Skip to content

Put issue numbers in PR description, not in PR title #8735

Description

@tianyizheng02

Feature description

Currently the PR template includes the following checklist item:

If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

I think it's better to ask contributors to put issue numbers in the PR description rather than the commit message for the following reasons:

  1. The vast majority of contributors to this repo (myself included) don't put closing keywords in commit messages. In my experience, the norm on GitHub is to put them in the PR description.

  2. Since contributors typically make their commits in their local git repos and not directly on GitHub, it's less convenient to include the issue number because git can't autocomplete GitHub issue numbers.

  3. A PR that resolves an issue often includes multiple commits, so no single commit single-handedly resolves the issue. Thus, putting the issue number in the PR description makes more sense IMO.

  4. From the GitHub docs:

    You can also use closing keywords in a commit message. The issue will be closed when you merge the commit into the default branch, but the pull request that contains the commit will not be listed as a linked pull request.

    Therefore, even if one puts the issue number with a closing keyword in a commit, GitHub won't automatically link the PR that it's a part of, which makes it slightly harder to refer back to the original issue.

We can also link to the GitHub docs (see above) in the checklist item to help contributors use the closing keywords correctly.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementThis PR modified some existing files

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
     blocks
    (function() {
    function addCopyButtons() {
    document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
    if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
    codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
    var btn = document.createElement('button');
    btn.textContent = 'Copy';
    btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
    btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
    btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
    btn.onclick = function() {
    navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
    btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
    setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
    });
    };
    codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
    codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
    });
    }
    addCopyButtons();
    // Re-run on dynamic content
    var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
    observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
    })();
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    Put issue numbers in PR description, not in PR title · Issue #8735 · TheAlgorithms/Python · GitHub
    Skip to content

    Put issue numbers in PR description, not in PR title #8735

    Description

    @tianyizheng02

    Feature description

    Currently the PR template includes the following checklist item:

    If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

    I think it's better to ask contributors to put issue numbers in the PR description rather than the commit message for the following reasons:

    1. The vast majority of contributors to this repo (myself included) don't put closing keywords in commit messages. In my experience, the norm on GitHub is to put them in the PR description.

    2. Since contributors typically make their commits in their local git repos and not directly on GitHub, it's less convenient to include the issue number because git can't autocomplete GitHub issue numbers.

    3. A PR that resolves an issue often includes multiple commits, so no single commit single-handedly resolves the issue. Thus, putting the issue number in the PR description makes more sense IMO.

    4. From the GitHub docs:

      You can also use closing keywords in a commit message. The issue will be closed when you merge the commit into the default branch, but the pull request that contains the commit will not be listed as a linked pull request.

      Therefore, even if one puts the issue number with a closing keyword in a commit, GitHub won't automatically link the PR that it's a part of, which makes it slightly harder to refer back to the original issue.

    We can also link to the GitHub docs (see above) in the checklist item to help contributors use the closing keywords correctly.

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    No one assigned

      Labels

      enhancementThis PR modified some existing files

      Type

      No type

      Projects

      No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Put issue numbers in PR description, not in PR title · Issue #8735 · TheAlgorithms/Python · GitHub
      Skip to content

      Put issue numbers in PR description, not in PR title #8735

      Description

      @tianyizheng02

      Feature description

      Currently the PR template includes the following checklist item:

      If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

      I think it's better to ask contributors to put issue numbers in the PR description rather than the commit message for the following reasons:

      1. The vast majority of contributors to this repo (myself included) don't put closing keywords in commit messages. In my experience, the norm on GitHub is to put them in the PR description.

      2. Since contributors typically make their commits in their local git repos and not directly on GitHub, it's less convenient to include the issue number because git can't autocomplete GitHub issue numbers.

      3. A PR that resolves an issue often includes multiple commits, so no single commit single-handedly resolves the issue. Thus, putting the issue number in the PR description makes more sense IMO.

      4. From the GitHub docs:

        You can also use closing keywords in a commit message. The issue will be closed when you merge the commit into the default branch, but the pull request that contains the commit will not be listed as a linked pull request.

        Therefore, even if one puts the issue number with a closing keyword in a commit, GitHub won't automatically link the PR that it's a part of, which makes it slightly harder to refer back to the original issue.

      We can also link to the GitHub docs (see above) in the checklist item to help contributors use the closing keywords correctly.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        enhancementThis PR modified some existing files

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Put issue numbers in PR description, not in PR title · Issue #8735 · TheAlgorithms/Python · GitHub
        Skip to content

        Put issue numbers in PR description, not in PR title #8735

        Description

        @tianyizheng02

        Feature description

        Currently the PR template includes the following checklist item:

        If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

        I think it's better to ask contributors to put issue numbers in the PR description rather than the commit message for the following reasons:

        1. The vast majority of contributors to this repo (myself included) don't put closing keywords in commit messages. In my experience, the norm on GitHub is to put them in the PR description.

