feat: Add a user feedback mechanism for translation quality #46

Open
Feature
Open
feat: Add a user feedback mechanism for translation quality#46
Feature
Assignees
whatsupsumit
Labels
backendFeature/issues related to backend workflowenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureNew feature requestgood first issueGood for newcomershacktoberfesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededuiImproves and fix uiuximprove user experience

Description

@dineshsutihar
dineshsutihar
opened on Oct 1, 2025

Is your feature request related to a problem?

The quality of AI-generated code can vary. Currently, if a user receives a translation that is incorrect, suboptimal, or buggy, they have no easy way to report it. Without this feedback, it's difficult for us to identify weaknesses and improve the core AI prompts.

Describe the solution you'd like

  1. In the injected UI, next to the "Copy" button, add a simple "👍" (Good) and "👎" (Bad) icon button.

  2. When a user clicks "👎", open a small, simple modal with a textarea, asking "What was wrong with this translation?".

  3. The feedback (including the original code, the bad translation, the target language, and the user's optional comment) should be sent to a new, dedicated backend endpoint.

  4. This feedback can be stored in a database (like Supabase/Firebase).

Additional context

Creating a direct feedback loop is one of the most effective ways to gather data for improving the quality of the AI. This feature would provide invaluable insights into where the model struggles.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

backendFeature/issues related to backend workflowenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureNew feature requestgood first issueGood for newcomershacktoberfesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededuiImproves and fix uiuximprove user experience

Type

Feature

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

    Skip to content
    feat: Add a user feedback mechanism for translation quality #46
    Open
    Feature
    Open
    feat: Add a user feedback mechanism for translation quality#46
    Feature
    Assignees
    whatsupsumit
    Labels
    backendFeature/issues related to backend workflowenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureNew feature requestgood first issueGood for newcomershacktoberfesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededuiImproves and fix uiuximprove user experience
    Description
    @dineshsutihar
    dineshsutihar
    opened on Oct 1, 2025
    Is your feature request related to a problem?
    The quality of AI-generated code can vary. Currently, if a user receives a translation that is incorrect, suboptimal, or buggy, they have no easy way to report it. Without this feedback, it's difficult for us to identify weaknesses and improve the core AI prompts.
    Describe the solution you'd like
    1. In the injected UI, next to the "Copy" button, add a simple "👍" (Good) and "👎" (Bad) icon button.
    2. When a user clicks "👎", open a small, simple modal with a textarea, asking "What was wrong with this translation?".
    3. The feedback (including the original code, the bad translation, the target language, and the user's optional comment) should be sent to a new, dedicated backend endpoint.
    4. This feedback can be stored in a database (like Supabase/Firebase).
    Additional context
    Creating a direct feedback loop is one of the most effective ways to gather data for improving the quality of the AI. This feature would provide invaluable insights into where the model struggles.
    Activity
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Metadata
    Metadata
    Assignees
    Labels
    backendFeature/issues related to backend workflowenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureNew feature requestgood first issueGood for newcomershacktoberfesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededuiImproves and fix uiuximprove user experience
    Type
    Feature
    Projects
    No projects
      Milestone
      No milestone
      Relationships
      None yet
      Development
      No branches or pull requests
      Issue actions
      
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

      Skip to content
      feat: Add a user feedback mechanism for translation quality #46
      Open
      Feature
      Open
      feat: Add a user feedback mechanism for translation quality#46
      Feature
      Assignees
      whatsupsumit
      Labels
      backendFeature/issues related to backend workflowenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureNew feature requestgood first issueGood for newcomershacktoberfesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededuiImproves and fix uiuximprove user experience
      Description
      @dineshsutihar
      dineshsutihar
      opened on Oct 1, 2025
      Is your feature request related to a problem?
      The quality of AI-generated code can vary. Currently, if a user receives a translation that is incorrect, suboptimal, or buggy, they have no easy way to report it. Without this feedback, it's difficult for us to identify weaknesses and improve the core AI prompts.
      Describe the solution you'd like
      1. In the injected UI, next to the "Copy" button, add a simple "👍" (Good) and "👎" (Bad) icon button.
      2. When a user clicks "👎", open a small, simple modal with a textarea, asking "What was wrong with this translation?".
      3. The feedback (including the original code, the bad translation, the target language, and the user's optional comment) should be sent to a new, dedicated backend endpoint.
      4. This feedback can be stored in a database (like Supabase/Firebase).
      Additional context
      Creating a direct feedback loop is one of the most effective ways to gather data for improving the quality of the AI. This feature would provide invaluable insights into where the model struggles.
      Activity
      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
      Metadata
      Metadata
      Assignees
      Labels
      backendFeature/issues related to backend workflowenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureNew feature requestgood first issueGood for newcomershacktoberfesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededuiImproves and fix uiuximprove user experience
      Type
      Feature
      Projects
      No projects
        Milestone
        No milestone
        Relationships
        None yet
        Development
        No branches or pull requests
        Issue actions
        
