Add sublevel.getForces() - #9

Open
Sascha-T wants to merge 6 commits into
TechTastic:masterfrom
Sascha-T:master
Open

Add sublevel.getForces()#9
Sascha-T wants to merge 6 commits into
TechTastic:masterfrom
Sascha-T:master

Conversation

@Sascha-T

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closes#7

Adds sublevel.getForces()
Format:

{
"sable:force_name": {
{
"position": --[ vector ]--,"force": --[ vector ]--
}
}
}

or just straight up null if something goes horribly wrong.

The cody is a bit funky but it should be fine, works on my machine! :p
(I didn't increment any versions)

Comment threadREADME.md
@TechTasticTechTastic added the enhancement New feature or request label May 16, 2026
@TechTasticTechTastic self-assigned this May 16, 2026
* Track "force requests" for sublevels because Sable be like "waaah no you cant request forces mid-tick"
*/
public class Physicker {
private static Map<ResourceLocation, Object> LOCKS = new HashMap();

@TechTasticTechTasticMay 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could be a ConcurrentHashMap and thus locks and syncronization do not need to be explicitly handled by this class

@Sascha-TSascha-TMay 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can make it a ConcurrentHashMap but getLock is synchronized to prevent an evil style "race condition" where you can potentially create 2 seperate locks, but only one is stored in the Map, leaving a computer to wait for the (currently 2 ticks) lock timeout. (and from my understanding, a ConcurrentHashMap wouldn't change that?)

Or I just straight up don't understand where you want to go with this, please elaborate 🥺

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually I see the vision

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It took a minute but I think I found somewhat decent way to outsource concurrency back to Java, what do you think?

@Sascha-T

Sascha-T commented May 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I've been informed that getForces apparently behaves erratically (occasionally returns nil for no reason) so it appears there's still some more work to be done

Correction: not nil. But the other forces disappear, which may as well be a nil...

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Function requests

2 participants

@Sascha-T@TechTastic
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add sublevel.getForces() - #9

Open
Sascha-T wants to merge 6 commits into
TechTastic:masterfrom
Sascha-T:master
Open

Add sublevel.getForces()#9
Sascha-T wants to merge 6 commits into
TechTastic:masterfrom
Sascha-T:master

Conversation

@Sascha-T

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closes#7

Adds sublevel.getForces()
Format:

{
"sable:force_name": {
{
"position": --[ vector ]--,"force": --[ vector ]--
}
}
}

or just straight up null if something goes horribly wrong.

The cody is a bit funky but it should be fine, works on my machine! :p
(I didn't increment any versions)

Comment threadREADME.md
@TechTasticTechTastic added the enhancement New feature or request label May 16, 2026
@TechTasticTechTastic self-assigned this May 16, 2026
* Track "force requests" for sublevels because Sable be like "waaah no you cant request forces mid-tick"
*/
public class Physicker {
private static Map<ResourceLocation, Object> LOCKS = new HashMap();

@TechTasticTechTasticMay 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could be a ConcurrentHashMap and thus locks and syncronization do not need to be explicitly handled by this class

@Sascha-TSascha-TMay 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can make it a ConcurrentHashMap but getLock is synchronized to prevent an evil style "race condition" where you can potentially create 2 seperate locks, but only one is stored in the Map, leaving a computer to wait for the (currently 2 ticks) lock timeout. (and from my understanding, a ConcurrentHashMap wouldn't change that?)

Or I just straight up don't understand where you want to go with this, please elaborate 🥺

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually I see the vision

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It took a minute but I think I found somewhat decent way to outsource concurrency back to Java, what do you think?

@Sascha-T

Sascha-T commented May 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I've been informed that getForces apparently behaves erratically (occasionally returns nil for no reason) so it appears there's still some more work to be done

Correction: not nil. But the other forces disappear, which may as well be a nil...