        2. Since contributors typically make their commits in their local git repos and not directly on GitHub, it's less convenient to include the issue number because git can't autocomplete GitHub issue numbers.

        3. A PR that resolves an issue often includes multiple commits, so no single commit single-handedly resolves the issue. Thus, putting the issue number in the PR description makes more sense IMO.

        4. From the GitHub docs:

          You can also use closing keywords in a commit message. The issue will be closed when you merge the commit into the default branch, but the pull request that contains the commit will not be listed as a linked pull request.

          Therefore, even if one puts the issue number with a closing keyword in a commit, GitHub won't automatically link the PR that it's a part of, which makes it slightly harder to refer back to the original issue.

        We can also link to the GitHub docs (see above) in the checklist item to help contributors use the closing keywords correctly.

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        No one assigned

          Labels

          enhancementThis PR modified some existing files

          Type

          No type

          Projects

          No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Put issue numbers in PR description, not in PR title · Issue #8735 · TheAlgorithms/Python · GitHub
          Skip to content

          Put issue numbers in PR description, not in PR title #8735

          Description

          @tianyizheng02

          Feature description

          Currently the PR template includes the following checklist item:

          If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

          I think it's better to ask contributors to put issue numbers in the PR description rather than the commit message for the following reasons:

          1. The vast majority of contributors to this repo (myself included) don't put closing keywords in commit messages. In my experience, the norm on GitHub is to put them in the PR description.

          2. Since contributors typically make their commits in their local git repos and not directly on GitHub, it's less convenient to include the issue number because git can't autocomplete GitHub issue numbers.

          3. A PR that resolves an issue often includes multiple commits, so no single commit single-handedly resolves the issue. Thus, putting the issue number in the PR description makes more sense IMO.

          4. From the GitHub docs:

            You can also use closing keywords in a commit message. The issue will be closed when you merge the commit into the default branch, but the pull request that contains the commit will not be listed as a linked pull request.

            Therefore, even if one puts the issue number with a closing keyword in a commit, GitHub won't automatically link the PR that it's a part of, which makes it slightly harder to refer back to the original issue.

          We can also link to the GitHub docs (see above) in the checklist item to help contributors use the closing keywords correctly.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            enhancementThis PR modified some existing files

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Put issue numbers in PR description, not in PR title · Issue #8735 · TheAlgorithms/Python · GitHub
            Skip to content

            Put issue numbers in PR description, not in PR title #8735

            Description

            @tianyizheng02

            Feature description

            Currently the PR template includes the following checklist item:

            If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

            I think it's better to ask contributors to put issue numbers in the PR description rather than the commit message for the following reasons:

            1. The vast majority of contributors to this repo (myself included) don't put closing keywords in commit messages. In my experience, the norm on GitHub is to put them in the PR description.

            2. Since contributors typically make their commits in their local git repos and not directly on GitHub, it's less convenient to include the issue number because git can't autocomplete GitHub issue numbers.

            3. A PR that resolves an issue often includes multiple commits, so no single commit single-handedly resolves the issue. Thus, putting the issue number in the PR description makes more sense IMO.

            4. From the GitHub docs:

              You can also use closing keywords in a commit message. The issue will be closed when you merge the commit into the default branch, but the pull request that contains the commit will not be listed as a linked pull request.

              Therefore, even if one puts the issue number with a closing keyword in a commit, GitHub won't automatically link the PR that it's a part of, which makes it slightly harder to refer back to the original issue.

            We can also link to the GitHub docs (see above) in the checklist item to help contributors use the closing keywords correctly.

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            No one assigned

              Labels

              enhancementThis PR modified some existing files

              Type

              No type

              Projects

              No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); })(); Put issue numbers in PR description, not in PR title · Issue #8735 · TheAlgorithms/Python · GitHub
              Skip to content

              Put issue numbers in PR description, not in PR title #8735

              Description

              @tianyizheng02

              Feature description

              Currently the PR template includes the following checklist item:

              If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

              I think it's better to ask contributors to put issue numbers in the PR description rather than the commit message for the following reasons:

              1. The vast majority of contributors to this repo (myself included) don't put closing keywords in commit messages. In my experience, the norm on GitHub is to put them in the PR description.

              2. Since contributors typically make their commits in their local git repos and not directly on GitHub, it's less convenient to include the issue number because git can't autocomplete GitHub issue numbers.

              3. A PR that resolves an issue often includes multiple commits, so no single commit single-handedly resolves the issue. Thus, putting the issue number in the PR description makes more sense IMO.

              4. From the GitHub docs:

                You can also use closing keywords in a commit message. The issue will be closed when you merge the commit into the default branch, but the pull request that contains the commit will not be listed as a linked pull request.

                Therefore, even if one puts the issue number with a closing keyword in a commit, GitHub won't automatically link the PR that it's a part of, which makes it slightly harder to refer back to the original issue.

              We can also link to the GitHub docs (see above) in the checklist item to help contributors use the closing keywords correctly.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                enhancementThis PR modified some existing files

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions