Skip to content
BranchesTags

Latest commit

History

11 Commits

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
src
src
README.md
README.md
index.html
index.html
package.json
package.json

Repository files navigation

Trilemma-scale

Blockchain trilemma in radar chart

image

Goal

The increasing variety and quantity of distributed ledger technology make blockchain selection and adoption more time consuming.
The creator of this project tries to find a universal metric to compare common blockchain attributes in this case Scalability, Decentralization, and Security also known as the blockchain trilemma.
With these 3 key attributes creators try to rank and/or quantified these metrics as much as possible knowing that these metrics are far from perfect but at least give us some high-level comparison between vastly different technology and design philosophy system.
With that create a visualization that will help distinguish different systems apart.

Evaluation criteria

NOTE All of this bias toward existing technology, the upperbound might not be future proof.

TODO we gonna need some kind of ratio or coefficiant here later

Scores

Scores range from 1 to 5, anything less than 1 is not permitted to create a centerline at 3.

Scalability

Scalability analysis using relative comparison with prior data.
Scalability is defined as an ability to increase support more nodes, load, feature, Storage, and bandwidth without exponential incurring cost, latency, and no significant degradation in performance

  • Scalability score at 1 if the least performance nodes (the bottleneck) have comparable scalability to Bitcoin in 2020
  • Scalability score at 3 if the least performance nodes (the bottleneck) in the chain scale linearly with cost
  • Scalability score at 5 if the chain scale-like BFT permissioned node

Security

QUESTION can we make this a percentage Security in terms of compromise for scalability and/or decentralization does not relate to software quality.

  • Security score at 5 if chain requires more than 1/2 dishonest node to compromise both consistency and liveness of the network
  • Security score at 4 if chain requires more than 1/2 dishonest node to compromise consistency or liveness of the network
  • Security score at 3 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise liveness of the network
  • Security score at 2 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise the consistency of the network
  • Security score at 1 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise both consistency and liveness of the network

Decentralize

Network Consensus Provider (NCP) is a network participant that influences the consensus of the network

  • Decentralize score at 1 if 100% NCP interest aligned
  • Decentralize score at 3 if 50% of NCP interest aligned
  • Decentralize score at 5 if 0% NCP interest aligned

About

Created with CodeSandbox

codesandbox.io/s/github/SuperCipher/trilema-scale

Resources

Readme
Activity

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

0 forks
Report repository

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
GitHub - SuperCipher/trilemma-scale: Created with CodeSandbox · GitHub
Skip to content
BranchesTags
Latest commit
History
11 Commits
Folders and files
NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
src
src
README.md
README.md
index.html
index.html
package.json
package.json
Repository files navigation
Trilemma-scale
Blockchain trilemma in radar chart
image
Goal
The increasing variety and quantity of distributed ledger technology make blockchain selection and adoption more time consuming.

The creator of this project tries to find a universal metric to compare common blockchain attributes in this case Scalability, Decentralization, and Security also known as the blockchain trilemma.

With these 3 key attributes creators try to rank and/or quantified these metrics as much as possible knowing that these metrics are far from perfect but at least give us some high-level comparison between vastly different technology and design philosophy system. 

With that create a visualization that will help distinguish different systems apart.
Evaluation criteria
NOTE All of this bias toward existing technology, the upperbound might not be future proof.
TODO we gonna need some kind of ratio or coefficiant here later
Scores
Scores range from 1 to 5, anything less than 1 is not permitted to create a centerline at 3.
Scalability
Scalability analysis using relative comparison with prior data.