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Function requests

2 participants

@Sascha-T@TechTastic
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add sublevel.getForces() - #9

Open
Sascha-T wants to merge 6 commits into
TechTastic:masterfrom
Sascha-T:master
Open

Add sublevel.getForces()#9
Sascha-T wants to merge 6 commits into
TechTastic:masterfrom
Sascha-T:master

Conversation

@Sascha-T

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closes#7

Adds sublevel.getForces()
Format:

{
"sable:force_name": {
{
"position": --[ vector ]--,"force": --[ vector ]--
}
}
}

or just straight up null if something goes horribly wrong.

The cody is a bit funky but it should be fine, works on my machine! :p
(I didn't increment any versions)

Comment threadREADME.md
@TechTasticTechTastic added the enhancement New feature or request label May 16, 2026
@TechTasticTechTastic self-assigned this May 16, 2026
* Track "force requests" for sublevels because Sable be like "waaah no you cant request forces mid-tick"
*/
public class Physicker {
private static Map<ResourceLocation, Object> LOCKS = new HashMap();

@TechTasticTechTasticMay 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could be a ConcurrentHashMap and thus locks and syncronization do not need to be explicitly handled by this class

@Sascha-TSascha-TMay 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can make it a ConcurrentHashMap but getLock is synchronized to prevent an evil style "race condition" where you can potentially create 2 seperate locks, but only one is stored in the Map, leaving a computer to wait for the (currently 2 ticks) lock timeout. (and from my understanding, a ConcurrentHashMap wouldn't change that?)

Or I just straight up don't understand where you want to go with this, please elaborate 🥺

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually I see the vision

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It took a minute but I think I found somewhat decent way to outsource concurrency back to Java, what do you think?

@Sascha-T

Sascha-T commented May 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I've been informed that getForces apparently behaves erratically (occasionally returns nil for no reason) so it appears there's still some more work to be done

Correction: not nil. But the other forces disappear, which may as well be a nil...

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Function requests

2 participants

@Sascha-T@TechTastic
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add sublevel.getForces() - #9

Open
Sascha-T wants to merge 6 commits into
TechTastic:masterfrom
Sascha-T:master
Open

Add sublevel.getForces()#9
Sascha-T wants to merge 6 commits into
TechTastic:masterfrom
Sascha-T:master

Conversation

@Sascha-T

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closes#7

Adds sublevel.getForces()
Format:

{
"sable:force_name": {
{
"position": --[ vector ]--,"force": --[ vector ]--
}
}
}

or just straight up null if something goes horribly wrong.

The cody is a bit funky but it should be fine, works on my machine! :p
(I didn't increment any versions)

Comment threadREADME.md
@TechTasticTechTastic added the enhancement New feature or request label May 16, 2026
@TechTasticTechTastic self-assigned this May 16, 2026
* Track "force requests" for sublevels because Sable be like "waaah no you cant request forces mid-tick"
*/
public class Physicker {
private static Map<ResourceLocation, Object> LOCKS = new HashMap();

@TechTasticTechTasticMay 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could be a ConcurrentHashMap and thus locks and syncronization do not need to be explicitly handled by this class

@Sascha-TSascha-TMay 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can make it a ConcurrentHashMap but getLock is synchronized to prevent an evil style "race condition" where you can potentially create 2 seperate locks, but only one is stored in the Map, leaving a computer to wait for the (currently 2 ticks) lock timeout. (and from my understanding, a ConcurrentHashMap wouldn't change that?)

Or I just straight up don't understand where you want to go with this, please elaborate 🥺

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually I see the vision

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It took a minute but I think I found somewhat decent way to outsource concurrency back to Java, what do you think?

@Sascha-T

Sascha-T commented May 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I've been informed that getForces apparently behaves erratically (occasionally returns nil for no reason) so it appears there's still some more work to be done

Correction: not nil. But the other forces disappear, which may as well be a nil...

