🧪 Add test coverage for std.sync lock contention - #39
Conversation
This adds a test `test_sync_mutex_contention` that spawns two threads to verify the `lock` and `unlock` behavior of `ScriptMutex` when there is contention. It ensures that the conditional variable wait loop works properly and the lock can be sequentially acquired. Co-authored-by: Tcode-Motion <188012755+Tcode-Motion@users.noreply.github.com>
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🎯 What: The untested lock waiting (
while *guard { guard = condvar.wait(guard).unwrap(); }) forScriptMutexinstdlib/src/sync.rsis now covered.📊 Coverage: A new test
test_sync_mutex_contentionverifies the behavior ofScriptMutex::lockandScriptMutex::unlockacross multiple threads, specifically checking the blocking/waiting mechanism when contention happens.✨ Result: Test coverage for
std.syncis improved by handling a previously untested and complex multithreaded edge case securely and without test flakiness.PR created automatically by Jules for task 4386471148693502504 started by @Tcode-Motion