materials filtered the documents table on course_id only, but
documents are user-scoped within a shared course. It decrypted every enrolled
user's summary/concept_notes and fed another student's private content into the
requester's tutor/note-chat LLM context. ctx.deps.user_id was available but
unused.
Thread user_id through as a keyword-only required arg (no silent default that
could re-disable scoping) and add user_id to the documents filter; the tool
wrapper passes ctx.deps.user_id alongside ctx.deps.course_id. Per-site scoping,
consistent with the sibling read_user_progress tool.
Test: two docs in one course owned by different users — the scoped query
returns only the caller's, and the query carries the caller's user_id filter.
Existing call sites updated for the new signature.
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 54 minutes and 8 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4de320d4-93e7-4da8-88d3-f7008da6d4cf

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a27b688 and 59b2bac.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • backend/agents/tools/chat_context.py
  • backend/tests/test_chat_context_tools.py
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch security/125-search-materials-user-scope

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

StatusNameLatest CommitPreview URLUpdated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
frontend59b2bacCommit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jun 13 2026, 05:02 AM

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez merged commit ad2e643 into mainJun 14, 2026
6 checks passed
@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez
Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez deleted the security/125-search-materials-user-scope branch June 14, 2026 02:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[P1] search_course_materials leaks other users' documents into the tutor/note-chat LLM

1 participant

@Jose-Gael-Cruz-Lopez