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Function requests

2 participants

@Sascha-T@TechTastic
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add sublevel.getForces() - #9

Open
Sascha-T wants to merge 6 commits into
TechTastic:masterfrom
Sascha-T:master
Open

Add sublevel.getForces()#9
Sascha-T wants to merge 6 commits into
TechTastic:masterfrom
Sascha-T:master

Conversation

@Sascha-T

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closes#7

Adds sublevel.getForces()
Format:

{
"sable:force_name": {
{
"position": --[ vector ]--,"force": --[ vector ]--
}
}
}

or just straight up null if something goes horribly wrong.

The cody is a bit funky but it should be fine, works on my machine! :p
(I didn't increment any versions)

Comment threadREADME.md
@TechTasticTechTastic added the enhancement New feature or request label May 16, 2026
@TechTasticTechTastic self-assigned this May 16, 2026
* Track "force requests" for sublevels because Sable be like "waaah no you cant request forces mid-tick"
*/
public class Physicker {
private static Map<ResourceLocation, Object> LOCKS = new HashMap();

@TechTasticTechTasticMay 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could be a ConcurrentHashMap and thus locks and syncronization do not need to be explicitly handled by this class

@Sascha-TSascha-TMay 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can make it a ConcurrentHashMap but getLock is synchronized to prevent an evil style "race condition" where you can potentially create 2 seperate locks, but only one is stored in the Map, leaving a computer to wait for the (currently 2 ticks) lock timeout. (and from my understanding, a ConcurrentHashMap wouldn't change that?)

Or I just straight up don't understand where you want to go with this, please elaborate 🥺

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually I see the vision

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It took a minute but I think I found somewhat decent way to outsource concurrency back to Java, what do you think?

@Sascha-T

Sascha-T commented May 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I've been informed that getForces apparently behaves erratically (occasionally returns nil for no reason) so it appears there's still some more work to be done

Correction: not nil. But the other forces disappear, which may as well be a nil...

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Function requests

2 participants

@Sascha-T@TechTastic
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add sublevel.getForces() - #9

Open
Sascha-T wants to merge 6 commits into
TechTastic:masterfrom
Sascha-T:master
Open

Add sublevel.getForces()#9
Sascha-T wants to merge 6 commits into
TechTastic:masterfrom
Sascha-T:master

Conversation

@Sascha-T

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closes#7

Adds sublevel.getForces()
Format:

{
"sable:force_name": {
{
"position": --[ vector ]--,"force": --[ vector ]--
}
}
}

or just straight up null if something goes horribly wrong.

The cody is a bit funky but it should be fine, works on my machine! :p
(I didn't increment any versions)

Comment threadREADME.md
@TechTasticTechTastic added the enhancement New feature or request label May 16, 2026
@TechTasticTechTastic self-assigned this May 16, 2026
* Track "force requests" for sublevels because Sable be like "waaah no you cant request forces mid-tick"
*/
public class Physicker {
private static Map<ResourceLocation, Object> LOCKS = new HashMap();

@TechTasticTechTasticMay 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could be a ConcurrentHashMap and thus locks and syncronization do not need to be explicitly handled by this class

@Sascha-TSascha-TMay 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can make it a ConcurrentHashMap but getLock is synchronized to prevent an evil style "race condition" where you can potentially create 2 seperate locks, but only one is stored in the Map, leaving a computer to wait for the (currently 2 ticks) lock timeout. (and from my understanding, a ConcurrentHashMap wouldn't change that?)

Or I just straight up don't understand where you want to go with this, please elaborate 🥺

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually I see the vision

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It took a minute but I think I found somewhat decent way to outsource concurrency back to Java, what do you think?

@Sascha-T

Sascha-T commented May 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I've been informed that getForces apparently behaves erratically (occasionally returns nil for no reason) so it appears there's still some more work to be done

Correction: not nil. But the other forces disappear, which may as well be a nil...

