Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
numerical tolerance - #1641
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@marqh You could simply refactor this to be the following ...
close_enough=np.allclose(pre_wrap_delta, post_wrap_delta)
ifnotclose_enough:
split_cell_indices, _=np.where(pre_wrap_delta!=post_wrap_delta)
# Re-calaulate the extended minimum.indices=inside_indices[split_cell_indices]
cells=bounds[indices]
....bjlittle
commented
Apr 22, 2015
Member
@marqh Great, thanks 👍 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There is a bug in the cube intersection code where
can return a result due to numerical tolerances in the floating point coordinate value
I have trapped this and added a test. This is a reported bug against 1.8.0, so please may it be targeted at the 1.8.1 milestone?
thank you