Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[java] Deprecate methods to avoid internal BiDi connection surfacing on driver - #17751
Merged
Conversation
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
PR Summary by QodoDeprecate HasBiDi accessors to keep BiDi internals off Java drivers
AI Description
Diagram
High-Level Assessment
Files changed (1) |
Contributor
Code Review by Qodo
Context used✅ Tickets: 🎫 Instance ChroneDriver Error: ConnectFailure🎫 2.48 doesn't trigger javascript in link's href on click()✅ Compliance rules (platform): 18 rules 1. getBiDi() Javadoc missing @return |
Comment on lines
+25
to
40
| /** | ||
| * @deprecated BiDi is an internal implementation detail. Direct access to the BiDi object from | ||
| * drivers will be removed in a future release. | ||
| */ | ||
| @Deprecated(since = "4.46", forRemoval = true) | ||
| default BiDi getBiDi() { | ||
| return maybeGetBiDi() | ||
| .orElseThrow(() -> new BiDiException("Unable to create a BiDi connection")); | ||
| } | ||
| /** | ||
| * @deprecated BiDi is an internal implementation detail. Direct access to the BiDi object from | ||
| * drivers will be removed in a future release. | ||
| */ | ||
| @Deprecated(since = "4.46", forRemoval = true) | ||
| Optional<BiDi> maybeGetBiDi(); |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1. getbidi() javadoc missing @return📘 Rule violation✧ Quality
The new Javadoc for public methods getBiDi() and maybeGetBiDi() contains only an @deprecated tag and omits required documentation, including a free-text description and @return tags. This reduces API documentation quality and violates the requirement for complete Javadoc on public methods.
Agent Prompt
## Issue description
Public methods `getBiDi()` and `maybeGetBiDi()` have new Javadoc that only includes an `@deprecated` tag, but is missing (a) at least one free-text sentence describing the method and (b) an `@return` tag.
## Issue Context
These methods are part of a `public interface` and therefore need complete Javadoc per the checklist.
## Fix Focus Areas
- java/src/org/openqa/selenium/bidi/HasBiDi.java[25-40]
ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools
Comment on lines
+25
to
+39
| /** | ||
| * @deprecated BiDi is an internal implementation detail. Direct access to the BiDi object from | ||
| * drivers will be removed in a future release. | ||
| */ | ||
| @Deprecated(since = "4.46", forRemoval = true) | ||
| default BiDi getBiDi() { | ||
| return maybeGetBiDi() | ||
| .orElseThrow(() -> new BiDiException("Unable to create a BiDi connection")); | ||
| } | ||
| /** | ||
| * @deprecated BiDi is an internal implementation detail. Direct access to the BiDi object from | ||
| * drivers will be removed in a future release. | ||
| */ | ||
| @Deprecated(since = "4.46", forRemoval = true) |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
2. Deprecated methods lack alternative guidance 📘 Rule violation☼ Reliability
The new @deprecated Javadoc text explains removal intent but does not name a recommended alternative or explicitly state there is no replacement. This violates the requirement that deprecated public APIs include guidance before removal.
Agent Prompt
## Issue description
The `@deprecated` Javadoc for `getBiDi()` and `maybeGetBiDi()` does not provide guidance on what callers should use instead, nor does it explicitly state "no replacement".
## Issue Context
The checklist requires deprecated public APIs to include a human-readable message that names or links to the recommended alternative, or explicitly states there is no replacement.
## Fix Focus Areas
- java/src/org/openqa/selenium/bidi/HasBiDi.java[25-29]
- java/src/org/openqa/selenium/bidi/HasBiDi.java[35-39]
ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools
This was referenced Jul 11, 2026
This was referenced Jul 17, 2026
This was referenced Aug 1, 2026
This was referenced Aug 17, 2026
This was referenced Aug 31, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🔗 Related Issues
To align the Java BiDi code with the ADR #17670
💥 What does this PR do?
It deprecates methods that allow get BiDi internals on driver object
🔧 Implementation Notes
🤖 AI assistance
💡 Additional Considerations
🔄 Types of changes