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

        Skip to content
        feat: Add a user feedback mechanism for translation quality #46
        Open
        Feature
        Open
        feat: Add a user feedback mechanism for translation quality#46
        Feature
        Assignees
        whatsupsumit
        Labels
        backendFeature/issues related to backend workflowenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureNew feature requestgood first issueGood for newcomershacktoberfesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededuiImproves and fix uiuximprove user experience
        Description
        @dineshsutihar
        dineshsutihar
        opened on Oct 1, 2025
        Is your feature request related to a problem?
        The quality of AI-generated code can vary. Currently, if a user receives a translation that is incorrect, suboptimal, or buggy, they have no easy way to report it. Without this feedback, it's difficult for us to identify weaknesses and improve the core AI prompts.
        Describe the solution you'd like
        1. In the injected UI, next to the "Copy" button, add a simple "👍" (Good) and "👎" (Bad) icon button.
        2. When a user clicks "👎", open a small, simple modal with a textarea, asking "What was wrong with this translation?".
        3. The feedback (including the original code, the bad translation, the target language, and the user's optional comment) should be sent to a new, dedicated backend endpoint.
        4. This feedback can be stored in a database (like Supabase/Firebase).
        Additional context
        Creating a direct feedback loop is one of the most effective ways to gather data for improving the quality of the AI. This feature would provide invaluable insights into where the model struggles.
        Activity
        Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
        Metadata
        Metadata
        Assignees
        Labels
        backendFeature/issues related to backend workflowenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureNew feature requestgood first issueGood for newcomershacktoberfesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededuiImproves and fix uiuximprove user experience
        Type
        Feature
        Projects
        No projects
          Milestone
          No milestone
          Relationships
          None yet
          Development
          No branches or pull requests
          Issue actions
          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

          Skip to content
          feat: Add a user feedback mechanism for translation quality #46
          Open
          Feature
          Open
          feat: Add a user feedback mechanism for translation quality#46
          Feature
          Assignees
          whatsupsumit
          Labels
          backendFeature/issues related to backend workflowenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureNew feature requestgood first issueGood for newcomershacktoberfesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededuiImproves and fix uiuximprove user experience
          Description
          @dineshsutihar
          dineshsutihar
          opened on Oct 1, 2025
          Is your feature request related to a problem?
          The quality of AI-generated code can vary. Currently, if a user receives a translation that is incorrect, suboptimal, or buggy, they have no easy way to report it. Without this feedback, it's difficult for us to identify weaknesses and improve the core AI prompts.
          Describe the solution you'd like
          1. In the injected UI, next to the "Copy" button, add a simple "👍" (Good) and "👎" (Bad) icon button.
          2. When a user clicks "👎", open a small, simple modal with a textarea, asking "What was wrong with this translation?".
          3. The feedback (including the original code, the bad translation, the target language, and the user's optional comment) should be sent to a new, dedicated backend endpoint.
          4. This feedback can be stored in a database (like Supabase/Firebase).
          Additional context
          Creating a direct feedback loop is one of the most effective ways to gather data for improving the quality of the AI. This feature would provide invaluable insights into where the model struggles.
          Activity
          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
          Metadata
          Metadata
          Assignees
          Labels
          backendFeature/issues related to backend workflowenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureNew feature requestgood first issueGood for newcomershacktoberfesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededuiImproves and fix uiuximprove user experience
          Type
          Feature
          Projects
          No projects
            Milestone
            No milestone
            Relationships
            None yet
            Development
            No branches or pull requests
            Issue actions
            