Scalability is defined as an ability to increase support more nodes, load, feature, Storage, and bandwidth without exponential incurring cost, latency, and no significant degradation in performance
  • Scalability score at 1 if the least performance nodes (the bottleneck) have comparable scalability to Bitcoin in 2020
  • Scalability score at 3 if the least performance nodes (the bottleneck) in the chain scale linearly with cost
  • Scalability score at 5 if the chain scale-like BFT permissioned node
Security
QUESTION can we make this a percentage
Security in terms of compromise for scalability and/or decentralization does not relate to software quality.
  • Security score at 5 if chain requires more than 1/2 dishonest node to compromise both consistency and liveness of the network
  • Security score at 4 if chain requires more than 1/2 dishonest node to compromise consistency or liveness of the network
  • Security score at 3 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise liveness of the network
  • Security score at 2 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise the consistency of the network
  • Security score at 1 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise both consistency and liveness of the network
Decentralize
Network Consensus Provider (NCP) is a network participant that influences the consensus of the network
  • Decentralize score at 1 if 100% NCP interest aligned
  • Decentralize score at 3 if 50% of NCP interest aligned
  • Decentralize score at 5 if 0% NCP interest aligned
About
Created with CodeSandbox
codesandbox.io/s/github/SuperCipher/trilema-scale
Resources
Readme
Activity
Stars
0 stars
Watchers
1 watching
Forks
0 forks
Report repository
Releases
Packages
Contributors
Languages

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
GitHub - SuperCipher/trilemma-scale: Created with CodeSandbox · GitHub
Skip to content
BranchesTags
Latest commit
History
11 Commits
Folders and files
NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
src
src
README.md
README.md
index.html
index.html
package.json
package.json
Repository files navigation
Trilemma-scale
Blockchain trilemma in radar chart
image
Goal
The increasing variety and quantity of distributed ledger technology make blockchain selection and adoption more time consuming.

The creator of this project tries to find a universal metric to compare common blockchain attributes in this case Scalability, Decentralization, and Security also known as the blockchain trilemma.

With these 3 key attributes creators try to rank and/or quantified these metrics as much as possible knowing that these metrics are far from perfect but at least give us some high-level comparison between vastly different technology and design philosophy system. 

With that create a visualization that will help distinguish different systems apart.
Evaluation criteria
NOTE All of this bias toward existing technology, the upperbound might not be future proof.
TODO we gonna need some kind of ratio or coefficiant here later
Scores
Scores range from 1 to 5, anything less than 1 is not permitted to create a centerline at 3.
Scalability
Scalability analysis using relative comparison with prior data.

Scalability is defined as an ability to increase support more nodes, load, feature, Storage, and bandwidth without exponential incurring cost, latency, and no significant degradation in performance
  • Scalability score at 1 if the least performance nodes (the bottleneck) have comparable scalability to Bitcoin in 2020
  • Scalability score at 3 if the least performance nodes (the bottleneck) in the chain scale linearly with cost
  • Scalability score at 5 if the chain scale-like BFT permissioned node
Security
QUESTION can we make this a percentage
Security in terms of compromise for scalability and/or decentralization does not relate to software quality.
  • Security score at 5 if chain requires more than 1/2 dishonest node to compromise both consistency and liveness of the network
  • Security score at 4 if chain requires more than 1/2 dishonest node to compromise consistency or liveness of the network
  • Security score at 3 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise liveness of the network
  • Security score at 2 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise the consistency of the network
  • Security score at 1 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise both consistency and liveness of the network
Decentralize
Network Consensus Provider (NCP) is a network participant that influences the consensus of the network
  • Decentralize score at 1 if 100% NCP interest aligned
  • Decentralize score at 3 if 50% of NCP interest aligned
  • Decentralize score at 5 if 0% NCP interest aligned
About
Created with CodeSandbox
codesandbox.io/s/github/SuperCipher/trilema-scale
Resources
Readme
Activity
Stars
0 stars
Watchers
1 watching
Forks
0 forks
Report repository
Releases
Packages
Contributors
Languages

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
GitHub - SuperCipher/trilemma-scale: Created with CodeSandbox · GitHub
Skip to content
BranchesTags
Latest commit
History
11 Commits
Folders and files
NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
src
src
README.md
README.md
index.html
index.html
package.json
package.json
Repository files navigation
Trilemma-scale
Blockchain trilemma in radar chart
image
Goal
The increasing variety and quantity of distributed ledger technology make blockchain selection and adoption more time consuming.

The creator of this project tries to find a universal metric to compare common blockchain attributes in this case Scalability, Decentralization, and Security also known as the blockchain trilemma.

