Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
cozek
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi, @paulo9428. Can you please answer me this. I can learn everything that you have written in your code by just reading the documentation on deque and moreover it is explained better in the documentation. So why should I read your code instead of directly reading the documentation?
Fixes#1200 As discussed on #1200 this file does not contain an algorithm as it does not implement a double ended queue but instead just uses the standard library's DEQ. @paulo9428 @cozek, @AnupKumarPanwar Your reviews please.
Sorry, i just wanna complement double ended queue methods of this file. I think this code has no ingenious points. So i agree with the pr the previous writter @cclauss push newly. And i also totally agree with your opinion. Thank you for your great advice. It was my first event of pushing pr. It leaves me great motive to comtribute on open source. I am satisfied just with that. |
FixesTheAlgorithms#1200 As discussed on TheAlgorithms#1200 this file does not contain an algorithm as it does not implement a double ended queue but instead just uses the standard library's DEQ. @paulo9428 @cozek, @AnupKumarPanwar Your reviews please.
* deque add pop * deque add remove
At Double ended queue, added "pop", "popleft", "remove" method