All issues

Search results

Process-Interaction Glyph is missing in the visual SBOL 3.0 release

Status: Open.

#176In SynBioDex/SBOL-visual;

· PrashantVaidyanathan opened on May 22, 2026

Voting for SEP_V026 | Introduction of “//” as a Glyph for Generic DNA Breaks in SBOL Visual

ready for voteSEP appears generally stable and ready for voteSEP appears generally stable and ready for vote

SEP

Status: Open.

#172In SynBioDex/SBOL-visual;

· ERIK-KE opened on Mar 10, 2026

Glyphs bounding box

bug

Status: Open.

#170In SynBioDex/SBOL-visual;

· ERIK-KE opened on Oct 15, 2025

5' and 3' untranslated regions for eukaryotic parts

Draft

Status: Open.

#169In SynBioDex/SBOL-visual;

· fxbuson opened on Nov 3, 2023

·

SBOL Visual 3.1

Representation of introns in non-CDS regions

Draft

Status: Open.

#168In SynBioDex/SBOL-visual;

· fxbuson opened on Nov 2, 2023

·

SBOL Visual 3.1

Usage of protein feature glyphs in combination with CDSs

Draft

Status: Open.

#167In SynBioDex/SBOL-visual;

· shyambhakta opened on Nov 2, 2023

·

SBOL Visual 3.1

SEP V025: Handle nucleic acid parts with overlapping sequences

Draft

SEP

Status: Open.

#165In SynBioDex/SBOL-visual;

· chofski opened on Oct 7, 2022

·

SBOL Visual 3.1

Glyphs not very legible

bug

Status: Open.

#164In SynBioDex/SBOL-visual;

· cjmyers opened on Mar 15, 2022

Many GenBank feature types do not have SBOL Visual Glyphs

Status: Open.

#159In SynBioDex/SBOL-visual;

· cjmyers opened on Mar 29, 2021

·

Future Tasks

Incomplete set of examples

Status: Open.

#158In SynBioDex/SBOL-visual;

· jamesscottbrown opened on Mar 26, 2021

·

SBOL Visual 3.1

Abstract classes should not link to syntax descriptors

bug

ontology

Status: Open.

#152In SynBioDex/SBOL-visual;

· jakebeal opened on Mar 25, 2021

Representation of constraints

Status: Open.

#150In SynBioDex/SBOL-visual;

· jakebeal opened on Mar 24, 2021

·

SBOL Visual 3.1