With these 3 key attributes creators try to rank and/or quantified these metrics as much as possible knowing that these metrics are far from perfect but at least give us some high-level comparison between vastly different technology and design philosophy system. 

With that create a visualization that will help distinguish different systems apart.
Evaluation criteria
NOTE All of this bias toward existing technology, the upperbound might not be future proof.
TODO we gonna need some kind of ratio or coefficiant here later
Scores
Scores range from 1 to 5, anything less than 1 is not permitted to create a centerline at 3.
Scalability
Scalability analysis using relative comparison with prior data.

Scalability is defined as an ability to increase support more nodes, load, feature, Storage, and bandwidth without exponential incurring cost, latency, and no significant degradation in performance
  • Scalability score at 1 if the least performance nodes (the bottleneck) have comparable scalability to Bitcoin in 2020
  • Scalability score at 3 if the least performance nodes (the bottleneck) in the chain scale linearly with cost
  • Scalability score at 5 if the chain scale-like BFT permissioned node
Security
QUESTION can we make this a percentage
Security in terms of compromise for scalability and/or decentralization does not relate to software quality.
  • Security score at 5 if chain requires more than 1/2 dishonest node to compromise both consistency and liveness of the network
  • Security score at 4 if chain requires more than 1/2 dishonest node to compromise consistency or liveness of the network
  • Security score at 3 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise liveness of the network
  • Security score at 2 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise the consistency of the network
  • Security score at 1 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise both consistency and liveness of the network
Decentralize
Network Consensus Provider (NCP) is a network participant that influences the consensus of the network
  • Decentralize score at 1 if 100% NCP interest aligned
  • Decentralize score at 3 if 50% of NCP interest aligned
  • Decentralize score at 5 if 0% NCP interest aligned
About
Created with CodeSandbox
codesandbox.io/s/github/SuperCipher/trilema-scale
Resources
Readme
Activity
Stars
0 stars
Watchers
1 watching
Forks
0 forks
Report repository
Releases
Packages
Contributors
Languages

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
GitHub - SuperCipher/trilemma-scale: Created with CodeSandbox · GitHub
Skip to content
BranchesTags
Latest commit
History
11 Commits
Folders and files
NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
src
src
README.md
README.md
index.html
index.html
package.json
package.json
Repository files navigation
Trilemma-scale
Blockchain trilemma in radar chart
image
Goal
The increasing variety and quantity of distributed ledger technology make blockchain selection and adoption more time consuming.

The creator of this project tries to find a universal metric to compare common blockchain attributes in this case Scalability, Decentralization, and Security also known as the blockchain trilemma.

With these 3 key attributes creators try to rank and/or quantified these metrics as much as possible knowing that these metrics are far from perfect but at least give us some high-level comparison between vastly different technology and design philosophy system. 

With that create a visualization that will help distinguish different systems apart.
Evaluation criteria
NOTE All of this bias toward existing technology, the upperbound might not be future proof.
TODO we gonna need some kind of ratio or coefficiant here later
Scores
Scores range from 1 to 5, anything less than 1 is not permitted to create a centerline at 3.
Scalability
Scalability analysis using relative comparison with prior data.

Scalability is defined as an ability to increase support more nodes, load, feature, Storage, and bandwidth without exponential incurring cost, latency, and no significant degradation in performance
  • Scalability score at 1 if the least performance nodes (the bottleneck) have comparable scalability to Bitcoin in 2020
  • Scalability score at 3 if the least performance nodes (the bottleneck) in the chain scale linearly with cost
  • Scalability score at 5 if the chain scale-like BFT permissioned node
Security
QUESTION can we make this a percentage
Security in terms of compromise for scalability and/or decentralization does not relate to software quality.
  • Security score at 5 if chain requires more than 1/2 dishonest node to compromise both consistency and liveness of the network
  • Security score at 4 if chain requires more than 1/2 dishonest node to compromise consistency or liveness of the network
  • Security score at 3 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise liveness of the network
  • Security score at 2 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise the consistency of the network
  • Security score at 1 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise both consistency and liveness of the network
Decentralize
Network Consensus Provider (NCP) is a network participant that influences the consensus of the network
  • Decentralize score at 1 if 100% NCP interest aligned
  • Decentralize score at 3 if 50% of NCP interest aligned
  • Decentralize score at 5 if 0% NCP interest aligned
About
Created with CodeSandbox
codesandbox.io/s/github/SuperCipher/trilema-scale
Resources
Readme
Activity
Stars
0 stars
Watchers
1 watching
Forks
0 forks
Report repository
Releases
Packages
Contributors
Languages