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

            Skip to content
            feat: Add a user feedback mechanism for translation quality #46
            Open
            Feature
            Open
            feat: Add a user feedback mechanism for translation quality#46
            Feature
            Assignees
            whatsupsumit
            Labels
            backendFeature/issues related to backend workflowenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureNew feature requestgood first issueGood for newcomershacktoberfesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededuiImproves and fix uiuximprove user experience
            Description
            @dineshsutihar
            dineshsutihar
            opened on Oct 1, 2025
            Is your feature request related to a problem?
            The quality of AI-generated code can vary. Currently, if a user receives a translation that is incorrect, suboptimal, or buggy, they have no easy way to report it. Without this feedback, it's difficult for us to identify weaknesses and improve the core AI prompts.
            Describe the solution you'd like
            1. In the injected UI, next to the "Copy" button, add a simple "👍" (Good) and "👎" (Bad) icon button.
            2. When a user clicks "👎", open a small, simple modal with a textarea, asking "What was wrong with this translation?".
            3. The feedback (including the original code, the bad translation, the target language, and the user's optional comment) should be sent to a new, dedicated backend endpoint.
            4. This feedback can be stored in a database (like Supabase/Firebase).
            Additional context
            Creating a direct feedback loop is one of the most effective ways to gather data for improving the quality of the AI. This feature would provide invaluable insights into where the model struggles.
            Activity
            Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
            Metadata
            Metadata
            Assignees
            Labels
            backendFeature/issues related to backend workflowenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureNew feature requestgood first issueGood for newcomershacktoberfesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededuiImproves and fix uiuximprove user experience
            Type
            Feature
            Projects
            No projects
              Milestone
              No milestone
              Relationships
              None yet
              Development
              No branches or pull requests
              Issue actions
              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

              Skip to content
              feat: Add a user feedback mechanism for translation quality #46
              Open
              Feature
              Open
              feat: Add a user feedback mechanism for translation quality#46
              Feature
              Assignees
              whatsupsumit
              Labels
              backendFeature/issues related to backend workflowenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureNew feature requestgood first issueGood for newcomershacktoberfesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededuiImproves and fix uiuximprove user experience
              Description
              @dineshsutihar
              dineshsutihar
              opened on Oct 1, 2025
              Is your feature request related to a problem?
              The quality of AI-generated code can vary. Currently, if a user receives a translation that is incorrect, suboptimal, or buggy, they have no easy way to report it. Without this feedback, it's difficult for us to identify weaknesses and improve the core AI prompts.
              Describe the solution you'd like
              1. In the injected UI, next to the "Copy" button, add a simple "👍" (Good) and "👎" (Bad) icon button.
              2. When a user clicks "👎", open a small, simple modal with a textarea, asking "What was wrong with this translation?".
              3. The feedback (including the original code, the bad translation, the target language, and the user's optional comment) should be sent to a new, dedicated backend endpoint.
              4. This feedback can be stored in a database (like Supabase/Firebase).
              Additional context
              Creating a direct feedback loop is one of the most effective ways to gather data for improving the quality of the AI. This feature would provide invaluable insights into where the model struggles.
              Activity
              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
              Metadata
              Metadata
              Assignees
              Labels
              backendFeature/issues related to backend workflowenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureNew feature requestgood first issueGood for newcomershacktoberfesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededuiImproves and fix uiuximprove user experience
              Type
              Feature
              Projects
              No projects
                Milestone
                No milestone
                Relationships
                None yet
                Development
                No branches or pull requests
                Issue actions
                
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

                Skip to content
                feat: Add a user feedback mechanism for translation quality #46
                Open
                Feature
                Open
                feat: Add a user feedback mechanism for translation quality#46
                Feature
                Assignees
                whatsupsumit
                Labels
                backendFeature/issues related to backend workflowenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureNew feature requestgood first issueGood for newcomershacktoberfesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededuiImproves and fix uiuximprove user experience
                Description
                @dineshsutihar
                dineshsutihar
                opened on Oct 1, 2025
                Is your feature request related to a problem?
                The quality of AI-generated code can vary. Currently, if a user receives a translation that is incorrect, suboptimal, or buggy, they have no easy way to report it. Without this feedback, it's difficult for us to identify weaknesses and improve the core AI prompts.
                Describe the solution you'd like
                1. In the injected UI, next to the "Copy" button, add a simple "👍" (Good) and "👎" (Bad) icon button.
                2. When a user clicks "👎", open a small, simple modal with a textarea, asking "What was wrong with this translation?".
                3. The feedback (including the original code, the bad translation, the target language, and the user's optional comment) should be sent to a new, dedicated backend endpoint.
                4. This feedback can be stored in a database (like Supabase/Firebase).
                Additional context
                Creating a direct feedback loop is one of the most effective ways to gather data for improving the quality of the AI. This feature would provide invaluable insights into where the model struggles.
                Activity
                Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
                Metadata
                Metadata
                Assignees
                Labels
                backendFeature/issues related to backend workflowenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureNew feature requestgood first issueGood for newcomershacktoberfesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededuiImproves and fix uiuximprove user experience
                Type
                Feature
                Projects
                No projects
                  Milestone
                  No milestone
                  Relationships
                  None yet
                  Development
                  No branches or pull requests
                  Issue actions