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Function requests

2 participants

@Sascha-T@TechTastic
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add sublevel.getForces() - #9

Open
Sascha-T wants to merge 6 commits into
TechTastic:masterfrom
Sascha-T:master
Open

Add sublevel.getForces()#9
Sascha-T wants to merge 6 commits into
TechTastic:masterfrom
Sascha-T:master

Conversation

@Sascha-T

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closes#7

Adds sublevel.getForces()
Format:

{
"sable:force_name": {
{
"position": --[ vector ]--,"force": --[ vector ]--
}
}
}

or just straight up null if something goes horribly wrong.

The cody is a bit funky but it should be fine, works on my machine! :p
(I didn't increment any versions)

Comment threadREADME.md
@TechTasticTechTastic added the enhancement New feature or request label May 16, 2026
@TechTasticTechTastic self-assigned this May 16, 2026
* Track "force requests" for sublevels because Sable be like "waaah no you cant request forces mid-tick"
*/
public class Physicker {
private static Map<ResourceLocation, Object> LOCKS = new HashMap();

@TechTasticTechTasticMay 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could be a ConcurrentHashMap and thus locks and syncronization do not need to be explicitly handled by this class

@Sascha-TSascha-TMay 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can make it a ConcurrentHashMap but getLock is synchronized to prevent an evil style "race condition" where you can potentially create 2 seperate locks, but only one is stored in the Map, leaving a computer to wait for the (currently 2 ticks) lock timeout. (and from my understanding, a ConcurrentHashMap wouldn't change that?)

Or I just straight up don't understand where you want to go with this, please elaborate 🥺

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually I see the vision

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It took a minute but I think I found somewhat decent way to outsource concurrency back to Java, what do you think?

@Sascha-T

Sascha-T commented May 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I've been informed that getForces apparently behaves erratically (occasionally returns nil for no reason) so it appears there's still some more work to be done

Correction: not nil. But the other forces disappear, which may as well be a nil...

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Function requests

2 participants

@Sascha-T@TechTastic
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Add sublevel.getForces() - #9

Open
Sascha-T wants to merge 6 commits into
TechTastic:masterfrom
Sascha-T:master
Open

Add sublevel.getForces()#9
Sascha-T wants to merge 6 commits into
TechTastic:masterfrom
Sascha-T:master

Conversation

@Sascha-T

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closes#7

Adds sublevel.getForces()
Format:

{
"sable:force_name": {
{
"position": --[ vector ]--,"force": --[ vector ]--
}
}
}

or just straight up null if something goes horribly wrong.

The cody is a bit funky but it should be fine, works on my machine! :p
(I didn't increment any versions)

Comment threadREADME.md
@TechTasticTechTastic added the enhancement New feature or request label May 16, 2026
@TechTasticTechTastic self-assigned this May 16, 2026
* Track "force requests" for sublevels because Sable be like "waaah no you cant request forces mid-tick"
*/
public class Physicker {
private static Map<ResourceLocation, Object> LOCKS = new HashMap();

@TechTasticTechTasticMay 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could be a ConcurrentHashMap and thus locks and syncronization do not need to be explicitly handled by this class

@Sascha-TSascha-TMay 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can make it a ConcurrentHashMap but getLock is synchronized to prevent an evil style "race condition" where you can potentially create 2 seperate locks, but only one is stored in the Map, leaving a computer to wait for the (currently 2 ticks) lock timeout. (and from my understanding, a ConcurrentHashMap wouldn't change that?)

Or I just straight up don't understand where you want to go with this, please elaborate 🥺

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually I see the vision

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It took a minute but I think I found somewhat decent way to outsource concurrency back to Java, what do you think?

@Sascha-T

Sascha-T commented May 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I've been informed that getForces apparently behaves erratically (occasionally returns nil for no reason) so it appears there's still some more work to be done

Correction: not nil. But the other forces disappear, which may as well be a nil...

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Function requests

2 participants

@Sascha-T@TechTastic