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
GitHub - SuperCipher/trilemma-scale: Created with CodeSandbox · GitHub
Skip to content
BranchesTags
Latest commit
History
11 Commits
Folders and files
NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
src
src
README.md
README.md
index.html
index.html
package.json
package.json
Repository files navigation
Trilemma-scale
Blockchain trilemma in radar chart
image
Goal
The increasing variety and quantity of distributed ledger technology make blockchain selection and adoption more time consuming.

The creator of this project tries to find a universal metric to compare common blockchain attributes in this case Scalability, Decentralization, and Security also known as the blockchain trilemma.

With these 3 key attributes creators try to rank and/or quantified these metrics as much as possible knowing that these metrics are far from perfect but at least give us some high-level comparison between vastly different technology and design philosophy system. 

With that create a visualization that will help distinguish different systems apart.
Evaluation criteria
NOTE All of this bias toward existing technology, the upperbound might not be future proof.
TODO we gonna need some kind of ratio or coefficiant here later
Scores
Scores range from 1 to 5, anything less than 1 is not permitted to create a centerline at 3.
Scalability
Scalability analysis using relative comparison with prior data.

Scalability is defined as an ability to increase support more nodes, load, feature, Storage, and bandwidth without exponential incurring cost, latency, and no significant degradation in performance
  • Scalability score at 1 if the least performance nodes (the bottleneck) have comparable scalability to Bitcoin in 2020
  • Scalability score at 3 if the least performance nodes (the bottleneck) in the chain scale linearly with cost
  • Scalability score at 5 if the chain scale-like BFT permissioned node
Security
QUESTION can we make this a percentage
Security in terms of compromise for scalability and/or decentralization does not relate to software quality.
  • Security score at 5 if chain requires more than 1/2 dishonest node to compromise both consistency and liveness of the network
  • Security score at 4 if chain requires more than 1/2 dishonest node to compromise consistency or liveness of the network
  • Security score at 3 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise liveness of the network
  • Security score at 2 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise the consistency of the network
  • Security score at 1 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise both consistency and liveness of the network
Decentralize
Network Consensus Provider (NCP) is a network participant that influences the consensus of the network
  • Decentralize score at 1 if 100% NCP interest aligned
  • Decentralize score at 3 if 50% of NCP interest aligned
  • Decentralize score at 5 if 0% NCP interest aligned
About
Created with CodeSandbox
codesandbox.io/s/github/SuperCipher/trilema-scale
Resources
Readme
Activity
Stars
0 stars
Watchers
1 watching
Forks
0 forks
Report repository
Releases
Packages
Contributors
Languages

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
GitHub - SuperCipher/trilemma-scale: Created with CodeSandbox · GitHub
Skip to content
BranchesTags
Latest commit
History
11 Commits
Folders and files
NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
src
src
README.md
README.md
index.html
index.html
package.json
package.json
Repository files navigation
Trilemma-scale
Blockchain trilemma in radar chart
image
Goal
The increasing variety and quantity of distributed ledger technology make blockchain selection and adoption more time consuming.

The creator of this project tries to find a universal metric to compare common blockchain attributes in this case Scalability, Decentralization, and Security also known as the blockchain trilemma.

With these 3 key attributes creators try to rank and/or quantified these metrics as much as possible knowing that these metrics are far from perfect but at least give us some high-level comparison between vastly different technology and design philosophy system. 

With that create a visualization that will help distinguish different systems apart.
Evaluation criteria
NOTE All of this bias toward existing technology, the upperbound might not be future proof.
TODO we gonna need some kind of ratio or coefficiant here later
Scores
Scores range from 1 to 5, anything less than 1 is not permitted to create a centerline at 3.
Scalability
Scalability analysis using relative comparison with prior data.

