Allow setting detached

[mifi]

Allow setting detached: true on the child process so that we can prevent it from propagating signals from parent

[munro]

It looks like the Travis CI broke support building for Python 2.6, 3.2, 3.3, annoying... I think I have to manually specify the Ubuntu distribution for these Python versions

travis-ci/travis-ci#9133 (comment)

[munro]

@mifi I still haven't dug into the travis-ci error, so any help to get this moving is greatly appreciated! Also if you could write an automated test that uses detached, that would be awesome—really so we can make sure this feature always works for you in the future.

I think the integration test could be done pretty easily, here's some pseudo code:

constisRunning=require('is-running');asyncfunctiontest(){// to do an automated test for this, we need to run our JS code in another process// so that when that process exits, we can test that the Python process is still running.constprocessPythonPid=awaitsomeFunctionThatSpawnAProcess(async()=>{constpythonBridge=require('./');constpython=pythonBridge({detached: true});awaitpython.exec`import os`;constpythonPid=python`os.getpid()`;t.equal(pythonPid,python.pid,'same pid');python.ps.unref();returnpython.ps.pid;});t.assertTrue(awaitisRunning(processPythonPid),'python process is still running after nodejs terminated');process.kill(processPythonPid,'SIGKILL');}functionsomeFunctionThatSpawnAProcess(f){// @TODO do we have to write this, or is there an NPM module for this?}

Alternatively, you could launch a detached process for background work from the Python side, which wouldn't require any changes to the python-bridge API.

Anyway, I'm pretty easy going, so I'd love to know your thoughts, or if you found another solution.

[mdesmet]

I don't think that test would be easy. We could spawn another process through node -e "my code here" but there wouldn't be any way for the processes to communicate, eg getting a reference to any variable from the other process. This is actually the whole point about node being single threaded.

Not sure I follow the alternative solution regarding the Python background process. The Python process is launched by the exact spawn that needs to be detached for Windows to not show a console window.