Scalability is defined as an ability to increase support more nodes, load, feature, Storage, and bandwidth without exponential incurring cost, latency, and no significant degradation in performance
  • Scalability score at 1 if the least performance nodes (the bottleneck) have comparable scalability to Bitcoin in 2020
  • Scalability score at 3 if the least performance nodes (the bottleneck) in the chain scale linearly with cost
  • Scalability score at 5 if the chain scale-like BFT permissioned node
Security
QUESTION can we make this a percentage
Security in terms of compromise for scalability and/or decentralization does not relate to software quality.
  • Security score at 5 if chain requires more than 1/2 dishonest node to compromise both consistency and liveness of the network
  • Security score at 4 if chain requires more than 1/2 dishonest node to compromise consistency or liveness of the network
  • Security score at 3 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise liveness of the network
  • Security score at 2 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise the consistency of the network
  • Security score at 1 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise both consistency and liveness of the network
Decentralize
Network Consensus Provider (NCP) is a network participant that influences the consensus of the network
  • Decentralize score at 1 if 100% NCP interest aligned
  • Decentralize score at 3 if 50% of NCP interest aligned
  • Decentralize score at 5 if 0% NCP interest aligned
About
Created with CodeSandbox
codesandbox.io/s/github/SuperCipher/trilema-scale
Resources
Readme
Activity
Stars
0 stars
Watchers
1 watching
Forks
0 forks
Report repository
Releases
Packages
Contributors
Languages

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();
GitHub - SuperCipher/trilemma-scale: Created with CodeSandbox · GitHub
Skip to content
BranchesTags
Latest commit
History
11 Commits
Folders and files
NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
src
src
README.md
README.md
index.html
index.html
package.json
package.json
Repository files navigation
Trilemma-scale
Blockchain trilemma in radar chart
image
Goal
The increasing variety and quantity of distributed ledger technology make blockchain selection and adoption more time consuming.

The creator of this project tries to find a universal metric to compare common blockchain attributes in this case Scalability, Decentralization, and Security also known as the blockchain trilemma.

With these 3 key attributes creators try to rank and/or quantified these metrics as much as possible knowing that these metrics are far from perfect but at least give us some high-level comparison between vastly different technology and design philosophy system. 

With that create a visualization that will help distinguish different systems apart.
Evaluation criteria
NOTE All of this bias toward existing technology, the upperbound might not be future proof.
TODO we gonna need some kind of ratio or coefficiant here later
Scores
Scores range from 1 to 5, anything less than 1 is not permitted to create a centerline at 3.
Scalability
Scalability analysis using relative comparison with prior data.

Scalability is defined as an ability to increase support more nodes, load, feature, Storage, and bandwidth without exponential incurring cost, latency, and no significant degradation in performance
  • Scalability score at 1 if the least performance nodes (the bottleneck) have comparable scalability to Bitcoin in 2020
  • Scalability score at 3 if the least performance nodes (the bottleneck) in the chain scale linearly with cost
  • Scalability score at 5 if the chain scale-like BFT permissioned node
Security
QUESTION can we make this a percentage
Security in terms of compromise for scalability and/or decentralization does not relate to software quality.
  • Security score at 5 if chain requires more than 1/2 dishonest node to compromise both consistency and liveness of the network
  • Security score at 4 if chain requires more than 1/2 dishonest node to compromise consistency or liveness of the network
  • Security score at 3 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise liveness of the network
  • Security score at 2 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise the consistency of the network
  • Security score at 1 if chain requires 1/3 dishonest node to compromise both consistency and liveness of the network
Decentralize
Network Consensus Provider (NCP) is a network participant that influences the consensus of the network
  • Decentralize score at 1 if 100% NCP interest aligned
  • Decentralize score at 3 if 50% of NCP interest aligned
  • Decentralize score at 5 if 0% NCP interest aligned
About
Created with CodeSandbox
codesandbox.io/s/github/SuperCipher/trilema-scale
Resources
Readme
Activity
Stars
0 stars
Watchers
1 watching
Forks
0 forks
Report repository
Releases
Packages
Contributors
Languages